Fisheries Models: Methods, Data Requirements, Environmental Linkages Richard Methot NOAA Fisheries Science & Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differential Impacts of Climate Change on Spawning Populations of Atlantic cod in U.S. Waters Lisa Kerr, Steve Cadrin (UMass School for Marine Science.
Advertisements

The Magnitude and Impact of By-catch Mortality by Fishing Gear Robin Cook FRS Marine Laboratory Aberdeen UK.
Population dynamics Zoo 511 Ecology of Fishes.
Issues in fisheries sustainability
Are the apparent rapid declines in top pelagic predators real? Mark Maunder, Shelton Harley, Mike Hinton, and others IATTC.
Hawaiian Fisheries Bycatch Presentation by Mr. Jeremy Wilson, NOAA-NMFS, 2 October, 2007 Material not yet published does not represent the formal policies.
Black Sea Bass – Northern Stock Coastal-Pelagic/ASMFC Working Group Review June 15, 2010.
The current status of fisheries stock assessment Mark Maunder Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) Center for the Advancement of Population.
Searching for a good stocking policy for Lake Michigan salmonines Michael L. Jones and Iyob Tsehaye Quantitative Fisheries Center, Fisheries and Wildlife.
GS1 Multispecies models Issues and state of art in modelling Issues in interpretation and implementation Gunnar Stefansson Marine Research Institute/Univ.
Using CWT’s to assess survival, ocean distribution and maturation for Chinook stocks across the Pacific Northwest: Are there any predictive capabilities.
Fishery Pacific Model Wakeland, Cangur, Rueda & Scholz International System Dynamics Conference (ISDC) Wayne Wakeland 1, Olgay Cangur 1, Guillermo.
Are pelagic fisheries managed well? A stock assessment scientists perspective Mark Maunder and Shelton Harley Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
Using Climate Information in Fisheries Stock Assessments (with a focus on Pacific Whiting) Ian Taylor SMA 550: Climate Impacts on the Pacific Northwest.
Technical University of Denmark Danish Institute for Fisheries Research Danish marine stocking experiments applying the Responsible Approach.
Descriptor 3 for determining Good Environmental Status (GES) under the MSFD was defined as “Populations of all commercially exploited fish and shellfish.
Fishery Management Fishing is extractive – Removes choices organisms- “ fine-ing ” – Changes food web structure The human condition provides little incentive.
Gary D. Marty 1, Peter-John F. Hulson 2, Sara E. Miller 2, Terrance J. Quinn II 2, Steve D. Moffitt 3, Richard A. Merizon 3 1 School of Veterinary Medicine,
Stock assessment, fishery management systems, and the FMSP Tools -- Summary -- FMSP Stock Assessment Tools Training Workshop Bangladesh 19th - 25th September.
Richard Methot NOAA Fisheries Service Seattle, WA
WP4: Models to predict & test recovery strategies Cefas: Laurence Kell & John Pinnegar Univ. Aberdeen: Tara Marshall & Bruce McAdam.
Utilizing Ecosystem Information to Improve Decision Support for Central California Salmon Project Acronym: Salmon Applied Forecasting, Assessment and Research.
Population Dynamics Mortality, Growth, and More. Fish Growth Growth of fish is indeterminate Affected by: –Food abundance –Weather –Competition –Other.
Pacific Hake Management Strategy Evaluation Joint Technical Committee Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Pacific Biological Station, DFO School of.
Spatial Fisheries Values in the Gulf of Alaska Matthew Berman Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage Ed Gregr Ryan Coatta.
History of Marine Animal Populations. HMAP Executive Committee Chair: Poul Holm Trinity Long Room Hub, Trinity College Dublin Andrew A. Rosenberg Institute.
Surplus-Production Models
ASSESSMENT OF BIGEYE TUNA (THUNNUS OBESUS) IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN January 1975 – December 2006.
Lecture 8: Introduction to Stock Assessment
Pacific Hake Management Strategy Evaluation Joint Technical Committee Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Pacific Biological Station, DFO School of.
A REVIEW OF BIOLOGICAL REFERENCE POINTS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE CHILEAN JACK MACKEREL Aquiles Sepúlveda Instituto de Investigación Pesquera, Av. Colón 2780,
UNIT 8: Fisheries assessments. 2 Fisheries data Why do we need fisheries data? FAO (2005): “Information is critical to EAF. It underpins the formulation.
A retrospective investigation of selectivity for Pacific halibut CAPAM Selectivity workshop 14 March, 2013 Ian Stewart & Steve Martell.
Revisiting the SSC Decision to Use all Available Data to Calculate Average Landings/OFLs/ABCs Southeast Fisheries Science Center.
Links to Policy Activities Marine Fisheries Protection of other species / biodiversity Coastal zone management Emissions / CO 2 Policies.
. Assessment of the Icelandic cod stock Björn Ævarr Steinarsson Marine Research Institute.
ALADYM (Age-Length Based Dynamic Model): a stochastic simulation tool to predict population dynamics and management scenarios using fishery-independent.
Harvesting and viability
Economic impacts of changes in fish population dynamics: the role of the fishermen’s behavior Dipl.-Geogr. Peter Michael Link, BA Research Unit Sustainability.
Summary of Atlantic Swordfish Species Working Group Discussion (see also SCI -021)
Kevin T. Hill Fisheries Resources Division Southwest Fisheries Science Center.
GIANNOULAKI M., SOMARAKIS S., MACHIAS A., SIAPATIS A., PAPACONSTANTINOU C. Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, PO Box 2214, Iraklion 71003, Greece Department.
The management of small pelagics. Comprise the 1/3 of the total world landings Comprise more than 50% of the total Mediterranean landings, while Two species,
Mrs Nafisat Bolatito IKENWEIWE (PhD) DEPARTMENT OF AQUACULTURE AND FISHERIES MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA FISH STOCK ASSESSMENT
Fisheries 101: Modeling and assessments to achieve sustainability Training Module July 2013.
Stock Assessment Methodologies for Reef Systems: A Joint Analyses
Steve Gaines Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Sustainable Fisheries Group UC Santa Barbara12 May 2011.
POPULATION DYNAMICS Zoo 511 Ecology of Fishes 2009.
Interannual Time Scales: ENSO Decadal Time Scales: Basin Wide Variability (e.g. Pacific Decadal Oscillation, North Atlantic Oscillation) Longer Time Scales:
Extending length-based models for data-limited fisheries into a state-space framework Merrill B. Rudd* and James T. Thorson *PhD Student, School of Aquatic.
ASSESSMENT OF BIGEYE TUNA (THUNNUS OBESUS) IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN January 1975 – December 2005.
1 Federal Research Centre for Fisheries Institute for Sea Fisheries, Hamburg Hans-Joachim Rätz Josep Lloret Institut de Ciències del Mar, Barcelona Long-term.
1 Assessing Vulnerability of Living Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Roger Griffis Climate Change Coordinator, NOAA Fisheries Service.
Management of the brown crab (Cancer pagurus) fishery in Ireland Oliver Tully Irish sea Fisheries Board (BIM)
Annual Catch Limits & NS1 Guidelines. 2 Requirements of the 2006 MSRA Annual catch limits and accountability measures must be implemented: in fishing.
Incorporation of Climate-Ocean Information in Short- and Medium Term Sprat Predictions in the Baltic Sea Acknowledgements: ICES Baltic Fish. Assess. WG.
1 Climate Change and Implications for Management of North Sea Cod (Gadus morhua) L.T. Kell, G.M. Pilling and C.M. O’Brien CEFAS, Lowestoft.
MSE Performance Metrics, Tentative Results and Summary Joint Technical Committee Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Pacific Biological Station, DFO.
Empirical comparison of historical data and age- structured assessment models for Prince William Sound and Sitka Sound Pacific herring Peter-John F. Hulson,
The influence of climate on cod, capelin and herring in the Barents Sea Dag Ø. Hjermann (CEES, Oslo) Nils Chr. Stenseth (CEES, Oslo & IMR, Bergen) Geir.
Market Squid Fishery Management Plan CA Department of Fish and Game December 15, 2011 Fish and Game Commission.
For 2014 Show the line of R producing SSB, and SSB producing R, and how they would spiderweb to get to equilibrium R. Took a long time, did not get to.
1 PIRO’s Pelagic Ecosystem Management Needs PIFSC External Science Review April 5, 2016.
Data requirement of stock assessment. Data used in stock assessments can be classified as fishery-dependent data or fishery-independent data. Fishery-dependent.
Day 4, Session 1 Abundance indices, CPUE, and CPUE standardisation
Training course in fish stock assessment and fisheries management
PRINCIPLES OF STOCK ASSESSMENT. Aims of stock assessment The overall aim of fisheries science is to provide information to managers on the state and life.
Pacific-Wide Assessment of Bigeye Tuna
Milton Haughton Executive Director
Effects of Catch-at-Age Sample Size on Gulf of Mexico Gray Triggerfish Spawning Stock Biomass Estimates Jeff Isely SEFSC Miami.
Presentation transcript:

Fisheries Models: Methods, Data Requirements, Environmental Linkages Richard Methot NOAA Fisheries Science & Technology

Stock Assessment Overview2 PRESENTATION OUTLINE Assessment Goals What is a “Stock Assessment”? Data Inputs Assessment Methods Role of Environmental Data

Stock Assessment Overview3 Stock Assessment Collecting, analyzing, and reporting demographic information for the purpose of determining the effects of fishing on fish populations. Key Concepts / Jargon –Stock; Population; Unit –Abundance; Biomass; Spawning Biomass –Recruitment; Yearclass; Cohort –Fishery –Fishing mortality (F); Exploitation Rate

Stock Assessment Overview4 POPULATION MODEL: (Abundance, mortality) POPULATION MODEL: (Abundance, mortality) STOCK STATUS OPTIMUM YIELD OPTIMUM YIELD CATCH LOGBOOKS, OBSERVERS, AGE/SIZE DATA BIOLOGY AGE, GROWTH, MATURITY ABUNDANCE TREND RESOURCE SURVEY, FISHERY CPUE, AGE/SIZE DATA ADVANCED MODELS HABITAT CLIMATE ECOSYSTEM MANMADE STRESS SOCIOECONOMICS STOCK ASSESSMENT PROCESS

Stock Assessment Overview5 OPTIMUM YIELD OPTIMUM YIELD SINGLE SPECIES ASSESSMENT MODEL TIME SERIES OF RESULTS BIOMASS, RECRUITMENT, GROWTH, MORTALITY STOCK ASSESSMENT & ECOSYSTEM HOLISTIC ECOSYSTEM MODEL CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF ALL FISHERIES AND OTHER FACTORS INDICATORS ENVIRONMENTAL, ECOSYSTEM, OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH ON INDICATOR EFFECTS

Stock Assessment Overview6 Assessment Results Used in Fishery Management Monitoring / Reactive –Exploitation rate is higher than a maximum limit: overfishing is occurring and must be eliminated; –biomass is below a minimum level: the stock is overfished (depleted). A rebuilding plan must be prepared to rebuild the stock in as short a time as possible; Proactive –Assessment forecasts provide the technical basis (operational model) for setting and adjusting fishery quotas and other management measures to: implement harvest policies Rebuild depleted stocks

Stock Assessment Overview7 HARVEST CONTROL RULE = OPERATIONAL MODEL What is the current stock abundance relative to historical and target levels? What level of fishing mortality (F) is the limit (RED) and target (GREEN)? What level of short-term future catch would achieve target?

Stock Assessment Overview8 FISHING REDUCES LIFETIME EGG PRODUCTION

Stock Assessment Overview9 DIRECT FISHING EFFECTS Yield per Recruit and Eggs (Spawning Biomass) per Recruit

Stock Assessment Overview10 Assessment Inputs STOCK STRUCTURE: Spatial limits of demographic unit TOTAL CATCH: total removals due to human activities (due to fishery landings, discarded bycatch, and cryptic mortality due to encounters with fishing gear); SURVEYS: the relative or absolute magnitude of a fish population (by age); LIFE HISTORY: growth, maturation, fecundity, natural mortality, and other characteristics of individual fish.

Stock Assessment Overview11 What is a “Stock”? A group of individuals of the same species that: –inhabit the same geographic region; –interbreed when mature; –have sufficiently high levels of diffusion/mixing Northern Stock Southern Stock High mixing within Low mixing between

Stock Assessment Overview12 Commercial fishing effort, catch, and value –Dealer reports –Vessel trip reports Recreational fishing effort and catch –Telephone surveys –Shoreside sampling surveys Size and age structure of catch –Commercial catch sampling surveys –Recreational catch sampling surveys Electronic dissemination of data Serves stock assessment, economic analysis, and fishery monitoring needs Pillar I - Catch Data Fisheries Information System

Stock Assessment Overview13 Fishery Observers Since 1972 NOAA Fisheries has deployed fishery observers to collect catch and bycatch data from US and foreign commercial fishing and processing vessels. Today, 42 fisheries all around the nation are monitored by observer programs logging over 60,000 observer days at sea. Data support fish stock assessment, fishery monitoring, protected species mortality monitoring, and other conservation and management programs.

Stock Assessment Overview14 Pillar II - Abundance Index Fishery-Independent Surveys Catch/Effort = q * Abundance –Survey sampling units (effort) is highly standardized; –Sampling follows a statistical design; –Assert that q is sufficiently constant; –Sometimes, q can be measured directly, so survey catch rate can be transformed directly to measure of abundance

Stock Assessment Overview15 Fishery-Independent Surveys 10 NOAA Ships Plus 1768 charter DAS

Stock Assessment Overview16 Fishery CPUE as Abundance Index Fishery Catch = q * Effort * Abundance –So Catch/Effort = q * Abundance Unfortunately, –Fishing effort is very hard to standardize, so the effective q may not be constant; –Fishing tends to occur where abundance is high, not where abundance is average.

Stock Assessment Overview17  Autonomous Underwater Vehicle  Contains cameras, sensors, acoustics  Reach into habitats inaccessible to other survey tools Advanced Technology

Stock Assessment Overview18 Pillar III - Fish Biology / Life History Ease: Length > Weight >> Age > Eggs & Maturity >>> Mortality

Stock Assessment Overview19 STOCK ASSESSMENT LOGIC Estimating Abundance How big must stock have been if: –We saw a relative decline of X% per year in the survey index; –While Y tons of catch were removed per year; –And the stock’s biology indicates that natural changes in abundance are only +/-Z% per year

Stock Assessment Overview20 BASIC ASSESSMENT APPROACHES Index Methods –Is stock abundance: Increasing, decreasing, or stable? Equilibrium Methods –On average, is fishing mortality: too high, too low, or just right? Dynamic Population Methods –Estimates time series of stock abundance and mortality –Forecast stock abundance and catch level that maintains mortality target –Can be biomass-based, but age & size structure provide more detail, especially for forecasting Choice depends on data availability and complexity of management questions

Stock Assessment Overview21 Trend in Survey Abundance Index Lack of fit due to: –Sampling variability of the observations Environmental data can improve stratification and adaptive sampling –Unknown changes in the calibration, q Environmental data can inform about changes in availability of fish to the survey Other Data in Model: –Recruitment index for some years –Proportion at each age in the fishery –Total catch

Stock Assessment Overview22 INTEGRATED ANALYSIS Ability to use various age, length, abundance data to calibrate model Smoothly transitions from pre-data era, to data-rich era, to forecast. Produces estimates of model uncertainty

Stock Assessment Overview23 MODEL PROCESSES CONSTANT Assert, Believe!, Hope!! To Be Stable Over Time –Traditional Data Provide Little Information To Estimate Variability Examples: –Natural Mortality –Survey Catchability –Average Spawner- Recruitment Relationship VARIABLE Expected To Vary Over Time –Data Are Informative About Fluctuations Examples: –Fishing Mortality –Annual Recruitment –Growth and Maturity Changes

Stock Assessment Overview24 PRODUCTIVITY High productivity stocks maintain high recruitment levels even as stock abundance declines. They rebuild quickly as fishing mortality is reduced. Low productivity stocks can sustain only low fishing mortality rates. They require multiple generations to rebuild from low biomass levels. Short-term (annual) environmental variability obscures these ecological relationships Long-term (decadal) environmental and ecosystem shifts are confounded with relationships

Stock Assessment Overview25 ENVIRONMENTAL DATA & “VARIABLE” PROCESSES Including environmental component in model can: –Reduce alias in estimate of biomass linkage caused by long- term environmental patterns; –Provide additional information on historical fluctuations during data-poor periods; –Provide early indicators of upcoming fluctuations. Similar situation for environmental effects on body growth Ecosystem effects are harder! Recruitment = f(biomass, environment, ecosystem) + e

Stock Assessment Overview26 ENVIRONMENTAL DATA & CONSTANT PROCESSES New Information About Changes In “Constant” Processes –Need Validation Outside Model EXAMPLES: –Predators Affect Natural Mortality –Spatial Distribution Affects Catchability –Thermocline Depth Affects Catchability –PDO Regime Affects Average Recruitment

Fisheries And The Environment FATE A NOAA Fisheries Oceanographic Program Supporting NOAA’s mission to ensure the sustainable use of US fishery resources under a changing climate

Stock Assessment Overview28 A FATE Ecosystem Indicator Peterson et al.; Northwest Fisheries Science Center This function can be used to predict returns of salmon the following year; copepod anomalies from 2001 predict that about 10% of the juvenile salmon that went to sea in spring 2001 will return to spawn in fall 2002.

Stock Assessment Overview29 Sablefish Recruitment Variability Michael J. Schirripa and Jim J. Colbert Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Oregon State University Recruitment is fit to stock biomass as well as annual deviations in the Spring sea level anomalies. This made possible estimates of current year-class strengths

Stock Assessment Overview30 Evan Howell and Jeff Polovina, Pacific Islands Fishery Science Center

Stock Assessment Overview cohort STD Growth rate Growth year Using variables related to oceanic conditions* we can fit growth rates for individual California cohorts and the probability that a cohort will mature after the third ocean winter at sea. * e.g. Wind Turbulence, Upwelling, Sea Level Height, Sea Surface Temperature. Proportion maturing after 3 OW Brood year (cohort) CA Chinook Growth and Maturation Vary with the Environment B. Wells, C. Grimes, J. Field, C. Reiss; Southwest Fisheries Science Center

Stock Assessment Overview32 CONCLUSIONS Environmental information can improve precision and accuracy of fish assessments by providing: –Info on large scale changes in spatial distribution; –Info on factors affecting fish behavior and availability to surveys; –Info of factors affecting spatial distribution in fishing effort; –Indicators to adjust mortality and growth factors otherwise held constant; –Indicators to forecast upcoming fluctuations in highly variable recruitment