Kr2Det: TWO - DETECTOR REACTOR NEUTRINO OSCILLATION EXPERIMENT AT KRASNOYARSK UNDERGROUND SITE L. Mikaelyan for KURCHATOV INSTITUTE NEUTRINO GROUP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrinos Louvain, February 2005 Alan Martin Arguably the most fascinating of the elementary particles. Certainly they take us beyond the Standard Model.
Advertisements

Results from Daya Bay Xin Qian On behalf of Daya Bay Collaboration Xin Qian, BNL1.
Controlling Systematics in a Future Reactor  13 Experiment Jonathan Link Columbia University Workshop on Future Low-Energy Neutrino Experiments April.
6/6/2003Jonathan Link, Columbia U. NuFact03 Future Measurement of sin 2 2  13 at Nuclear Reactors Jonathan Link Columbia University June 6, 2003 ′03.
Summary of Nufact-03 Alain Blondel NuFact 03 5th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories & Superbeams Columbia University, New York 5-11 June 2003.
Sensitivity of the DANSS detector to short range neutrino oscillations
Past Experience of reactor neutrino experiments Yifang Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Nov. 28, 2003.
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
Experimental Status of Geo-reactor Search with KamLAND Detector
Reactor & Accelerator Thanks to Bob McKeown for many of the slides.
Results and Future of the KamLAND Experiment
Summary of Nufact-03 Alain Blondel NuFact 03 5th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories & Superbeams Columbia University, New York 5-11 June 2003.
Measuring  13 with Reactors Stuart Freedman University of California at Berkeley SLAC Seminar September 29, 2003.
1 The Daya Bay Reactor Electron Anti-neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jianglai Liu (for the Daya Bay Collaboration) California Institute of Technology APS.
Jun Cao Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics, Oct. 3-8, 2005 National.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Eun-Ju Jeon Sejong Univ. Sept. 09, 2010 Status of RENO Experiment Neutrino Oscillation Workshop (NOW 2010) September 4-11, 2010, Otranto, Lecce, Italy.
Soo-Bong Kim Seoul National Univ. RENO for Neutrino Mixing Angle  13 5 th International Workshop on Low Energy Neutrino Physcis (Neutrino Champagne LowNu.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
KamLAND : Studying Neutrinos from Reactor Atsuto Suzuki KamLAND Collaboration KEK : High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
SYSTEMATICS (preliminary consideration) V. Sinev for Kurchatov Institute Neutrino group.
Using Reactor Neutrinos to Study Neutrino Oscillations Jonathan Link Columbia University Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2004 Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2004 June.
Using Reactor Anti-Neutrinos to Measure sin 2 2θ 13 Jonathan Link Columbia University Fermilab Long Range Planning Committee, Neutrino Session November.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Karsten M. Heeger US Reactor  13 Meeting, March 15, 2004 Comparison of Reactor Sites and  13 Experiments Karsten Heeger LBNL.
νeνe νeνe νeνe νeνe νeνe νeνe Distance (L/E) Probability ν e 1.0 ~1800 meters 3 MeV) Reactor Oscillation Experiment Basics Unoscillated flux observed.
Karsten Heeger, Univ. of WisconsinDNP2006, Nashville, October 28, 2006 A High-Precision Measurement of sin 2 2  13 with the Daya Bay Reactor Antineutrino.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Present and future detectors for Geo-neutrinos: Borexino and LENA Applied Antineutrino Physics Workshop APC, Paris, Dec L. Oberauer, TU München.
SNO and the new SNOLAB SNO: Heavy Water Phase Complete Status of SNOLAB Future experiments at SNOLAB: (Dark Matter, Double beta, Solar, geo-, supernova.
Efforts in Russia V. Sinev Kurchatov Institute. Plan of talk Rovno experiments at th On the determination of the reactor fuel isotopic content by.
L. Oberauer, Paris, June 2004   Measurements at Reactors Neutrino 2004 CdF, Paris, June chasing the missing mixing angle.
Park Kang Soon Seokyeong Univ. Status of the RENO San Clemente, Pelugia Sep , 2009.
Baseline Optimization Studies D. Reyna Argonne National Lab.
Karsten Heeger, LBNL TAUP03, September 7, 2003 Reactor Neutrino Measurement of  13 Karsten M. Heeger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Double-Chooz A search for  13 Guillaume MENTION (PCC-Collège de France/APC) On behalf of the Double-Chooz collaboration NOW 2004 Conca Specchiulla, Italy.
New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury.
Results from RENO Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “17 th Lomosonov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics” Moscow. Russia, Aug ,
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment R. D. McKeown Caltech On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration CIPANP 2009.
Performance Comparisons of Safeguard Detector Designs D. Reyna (Argonne National Laboratory) with help from R.W. McKeown (Drexel University)
CTF at Gran Sasso (overview of the hardware) Richard Ford (SNOLAB) (who has not been in the collaboration since 2004) March 19 th 2010.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Karsten Heeger Beijing, January 18, 2003 Design Considerations for a  13 Reactor Neutrino Experiment with Multiple Detectors Karsten M. Heeger Lawrence.
Double Chooz Near Detector Guillaume MENTION CEA Saclay, DAPNIA/SPP Workshop AAP 2007 Friday, December 14 th, 2007
Summary of the Reactor/  13 Meeting At College de France, Paris April 22-23, 2003 Thierry Lasserre On Behalf the reactor/  13 “european” working group.
Jun Cao Jan. 18, 2004 Daya Bay neutrino experiment workshop (Beijing) Detector Module Simulation and Baseline Optimization ● Determine module geometric.
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
Measuring  13 with Reactors Stuart Freedman HEPAP July 24, 2003 Bethesda Reactor Detector 1Detector 2 d2d2 d1d1.
Θ 13 and CP-Violation in the Lepton Sector SEESAW25 Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg SEESAW25 Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris.
1 Muon Veto System and Expected Backgrounds at Dayabay Hongshan (Kevin) Zhang, BNL DayaBay Collaboration DNP08, Oakland.
  Measurement with Double Chooz IDM chasing the missing mixing angle e  x.
Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin Yale University, March 1, 2010  13 from Global Fits current best limit sin 2 2θ 13 < CL Fogli, et al., arXiv:0905:3549.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
Recent Results from RENO NUFACT2014 August. 25 to 30, 2014, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. Hyunkwan Seo on behalf of the RENO Collaboration Seoul National University.
CHOOZ  Double Chooz réalité  mythe ? Yves Déclais, IPNL (CNRS-IN2P3/UCBL) Questions (sur le bruit) de fond.
Double Chooz Optimizing Chooz for a possible Theta 13 measurement Steven Dazeley (Louisiana State University) NuFact05 Rome.
5th June 2003, NuFact03 Kengo Nakamura1 Solar neutrino results, KamLAND & prospects Solar Neutrino History Solar.
Results on  13 Neutrino Oscillations from Reactor Experiments Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “INPC 2013, Firenze, June 2-7, 2013”
Status and Prospects of Reactor Neutrino Experiments Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “NuPhys 2014: Prospects in Neutrino Physics, London,
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
IBD Detection Efficiencies and Uncertainties
The Double Chooz reactor neutrino experiment
Fast neutron flux measurement in CJPL
Donato Nicolo` Pisa University & INFN,Pisa
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
Search for sterile neutrinos with SOX: Monte Carlo studies of the experiment sensitivity Davide Basilico 1st year Workshop – 11/10/17 Tutors: Dott. Barbara.
Current Results from Reactor Neutrino Experiments
Anti-Neutrino Simulations
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Presentation transcript:

Kr2Det: TWO - DETECTOR REACTOR NEUTRINO OSCILLATION EXPERIMENT AT KRASNOYARSK UNDERGROUND SITE L. Mikaelyan for KURCHATOV INSTITUTE NEUTRINO GROUP

TOWARDS VERY SMALL MIXING PARAMETERS IN THE ATMOSPHERIC NEUTRINO MASS REGION THE MAIN GOAL OF THE PROJECT IS : TO FIND THE CONTRIBUTION of m-3 MASS STATE to the ELECTRON NEUTRINO FLAVOR STATE or to SET NEW MORE STRINGENT CONSTRAINTS WE HOPE THAT at 1km from REACTOR the SENSITIVITY sin 2 2  13  2.0  for  m 2 = 2.5  eV 2 CAN BE ACHIEVED. For larger mixing parameters the experiment is sensible to  m 2  4  eV 2 (PART of the HLMA REGION!)

NEUTRINO OSCILLATION LIMITS

Plan of the report The CHOOZ oscillation limits Kr2Det: Idea of experiment, Detectors, Neutrino detection rates, backgrounds, Method of analysis, Systematics, Expected sensitivity, Other applications, Conclusions

Philosophy: Reactors vs Accelerators Strategy: Step by step progress If sin 2 2  13 is times smaller than present CHOOZ limits then necessary sensitivity can be achieved (in distant future and in several steps) with neutrino super beams and neutrino factories using kt (!) detectors located at a few thousand km from accelerator source. See for example: S.Geer, hep-ph/ However, the first step can be done sooner (an cheaper) at reactors. It is quit possible that sin 2 2  13 is just a few times smaller than present limit. No physical principal is known why it should be so terribly small.

REACTOR ANTINEUTRINO DETECTION REACTION: e + p  e + + n Positron visible energy E e + vis : E e + vis  E (MeV) (E is the energy of incident e ) The neutron is captured in H (or in Gd). In the experiment spatial- and time correlated (e+, n ) pairs are detected and positron energy spectrum measured.

Positron spectrum

REACTOR ANTINEUTRINO OSCILLA- TIONS AT ~ 1 km FROM THE REACTOR SOURCE e = U e1  1 + U e2  2 + U e3  3 ( U e3  sin  13 ) We conservatory assume here that m 1 < m 2 < m 3 and  m 2 sol = m 2 2 – m 1 2 < eV 2  m 2 atm = m 3 2 – m 1 2  m 3 2 – m 2 2  2.5  eV 2 >>  m 2 sol The e survival probability P( e  e ) is then: P( e  e ) = 1 – sin 2 2  sin 2 , sin 2 2   sin 2 2  13  4U e3 2 (1-U e3 2 ),  = (1.27  m 2 L  E -1 ), L(m) is the distance from the reactor Numerically:  = 1.05 = 60  for  m 2 = 2.5  eV 2, L = 1000 m, E = 3 MeV

CHOOZ detector (300 mwe) The detector is contained in 5.5 m diameter cylindrical steel tank shielded by low radioactivity sand (75 cm) and cast iron (14 cm) Gd Inside the tank there are three concentric regions: Central 5-ton target in a transparent Plexiglas container filled with a 0.09% Gd loaded scintillator, Intermediate 17-ton volume filled with unloaded scintillator, Outer 90-ton optically separated veto counter filled with unloaded scintillator Very important to suppress  -s

CHOOZ final results France-Italy-Russia-US Collaboration College de France LAPP, Annecy INFN&Univ. of Pisa INFN&Univ. of Trieste Kurchatov Institute, Moscow Univ. of IrvineDrexel Univ. Univ. of New Mexico Two reactors of summed rated power W=8.5 GW (thermal) Detector located at a depth of 300 mwe, at ~1000 m from the reactors. Neutrino events selection Summary of data acquisition (April 1997 – July 1998) Neutrino detection efficiency: 70% Total No of detected neutrinos: ~2700 Neutrino detected rate at full power: 26 d -1 Background: ~1.2 d -1 Neutrino/BKG, typically ~10:1

CHOOZ final results Neutrino detection rates X rate = measured/expected Positron spectrum shape: measured vs expected Number neutrino separately measured from two reactors CHOOZ’97 X rate = 0.98  4%(stat)  4%(syst) CHOOZ’99 X rate = 1.01  2.8%(stat)  2.7%(syst) CHOOZ’97 used  (0) calculated (2.5%) CHOOZ’99 uses  (0) measured (1.4%) CdF+LAPP+Kurchatov, 1994 y.

Kr2Det - probing U e3 with reactor e Method: Two identical detectors (BOREXINO, KamLAND design)600 mwe 100 m 1000 m Target: 50 t 50 t Rate: 1.5 ·10 6 /year 15 ·10 3 /year S:B >>1 ~ 10:1

Kr2Det, detector scheme 500 PMT EMI 9350 Diameter – 8 inches, Coverage – 20%

NEUTRINO DETECTION RATES Assuming: Target radius 2.35 m Target volume 54 m 3 Scintillator: Density:0.85 g/cm 3 Mass:46 ton H/C ratio:1.8 # of H atoms0.785  / ton Detection efficiency days/year L far = 1000 m, L near = 100 m One finds: N far = 17  10 3 /yearN near = 1.7  10 6 /year ( 1.2 / ton  day ) ( 120 / ton  day)

BACKGROUNDS Time correlated BKG is found by extrapolating the value measured at CHOOZ : CHOOZ: 300 m.w.e., 0,24 / day  target ton   Kr2Det: 600 m.w.e., 0.08/ day  target ton, which is less than 10% of the far detector e detection rate Accidentals Due to high neutrino rates requirements to radiopurity of the detector materials are much less severe than in BOREXINO and KamLAND experiments. The target scintillator can have U, Th, 40 K and 222 Rn concentrations , , g/g and 1mBq/m 3 respectively. In no Gd case the surrounding rock is expected to be the main source of the BKG… Additional passive shielding around the detector may be required.

ANALYSIS The RATIO of the two MEASURED POSITRON SPECTRA in no-oscillation case is ENERGY INDEPENDENT. Small specific deviations from the constant value of this ratio: S far /S near = const  [1 – Sin 2 2  Sin 2 (1.27  m 2 L  E -1 )] are searched for oscillations. The analysis is independent of the exact knowledge of the neutrino flux and their energy spectrum, burn up effects, numbers of target protons… HOWEVERE RELATIVE DIFFERENCE of the DETECTOR RESPONCE FUNCTIONS MUST BE STRICTLY CONTROLLED. CALIBRATION OF THE DETECTORS IS THE KEY PROBLEM OF THIS EXPERIMENT

Visible positron energy, MeV Positron spectrum

DIFFERENCE of the DETECTOR’s RESPONSE CAN BE MEASURED AND CORRECTED FOR WE HOPE THAT WITH CALIBRATION PROCEDURES DETECTOR SPECTROMETRIC DIFFERENCE CAN BE CONTROLLED DOWN TO 0.5%.

Ratio of positron spectra far/near L far = 1000 m, L near = 100 m, N far = 16·10 3 /year Values of sin 2 2  are shown at the curves  m 2 = 2.5  eV 2

Ratio of positron spectra far/near L far = 1000 m, L near = 100 m, N far = 15·10 3 /year Values of sin 2 2  are shown at the curves  m 2 = 3  eV 2

CONCLUSIONS & DISCUSSIONS 1) In the one reactor – two detector scheme systematic errors are minimized since NO ACCURATE KNOWLEDGE is needed of - Reactor power and its fuel composition, - Reactor e energy spectrum, its variation during the operational run - Hydrogen atom concentrations - Target volumes With ONE reactor backgrounds can periodically be measured. We conclude that Kr2Det can sensitively search for neutrino oscillations in the atmo- spheric mass region

2) Kr2Det uses available underground halls for the Far (1000m) and Near (115m) 50 ton detectors The oscillation signal could be some- what increased with the Far detector at ~ m or with two far detectors at ~ 1300 and 2600 m… This however would require digging new caverns and using detectors with larger target masses… *** The Kr2Det project is still in R&D phase All parameters of the experiment are open for discussions… Use of a good Gd scintillator would help to suppress accidentals from U/Th in the rock Effective collaborators are welcome to join.