Preparing for 2017 RA Update March 2014. 2017 Tampa Bay Reasonable Assurance Update Annual assessment of water quality and attainment status of chl-a.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Animal Tracking Component Private and State Animal Tracking Databases (ATD) Animal Trace Processing System (ATPS) National Animal Identification System.
Advertisements

…by your side. …working collaboratively. …to add value.
Project Overview 2010 Programme FA: 14 June 2007 Start: 2 Sept 2007 Completion: 31 June 2011 Budget: €10,155,000 (EU), €155,000 (National)
Training Module: The MED-Dialogue project (611433) is co-funded by the European Community's ICT Programme under FP7 6 - Resource Allocation and Budgeting.
Quantification of Spill Data from Domestic Facilities Andy Squires Pinellas County Environmental Management Keith Hackett Janicki Environmental, Inc.
Pollutant Trading Discussion 22 July Why Allow Trading? §To make point sources pay §To lure nonpoint sources into doing pollution control so we.
ENTITY and DATE HERE Tampa Bay Nitrogen Management Consortium TMDL and Reasonable Assurance Overview.
A Collaborative Approach to Meeting Water Quality Goals : Tampa Bay, Florida Holly Greening, Tampa Bay Estuary Program Michael Connors, City of St. Petersburg.
How to Hit a Homerun Saving Energy and Updating Facilities Presented by Shirley McNutt.
Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Post Award Workshop April 5, Fiscal Responsibilities 1. University Wide Responsibilities Every university employee has a responsibility to ensure.
Grants Management Overview 2013 Minority Fellowship Program Grantee Meeting April 23-24, 2013 Salvador Ortiz; Maria Martinez;
Wisconsin Technical Service Providers (TSP) Plan.
Washington State Low Income Weatherization Program Evaluation Calendar Year 2011 DRAFT Results Prepared by: Rick Kunkle July 2013.
NMC Potential Projects RA Implementation Plan Section IX, Approved RA Plan A.Defining the Basic Roles of the Consortium B.Revisiting the 1998.
Regional Technical Forum End-use Load Shape Business Case Project Project Initiation Meeting Portland, OR March 5, 2012.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Forestry BMP Review Process Mark Sievers, Tetra Tech Forestry Workgroup (FWG) Conference Call—February 1, 2012.
Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Completing the State Aid Payment Request (SAPR). Tips Each spring check on the State Aid Finance web page for the current version of the State Aid Pay.
Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members in Alaska’s Commercial Fisheries Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members.
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council The Role of the Regional Technical Forum in PNW Energy Efficiency Programs May 14, 2008.
Proposed 2014 RTF Work Plan and 3-year Look Back October 21,
Office of International Research, Education, and Development, Virginia Tech SANREM CRSP: Organizational Structure, Budget Overview, Key Budget Policies.
A New Start for EUTO Redruth, 29 September 2012 Henk Schüller.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
PACIFIC AID EFFECTIVENESS PRINCIPLES. Purpose of Presentation Provide an overview of Pacific Principles on Aid Effectiveness Provide an overview of Pacific.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
Key Elements for Successful Collaboration: Examples from TBEP Holly Greening Tampa Bay Estuary Program July 2014.
Tampa Bay Nitrogen Management Consortium Update Holly Greening Tampa Bay Estuary Program March 2014.
Inland Numeric Nutrient Criteria: Ramifications for Tampa Bay’s RA/TMDL.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
Science, research and development European Commission IDARI Project Meeting Tartu, June 2005 Martin Greimel Scientific Officer Directorate-E ‘Biotechnology,
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. September 16, 2015 How can we make sure the Chesapeake Bay Restoration really works?
1 PDD and PIN preparation Technical Workshop on CDM Paramaribo, 18 June 2008 Adriaan Korthuis.
California Public Utilities Commission CPUC Climate Change Activities Paul Clanon Executive Director August 28, 2007 Presentation to the Senate Energy,
2013 Water Quality Assessment Update Ed Sherwood Tampa Bay Estuary Program th Ave. South St. Petersburg, FL
HEALTH FINANCING MOH - HPG JAHR UPDATE ON POLICIES Eleventh Party Congress -Increase state investment while simultaneously mobilizing social mobilization.
Outdoor Heritage Fund. Established on August 1, 2013 by the Legislature. Continuing Appropriation of $20,000,000 annually from oil and gas taxes. Outdoor.
Tinus Pulles & Justin Goodwin Guidebook Revision Elements for a Maintenance Plan Consultants view.
OVERVIEW: CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTS AND WATER & CLIMATE CHANGE ACTIVITIES Water Resources Technical Committee Oct. 29, 2015 Presented by Tanya.
How The Regional Technical Forum Supports PNW Energy Efficiency Programs January 5, 2010.
Lifecycle of an Award Reporting, Close-outs and Audits Michelle Vazin, Vanderbilt University Michele Codd, George Washington University.
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
1 Malawi Public Expenditure Review: Road Sector 21 November 2007.
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Subcommittee on Hydrology, ACWI New Extreme Storm Work Group Status and Plans.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
2016 Water Quality Assessment Update (thru Sep. 2016)
Longreach Water Mains Replacement
The SWA Collaborative Behaviors
Residential Placement Application 2011
Create, Collaborate, Construct - A Guide to Projects
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Klamath Tracking and Accounting Program
Patrick Mwangi & Japheth Mbuvi May 24, 2004
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Dairy Subgroup #1: Fostering Markets for Non-Digester Projects
SPECIAL EDUCATION FINANCE UPDATES
SPOT CHECKS 2016.
Presentation transcript:

Preparing for 2017 RA Update March 2014

2017 Tampa Bay Reasonable Assurance Update Annual assessment of water quality and attainment status of chl-a thresholds (TBEP) – 2012 through year TN, TP and TSS and hydrologic loading report ( ) Update Projects Database through 2016 (NMC participants and TBEP) Assessment of allocation attainment (NMC Consultant) Investigate reallocation, including interim allocation finalization (NMC Consultant)

NMC Key Elements: Everyone participates All invited to participate in a collaborative process –Public sector –Private sector- industries –Regulatory agencies –Agriculture (FDACS) –Electric utilities –Any entity with a discharge permit

Expanding Participation Help in identifying contact information for entities (> 1 ton allocation) not currently participating. Consider entities and CDDs with < 1 ton allocation be included in the “small source” category for each bay segment. Other?

NMC Key Elements: Projects Database Database to track projects and nutrient reductions –RA, TMDL, permits –Project entry is responsibility of each party –Database maintenance responsibility of organizer

Incorporating credits/debits Original use: means to track cumulative progress towards 17 ton reduction goal. With allocation, each entity may want to track credits and debits for their own use. Recommendation: Special NMC meeting devoted to Database, specifically for quantifying credits available.

NMC Key Elements: Participants develop draft allocations NMC decided to reallocate TN loads for the 2017 RA Update Questions include: New or expanded sources: is the existing transfer framework to demonstrate offsets or transfers adequate? How to address existing ‘interim allocations’ Recommendation: Special NMC meeting on reallocation (could be paired with Database meeting for a full day)

NMC Key Elements: Pooled Funding ‘Declaration of Cooperation’ – In 2009, all parties signed on to act in good faith –Agreement to contribute funds to support technical work NMC participants contribution $6K every 5 years: greater than 1 ton $500 every 5 years: less than 1 ton

NMC Technical Contractor Roles Nutrient and hydrologic loadings from all entities Hydrologic adjustment calculations Assess RA/TMDL attainment Facilitate NMC technical decisions (allocation, transfers, new and expanded sources, etc) Prepare RA documents, with TBEP Enhance project database if needed

TBEP Roles Organizing entity (TBEP) 1.Organize and facilitate meetings; assessments; discussions; serve as point of contact 2.Maintain and enhance databases 3.Manage technical contractor 4.Request and manage contributions 5.Prepare annual assessments on progress 6.Report to stakeholders, agencies and the public 7.NMC technical support, with NMC Contractor

Current Funding Status $63,000 currently available in NMC funds account (some entities have already contributed for 2017 RA Update). $200,000 (not to exceed) needed for NMC Tech Contractor for 2017 RA Update tasks, based on 2009 RA expenditures. TBEP roles currently not supported by NMC funds (estimated at $20K per year). Request $10K per year if budget allows.

Potential Funds 43 entities with allocations over 1 ton X $6,000 once every 5 years = $258, entities with allocation 1 ton or less X $500 once every 5 years = $15,000 Max potential = $273,000

Reality Check In 2009: 27 entities (63%) over 1 ton contributed 3 entities less than 1 ton contributed Total contributions: $171,100 Total invoices from Tech Contractor: $230,000 Remaining amount paid from TBEP Work Plans; no longer available due to Fed budget reductions

Budget Requirements Minimum needed: $200,000 for Tech Contract (no TBEP) Would need 34 of 43 participants to contribute at $6000 each once every 5 years ($1200 per year) With $10K per year for TBEP support: $250,000 for Tech Support plus TBEP Would need 42 of 43 to contribute at $6000 each

Recommended Next Steps Expanding Participation- ideas? Special NMC meeting devoted to Database, specifically for quantifying credits available. Special NMC meeting on reallocation (could be paired with Database meeting for a full day) Funding the NMC- recommendations from the NMC

Extra slides

Potential Options: Increase by $1000 Minimum needed: $200,000 for Tech Contract (no TBEP) Would need 29 of 43 participants to contribute at $7000 each, once every 5 years ($1400 per year) With $10K per year for TBEP support: $250,000 for Tech Support plus TBEP Would need 36 of 43 to contribute at $7000 each

Potential Options: Increase by $2000 Minimum needed: $200,000 for Tech Contract (no TBEP) Would need 25 of 43 participants to contribute at $8000 each, once every 5 years ($1600 per year) With $10K per year for TBEP support: $250,000 for Tech Contract plus TBEP Would need 31 of 43 to contribute at $8000 each