Economic Significance of the Border: A Perspective at the Regional and National Levels for both Passenger and Freight Movements Bruno Penet HDR | Decision.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Multimodal Goods Movement Strategy for Ontario Canada-United States Transportation Border Working Group Fall Plenary November 7 – 8, 2012 James Perttula.
Advertisements

Balance of Payments Adjustment Policies
Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study -- Benefit Assessment Presented by: Jack Lettiere, Commissioner New Jersey Department of Transportation Presented to:
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Presentation to the Transportation Border Working Group Montreal Plenary Meeting – October 25, 2007 Presentation by Marc Fortin Director, Seaway and Domestic.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Economic and scientific impacts of the externalities of the wine industry: Tony Battaglene.
Canada-U.S. Trade/Traffic Statistics Transport Canada Economic Analysis October 27, 2010.
Passenger Rail Discussion Group April 17, 2012 Seattle, Washington Cross Border Passenger Rail: A Canadian Perspective.
© 2009 Rochester Institute of Technology Geospatial Intermodal Freight Transportation (GIFT)
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
The BGA Apollo Clean Transportation Manufacturing Action Plan  Modern Transit  High Speed Rail  Clean Freight Movement  Make it in America!
LECTURE. FORMATION OF PRICE FOR THE COMPANIES PRODUCT Plan lectures 1. Price and types of prices 2. Classification prices 3. Pricing policy of the enterprise.
Trade, Transportation and Energy: Canada-US relations Colin Robertson NASCO Webinar July 16, 2016.
The Importance of Economic Census Data for Federal Policy Katharine G. Abraham Member, Council of Economic Advisers Hi-Beams for the Economic Road Ahead.
... ONE OF AMERICA’S LARGEST SERVICE EXPORTS!  $93.3 billion* spent by international visitors in the U.S. and the…  $89.3 billion ** spent outside.
U.S. Railroad Industry Federal Railroad Administration U.S. Railroad Industry Federal Railroad Administration.
Ch 6: Macroeconomic Measurements, Part II GDP and Real GDP
Overview of the Freight Analysis Framework Rolf R. Schmitt January, 2008.
Canada Auto industry Part 2. Historical Maps
Caribbean & the Economy.  Definition  an area characterized by a distinct system of production, trade, movement and consumption of goods and services.
Economic Contributions of Florida Agriculture, Natural Resources, Food & Kindred Product Manufacturing, Distribution and Service Industries: 2008 Update.
Chapter 5 - Summary for Spring, 2015
Study conducted for the Coalition of Alabama Waterway Associations by Troy University Center for International Business and Economic Development.
PRESENTED TO: TO BE DETERMINED PRESENTED ON: TO BE DETERMINED THE POWER OF TOURISM IN WISCONSIN PRESENTED TO: ________ PRESENTED ON: MONTH _ _, 20_ _.
REGIONAL FREIGHT PERSPECTIVES: QUESTIONS ABOUT THE FUTURE OF VOLUMES Bill Anderson Ontario Research Chair in Cross-Border Transportation.
Overview of Project Main objective of study is to assess the impact of delay at border crossings and resulting changes in user benefits and broad macroeconomic.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
THE BORDER AND THE ONTARIO ECONOMY Bill Anderson Ontario Research Chair in Cross-Border Transportation Policy, University of Windsor.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Chapter 6: Chapter 6: Data Sources for Compiling SUT Ramesh KOLLI Senior Advisor.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Week 8 Introduction to macroeconomics.
___________________________ Principles, Practices, Philosophies TOURISM TWELFTH EDITION Charles R. Goeldner J. R. Brent Ritchie © 2012 John Wiley and Sons,
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
July 2012 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Clark County, Ohio.
Encouraging Transportation Investment Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce Percolator Breakfast May 2, 2013 Horizons Conference Center Rich Studley, President.
U.S./Canada Transportation Border Working group April 9, 2014 Roger Petzold Office of Planning Federal Highway Administration.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
San Diego Regional Economic Prosperity Strategy Transportation: Helping Address the Three E’s.
5 th Bi-Annual Border to Border Conference Performance Measures at Commercial Ports of Entry Juan Carlos Villa.
Tutorial 5 Multiplier effects and positive impacts.
Input Demand: The Capital Market and the Investment Decision
Estimating Economic Impacts of Border Wait Times in the San Diego-Baja California Region February 24, 2006.
RECAP LAST CLASS. ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT FOR BUSINESS Maximisation of Shareholders wealth ID FD DD NEW PROJECTS RAISING CAPITAL PAY OR INVEST ACQUISITION.
TYBEE ISLAND TOURISM STUDY, OUTLINE 1.Introduction 2.Survey of Tybee Island Visitors 3.Visitor Expenditure Patterns 4.Estimated Annual Visitation.
Greening Freight & Transportation Corridors Commission for Environmental Cooperation Mapping the road to a sustainable future.
Canada’s Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative 2006.
The Border, Canada-US Trade and the Post-9/11 Security Regime with implications for Immigration and Diversity.
The Canadian Approach To Compiling Emission Projections Marc Deslauriers Environment Canada Pollution Data Division Science and Technology Branch Projections.
The Australian Approach to the Production Based Measurement of GDP Ian Ewing Deputy Australian Statistician Macroeconomics and Integration Group June.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Canada/U.S. Transportation Border Working Group presented by Stephen Fitzroy & Brian Alstadt, Economic.
Chapter 5 Fall, 2015 National Income Accounting. Now we study the branch of macroeconomics that examines aggregate performance of all markets in the market.
KEP LLC Economic and Management Consulting PRESENTED TO: Usaee/iaee north American conference Pittsburgh, pa Rail capacity for transportation of energy.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues for aviation, highways and transit Uncertain.
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. Livingston Washtenaw Monroe Oakland Wayne Macomb St. Clair SEMCOG Region.
IGCSE®/O Level Economics
3.01 Discuss the economic impact of tourism.
Caribbean & the Economy.  Definition  an area characterized by a distinct system of production, trade, movement and consumption of goods and services.
Making the Job-Infrastructure Connection CALCOG Region Issues Forum Darin Chidsey.
1 IRU 30th WORLD CONGRESS Logistic Service Insures the Ever Lasting Economic Development Duanwei Fan Vice President SINOTRANS Group MARCH 15,2005.
I’ve Been Working on the Railroad... Marketing Opportunities.
SmartWay & Sustainability Erik Herzog US Environmental Protection Agency 4 th Annual Government Transportation Forum April 24, 2014 SmartWay & Sustainability.
Unit 2 Glossary. Macroeconomics The study of issues that effect economies as a whole.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Expert Group Meeting: to review “Handbook on Supply and Use Table, Compilation,Application,and.
October 22, 2013 Ontario Ministry of Transportation Transportation Planning Branch Systems Analysis and Forecasting Office Rob Tardif Ontario Update on.
Rice University – Baker Institute
Economic Development Research Group, Inc.
Freight Analysis of the Chesapeake Megaregion
The External Marketing Environment
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
The Economic Impact of the Conceptual Plan for the Redevelopment of the Green Bay Correctional Institution Site Commissioned by the Village of Allouez.
Presentation transcript:

Economic Significance of the Border: A Perspective at the Regional and National Levels for both Passenger and Freight Movements Bruno Penet HDR | Decision Economics Canada - United States Transportation Border Working Group (TBWG) Meeting

2  Recognizing the economic significance of the northern border  Understanding the changes in freight movements caused by border delays and their economic impacts at the regional and national levels  Understanding the changes in passenger crossings caused by border delays and their impacts on the cross-border economy Discussion Points

3 Source: North American Transborder Freight Data, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration Top Trading Partners of the U.S. Year MeasureCanadaChinaGermanyJapanMexicoWorld 1993 Imports ($ Billions)$111,216.4$31,539.9$28,562.1$107,246.4$39,917.4$580,659.4 Exports ($ Billions)$100,443.7$8,762.8$18,932.2$47,891.5$41,581.1$465,091.0 Total Trade ($ Billions)$211,660.1$40,302.8$47,494.3$155,137.9$81,498.5$1,045,750.3 % of World Total20.2%3.9%4.5%14.8%7.8%100.0% Rank Imports ($ Billions)$230,838.3$100,018.4$58,512.8$146,479.4$135,926.4$1,218,022.0 Exports ($ Billions)$178,941.0$16,185.3$29,448.4$64,924.4$111,349.0$781,917.7 Total Trade ($ Billions)$409,779.4$116,203.7$87,961.2$211,403.8$247,275.4$1,999,939.7 % of World Total20.5%5.8%4.4%10.6%12.4%100.0% Rank Annual Growth Rate9.90%16.30%9.20%4.50%17.20%9.70% 2010 Imports ($ Billions)$276,477.8$364,943.8$82,679.7$120,347.8$229,654.6$1,912,091.6 Exports ($ Billions)$248,194.1$91,878.3$48,201.2$60,545.5$163,320.8$1,277,503.9 Total Trade ($ Billions)$524,671.8$456,822.1$130,880.9$180,893.3$392,975.4$3,189,595.6 % of World Total16.4%14.3%4.1%5.7%12.3%100.0% Rank Annual Growth Rate2.5%14.7%4.1%-1.5%4.7%4.8%

4 U.S.-Canada Trade by Transportation Mode (2010) Source: North American Transborder Freight Data, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration

5 U.S.-Canada Trade by Truck, by Commodity Group (2010) Source: North American Transborder Freight Data, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration

6 U.S. Exports to Canada by Truck, for Selected POEs Source: North American Transborder Freight Data, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration

7 U.S. Imports from Canada by Truck, for Selected POEs Source: North American Transborder Freight Data, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration

8 Incoming Trucks for Selected POEs Source: Border Crossing/Entry Data, U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration

9 Wait Times at the Canada-U.S. Border Source: Border Wait Time Measurement Project, Transport Canada, 2006

10 HDR Study: Key Steps  Comprehensive review of existing studies  Assessment of existing traffic and trade data  Interview of border’s stakeholders such as metropolitan planning agencies, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, trucking industry and major industries in the region  Estimated incremental impacts on both sides of the border  Risk analysis framework  Continuous involvement of panel of experts and stakeholders

11 Economic Analysis Framework

12 Speed and Travel Cost per Mile for Trucks and Passenger Cars

Annual Economic Impact Year Impact Metric Direct Impact Indirect Impact Induced Impact Total Impact 2020 Output ($649) ($185) ($135) ($970) Earnings ($236) ($93) ($84) ($413) 2030 Output($3,317) ($911) ($696)($4,924) Earnings ($1,229) ($463) ($431) ($2,123) Cumulative Employment Impact Year Direct Impact Indirect Impact Induced Impact Total Impact ,292-1,415-1,698-6, ,148-7,104-8,725-33,977 Annual Tax Impact Year Employee Compensation Proprietary Income Household Expenditure Enterprises (Corporations) Indirect Business Taxes Total Tax Impact 2020 ($29) ($1) ($38) ($13) ($23) ($104) 2030 ($149) ($4) ($197) ($65) ($121)($536) 13 Impact on Michigan (Freight)

Annual Economic Impact Year Impact Metric Direct Impact Indirect Impact Induced Impact Total Impact 2020 Output ($828) ($720) ($672) ($2,219) Earnings ($307) ($351) ($401) ($1,058) 2030 Output ($4,288) ($3,644) ($3,504) ($11,436) Earnings ($1,626) ($1,790) ($2,089) ($5,504) Year Direct Impact Indirect Impact Induced Impact Total Impact ,166-5,149-7,029-17, ,096-26,456-36,642-91,194 Year Employee Compensation Proprietary Income Household Expenditure Enterprises (Corporations) Indirect Business Taxes Total Tax Impact 2020($71)($4)($96)($28)($73)($272) 2030($369)($19)($500)($146)($381)($1,415) 14 Impact on the United States (Freight) Cumulative Employment Impact Annual Tax Impact

OUTPUT (ANNUAL) Final Domestic Expenditure ($883) ($4,461) Indirect Taxes on Final Demand ($17) ($91) Direct Foreign Imports $501 $2,434 Indirect Foreign Imports $109 $530 Inventories and Other Leakages $8 $41 Inter-provincial Imports $68 $396 Inter-provincial Exports ($6) ($33) Total ($220) ($1,184) EMPLOYMENT (CUMULATIVE) Direct-2,429-13,634 Indirect-1,190-6,454 Total-3,619-20, Impact on Ontario (Freight)

OUTPUT (ANNUAL) Final Domestic Expenditure ($1,293) ($6,576) Indirect Taxes on Final Demand ($25) ($134) Direct Foreign Imports $733 $3,589 Indirect Foreign Imports $183 $912 Inventories and Other Leakages $16 $82 Inter-provincial Imports $115 $671 Inter-provincial Exports ($115) ($671) Total ($387) ($2,127) EMPLOYMENT (CUMULATIVE) Direct-3,870-22,013 Indirect-2,336-12,913 Total-6,206-34, Impact on Canada (Freight)

17 Freight Stakeholders’ Inputs  Trade, truck volumes & congestion have grown significantly over the years  Physical infrastructure constraints at various POEs  For some industries, modern rail is key to lower transportation costs  Delays mean higher logistics costs and therefore lost economic opportunities  There is willingness to pay (toll road) if there is a significant travel time saving  Extremely sensitive supply chain  No inventories  Parts go back and forth across the border several times  Companies must build buffers in production cycles due to transportation delays

1.Obtained crossing projections for passenger cars (in both directions) 2.Estimated the annual percentage change in travel costs (travel time and vehicle operating costs) associated with increased congestion 3.Applied demand elasticity coefficients to the estimated changes in travel costs and derive the potential annual loss of crossings, by trip purpose, due to increased congestion 4.Estimated the expected loss of revenue (spending from vacationers, shoppers and other travelers) associated with the foregone trips 5.Adjusted for changes in local demand (e.g., vacation money spent in Canada instead of the U.S., and vice versa) 6.Derived the net direct impacts of foregone spending on national and regional output, earnings and employment 18 Economic Impact Estimation Process for Personal Trips

19 Lost Cross-Border Trips, Personal Trips

YearImpactLost TripsDirectIndirectInducedTotal 2020 Output Recreation & Shopping$37.3$19.2$36.6$93.1 Vacation$25.1$14.4$24.2$63.7 Total$62.4$33.5$60.9$156.8 Earnings Recreation & Shopping$25.0$11.2$21.8$58.0 Vacation$15.7$8.7$14.4$38.8 Total$40.6$19.9$36.3$96.8 Employment Recreation & Shopping ,441 Vacation Total1, , Output Recreation & Shopping$194.5$99.8$190.8$485.1 Vacation$130.7$74.9$126.2$331.7 Total$325.2$174.6$317.0$816.8 Earnings Recreation & Shopping$130.0$58.4$113.7$302.2 Vacation$81.7$45.1$75.2$202.0 Total$211.7$103.5$188.9$504.1 Employment Recreation & Shopping4,4761,0361,9957,507 Vacation2, ,3194,354 Total6,7681,7793,31511,861 Impact on the United States (Personal Trips) 20

YearImpactLost TripsDirectIndirectTotal 2020 Output Recreation & Shopping($103.0)($50.2)($153.2) Vacation($196.8)($107.1)($303.8) Total($299.8)($157.3)($457.1) Earnings Recreation & Shopping($68.8)($27.9)($96.7) Vacation($123.0)($61.1)($184.0) Total($191.8)($88.9)($280.7) Employment Recreation & Shopping-2, ,627 Vacation-3,105-1,006-4,111 Total-5,239-1,500-6, Output Recreation & Shopping($536.7)($261.4)($798.1) Vacation($1,024.9)($557.7)($1,582.6) Total($1,561.6)($819.1)($2,380.8) Earnings Recreation & Shopping($358.6)($145.1)($503.7) Vacation($640.5)($318.2)($958.6) Total($999.1)($463.3)($1,462.3) Employment Recreation & Shopping-11,113-2,573-13,686 Vacation-16,174-5,240-21,414 Total-27,287-7,813-35,100 Impact on Canada (Personal Trips) 21

Year Impact on the State of Michigan and the Province of Ontario (Values are in millions of 2000 Dollars) Impact on the United States and Canada (Values are in millions of 2000 Dollars) US$CAN$US$CAN$ 2020($1,234)($1,898)($2,611)($4,017) 2030($6,323)($9,728)($13,549)($20,845) Year Impact on the State of Michigan and the Province of Ontario (Jobs) Impact on the United States and Canada (Jobs) ,355-28, , ,359 Annual Foregone Production Cumulative Foregone Employment Combined Economic Impacts (Personal Trips) 22

23 Concluding Remarks  Trade is a key contributor to regional and national economic growth  Border delays impact the competitiveness of both the region and the nation as a whole  Border delays are responsible for significant economic losses on both sides of the border  Economic assessment should take into consideration both sides of the border as the supply chain tend to be well integrated across the border  Economic assessment must be conducted with the involvement of various stakeholders to scrutinize assumptions and account for uncertainty  Economic assessment allows policy makers to assess the implications of policies, infrastructure, and technology on the regional and national economy