BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 Special survey & key figure topic 2014 Tickets and ticket inspections Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integration of Public Transport in an Overall Transport System The Example of the Greater Zurich Area Christian Vogt, Zurich Transport Authority (ZVV)
Advertisements

BEST 2014 BEST special topic 2013 Ticket media Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project Manager 2014.
BEST 2014 BEST special topic 2013 Use of PT information channels Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project Manager 2014.
BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 BEST Survey results 2013.
Third Party Advertising Evaluation: American Express eStatement Topline July 2008.
1 Selecting Test Participants CSSE 376, Software Quality Assurance Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology April 24, 2007.
1 Efficient pricing of urban public transport with budget constraints Nils Fearnley Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo
OV-chipcard UITP Urban Transport Benchmark Group, Visit, January 2006 Presentation and demonstration of the OV-chipcard system at the RET.
Session 8. Today  Handouts—  Review of last week topics  Content validity and reliability  Survey construction –Two research questions  Leadership.
Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Paris and the Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Isabelle Bachmann- RATP- Paris.
April 27, 2006 Budapest Transport Closely Held Corporation HOUSEHOLD SURVEY OF BUDAPEST AND ITS SURROUNDINGS Data processing, utilization and.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 26: Transit Pricing.
Mobility plan for Geneva Airport employees. Constraints and needs for the mobility of Geneva airport staff Airport staff: all employees working in the.
EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE from Passenger Perspective or… I n t e r m o d a l i t y from Passenger Perspective or… PhD Thesis EUROCONTROL Experimental.
BEST seminar 2007 Berlin November 2nd
BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 BEST Survey results 2014.
Alasdair Cain & Jennifer Flynn National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida Mark McCourt &
BEST Survey 2009 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
1 Progress Report from NFC Working Group General Meeting London 09 October 2014 Andrea Soehnchen.
1 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Customer Satisfaction Measurement FY 2006 Q3 Comparison April 28, 2006.
Christian Hödl Lisa Koch Christine Rossegger Lisa Thalmaier Exploring our lifestyles and energy services.
Bertil Hylén VTI Statens väg- och transportforskningsinstitut Swedish National Road and Transport Reearch Institute Public Transport.
BEST Survey 2010 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
BEST Survey 2011 City report: Stockholm Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
WRTA Advisory Board Meeting February 19, 2015 Charlie Card Saves Money Dollars and Quarters Only Policy Saves Your Time.
Veli Heikkinen Travel cards in Finland Tallinn
Unit 4 Part 2: Credit Cards What You Need To KNOW.
MIAMI UNIVERSITY BUS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PLAN. What’s the problem? ●A current Miami student pays $66 per semester for transit fees that goes towards the.
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
BILBAO MEETING / APRIL 2007 CREDITRANS The single public transport ticket for Bizkaia.
Helsingin seudun liikenne -kuntayhtymä Ticketing practices in certain large European cities Questionnaire to the EMTA network.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2010 Survey.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2009 Survey.
On-Line Discussion Forums: New Platforms to supplement Professional Development at Walter Sisulu University BY Z.G.Baleni RPL Manager 10/16/20151.
Current trends and problems in Tbilisi public transport system.
Prague Integrated Transport (PID).  Prague - area 496 km 2 population 1.2 mil. distance of the city boundary from the centre is 10 km to the north, 18.
FEST Finans Energi Samferdsel Telekom BEST Survey 2008 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Per Gellert /Barcelona Quality for Passengers.
Two years of free public transport in Tallinn February, 2015 Allan Alaküla Head of Tallinn EU Office.
Martin KalabMarketing and TramFlorence Jan Marketing and Tramway in Vienna Martin Kalab Marketing/Advertising Wiener Linien.
Case study Oslo: PT optimisation under different rules for revenue use REVENUE final conference Brussels 29th - 30th November 2005 Jon-Terje Bekken Institute.
1 BEST results 2007 for Oslo Svein L. Alfheim Manager for Planning and Development SL (Greater Oslo Public Transport)
BEST on Strategic Planning September 2008 Benchmarking Public Transport Strategic Planning Participants Ruter AS, Oslo HKL, Helsinki Movia, Copenhagen.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city.
Functional Question Foundation (Statistics 6) For the week beginning ….
THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF LUAS ON TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR Mr. Hazael Brown Dr. Aoife Ahern Dr. Margaret O’Mahony.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 600 interviews in Vienna city.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Report Copenhagen BEST 2007 BEST Survey Contents About the survey Participants Sample Method How to read the graphs Overall.
The monitoring of Customer Satisfaction Customer satisfaction survey of HCT BEST-survey Customer complaints.
BEST 2010 BEST 2010 Results of the survey Kjetil Vrenne BEST Project Manager May 27 th, 2010 BEST Survey 2010 Results & Analyses Page 1.
Prepared by: May Metro Transit Train and Bus Rider Surveys COMPARATIVE RESULTS Bruce Howard Director of Marketing.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2008 Survey.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport Results of the 2007 survey.
Quality indicators impact on overall citizen satisfaction BEST Survey 2014.
MOTION TEXT WORK. HOW DO DISTANCE AND DISPLACEMENT DIFFER? Distance describes how far an object has moved; Displacement includes distance and direction.
How the MBTA effects us.. Student Fares Before Bus $0.60 Rapid Transit $0.85 Bus + Rapid Transit $0.85 After Bus $0.75 Rapid Transit $1.00 Bus + Rapid.
Manchester Regional Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 996 – GMATS Manchester Regional Key Centre.
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
Helsingin seudun liikenne -kuntayhtymä Ticket survey – the way to share the costs of public transport for HSL’s member municipalities Matleena Lindeqvist.
Successful Commute Programs Critical components include: 1.An active and informed Employee Transportation Coordinator (you!) 2.Guaranteed ride home 3.Parking.
Introduction to BEST Survey results 2015 Oslo, 8 th of February 2016.
FARE STUDY: STRUCTURE & LEVEL RECOMMENDATION Operations & Customer Service Committee February 10,
Means of transport. Means of transport Types of transport private x public Private transport – cars, motorbikes, bicycles Public transport – trams,
Moving On Up. Welcome & Introductions Today’s session Moving On Up Sustainable Travel for School and Leisure - A journey towards Independence.
FARE STUDY UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee September 9,
Andres Harjo Transport Department City of Tallinn
Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city
Bellringer 10/11.
BEST Special topic 2015 What could make PT more interesting for car users? Stockholm, 15th of March 2016.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST)
Presentation transcript:

BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 Special survey & key figure topic 2014 Tickets and ticket inspections Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project manager

BEST 2014 Previous special topics 2008: Use of PT information channels 2009: How to finance PT service improvements 2010: Transfers 2011: Walking distance vs. frequency 2012: Comfort vs. travel time 2013: Ticket media & use of PT information channels 2014: Tickets & ticket inspections, and use of ticket media BEST Special topic fare evasionPage 2

BEST 2014 Content 1.Key figures: Reported fare evasion rates 2.How common is it to be fined by the PTA for not paying? 3.Perception of the ticketing system (ease of use) 4.Perception of the PTA’s effort to reduce fare evasion 5.Perception of how the inspections are conducted 6.Citizens attitude towards fare evasion 7.Preliminary findings BEST Special topic fare evasionPage 3

BEST 2014 Key figures: Fare evasion rates 2013 Share of passengers inspected is around 1 % on average (from 0,87% - 1,5 %) Reported fare evasion rates is around 3 to 4 % BEST Special topic fare evasionPage 4 Share of passengers inspected Mode Copen- hagen HelsinkiGenevaOslo Stock- holm Total 0,87 %1,22 %0,90 %1,5 % Bus0,24 %0,27 %0,85 %0,55 % Metro 1,75 %n.a.1,54 % Tram 1,05 %0,85 %0,90 % Train*8,32 %1,67 %8,00 % Boat 1,95 %100,00 % Share without a valid ticket Mode Copen- hagen HelsinkiGenevaOslo Stock- holm Bus3,5 %0,5 %2,9 %7,1 % Metro 2,9 %n.a.3,0 % Tram 2,9 % 5,2 % Train*0,9 %4,0 %n.a.n.a Boat 1,4 %0,0 % Average2,7 %3,1 %4,4 %3,0 % Comments:*Train includes Movias train and not DSB

BEST 2014 How does share of inspected passengers affect fare evasion? BEST Special topic fare evasionPage 5

BEST 2014 Around 20% of the population has been fined by their PTA (except Bergen and Stockholm) BEST Special topic fare evasionPage 6

BEST 2014 Ticketing systems not perceived as user friendly – Helsinki is “best in class” BEST Special topic fare evasionPage 7

BEST 2014 A reduction in fare evasion not perceived as top-priority in Stockholm BEST Special topic fare evasionPage 8

BEST 2014 Almost one of four in Copenhagen thinks it is socially acceptable to travel without a ticket BEST Special topic fare evasionPage 9

BEST 2014 How ticket inspections are conducted is perceived quite well – except in Stockholm BEST Special topic fare evasionPage 10

BEST 2014 People in Oslo and Stockholm seems more likely to travel without a valid ticket BEST Special topic fare evasionPage 11 Attitudes towards fare evasion Bergen Copen- hagen GenevaHelsinkiOslo Stock- holm I have no trouble traveling without a valid ticket 1 % 2 %1 % I occasionally travel without a valid ticket, but I try to avoid it 4 %3 %9 %5 %8 %15 % I will always, if possible, travel with a valid ticket 26 %28 % 26 %42 %41 % I will never travel without a valid ticket 68 %69 %61 %68 %48 %43 % Total100 %

BEST 2014 Attitudes towards travelling without a ticket correlates strongly with social acceptance and how ticket inspections are performed BEST Special topic fare evasionPage 12

BEST 2014 Preliminary summary 1.Reported fare evasion rates around 3 to 4 %, but attitudes towards the ticketing system, fare evasion and ticket inspections differs between cities 2.Around 5 to 15 % of citizens might have a tendency to travel without a valid ticket 3.Up to 25 % of the population in some cities have paid a fine 4.Ticketing systems are not perceived as user-friendly, except in Helsinki 5.It’s more socially acceptable to travel without a valid ticket in Oslo and especially Copenhagen 6.Ticket inspections are performed in a way citizens are quite satisfied with (taking into account that it is an inspection), except in Stockholm BEST Special topic fare evasionPage 13

BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 Appendix: Questionnaire

BEST 2014 Tickets & ticket inspections Questions added in the survey What kind of ticket did you use last time you travelled with public transport? Single ticket Multiple ride ticket 24-hours / 7-days passes 30-days or 365 day passes (season cards) I did not have a valid ticket Other type of ticket Which of the following statements best fit for you? I have no trouble traveling without a valid ticket, and will continue to do so in the future I occasionally travel without a valid ticket, but I try to avoid it I will always, if possible, travel with a valid ticket I will never travel without a valid ticket To which degree to you agree with the following statements It is socially acceptable to travel without a valid ticket PTA is actively working to reduce the number of non– paying passengers PTA ticketing system is easy to use (read- ticket, check the expiration date, check balance, determine the number of zones, rules when changing lines etc) Ticket controls are performed in an efficient and professional manner In which public transport mode did you last experience a ticket inspection? Bus/trolleybus Tramway Train/RER Boat I have never experienced a ticket inspection Have you ever had to pay a fine because you didn’t have a valid ticket? Yes No BEST Special topic fare evasionPage 15