EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Kara Hanges, Martha Slamer, Maribeth Pennekamp, Debbie Dye, Rhonda Parker, and Kim Davidson.
An Osborn Education. Comprehensive Reform in Education Putting the Pieces Together… The Nation The Nation The State The State The District The District.
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
TEACHER EVALUATION What it is going to look like….
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Developing Principals One State’s Initiative Dr. Sharon Brittingham RTTT Project Director, Development Coaches Dr. Jacquelyn Wilson Director, Delaware.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
Beginning Teacher Support Program Peer Review Process Training for Charter Schools June 2013.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Common Principles of Effective Practice (CPEP)
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education SECRETARY OF EDUCATION’S PRIORITIES.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Observations Pre observation (optional) Observations (minimum of 2 thirty minute) Post observation Rubric
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Ohio TIF A collaboration of 24 Ohio districts, ODE and Battelle for Kids Five-year grant from the U.S. Department of Education.
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  To develop a teacher effectiveness model that will reform the way we evaluate.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Oregon’s Future Starts Here Superintendents’ vision for turning our good schools into great schools.
Presented to: [District] Staff DATE TIF AWARD PAYOUT PROCESS [insert district logo]
Presented to: [District] Staff DATE RECOGNIZING EDUCATOR EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
2012 – 2013 School Year. OTES West Branch Local Schools.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
BELPRE CITY SCHOOLS TIF PROGRAM Presented by: Strategic Compensation Committee August 2011 [insert district logo]
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Presented to:Bellefontaine City Schools RECOGNIZING TEACHING EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
PDE Literacy Design Collaborative Grant February 16, 2011.
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM September 29, 2011 Carmel Martin, Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Examining the Trend of Change in regards to Ohio’s Common Core Standards and Teacher Accountability and Evaluation Jamie S. Rawson EDU 723/Lesson 8 November.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Sustainable Educator Evaluation and Compensation Supported by the Teacher Incentive Fund Improved educator performance = Increased student growth seec.nefec.org.
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Five Required Elements
R3 – Recruiting, Retaining, Rewarding Excellent Educators for the Success of Every Child, Every Day Pitt County Schools, NC.
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
Implementing Race to the Top
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Presentation transcript:

EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES

CORE BELIEFS  There is an urgency to ensure all students graduate prepared for college, careers, and future opportunities  A critical link exists between teacher effectiveness and student achievement  Effective educator evaluations are an important part of strengthening the teaching profession and providing professional growth opportunities for all

THE CONTEXT  The world is changing  Technology is advancing  Low-skill, living-wage jobs are declining  Businesses are looking globally for candidates  Education is the linchpin for future economic success  For individuals  For our country  Students need post-secondary training to open doors to future opportunities

ADAPTING TO A NEW REALITY  Educators are embracing changes to prepare students for the future  This work involves:  What teachers teach – Common Core and state standards  How teachers teach – formative instructional practices  Evidence of student learning – assessments and data  Evidence of teacher effectiveness – teacher performance and student growth

TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS  Educator effectiveness is single most important classroom factor impacting student achievement  Effective evaluation systems:  Set high expectations for teachers and leaders  Provide feedback and support for professional growth  Help everyone in the profession, including the best, continually get better

EVALUATION FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH  Educator evaluation systems should align with local district goals and values  Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES) is framework to help districts design evaluation systems for professional growth  Aligned to Ohio’s standards for teachers  Based 50 percent on measures of teacher performance, and 50 percent on student growth  Provides targeted professional learning opportunities based on results of evaluation

PIONEERING THROUGH OHIO TIF  Through TIF, districts are designing and implementing evaluation systems that:  Support local values and goals  Bring out the best in teachers  Focus on student outcomes  TIF districts will use the teacher performance side of the OTES framework in  A year ahead of statewide implementation  Phased-in approach  Opportunity to be creative and test out the system

OTES FRAMEWORK (OTES Evaluation Framework, Ohio Department of Education)

 : All Ohio TIF districts (plus 100 other districts statewide) participating in OTES pilot  : All Ohio TIF districts begin phased-in implementation of OTES framework  Ohio TIF districts must have MOU in place by April 1, 2012 affirming they will implement in  : All Ohio districts must begin full OTES implementation  Ohio districts must adopt or align to OTES framework by June 1, 2013 through local board policy CURRENT STATE OF THE WORK

CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES Challenges  Capacity for implementation  Fairness in evaluations for different types of educators  Reliability and accuracy of data Opportunities  phase-in, transition year  Be innovative and creative  Provide feedback to inform statewide implementation

 USDOE has provided flexibility for Ohio TIF districts around OTES implementation  In , TIF districts must implement teacher performance components:  Two 30-minute observations and walkthroughs for all teachers  Ensuring inter-rater reliability by using credentialed evaluators  Using rubrics to determine ratings  Utilizing student growth in strategic compensation models WHAT DOES “PHASED-IN” MEAN?

EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR OHIO TIF

 How does the OTES implementation impact personnel decisions in ?  All local policies regarding personnel decisions stand for  Per House Bill 153, districts to not need to use outcomes of evaluations in personnel decisions until PERSONNEL POLICIES

 How will student growth be used in evaluations in ?  Student growth will only be used as part of district strategic compensation award models  Student growth is not required to be part of the evaluation, rating or personnel decisions in  This phased-in approach provides additional time to explore value-added and other student growth metrics STUDENT GROWTH

 Ohio TIF districts are receiving support from ODE and BFK to implement OTES in  Through participating in this year’s pilot, Ohio TIF districts are informing state policy and guidance on implementation THE WORK AHEAD

EVALUATIONS IN OUR DISTRICT  [insert specific information about your district’s work to implement OTES]  Collaborative team  Principals and teachers participating in pilot  Specific way in which student growth is part of TIF award model

LEARN MORE  The work around evaluations is challenging work, but worthwhile  For more information about evaluations and OTES in our district, contact:  [insert contact person]