ASPIRE CLASS 6: Interpreting Scientific Data Sarah J. Billups, PharmD, BCPS, Clinical Pharmacy Specialist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observational Studies and RCT Libby Brewin. What are the 3 types of observational studies? Cross-sectional studies Case-control Cohort.
Advertisements

Analysis & Expressing Resultd in Clinical Trials Dr. Khalili.
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
Find the Joy in Stats ? ! ? Walt Senterfitt, Ph.D., PWA Los Angeles County Department of Public Health and CHAMP.
Extension Article by Dr Tim Kenny
Understanding real research 3. Assessment of risk.
MEASURES OF DISEASE ASSOCIATION Nigel Paneth. MEASURES OF DISEASE ASSOCIATION The chances of something happening can be expressed as a risk or as an odds:
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2011.
BIOST 536 Lecture 3 1 Lecture 3 – Overview of study designs Prospective/retrospective  Prospective cohort study: Subjects followed; data collection in.
Efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blockers: a meta-analysis of randomized trials Elgendy IY et al. Am J Hypertens. 2014; doi:10,1093/ajh/hpu209.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November–December 2010.
Measures of disease frequency (I). MEASURES OF DISEASE FREQUENCY Absolute measures of disease frequency: –Incidence –Prevalence –Odds Measures of association:
HaDPop Measuring Disease and Exposure in Populations (MD) &
Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model Mai Zhou Department of Statistics University of Kentucky.
Healthy Living Factors in Preventing Serious Disease ( Diabetes, Cancer Heart Attack, Stroke)
EPIDEMIOLOGY Why is it so damn confusing?. Disease or Outcome Exposure ab cd n.
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
Analytic Epidemiology
Absolute, Relative and Attributable Risks. Outcomes or differences that we are interested in:  Differences in means or proportions  Odds ratio (OR)
Mohsen Askarishahi Reference: 1)Aviva Petrie. Medical Statistics at a Glance. Blackwell (2005) 2) Sheldon M. Ross. Introductory Statistics. Elsevier Inc.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7: Gathering Evidence for Practice.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2014.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 14 Screening and Prevention of Illnesses and Injuries: Research Methods.
Essentials of survival analysis How to practice evidence based oncology European School of Oncology July 2004 Antwerp, Belgium Dr. Iztok Hozo Professor.
DEB BYNUM, MD AUGUST 2010 Evidence Based Medicine: Review of the basics.
Dr Laura Bonnett Department of Biostatistics. UNDERSTANDING SURVIVAL ANALYSIS.
Statistics for nMRCGP Jo Kirkcaldy. Curriculum Condensed Knowledge Incidence and prevalence Specificity and sensitivity Positive and negative predictive.
Design and Analysis of Clinical Study 11. Analysis of Cohort Study Dr. Tuan V. Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Australia.
Marshall University School of Medicine Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology BMS 617 Lecture 8 – Comparing Proportions Marshall University Genomics.
How to Analyze Therapy in the Medical Literature (part 2)
Understanding real research 4. Randomised controlled trials.
EBCP. Random vs Systemic error Random error: errors in measurement that lead to measured values being inconsistent when repeated measures are taken. Ie:
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Literature searching & critical appraisal Chihaya Koriyama August 15, 2011 (Lecture 2)
O RGANIZING & DISPLAYING DATA Dr. Omar Al Jadaan Assistant Professor – Computer Science & Mathematics.
CRITICAL READING ST HELIER VTS 2008 RCGP Curriculum Core Statement Domain 3 AS.
Causation ? Tim Wiemken, PhD MPH CIC Assistant Professor Division of Infectious Diseases University of Louisville, Kentucky.
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
November 5, 2014 Matthew Tuck, MD Hospitalist, Veterans Affairs Medical Center Assistant Professor of Medicine, George Washington University.
RATES AND RISK Daniel E. Ford, MD, MPH Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Introduction to Clinical Research July 12, 2010.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ALLHAT Major Outcomes in Moderately.
Measuring associations between exposures and outcomes
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE BY MOHEB KHOUZAM MD. EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE  1- TYPES OF STUDY DESIGNS  2- RECOMMENDATIONS.
Background There are 12 different types of medications to lower blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is widely agreed upon that metformin.
Organization of statistical research. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and.
Risks & Odds Professor Kate O’Donnell. When talking about the chance of something happening, e.g. death, hip fracture, we can talk about: risk and relative.
BIOSTATISTICS Lecture 2. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and creating methods.
Biostatistics Case Studies 2009 Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician Session 2: Survival Analysis Fundamentals.
Journal Club Julie Shah, MD Milton S Hershey Medical Center Penn State University.
Article Title Resident Name, MD SVCH6/13/2016 Journal Club.
2 3 انواع مطالعات توصيفي (Descriptive) تحليلي (Analytic) مداخله اي (Interventional) مشاهده اي ( Observational ) كارآزمايي باليني كارآزمايي اجتماعي كارآزمايي.
HelpDesk Answers Synthesizing the Evidence
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2017
CRITICAL NUMBERS LIVING WITH RISK
Evidence-Based Journal Club: Intention-to-Treat, Odds and Risk.
Lecture 8 – Comparing Proportions
Measures of Association
NAPLEX preparation: Biostatistics
Prospective Cohort Study (Click or press Enter to follow animation)
مقدمه‌ای بر طب مبتنی بر شواهد
Three Steps to Interpret Clinical Trials
Interpreting Basic Statistics
Measurements of Risk & Association …
ASPIRE CLASS 6: Interpreting Results and Writing an Abstract
A decade after the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial: Weaving firm clinical recommendations from lessons learned  Robert E.
EBM – therapy Dr. Tina Dewi J , dr., SpOG
Time to Recurrence (Hormone Receptor-positive Patients)
Increase of physical activity over time associated with lower HF risk
Medical Statistics Exam Technique and Coaching, Part 2 Richard Kay Statistical Consultant RK Statistics Ltd 22/09/2019.
Presentation transcript:

ASPIRE CLASS 6: Interpreting Scientific Data Sarah J. Billups, PharmD, BCPS, Clinical Pharmacy Specialist

RR: Relative Risk  Used in prospective studies  Tells you the comparative risk in each group over a given period of time

RR: Relative Risk  Example Question: – Does ingesting dark chocolate reduce the risk of stroke? Fabricated data based on a real retrospective study by Buijsse: European Heart Journal (2010) 31, 1616–1623

RR: Relative Risk  Study:  Randomize 9,000 people over age 50 with no known heart disease to: intervention: dark chocolate (7 g daily) control: white “chocolate”  Follow x 8 years

RR: Relative Risk

 Calculate RR & RRR and interpret  Calculate ARD & NNT and interpret StrokeNo Stroke Dark Chocolate404,4604,500 Control704,4304,500

RR: Relative Risk Stroke risk: chocolate group= 50/4500 = 1.1% control group= 70/4500 = 1.6% 1.1% RR = 1.6% = 0.7

RR: Relative Risk  RRR= = 0.3  Given an individual consumes daily dark chocolate, he has a 30% lower risk of having a stroke over the next 8 yrs

ARD: Absolute Risk Difference Stroke risk: chocolate group= 50/4500 = 1.1% control group= 70/4500 = 1.6%  ARD = – =  NNT = 1/0.005 = 200

OR: Odds Ratio UUsed in retrospective studies EExample Question: Is colchicine associated with an increased incidence of Very Bad Outcomes, specifically blood dyscrasias or rhabdomyolysis ?

 Study: 1. Identify all patients with VBO (CASES) 2. Identify a comparable CONTROL group 3. Match cases to controls on key characteristics 4. Look back in time for exposure of interest

OR: Odds Ratio Very Bad Outcome No Very Bad Outcome Colchicine exposure613 No exposure8948,987

OR: Odds Ratio  Odds of drug exposure in cases: 6 / 13 = 46.2% controls: 894 / 8,987 = 9.9% 46.2% OR = 9.9% = 4.7

OR: Odds Ratio  Desired Question: Given colchicine  risk of VBO?  Actual odds ratio answer:  Given that a patient had a VBO, his odds of being exposed to colchicine are 4.7 times that of someone without a VBO.

HR: Hazard Ratio  Used in prospective studies with time-to-event or survival analysis  Incorporates TIME

HR: Hazard Ratio  Hazard h(t) = event rate for an individual who has already survived to time t  Calculation:  # of patients dying over a given time interval # still alive at the start of that interval  For example…

HR: Hazard Ratio Example  Background:  A bunch of moms want to find a way to get their teenagers to stop playing video games and come eat lunch. Calling their names gets a response of “as soon as I finish this level.” They decide to appeal to the teen’s sense of smell and design a study to test the effects of 2 different fragrances.

HR Example, continued  Study design:  They randomize teens to have one of two different smells pumped into their gaming area: lavender, or pizza, and measure how much time it takes each teen to “finish this level” and come eat lunch.

HR: Hazard Ratio: Study in head & neck cancer

HR: Hazard Ratio  hazard rate in treatment group  HR= hazard rate in control group  What’s true if HR = 1 ? 2 ? 0.5 ?

HR: Hazard Ratio: Study in head & neck cancer  HR = 3.0 (CI 1.9 – 5.2)  Interpretation: At any given time, about 3 times as many teens smelling pizza manage to tear themselves from their video game to eat lunch compared to the control group.

ASPIRE CLASS 5: Preparing Abstracts for conference Submission Sarah J. Billups, PharmD, BCPS, Clinical Pharmacy Specialist

WSC Specifics Read the submission guidelines carefully  Deadline: Feb 21, words recommended (max 500 words) 5-7 Key Words required 2 Presentation Objectives required Platform Presentation Category