LIGO-G020453-00-D LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO R&D Review The PSL Peter King & Rich Abbott October 8, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
G v1 H1 Squeezer Experiment Update L-V Meeting, Caltech, March 18, 2009 ANU, AEI, MIT, CIT and LHO Ping Koy Lam, Nergis Mavalvala, David McClelland,
Advertisements

LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
1 LHC-DFBX Procurement Strategy Joseph Rasson LBNL Presented at the DFBX Production Readiness Review October 2002, LBNL Brookhaven - Fermilab - Berkeley.
Harald Lück, AEI Hannover 1 GWADW- May, 10-15, 2009 EU contract #
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
G M Advanced R&D1 Seismic Isolation Retrofit Plan for the LIGO Livingston Observatory Dennis Coyne 29 Nov 2001.
LIGO-G W LIGO II Pre-stabilized Laser System Design Requirements and Conceptual Design David Ottaway, Todd Rutherford, Rick Savage, Peter Veitch,
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Seismic Isolation (SEI) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Schedule »through R&D, including near-term plans »project.
G D Interferometer Status LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor, June 4, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors David Shoemaker NSF Operations Review Hanford, 26 February 2001.
LIGO-G06xxxx-00-M Technical Progress Planned/Needed in FY07 Advanced LIGO Program Advisory Panel meeting, 30 November – 1 December 2006, MIT Dennis Coyne,
Performance of the LIGO Pre-stabilized Laser System Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory Ninth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity Rome 2000.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
LIGO-G M April 5, 2006 Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Richard.
G R PHOTON ACTUATION R&D PROGRAM Michael Smith 8 Oct 02.
G v1 Squeezer Update Review August 25, 2009 H1 Squeezer Experiment ANU, AEI, MIT, CIT and LHO collaboration.
LSU Amplifier Experiments Rupal S. Amin (LSU) J. Giaime (LSU), D. Hosken (Uni. Adelaide), D. Ottaway (MIT) LSC/VIRGO Meeting March 2007 Lasers Working.
G R Advanced LIGO Seismic Isolation R&D Dennis Coyne 8 Oct 2002.
From Research Prototype to Production
LIGO-G v5 1 Pre-stabilized Laser System (PSL) Technical Status NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Benno Willke, AEI Hannover and the AdvLIGO PSL.
LIGO-G Z August, 2006 LSC R&D for AdLIGO ASC Detectors LSC Meeting August 2006 Richard Abbott.
LBT Q Engineering Review DYB. 26-Oct-2007LBT Q Engineering Review Highlights (Q3/2007) Currently in Commissioning Phase Currently in Commissioning.
LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF.
Conceptual Design for Advanced LIGO Suspensions Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University for the GEO suspension team +contribution.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
Update on Advanced LIGO suspension design and technology development towards the quad noise prototype Caroline A. Cantley for Advanced LIGO Suspension.
B. Willke, Mar 01 LIGO-G Z Laser Developement for Advanced LIGO Benno Willke LSC meeting LIGO-Livingston Site, Mar 2001.
CRISP & SKA WP19 Status. Overview Staffing SKA Preconstruction phase Tiered Data Delivery Infrastructure Prototype deployment.
Advanced LIGO laser development P. Weßels, L. Winkelmann, O. Puncken, B. Schulz, S. Wagner, M. Hildebrandt, C. Veltkamp, M. Janssen, R. Kluzik, M. Frede,
19 Aug 2003, LSC Hannover G Z1 State of the LSC Peter Saulson Syracuse University.
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
G Z LIGO R&D1 Input Optics Definition, Function The input optics (IO) conditions light from the pre- stabilized laser (PSL) for injection into.
50 W Laser Concepts for Initial LIGO Lutz Winkelmann, Maik Frede, Ralf Wilhelm, Dietmar Kracht Laser Zentrum Hannover LSC March 05 Livingston G Z.
G Consideration of HAM SAS for Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker LIGO Excomm 30 April 07.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker NSF LIGO Review 23 October 2002.
David Shoemaker Aspen 3 February 03
Advanced LIGO Sensing and Control Readout schemes for Advanced LIGO K.A. Strain University of Glasgow G & G
Status of the Advanced LIGO PSL development LSC Virgo meeting, Caltech, March 2008 LIGO G Z Benno Willke for the PSL team.
LIGO-G D LSC Meeting Nov An Early Glimpse at the S3 Run Stan Whitcomb (LIGO–Caltech) LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford.
Status of the Advanced LIGO PSL development LSC meeting, Baton Rouge March 2007 G Z Benno Willke for the PSL team.
LSC Meeting March ‘05 1 LIGO ADVANCED SYSTEMS TEST INTERFEROMETER (LASTI) Program Update: LSC Meeting, LLO Dave Ottaway for the LASTI team March 2006 LIGO-G Z.
Mark McKinnon NSF Mid-Project Review May 11-12, Baseline Project Definition Mark McKinnon Project Manager.
AOS: Photon Calibrator Technical Status
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
Contribution from Pakistan to CLIC & CTF-3 Project. NASIR ABBAS
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
LIGO Scientific Collaboration Lasers and Optics Working Group 6 Month Report to the LSC - August 15, 2000 Outline Highlights Meeting Agenda LIGO-G D.
G R Interferometer Sensing & Control P Fritschel 8 Oct 02.
LIGO-G D Downselect: Silica. What Were We Thinking? Phil Willems, Caltech -representing- the Downselect Committee: David Shoemaker, Jordan Camp,
Ultra-stable, high-power laser systems Patrick Kwee on behalf of AEI Hannover and LZH Advanced detectors session, 26. March 2011 Albert-Einstein-Institut.
G R Advanced LIGO1 David Shoemaker LLO LSC 19 Aug 2002.
G D H1 Squeezer Experiment L-V Meeting, LAL Orsay, June 11, 2008 ANU, AEI, MIT, CIT and LHO Ping Koy Lam, Nergis Mavalvala, David McClelland,
High power lasers and their stabilization Benno Willke ET Workshop, Cascina 2008.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
NSF Annual Review of the LIGO Laboratory
LIGO LAB R&D PROGRAM TECHNICAL REVIEW, OCT 02
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Update on the Advanced LIGO PSL Program
Lasers for Advanced Interferometers
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Livingston 21 March 2005
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Advanced R&D Lab Review
Advanced LIGO R&D Review Input Optics
Globus-M2 will be constructed by the end of 2015
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G D LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO R&D Review The PSL Peter King & Rich Abbott October 8, 2002.

LIGO-G D LIGO R&D2 Advanced LIGO PSL Schedule High power laser design decision: Aug »Selection criteria currently being formulated. »Nov. through Dec. 2002, evaluation of different designs. »Decision deferred to Dec Design Requirements Review: Sept Preliminary Design Review: Jan Final Design Review: Jun Pathfinder shipment to LASTI: Sept Shipment to LLO: Nov. 2006

LIGO-G D LIGO R&D3 The AdLIGO PSL Team The AdLIGO PSL effort combines personnel » experienced in high-power laser design –University of Adelaide, Laser Zentrum Hannover (LZH) and Stanford »experienced with power and frequency stabilization –GEO600 and LIGO Lab Effort being led by LZH/University of Hannover

LIGO-G D LIGO R&D4 Design Approaches Three different designs are being evaluated. »University of Adelaide –stable/unstable slab oscillator –~75 W achieved with system to date –various problems experienced with delivery fibers, out-of-spec. crystal »Stanford –master-oscillator-power-amplifier (MOPA) –72 W achieved with system to date –problems experienced with thermal lensing »Laser Zentrum Hannover –rod oscillator –97 W achieved

LIGO-G D LIGO R&D5 Technical Issues & Challenges Demonstration of reliable single-mode, single- frequency 200-W operation Relative intensity noise requirement at 10 Hz »RIN ~ 2 x /sqrt[Hz] Development of shot-noise limited photodetector for 150 mW »variations in the photodiode surface may be a problem »possibly in-vacuum and suspended »may require some degree of pointing stabilization

LIGO-G D LIGO R&D6 Schedule Issues planned for late 2002 »technology transfer of VxWorks/EPICS environment »current generation frequency stabilization electronics fabricated and tested planned for 2003 through 2004 »procure long lead items for the LASTI prototype and LIGO Testbed –laser pump diodes –gain media »frequency stabilization of high power laser brassboard »intensity stabilization of high power laser brassboard

LIGO-G D LIGO R&D7 Cost Baseline & Issues costs to be borne by LZH with the exception of the LASTI Prototype and LIGO Testbed »LASTI prototype located at MIT »LIGO Testbed located at Caltech, doubles as a LASTI spare in the event of a laser malfunction large fraction of laser development hardware cost is the price of laser pump diodes and associated hardware used to deliver the pump power »estimated 60 required per $7500 ea. »long-lead time of 18 weeks »pump diode controllers, estimated 12 $6000 ea.

LIGO-G D LIGO R&D8 Cost Baseline & Issues computer control hardware for laser also expensive due to quantities involved fabrication of each laser is estimated to take ~5 months »coupled with lead time of laser diodes means items must be purchased ~10 months before delivery »for LASTI, all items should be ordered by Oct. 2003

LIGO-G D LIGO R&D9 Staffing Baseline staffing at LZH is still a work in progress »staffing plan as of Oct called for, not all positions listed are full time –2 scientists LZH and 2 from GEO600 –1 electrical engineer, University of Hannover –2 scientists, one each from LIGO Lab and Stanford/Adelaide –1 electrical engineer, LIGO Lab –workshop support from University of Hannover, CDS to date the LIGO Lab contribution has been the part- time contribution of 1 scientist and 1 electronics engineer, mostly for fabrication and testing of current LIGO frequency stabilization electronics

LIGO-G D LIGO R&D10 Staffing Baseline (cont.) LIGO staffing model, based on experience gained with LIGO PSL »1 scientist and 1 electronics engineer »1 technician and 1 electronics technician »1 technician, part-time for assisting in fabrication of electronics modules