TRAVEL TIME VARIABILITY AFTER A SHOCK: THE CASE OF THE TWIN CITIES RAMP METERING SHUT OFF David Levinson, Lei Zhang Department of Civil Engineering University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beltline Highway ITS – Ramp Metering Project ODOT Planners Meeting April 25, 2012.
Advertisements

A Synthetic Environment to Evaluate Alternative Trip Distribution Models Xin Ye Wen Cheng Xudong Jia Civil Engineering Department California State Polytechnic.
Data Collection Methods BluFax: vehicle identification using bluetooth MAC addresses – provides corridor traffic patterns (origin-destination data) and.
GDOT’s Metro Atlanta Ramp Meters
The traveler costs of unplanned transport network disruptions: An activity-based approach Erik Jenelius Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden Lars-Göran.
Matt’s Schedule. Headway Variation Estimated Load vs. Passenger Movement.
Abstract Travel time based performance measures are widely used for transportation systems and particularly freeways. However, it has become evident that.
I-80 Corridor System Management Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission ACTAC Meeting September 7, 2010.
Travel Time Reliability Measures Shawn Turner Texas Transportation Institute NTOC Web Cast: Travel Time Reliability June 28, 2006.
Effect of Electronically Enhanced Driver Behavior on Freeway Traffic Flow Alain L. Kornhauser Professor, Operations Research & Financial Engineering Director,
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.
February 9, 2006TransNow Student Conference Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages.
Gresham Traffic Signal System Optimization A Comprehensive Evaluation of Corridor Performance After Deploying Adaptive Signal Control.
1 Statistics of Freeway Traffic. 2 Overview The Freeway Performance Measurement System (PeMS) Computer Lab Visualization of Traffic Dynamics Visualization.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Potential ATMIS Strategies Using Microscopic Simulation Lianyu Chu, Henry X. Liu, Will Recker PATH ATMS UC.
1 Vehicular Sensor Networks for Traffic Monitoring In proceedings of 17th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN 2008)
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
Highway Hierarchies and the Efficient Provision of Road Services -David Levinson -Bhanu Yerra Levinson, David and Bhanu Yerra (2002) Highway Costs and.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
1 Segment Level Analysis of Travel Time Reliability Meead Saberi K., Portland State University I-5 SB, San Diego, CA.
15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Tuesday, May 19 th, 2015 – Atlantic City, NJ Integrating Travel Demand Models & SHRP2 C11 Tools:
Evaluating Robustness of Signal Timings for Conditions of Varying Traffic Flows 2013 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium – August 16, 2013.
Considerations when applying Paramics to Strategic Traffic Models Paramics User Group Meeting October 9 th, 2009 Presented Matthew.
University of Minnesota FUSING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TRUCK DATA TO SUPPORT REGIONAL FREIGHT PLANNING AND MODELING Chen-Fu Liao Minnesota Traffic Observatory.
1 Modeling Active Traffic Management for the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project Terry Klim, P.E. Kevin Fehon, P.E. DKS Associates D.
Multimodal Corridor System Management – Incorporating Analysis of Transit, Demand Management Programs and Operational Strategies Presented by Bill Loudon,
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n ANALYSIS OF BARRIERS TO THE UTILITY OF GENERAL AVIATION TROY D. DOWNENR.
Estimating Traffic Flow Rate on Freeways from Probe Vehicle Data and Fundamental Diagram Khairul Anuar (PhD Candidate) Dr. Filmon Habtemichael Dr. Mecit.
Travel Speed Study of Urban Streets Using GPS &GIS Tom E. Sellsted City of Yakima, Washington Information Systems and Traffic.
June 2006 ITE District 6 Annual Meeting June Evaluation of Single-Loop Detector Vehicle-Classification Algorithms using an Archived Data User.
Route 1 Project Study Report Overview. A report that describes the transportation problem and identifies the project scope, schedule and estimated cost.
NATMEC June 5, 2006 Comparative Analysis Of Various Travel Time Estimation Algorithms To Ground Truth Data Using Archived Data Christopher M. Monsere Research.
TRB Transportation Applications Conference Congestion-Free Freeways US Department of Transportation Establishing a Metropolitan.
November 15, 2005 Dr. Robert Bertini Dr. Sue Ahn Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System.
Bell Ringer: Solve the following problem: d=s X t s=30m/s t=2s Agenda: 1. Bell Ringer 2. What is Speed Lesson 3. Exit Slip.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
1 Evaluation of Adaptive Cruise Control in Mixed Traffic Session
Valuation of Travel Time Uncertainty & Delays Joel P. Franklin Assistant Professor, KTH – Transport and Location Analysis.
January 23, 2006Transportation Research Board 85 th Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems.
ITS Lab Members  1 st year M.S. Student in Civil Engineering  Areas of Interest  Traffic Flow Theory  Intelligent Transportation Systems  Possible.
April 18, 2006 Dr. Robert Bertini Dr. Sue Ahn Dr. Chris Monsere Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering.
A Moment of Time: Reliability in Route Choice using Stated Preference David M. Levinson Nebiyou Y. Tilahun Department of Civil Engineering University of.
Function Notation II. Lesson notes As we learned in using patterns, some relations or sets of ordered pairs can be represented by an equation. When the.
Comparative Analysis Of Various Travel Time Estimation Algorithms To Ground Truth Data Using Archived Data Christopher M. Monsere Research Assistant Professor.
ILLINOIS - RAILTEC Slide 1 © 2013 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. All Rights Reserved Crude Oil Pipeline Transportation Risk Analysis Safety.
National Transportation || || Presentation at 15 th TRB Planning Application.
Review of the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) 2007 Urban Mobility Report By Ronald F. Kirby Daivamani Sivasailam TPB Technical Committee October 5,
THE EL MONTE HOV / BUSWAY: A Policy Driven Experiment in Congestion Management Frank Quon Division of Operations Deputy District Director HOV LANES IN.
1 Using Archived ITS Data to Automatically Identify Freeway Bottlenecks in Portland, Oregon Robert L. Bertini, Rafael J. Fernández-Moctezuma, Jerzy Wieczorek,
Relationship between time, displacement, velocity, acceleration. Kinematic.
CCR = Connectivity Residue Ratio = Pr. [ node pair connected by an edge are together in a common page on computer disk drive.] “U of M Scientists were.
Severe statewide truck bottleneck: SR 501 westbound  Location: SR 501 westbound, west of I- 5, Vancouver, WA  Length: 0.15 mile  Daily Truck Volume:
September 15, 2011 Presented by: Clay Harris, PMP - City of Austin Federico Mendoza, PE, PTOE – Brown & Gay Engineers, Inc. Todd Lane Alternative Geometric.
(is it necessary?) By: Tim Torrini per. two Ramp meters are the “stop and go signals located at the entrance ramps of freeways to regulate the amount.
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
Safe roads, Reliable journeys, Informed travellers Highways Agency’s Journey Time Reliability Target With Thanks to Paresh Tailor Business Planning & Performance.
Performance Evaluation of Adaptive Ramp Metering Algorithms in PARAMICS Simulation Lianyu Chu, Henry X. Liu, Will Recker California PATH, UC Irvine H.
Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of a System-wide Adaptive Ramp Metering (SWARM) System Data Collection Plan / Experimental Design May.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
Slower vehicle speeds (under 30 mph) means less severe crashes 90% reduction in fatalities, 76% reduction in injury crashes 75% fewer vehicle conflict.
Transpo 2012 Yan Xiao, Mohammed Hadi, Maria Lucia Rojas Lehman Center for Transportation Research Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Florida.
1 Bottleneck Identification and Forecasting in Traveler Information Systems Robert L. Bertini, Rafael Fernández-Moctezuma, Huan Li, Jerzy Wieczorek, Portland.
I-35W/Highway 62 Crosstown Commons Reconstruction Nathan Aul, Bob Krussow, and Michael Martin.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7 Problem 2.
Weighting Waiting: Evaluating the Perception of In- Vehicle Travel Time Under Moving and Stopped Conditions David Levinson Kathleen Harder John Bloomfield.
Regression and Correlation
Objectives Average Rate of Change
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data
Presentation transcript:

TRAVEL TIME VARIABILITY AFTER A SHOCK: THE CASE OF THE TWIN CITIES RAMP METERING SHUT OFF David Levinson, Lei Zhang Department of Civil Engineering University of Minnesota Levinson, David and Lei Zhang (2001) Travel Time Variability After A Shock: The Case Of The Twin Cities Ramp Meter Shut Off,Travel Time Variability After A Shock: The Case Of The Twin Cities Ramp Meter Shut Off The Network Reliability of TransportThe Network Reliability of Transport (2003) Pergamon (editors Yasunori Iida and Michael Bell) (Presented at First International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability, Kyoto, Japan July 30- August ).

1. Introduction  Ramp Meter Shut Off Experiment TwinCities Oct. to Dec., 2000  Travel Time Variability  Studied Freeway Locations

2. Measuring Travel Times 2.1 Overview Trip Travel Time = Freeway Mainline Travel Time, metering-off Ramp Delay + Freeway Mainline Travel Time, metering-on Freeway Segment 1 Freeway Segment 2 Freeway Segment 3 Ramp 1 Ramp 2 Ramp 3 OD Trip 1 OD Trip 2 OD Trip 3

2.2 Methodology  Ramp Delay Calculation: Queuing Diagram  Freeway Segments q-k-v Relationship Detector Field Length  OD Trips Synchronize Ramp Delay and Freeway Travel Time to Find Trip Travel Time

Notations t:index of time of day (5 minute intervals) n:index of days s:ramp status, off = without, on = with ramp meter control  :travel time std():compute standard deviation ave():compute average V:inter-day travel time variation v:intra-day travel time variation D:difference of inter-day travel time variations (off - on) v:average of intra-day travel time variation

3. Travel Time Variations  Inter-day Travel Time Variation  Intra-day Travel Time Variation

3. Travel Time Variations (cont’d)  Comparing Travel Time Variations: Metering-On vs. Metering Off Inter-day: For Each OD Pair, There is a Vector of D t for Different t’s. Range-Median Graph Intra-day:

4. Results 4.1 Inter-day Travel Time Variation  V off - V on > 0, statistically significant at level 0.01 for 103/124 OD Pairs: 26/45 for OD Pairs 3 miles  Long Trips vs. Short Trips (<=3 miles)  Range-Median Graph for Each Freeway 4.2 Intra-day Travel Time Variation  v off > v on  Long Trips vs. Short Trips

Inter-day Travel Time Variation: I494 Eastbound and Southbound

Inter-day Travel Time Variation: I494 Westbound and Northbound

Inter-day Travel Time Variation: TH169 Northbound

Inter-day Travel Time Variation: TH62 Westbound

Intra-day Travel Time Variation: I494 Eastbound and Southbound

Intra-day Travel Time Variation: I494 Westbound and Northbound

Intra-day Travel Time Variation: TH169 Northbound

Intra-day Travel Time Variation: TH62 Westbound

4. Results (cont’d) 4.3 Benefit Estimation for the Reduction on Inter-day Travel Time Variation (on average, 1.82 minutes per trip)  Small et al. (1999): $0.21 per minute of travel time standard deviation  Monetized benefits of improved travel time reliability: $0.38 per trip 900,000 trips per PM peak in the Twin Cities 10 million dollars per year, savings during PM peak only 4.4 A Simple Approach to Incorporate this Travel Time Reliability Improvement into Ramp Meter B/C Analysis Apply a markup factor of 1.35 to value of time

5. Conclusion  Ramp Metering Improves Travel Time Reliability  Further Research on Monetizing the Value of Travel Time Reliability Contact Information David Levinson Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota 500 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN Tel(O):