San Marcos Fire Station Location Analysis - Progress Report- Andrea Nieto, Bryan Heisinger, Nadine Oliver Matthew Mitchell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning College of Architecture Texas A&M University April 24, 2002 Presented By Jin Y Jun Site Selection.
Advertisements

Advanced Student Population Projections Overview of Projection Factors.
GAINESVILLE HALL COUNTY Comprehensive Plan Update Land Demand & Development Capacity May 28, 2003.
Advanced Student Population Projections Overview of Projection Factors.
Evacuation Safety Planners * Jason HaycockRobert Broussard Colleen Grentz Project Manager Analyst & Webmaster Analyst & Project Designer.
From portions of Chapter 8, 9, 10, &11. Real world is complex. GIS is used model reality. The GIS models then enable us to ask questions of the data by.
GIS Level 2 MIT GIS Services
3680 Avalon Park Blvd E Orlando, FL Phone: Fax: Future Land Use Allocation Model (FLUAM)
Fairfax County, Virginia Watershed Management Plans.
Raster Based GIS Analysis
Visions of a Truly Green Eugene GIS 248 Final Project By: Lindsey Mendell.
Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors Uncertainty January 23, 2006.
©2007 Austin Troy Lecture 7: Introduction to GIS 1.Queries and table operations for a single layer in ArcGIS 2.Intro to queries in Access Lecture by Austin.
©2007 Austin Troy Lecture 7: Introduction to GIS 1.Queries and table operations for a single layer in Arc GIS 2.Intro to queries in Access Lecture by Austin.
Lec 15 LU, Part 1: Basics and simple LU models (ch6.1 & 2 (A), ch (C1) Get a general idea of urban planning theories (from rading p (A)
GIS 1 Copyright – Kristen S. Kurland, Carnegie Mellon University GIS Lecture 9 Spatial Analysis.
A GIS BASED ASSESSMENT OF ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION INFRASTRUCTURE IN ZANGON SHANU Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.
GARETT BALLARD-ROSA GIS FINAL 14 MARCH 2011 Green Job Attraction in Pacoima.
Florida Key Deer Land Acquisition
CALIFORNIA’S WATER WAR: PART II Balancing Agricultural and Domestic Water Demands Sharon Liu Urban Planning M206A – Intro to GIS February 13, 2012.
Lone Star Members Project Manager: Bob Armentrout Assistant Manager: Nina Castillo Web Designer: Daniel Roberts Analysts: Cade Colston, Mehs Ess, Linda.
{ Mapping & Analysis of Wastewater Spills in the Barton Springs and Southern Segments of the Edwards Aquifer Project Manager: Katie Tritsch GIS Analyst:
SAN MARCOS AIRPORT EXPANSION PROJECT Prepared for the Texas Department of Transportation.
Implementing the Freeland Subarea Plan Zoning and Development Regulations Island County Planning & Community Development 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update.
Urban Boundaries and Functional Classification. Discussion FHWA Urban Area Boundaries Federal Functional Classification Transitioning Area Boundaries.
San Marcos Municipal Airport Airspace Planning Project Prepared for: Texas Department of Transportation.
UPlan: How It Works and How to Get Started A description for the rest of us Nathaniel Roth Information Center for the Environment University of California,
Proposal For Opportunity Zone Identification A Spatial Approach Presenter, Duane Treadon Advisor, Patrick Kennelly, Ph.D.
People commuting to UW suffer delays, congestion using both public and private transportation. We propose a park & ride system with express shuttle service.
Evacuation Safety Planners * Jason HaycockRobert Broussard Colleen Grentz Project Manager Analyst & Webmaster Analyst & Project Designer.
Development Of A Stormwater Utility For The City Of Brunswick, Ohio John R. Woodard, MS GIS Specialist Chagrin Valley Engineering, Ltd Ohio GIS Conference.
Community Youth Center URP 4273 Survey of Planning Information Systems Final Group Project: Team Two Spring 2003.
Was the Foreclosure Crisis a Supply Problem? Megan Kirkeby GIS Final 12/7/2010.
Support the spread of “good practice” in generating, managing, analysing and communicating spatial information Introduction to GIS for the Purpose of Practising.
GIS Tutorial 1 Lecture 9 Spatial Analysis.
Cody Clarke - Project Team Leader Sherry Priddy - Project Assistant Team Leader Jason Baker - Information Analyst Les Stewart - Data Collection Randy Guzman.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
T.E.E.G.S Transportation, Emergency, and Environmental GIS Services Matt Smith Project Manager Lauren Bender GIS Analyst Amanda Magera GIS Analyst Aaron.
Geo-processing tools Tools: Buffer Geo-processing tools allow you to work with your data bases on spatial relations.... at a specified distance... with.
San Marcos Municipal Airport Airspace Planning Project Prepared for: Texas Department of Transportation.
The Countywide Zoning Dataset AIMS Coordinators Meeting 1/15/2004.
Krystal Zwinggi Project Manager John McClintock GIS Analyst Lance English Webmaster Michael Stanley GIS Analyst.
GEOG 318 WINTER 2015: FINAL PROJECT MOUNTAIN LION HABITATS DISTANCE FROM SAN LUIS OBISPO HIGH SCHOOLS By Katie Nehrenz & Dempsey Davis.
©2007 Austin Troy Lecture 7: Introduction to GIS 1.Queries and table operations for a single layer in Arc GIS 2.Intro to queries in Access Lecture by Austin.
Introduction The City of San Marcos is proactively developing a plan integrate GIS to help the San Marcos Fire Department prepare for and assess future.
Environmental Systems Modeling EENV 5326 GIS for Environmental Engineering.
City of Woodcreek, TX Project Proposal GEO 4427 Advanced GIS II.
Zoning Berlin from the ISS at night.. What are zones? Zones are areas of a city reserved for a special purpose. Different zones will have different kinds.
Lecture 7 Basic GIS Analysis Operations
10/31/2012 PROGRESS REPORT Prepared for the Texas Department of Transportation.
Daniel Hendren Jr., GISP Regional Technical Manager Introduction.
San Marcos Fire Station Location Analysis Andrea Nieto, Bryan Heisinger, Nadine Oliver Matthew Mitchell.
Team Contact Info Jordan SchmidtJohn Prater WebmasterGIS Analyst Nicholas Elkins Project.
ELSA RODRIGUEZ URBAN PLANNING 206A Proposed Affordable Mixed-Use Housing Projects in the City of Glendale.
POLK RAIL QUIET ZONE ANALYSIS Conditions Assessment CSX “S” Line March 24, 2016.
International Airport Site Evaluation St. George, Utah TYREL EDWARDS - JOSH GATHRO - MATTHEW HALES - PLOY SAMRANJIT 25 APRIL 2016 CEE 5190 – GIS FOR CIVIL.
Sidewalk Strategic Plan City of Peterborough, Ontario.
1 Gables Gateway. 2 1.Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2.Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 3.Zoning Code Text Amendment 4.Change in Zoning 5.MXD3 Mixed.
BUILDABLE LANDS ANALYSIS City of Snoqualmie Planning & Buildable Sno-lutions Chris Sungjin Im Ian Garnier Nick Nielson Geography 469.
Island County Comprehensive Plan 2016 Review and Update Buildable Lands Analysis Results 1.
Land Use Urban Service Boundary is the framework for managing growth.
GIS Institute Center for Geographic Analysis
Vector Analysis Ming-Chun Lee.
Fire Protection Impact Fee
GIS Lecture: Geoprocessing
GIS Institute Center for Geographic Analysis
GIS Institute Center for Geographic Analysis
Green urban areas Assessing the proximity of green areas for the population of major cities By Hugo Poelman – Veerle Martens.
Automating Student Yield Data Extraction
Risk-Based Prioritization for Investigating Illicit Discharges Along TxDOT ROW Prepared by: G.O.A.T. – Geographers of Austin Texas INTRODUCTION MAPS METHODS.
Presentation transcript:

San Marcos Fire Station Location Analysis - Progress Report- Andrea Nieto, Bryan Heisinger, Nadine Oliver Matthew Mitchell

Purpose The purpose of this report is to present to the City of San Marcos the status of the fire station location analysis project.

Background To meet the demand of an increasing growth trend, the City of San Marcos is proactively developing a plan to construct a new fire station. A GIS implementation would enable the San Marcos Fire Department to provide an even distribution of fire response services across the city.

Project Description We will preform calculations on the following factors to complete our analysis: parcel area parcel value day/night time population square footage of buildings value of improvements conflagration potential wildlife urban interfaces

Total Parcel Area To determine the area of parcels in each grid cell, we clipped the parcels layer by the grid boundary and summated the acreage in the attribute table.

Developed, Vacant, Multifamily, & Total Parcel Value Took into account the clipped parcels when calculating parcel values. Used the Vacant field & Buildings layer to determine if the parcel was developed or undeveloped. Used the SUB_CATEGO field in the attribute table of the buildings layer to determine if the parcel was multifamily.

Parcel Value Cont.

Value of Improvements Also took into account the clipped parcels when calculating the value of improvements. Added each parcel's TOTALIMPMK value together within the given grid cell boundary to find the total VOI. Grid cells 8, 13, and 16 complete

Wildlife/Urban Interface The Wildland/Urban Interface will be calculated upon the completion of the developed/undeveloped parcel classification. We will then be able to determine the total boundary length in a grid where undeveloped and undeveloped parcels meet.

Conflagration Index Factors 1. Proximity of Buildings -successful model built 2. Wildland-Urban Interface -to be completed after classification 3. Building Height -data quality issues

Buffer Reiterated Model 1.Create Buffer from Buildings layer 2.Merge shapefiles 3.Intersection

Square Footage of Buildings This calculation is relatively simple to complete and we already have values for the two grids we have worked with the most.

Population Finding the population has proved to be one of our biggest challenges. Most of the population data that has been provided to us is not an accurate representation of the parcel layer’s true population values. Due to the incompleteness of the population data we intend to estimate these values based on the parcel zoning codes.

Population Cont. We will determine whether a parcel is commercial, industrial, or residential by looking at its associated zoning code. These zoning codes will help us estimate the day and night time population of the parcels.

Timetable Our group is approaching week 8 in the timetable. We have made considerable progress overall, and our major challenges have been addressed and dealt with accordingly. By week 10 our analysis will be complete and we will begin the preparation of the final deliverables.

Summary of Project Overall our project is going quite well, despite some unsuspected challenges and revisions. We hope that this discussion has provided you insight on the work that is currently being done by our group in order to complete this comprehensive analysis. We are looking forward to the final results of this project and anticipate future use of this study by the City of San Marcos to expand upon our maps, models, and spreadsheets to meet their evolving needs as the city grows.

Questions?