Observing Strategies at Millimetre Wavelengths Tony Wong, ATNF Narrabri Synthesis Workshop 13 May 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3mm Testing in July 2001 Tony Wong ATNF Epping CA Forum, 6 Sep.
Advertisements

Basics of mm interferometry Turku Summer School – June 2009 Sébastien Muller Nordic ARC Onsala Space Observatory, Sweden.
7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
21 November 2002Millimetre Workshop 2002, ATNF First ATCA results at millimetre wavelengths Vincent Minier School of Physics University of New South Wales.
3mm amplitude test by Cheng-Jiun Ma. Observation Source : Orion SiO Frequency: GHz 256 channels within 64MHz bandwidth Ant 3 & Ant 4 no Tsys correction.
ALMA: MM Observing Considerations
Interferometric Spectral Line Imaging Martin Zwaan (Chapters of synthesis imaging book)
A rough guide to radio astronomy and its use in lensing studies Simple stuff other lecturers may assume you know (and probably do)
Image Analysis Jim Lovell ATNF Synthesis Imaging Workshop May 2003.
Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 2010 June 8-15 Observation Preparation Tool (OPT) Loránt Sjouwerman (NRAO/Socorro)
Image Analysis Jim Lovell ATNF Synthesis Imaging Workshop September 2001.
Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer Richard Hills University of Cambridge Mark Holdaway NRAO Tucson.
Mopra 115GHz The MAGMA Perspective Annie Hughes & Tony Wong.
Prospects for High-Frequency Calibration with the SMA Dual-IF/Receiver System Todd R. Hunter, Jun-Hui Zhao (CfA) Sheng-Yuan Liu, Yu-Nung Su, Vivien Chen.
1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Error recognition R. D. Ekers Narrabri, 14 May 2003.
Prospects for High-Frequency Calibration with the SMA Dual-IF/Receiver System Todd R. Hunter, Jun-Hui Zhao (CfA) Sheng-Yuan Liu, Yu-Nung Su, Vivien Chen.
Calibration with CASA Masaaki Hiramatsu 平松正顕 (ASIAA/NTHU) ALMA User Workshop, Feb 8-10, 2010.
Sensitivity Mark Wieringa Australia Telescope CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science.
J.M. Wrobel - 25 June 2002 PROPOSALS 1 PROPOSAL WRITING TUTORIAL Outline 30 minutes: Lecture on Generic Issues 60 minutes: Small Groups Write Proposals.
Multiwavelength Continuum Survey of Protostellar Disks in Ophiuchus Left: Submillimeter Array (SMA) aperture synthesis images of 870 μm (350 GHz) continuum.
Basic concepts of radio interferometric (VLBI) observations Hiroshi Imai Department of Physics and Astronomy Graduate School of Science and Engineering.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Emmanuel Momjian (NRAO)
Page 1© Crown copyright Distribution of water vapour in the turbulent atmosphere Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer & Richard.
Random Media in Radio Astronomy Atmospherepath length ~ 6 Km Ionospherepath length ~100 Km Interstellar Plasma path length ~ pc (3 x Km)
Wideband Imaging and Measurements ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCE Jamie Stevens | ATCA Senior Systems Scientist / ATCA Lead Scientist 2 October 2014.
What is Millimetre-Wave Astronomy and why is it different? Michael Burton University of New South Wales.
Cycle-3 Capabilities and the OT Andy Biggs ALMA Regional Centre, ESO.
Molecular Gas and Dust in SMGs in COSMOS Left panel is the COSMOS field with overlays of single-dish mm surveys. Right panel is a 0.3 sq degree map at.
ATCA synthesis workshop - May ATCA – Calibration at mm wavelengths Rick Forster University of California, Berkeley Hat Creek Radio Observatory Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Physics & Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS & PHYSICAL SCIENCES The Cornish Survey Workshop.
Observing strategies Max Voronkov Software Scientist – ASKAP 28 th September 2010.
Which dipoles to use to optimize survey speed? –What tapering? –Trade-off between sensitivity, FOV and low side-lobe levels –Station beam stability, pointing.
Making MOPRA go! Lucyna Kedziora-Chudczer Friend of the telescope (UNSW)
Designing Experiments T. Venturi Istituto di Radioastronomia, Bologna, INAF ERIS, Manchester, 9 September 2005.
PACS Spectrometer Spatial Calibration plan in PV phase A.Contursi D. Lutz and U. Klaas.
Academia Sinica National Taiwan University AMiBA System Performance Kai-yang Lin 1,2 and AMiBA Team 1,2,3 1 Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia.
1wnb Synthesis Imaging Workshop ALMA The Atacama Large Millimeter Array.
Dual frequency interferometry and phase transfer at the Submillimeter Array Todd R. Hunter, Jun-Hui Zhao (CfA) Sheng-Yuan Liu, Yu-Nung Su, Vivien Chen.
Phase Referencing Using More Than One Calibrator Ed Fomalont (NRAO)
Molecular Clouds in in the LMC at High Resolution: The Importance of Short ALMA Baselines T. Wong 1,2,4, J. B. Whiteoak 1, M. Hunt 2, J. Ott 1, Y.-N. Chin.
The Very Small Array Angela Taylor & Anze Slosar Cavendish Astrophysics University of Cambridge.
C. Chandler, Synthesis Imaging Summer School, 24 June Mm-Wave Interferometry Claire Chandler Why a special lecture on mm interferometry? –everything.
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 14 Reprise: dirty beam, dirty image. Sensitivity Wide-band imaging Weighting –Uniform vs Natural.
Tenth Summer Synthesis Imaging Workshop University of New Mexico, June 13-20, 2006 High Dynamic Range Imaging Craig Walker.
ALMA Week 2003 Victoria, B. C. Phase Calibration Al Wootten (based on work by many)
1 Problems and Challenges in the mm/submm. 2 Effect of atmosphere on data: Tsys Mean Refraction Phase fluctuations Correction techniques Other facility.
April 8/9, 2003 Green Bank GBT PTCS Conceptual Design Review Out of Focus (OOF) Holography for the GBT Claire Chandler.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Observing Scripts Basic.
Pulsar luminosity distribution in 47-Tuc Tim Connors, Vacation student University of Sydney.
Multi-frequency Phase Referencing VLBI Observation - Phase Referenced Image - Tae Hyun Jung, Bong Won Sohn, Hideyuki Kobayashi, Tetsuo Sasao, Tomoya Hirota,
1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Sept 24-28, 2001, ATCA Narrabri Calibration & Flagging Mark Wieringa  Theory of calibration  Practice - RFI & malfunctions.
1wnb Synthesis Imaging Workshop ALMA The Atacama Large Millimeter Array.
Jan URSI1 Fast Switching Phase Compensation for ALMA Mark Holdaway NRAO/Tucson Other Fast Switching Contributors: Frazer Owen Michael Rupen Chris.
Atmospheric phase correction at the Plateau de Bure interferometer IRAM interferometry school 2006 Aris Karastergiou.
L. Young, Synthesis Imaging Summer School, 19 June Spectral Line I Lisa Young This lecture: things you need to think about before you observe After.
Fourth IRAM Millimeter Interferometry School 2004: Atmospheric phase correction 1 Atmospheric phase correction Jan Martin Winters IRAM, Grenoble.
1 1 CORNISH WORKSHOP Leeds, 13 th April 2007 James Green The Methanol Multibeam Project Project MMB.
MWA imaging and calibration – early science results
A potted outline of the EVN data
Fringe-Fitting: Correcting for delays and rates
Observing Strategies for the Compact Array
Polarization Calibration
HERA Imaging and Closure
Max Voronkov Software Scientist – ASKAP 28th September 2010
Observational Astronomy
Observational Astronomy
Image Error Analysis Fourier-domain analysis of errors.
Early indications of performance
Basic theory Some choices Example Closing remarks
Presentation transcript:

Observing Strategies at Millimetre Wavelengths Tony Wong, ATNF Narrabri Synthesis Workshop 13 May 2003

2 Current 3mm System 3 antennas (CA02, CA03, CA04) with dual polarisation receivers. 2 freq bands: and GHz. Up to 128 MHz bandwidth in each of 2 frequencies (both must be in same band) SiO 2-1 v=1 (maser) SiO 2-1 v=0 (thermal) HCN HCO HNC 1-0

3 Current 12mm System 6 antennas with dual polarisation receivers. 2 freq bands: and GHz. If observing 2 frequencies, both must be in same band SiS HC 3 N 2-1 F= HC 5 N H 2 O maser C 2 S

4 Pending 12mm System 6 antennas with dual polarisation receivers. 2 overlapping frequency bands: and GHz (ammonia!). For dual-frequency operation, both freqs must be in same band, and separated by <2.7 GHz (lower band) or <2.3 GHz (upper band). Available from end of May!

5 Millimetre interferometry Millimetre interferometry poses special challenges: 1.Significant atmospheric opacity, much of which is due to H 2 O vapor (and is hence variable). 2.Fluctuations in H 2 O vapor content above the antennas produce atmospheric phase noise that increases with baseline length & with frequency. 3.Instrumental requirements (e.g. surface, pointing, baseline accuracy) become more severe. 4.Need more bandwidth to cover same velocity range: 1 MHz  mm km s -1

6 When to Observe The mm observing season is April to October. Observations outside this period are unlikely to succeed. R. Sault

7 Atmospheric Opacity The variable component of atmospheric opacity  (due to precipitable H 2 O vapor) is minimised in cold, clear conditions. To try to make optimum use of the array, each mm project is typically assigned a cm “swap” partner. The “swap” is made if the weather during the mm slot is poor. T sys  T rec + T sky = T rec + T atm (1-e -  ) T sys,eff = T sys e  = T rec e  + T atm (e  -1) T rms  T sys,eff (n bas Bt) –0.5

8 Phase Stability Effect of phase noise on a visibility measurement can be expressed as /V 0 = exp (–  rms 2 / 2) where  rms is the RMS phase variation during the averaging time, and V 0 is the true amplitude. For  rms =30º (280  m ), /V 0 =0.87 and the visibility amplitude will be reduced by 13% due to phase noise (also called decorrelation).  rms is a function of weather, frequency, and baseline length:  rms  K b 0.8

9 Clear Night, 8pm local time 45m75m120m  rms :22º 34º19º b:

10 4 hours later (midnight) 45m75m120m  rms :22º 34º19º b:  rms :16º 24º13º

11 Advice on Day vs. Night There is a very strong diurnal effect: phase stability is much better at night, with a few hours’ latency (2 hr after sunrise is much better than 2 hr after sunset). If phase stability is important (i.e. extended arrays) then may be better to observe in morning or evening during “shoulder” season (Apr-May, Sep-Oct) than during afternoon in “peak” season. Better statistics will be available once a phase monitor is in operation.

12 Array Configurations E-W configurations not always ideal for mm obs, which must be done at low airmass (elev > 30°).  =-35º, beam=7.7” x 2.7” EW214

13 Array Configurations N-S or hybrid arrays may improve u-v coverage. beam=6.6” x 4.9” H75

14 Array Configurations Example of combining E-W and N-S arrays. EW A + H168 beam=3.3” x 2.8”

15 Advice on Configurations Simulate your PSF before writing your proposal. Be sure to include shadowing! If the emission is likely to be extended, be sure to include short baselines. Shorter baselines also easier to calibrate.

16 Gain calibration Involves observing a bright point source at a known position (e.g., maser or quasar). Important for tracking phase drifts due to instrumental and large-scale atmospheric effects. For a quasar, use the maximum possible bandwidth (128 MHz at ATCA). T rms  T sys,eff (n bas Bt) –0.5 Rather than using different correlator config for source vs. cal, employ dual frequency mode (wide & narrow).

17 Gain calibration For a maser, use a bandwidth that gives you adequate freq resolution to resolve the line.

18 Choosing your calibrator A good calibrator is within 15º of your target source and has a flux in the ATCA catalogue of >1 Jy.

19 Choosing your calibrator The reasons for these guidelines are: 1.Catalogued mm fluxes unreliable, and sources <1 Jy are often <<1 Jy. 2.If the calibrator is more than 15º away, you may be observing it through a very different H 2 O column, and will be more susceptible to antenna position (baseline) errors. Holdaway (1992 ALMA memo) estimates that the mean distance between a source and calibrator at 115 GHz will be 7º x S 0.75, where S is the flux cutoff in Jy.

20 How often and how long? Don’t want to spend too much time calibrating! Need to find compromise between: 1.Errors in gain solution due to S/N on cal 2.Errors due to atmospheric changes 3.Time lost due to calibrator observations Usually calibrating every minutes is adequate for baselines < 100m. For a 1 Jy source, to achieve a S/N of 10 in each baseline and polarisation requires just 1 minute’s integration in good weather.

21 How often and how long? Ideally, we’d like to calibrate faster than troposphere moves across the array. But with typical wind speeds of ~10 m/s, this would require calibrating every 20s for a 100m baseline! Desai 1998

22 How often and how long? Less frequent calibration still useful: removes fluctuations with size scales > b eff ~ v a t cyc /2 ~ 300m x (t cyc /min). Rule of thumb: for baselines twice as long, calibrate the phase twice as often. Desai 1998

23 Observing a test calibrator In poor weather or when using long baselines, it may be unclear whether a non-detection is due to source weakness or to atmospheric phase decorrelation. Procedure: observe a weaker (but detectable) “test” quasar near your source, in addition to a stronger quasar as the phase calibrator. If phase gains applied to the test quasar yield a good detection, your phase calibration is probably adequate.

24 Other required calibrations Paddle (vane) calibration: measures T sys,eff. Changes quickly during rise & set or in cloudy weather (repeat every ~15 min), more slowly near transit (~30 min).

25 Other required calibrations Pointing calibration: refines antenna pointing by doing a “cross” pattern around a bright source. At least once an hour or when moving to a different part of sky. Primary beam FWHM is only 36” at 86 GHz! A 10º shift in elevation can produce a ~5” shift in pointing: must choose a nearby source!

26 Other required calibrations Bandpass calibration: determines amplitude and phase on a strong point source as a function of frequency (once during project).

27 Other required calibrations Flux calibration: observe thermal continuum emission from an unresolved planet once during project, to set absolute flux scale. MIRIAD task plplt

28 Multi-field imaging Due to the small size of the ATCA beam at mm wavelengths, it will often be desirable to combine several fields (mosaic). But, pointing errors and uncertainties in the beam shape make this difficult at present. Rectangular grid Hexagonal grid

29 Parting Thoughts Best to observe sources that you believe will be detectable in 4 hours or less integration time. Time flies when you’re stuffing around – don’t modify your observing strategy midway unless there’s an obvious mistake. Use loops when possible: have a sequence of pointing, calibration, and on-source scans that can be repeated many times. Keep an eye on slew times and shadowing (even by idle antennas!). Don’t observe at elevations >85º. Especially at 3mm, record T sys and pointing offsets in log – useful to diagnose problems in reduction.