Mediation in the cases of juvenile offenders in Croatia Antonija Žižak, PhD University of Zagreb Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences “European.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ARREST.
Advertisements

Children in Prison From Convention to National Legislation: Legal Implementation of International Standards Bragi Guðbrandsson Government Agency for Child.
PROTECTION OF VICTIMS’ RIGHTS Maja Munivrana Vajda Sunčana Roksandić Vidlička Aleksandar Maršavelski.
1 EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT /UNICEF SEMINAR ON JUSTICE FOR CHILDREN for Judiciary, Magistracy, Police and Social Workers in the Eastern Caribbean.
AREA OF STUDY 2 The criminal law PART 2. In this part you will learn about: the principles of criminal liability, crimes and defences the criminal investigation.
Sentencing A declaration, or decision, by a Court of Law to punish a convicted criminal.
PROBATION SERVICE IN REPUBLIC OF CROATIA FIRST CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY SANCTIONS IN CENTRAL AND EAST EUROPEAN COUNTRIES Chisinau, Moldova 4th-6th June.
Victim-offender mediation (VOM) in case of adult offenders in Hungary
Probation in Albania. Probation Service was established in 2009 Key legal changes in 2008 EU Twinning working with English Probation 10,000 cases in past.
 Why would the Canadian Justice system have a separate system just for youth?  What age should “youth” be considered?  Is a separate system beneficial?
Magistrates Court Specialist Division. Various Specialised Courts Drug Court The Drug Court division is concerned with sentencing and supervising people.
Misspent Youth - Opportunities for Juvenile Justice Address by The Hon Wayne Martin Chief Justice of Western Australia JOHN CURTIN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Alternative dispute resolution is the term used for a number of dispute resolution processes that are an alternative.
Developments of Probation and Mediation Service The Czech Republic.
YCJA THE YOUTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. JOHN HOWARD SOCIETY ROLE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Provides public education about the law, especially the.
Elfina L.Sahetapy Faculty of Law University of Surabaya Asia Pacific Council Juvenile Justice Second Meeting Phuket, 6 May 2015.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
YCJA - Senior High Handout
Regimantas Mikaliūnas The mission is a systematic supervision of the Probation Service and the control of penitentiary institutions.
Youth and Crime: Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA – 2003) Law 12 MUNDY 2009.
Youth Justice vs. Adult Justice
Kelvin Doherty Assistant Director Youth Justice Agency Children England Annual Conference 27/2/2013.
Youth Justice Convention 24 November 2010 Kelvin Doherty Assistant Director Youth Justice Agency.
Restorative Practices before Accusation Diversion for Promoting Compensation for Victims in Austria Karin Bruckmüller University of Vienna Best practices.
Restorative Justice and mediation in Europe Ivo Aertsen K.U.Leuven European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice Angers, May 6,
Criminal and Juvenile Justice
Community Sanctions in Croatia Neven Ricijaš, Ph.D. Department of Behavior Disorders Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Science University of Zagreb.
Deviance and Social Control Social Control The methods by which social groups try to ensure conformity. Prisons Laws Folkways mores Norms.
Chapter 4 Sentencing and punishment. In this chapter, you will look at the purposes and process of sentencing and the different factors affecting a sentencing.
Juvenile Delinquency in Latvia Dr. Andrejs Judins, senior researcher of the Centre for Public Policy Providus
Restorative Justice Programs Alternatives to Traditional Sentences.
AS Level Law Machinery of Justice Sentencing. AS Level Law What you need to know and discuss: the need for a criminal justice system the main aims of.
Collective efficacy and restorative justice as a crime prevention strategy Frederick P. Roth, PhD. Department of Sociology and Anthropology Marshall University.
Crime and Prison Grade 12 Sociology. How deviant are you? 20 questions 20 questions Answer each one with: Answer each one with: 1= very often 1= very.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Judiciary Statistics Part 1 Crime, Justice & Security Statistics Produced in Collaboration between.
SENTENCE:  punishment imposed on a person convicted of committing a crime.
YOUTH JUSTICE.
Canada’s Penal System. Review of the Criminal Justice System The Police: maintains public order by enforcing law Judicial System: court system that determines.
What is a crime? Criminal law 1. What are we going to learn about? In this part you will learn about: the principles of criminal liability, crimes and.
Viola Läänerand & Taavi Kruus
Restorative Justice in probation: Mediation and new promising practices in Latvia Diana Ziedina Head of Mediation Division of State Probation Service Republic.
Corrections Chapter Twelve Reading
 News article. OzP0QqsRg&feature=related.
 Applies to all young people who are years old  Law says your are an adult at 18, so at 18 the YCJA does not apply  Young people must be accountable.
Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions 1.  Intermediate sanctions emerged in the 1980s due to three factors: The belief that prisons were being overused Prison.
YCJA High School. Youth Criminal Justice Act Applies to all youth in Canada from the ages of 12 to 17.
 Sentence - punishment imposed on a person convicted of committing a crime.  The goal or purpose of a sentence ◦ Protection of public ◦ Retribution.
Juvenile Justice System.  Organized structurally on a state and local level  Private and individual agencies  58 county probation offices in 62 different.
Crime Any act that is labeled as such by those in authority, is prohibited by law, and is punishable by the gov’t.
Grade 11 Canadian Law Youth Criminal Justice Act.
7.5 Crime and Punishment Crime: acts committed in violation of the law. How are crime statistics collected? The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports (UCR). Statistics.
Criminal Law Sentencing Youth Justice May Sentencing The Goal of sentencing is Deterrence Rehabilitation Retribution Segregation Taking into account.
Trial Procedures.  Trials may be held in either a family court or a youth justice court  Trial follow the same rules of evidence and are equally formal.
Aim: How does the Juvenile Justice System operate in the United States.
JUVENILE JUSTICE In Minnesota. History of Juvenile Law  Originally, juvenile offenders were treated the same as adult criminals  Beginning in 1899,
Cje Karolina Kremens, LL.M., Ph.D. Wojciech Jasiński, Ph.D. Department of Criminal Procedure Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics University of.
Professor Kirsten Sandberg, Committee Member Juvenile justice and children’s rights: The position of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child.
The Youth Justice System. Youth Justice System For centuries, youths were treated the same as adults under the law. For centuries, youths were treated.
Follow-up of the MATRA project: Alternative sanctions and educational measures Frans Grobbe Zagreb, december
AJS101 (40384) Monday, October 3, 2016 Time Keeper.
7Y Thursday MN Juvenile Justice System
The Juvenile Justice and Restorative Approaches in Finland
Youth Offending Services
CHAPTER 7 SECTION 3 CRIME.
11.1 – SENTENCING LAW 12.
Victim-offender mediation (VOM) in case of adult offenders in Hungary
Warm Up (use 5.1) 1. What is deviance?
It’s not a solution. 30% of adult prisoners were juvenile prisoners.
Alternative Dispute Resolutions in the Juvenile Justice System
Presentation transcript:

Mediation in the cases of juvenile offenders in Croatia Antonija Žižak, PhD University of Zagreb Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences “European best practices of restorative justice in the criminal procesdure” Budapest, April 2009.

Changed perspective Global level Restorative justice trends in Europe Child rights movement Law and treatment trends in neighbouring counties Croatian level Transition, war and post-war society problems and needs Failures to reduce juvenile crime Need for new law – Juvenile Courts Act

Development of VOM in Croatia Year Project “Alternative Interventions for Juvenile Offenders” Year Out-of-court settlement (VOM) services in Zagreb, Osijek and Split

Preliminary pre-trial procedure Article 64 JCA The public prosecutor may make his or her decision not to institute criminal proceedings conditional on the minor’ willingness to fulfil one of four special obligations.

Special obligations 1.To repair or make compensation for the damage done by the offence, according to his or her own abilities. 2. To get involved in the work of humanitarian organisations or in the activities of having relevance for the community or for the environment. 3.To undergo, with prior consent of his or her legal representative, a professional medical treatment or treatment for drug addiction or other addictions. 4. To get involved in individual or group work in youth counselling services

Criterions for applying article 64 JCA Reasonable doubt that the minor concerned committed the offence Offence punishable by a prison sentence of up to five years or by a fine Insignificant offences are excluded Offender has to consent his/her free will to participate in VOM process Victim has to consent his/her free will to participate in VOM process The first time offenders are priority Recidivists are not excluded Prosecutor is the only person who could make decision on applying obligations prescribed by article 64, as well as decide if they had been successful

VOM PROCEDURE MODEL CRIME POLICE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE (PO) RELEASE VOM COURT MEDIATORS’ AGENCY SUCCESSFUL UNSECCESSFUL POSITIVE REPORT TO PO NEGATIV REPORT TO PO DECISION NOT TO INSTITUTE DECISION TO INSTITUTE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

Criterions for successful VOM: Offender assume the responsibility Victim and offender informed consent to participate in mediation process Achieved and signed agreement Fulfilment of the agreement Satisfaction of both parties Positive report to the Prosecutors’ office Decision not to institute criminal proceedings Absence of recidivism

Statistics for Zagreb VOM Autumn 2001 – Autumn cases Mail juveniles (only 16 female) Victims - mainly private persons (in 29 cases companies) VOM successfulness - from 56% (2003) to 84% (2007) Reasons for unsuccessful VOM: Offender do not assume responsibility; do not want to participate; do not want or can’t make financial compensation Victim do not want to participate; demands to high financial compensation Most present outcomes: - 68% - apology to the victim and financial compensation - 28% - apology

Some results of the evaluation of Zagreb VOM (Kovačić, 2006) N = 175 finished cases (from ) VOM procedure in 80% cases was lasting up to 3 month For 86% cases PO made decision not to institute criminal proceedings Recidivism rate was 9.7% - 17 offenders committed offence again (mostly possession of drugs)

Most present offences: 35% - Burglary 24% - Aggravated assault 19% - Theft 7% - Property violation 15%- Other (violent behaviour…)

Characteristics Offenders: 95% mail offenders 60% minors (14 to 18 years) 40% young adults (18 to 21) 61% offences committed by one offender 93% offenders were not registrated at the local centre for social work Victims: 94% - private persons Predominantly mail Age - 21 year and older

Most present VOM outcomes: 58% - apology to the victim and financial compensation 26% - apology 16% - other (just financial compensation, humanitarian work, returning stolen things, joining treatment for drug addicts, symbolic present...)

Satisfaction with VOM – both parties Offenders: 94% -satisfied Victims: 95% - satisfied

Plans Mediators - education and licensing Development of new VOM services all over Croatia Development of model of VOM for adult offenders Development of Croatian VOM network and joining European VOM network