Mao-Ning Tuanmu1, Andrés Viña1, Scott Bearer2,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lab for Remote Sensing Hydrology and Spatial Modeling Dept. of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, NTU Satellite Remote Sensing for Land-Use/Land-Cover.
Advertisements

Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
The Downscaled Climate Projection Has Arrived – NOW WHAT?
Active Remote Sensing Systems March 2, 2005 Spectral Characteristics of Vegetation Temporal Characteristics of Agricultural Crops Vegetation Indices Biodiversity.
Tiger Habitat Types: Classification of Vegetation Pornkamol Jornburom and Katie Purdham Kwanchai Waitanyakan WCS Thailand Program.
Detecting the Onset of Spring in the Midwest and Northeast United States: An Integrated Approach Jonathan M. Hanes Ph.D. Student Department of Geography.
Gradients or hierarchies? Which assumptions make a better map? Emilie B. Grossmann Janet L. Ohmann Matthew J. Gregory Heather K. May.
ReCover for REDD and sustainable forest management EU ReCover project: Remote sensing services to support REDD and sustainable forest management in Fiji.
Algorithm Development for Vegetation Change Detection and Environmental Monitoring Louis A. Scuderi 1, Amy Ellwein 2, Enrique Montano 3 and Richard P.
Princeton University Global Evaluation of a MODIS based Evapotranspiration Product Eric Wood Hongbo Su Matthew McCabe.
Development, implementation and lessons learned from the Northwest Forest Plan Michael W. Collopy Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science.
Gap Analysis: GIS, maps and a new view of regional conservation Southwest Regional GAP Project Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah US-IALE 2004,
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data General Classification Concepts Unsupervised Classifications.
Published in Remote Sensing of the Environment in May 2008.
Forest Structure and Distribution across the Geographic Range of the Giant Panda Up-scaling from Plots to the Entire Region Jianguo (Jack) Liu (Michigan.
Forest Structure & Distribution Across the Giant Panda Geographic Range Jianguo (Jack) Liu (Michigan State University) Zhiyun Ouyang (Chinese Academy of.
PILOT STUDY ON THE USE OF LANDSCAPE SCIENCES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A Science Framework for International Cooperation Committee on the Challenges.
An Object-oriented Classification Approach for Analyzing and Characterizing Urban Landscape at the Parcel Level Weiqi Zhou, Austin Troy& Morgan Grove University.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Advanced Satellite Products to Better Understand I&M Data within the Context of the Larger.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Assessment of Regional Vegetation Productivity: Using NDVI Temporal Profile Metrics Background NOAA satellite AVHRR data archive NDVI temporal profile.
VIRTUAL ECOLOGICAL INQUIRY MODULE: A Collaborative Project Between TAMU-ITS Center and CAS-CNIC Presented by: X. Ben Wu and Stephanie L. Knight Department.
Observing Kalahari ecosystems at local to regional scales: a remote sensing perspective Nigel Trodd Coventry University.
9th International Symposium on Wild Boar and others Suids, Hannover 2012 Factors influencing wild boar presence in agricultural landscape: a habitat suitability.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
UW-Milwaukee Geography Vision and Objectives National Phenology Network (NPN)
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
PIs: Giorgos Mountrakis, Colin Beier, Bill Porter +, Benjamin Zuckerberg^, Lianjun Zhang, Bryan Blair* USING LIDAR TO ASSESS THE ROLES OF CLIMATE AND LAND-COVER.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Advanced Satellite Products to Better Understand I&M Data within the Context of the Larger.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
New Uses and Approaches for Land Data Products Jeffrey Masek, Biospheric Sciences NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
Geography: The study of the world, its people and the landscapes they create.
Vegetation Mapping An Interagency Approach The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the USDA Forest Service Mark Rosenberg: Research.
Role of Spatial Database in Biodiversity Conservation Planning Sham Davande, GIS Expert Arid Communities Technologies, Bhuj 11 September, 2015.
Jake F. Weltzin Mark D. Schwartz In-situ validation of land- surface phenology A framework for involvement with USA National Phenology Network.
North American Carbon Program Sub-pixel Analysis of a 1-km Resolution Land-Water Mask Source of Data: The North American sub-pixel water mask product is.
Flux observation: Integrating fluxes derived from ground station and satellite remote sensing 王鹤松 Hesong Wang Institute of atmospheric physics, Chinese.
Xiaodong Chen Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Agent-based Modeling of the Effects of Social Norms on Enrollment in Payments for Ecosystem.
Remotely sensed land cover heterogeneity
Key information from FDOS Global distribution of plant communities as described by quantitative traits [and their association with phylogenetic composition??]
Global Terrestrial Observing System linking the world’s terrestrial monitoring systems to provide a global vision of the Earth we share.
Disturbance Effects on Carbon Dynamics in Amazon Forest: A Synthesis from Individual Trees to Landscapes Workshop 1 – Tulane University, New Orleans, Late.
Assessing the Phenological Suitability of Global Landsat Data Sets for Forest Change Analysis The Global Land Cover Facility What does.
Scaling Up Above Ground Live Biomass From Plot Data to Amazon Landscape Sassan S. Saatchi NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology.
Northern Michigan Forest Productivity Across a Complex Landscape David S. Ellsworth and Kathleen M. Bergen.
Using Lidar to Identify and Measure Forest Gaps on the William B. Bankhead National Forest, Alabama Jeffrey Stephens 1, Dr. Luben Dimov 1, Dr. Wubishet.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
Phil Hurvitz Avian Conservation Lab Meeting 8. March. 2002
Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information: 3 GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
Using Population Data to Address the Human Dimensions of Population Change D.M. Mageean and J.G. Bartlett Jessica Daniel 10/27/2009.
Contribution of Agricultural Expansion to Mato Grosso Deforestation LC22: Douglas Morton, Yosio Shimabukuro, Ruth DeFries, Liana Anderson, Egidio.
Citation: Moskal., L. M. and D. M. Styers, Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution near infrared aerial imagery: costs and applications.
Effects of fire, extreme weather, and anthropogenic disturbance on avian biodiversity in the United States Anna M. Pidgeon1, Chad Rittenhouse1, Thomas.
Remote Sensing and Avian Biodiversity Patterns in the United States Volker C. Radeloff 1, Anna M. Pidgeon 1, Curtis H. Flather 2, Patrick Culbert 1, Veronique.
Coupled Human and Natural Systems (CHANS)
Metrics and MODIS Diane Wickland December, Biology/Biogeochemistry/Ecosystems/Carbon Science Questions: How are global ecosystems changing? (Question.
Emergence of Landscape Ecology Equilibrium View Constant species composition Disturbance & succession = subordinate factors Ecosystems self-contained Internal.
Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems by Jianguo Liu, Thomas Dietz, Stephen R. Carpenter, Marina Alberti, Carl Folke, Emilio Moran, Alice N.
Brody Sandel Aarhus University IntroductionResults Objectives  Perform the first global, high-resolution analysis of controls on tree cover  Analyze.
Use & Availability of Habitats & Foods Resource selection Measurements of use & availability –Food –Habitat Design & analysis Modeling Sampling.
CYBER-GIS FOR SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES. Global Forest Change Hansen, M. C. et al (2013). High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change.
VEGA-GEOGLAM Web-based GIS for crop monitoring and decision support in agriculture Evgeniya Elkina, Russian Space Research Institute The GEO-XIII Plenary.
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data
Global Terrestrial Observing System
Multisource Imaging of Seasonal Dynamics in Land Surface Phenology: A Fusion Approach Using Landsat and Sentinel-2 Mark Friedl1, Eli Melaas1, Jordan Graesser1,
Using Remote Sensing to Monitor Plant Phenology Response to Rain Events in the Santa Catalina Mountains Katheryn Landau Arizona Remote Sensing Center Mentors:
Pan-European Assessment of Riparian Zones
A Comparison of Forest Biodiversity Metrics Using Field Measurements and Aircraft Remote Sensing Kaitlyn Baillargeon Scott Ollinger,
Evaluating the Ability to Derive Estimates of Biodiversity from Remote Sensing Kaitlyn Baillargeon Scott Ollinger, Andrew Ouimette,
Presentation transcript:

Mapping Understory Vegetation Using Phenological Characteristics Derived from Remotely Sensed Data Mao-Ning Tuanmu1, Andrés Viña1, Scott Bearer2, Weihua Xu3, Zhiyun Ouyang3, Hemin Zhang4 and Jianguo (Jack) Liu1 1 Michigan State University 2 The Nature Conservancy 3 Chinese Academy of Sciences 4 Wolong Nature Reserve, China

Understory Vegetation An important component in forest ecosystems Affecting forest structure, function and species composition Supporting wildlife species Providing ecosystem services Lack of detailed information on its spatio-temporal dynamics Interference of overstory canopy on the remote detection of understory vegetation Limitations of LANDSAT data and LiDAR data

Land Surface Phenology Seasonal pattern of variation of vegetated land surfaces captured by remotely sensed data Affected by both overstory and understory vegetation http://landportal.gsfc.nasa.gov/Documents/ESDR/Phenology_Friedl_whitepaper.pdf

Objectives To develop an effective remote sensing approach using land surface phenologies for mapping overall understory vegetation To explore the application of this approach to mapping and differentiating individual understory species

Methods

Wolong Nature Reserve ~2000 km2 ~ 10% of entire wild giant panda population Evergreen bamboo species dominate the understory of forests Two dominant bamboo species constitute the major food for giant pandas

Arrow and Umbrella Bamboo Arrow bamboo Bashania fangiana Elevation: 2300 – 3600 m Umbrella bamboo Fargesia robusta Elevation: 1600 – 2650 m Photographed by Andrés Viña (Elevation: 2546 m) Arrow bamboo

Phenology Metrics Time series of 16-day MODIS-WDRVI composites MODIS surface reflectance (~ 250 m/pixel) Wide Dynamic Range Vegetation Index (WDRVI) Eleven phenology metrics A - Base level B - Maximum level C – Amplitude D - Date of start of a season E - Date of middle of a season F - Date of end of a season G - Length of a season H - Large integral I - Small integral J - Increase rate K - Decrease rate

Identifying Phenological Features of Forests with Understory Bamboo Comparing the 11 phenology metrics among 5 groups of pixels Pixels in the entire study area (background pixels) Pixels with forest cover Forest pixels with understory bamboo Forest pixels with arrow bamboo Forest pixels with umbrella bamboo

Overall Bamboo Distribution Model Maximum Entropy Algorithm (MAXENT) Using pixels with understory bamboo cover ≥ 25% as presence locations Using the 11 phenology metrics as predictor variables Estimating bamboo presence probability (0~1) across the entire study area Model evaluation Kappa statistics Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)

Individual Bamboo Distribution Model Using pixels with arrow and umbrella bamboo as presence locations, separately Using the 11 phenology metrics as predictor variables Using elevation as an additional predictor variable Comparing the accuracy between the models with and without elevation

Results

Overall Bamboo Distribution Kappa: 0.591±0.018 AUC: 0.851±0.005

Phenological Features of Forests with Understory Bamboo Pixels with overall understory bamboo were significantly different from background and forest pixels in most phenology metrics Pixels with single bamboo species (arrow or umbrella bamboo) were also different from the background and forest pixels in most metrics

Individual Bamboo Distribution Kappa: 0.46 ± 0.02 AUC: 0.80 ± 0.01 Kappa: 0.68 ± 0.02 AUC: 0.91 ± 0.01 Kappa: 0.66 ± 0.02 AUC: 0.90 ± 0.01 Kappa: 0.70 ± 0.02 AUC: 0.92 ± 0.01

Summary Phenology metrics derived from a time series of MODIS data can be used to distinguish forests with understory bamboo from other land cover types By combining field data, phenology metrics, and maximum entropy modeling, understory bamboo can be mapped with high accuracy By incorporating species-specific information (e.g., elevation), individual understory species can be differentiated

Advantages of the Approach Suitability for broad-scale monitoring Easy access, global coverage, and temporally continuous availability of MODIS data Generality Without the need of specific information on the phenological difference between overstory and understory vegetation or the relationships between understory vegetation and environmental variables Flexibility and extensibility Overall understory vegetation or groups of species with similar phenological characteristics Individual species within specific geographic areas

Conservation Implications Ecosystem management Invasive understory species Biodiversity conservation Biodiversity of understory vegetation Wildlife conservation and habitat management Habitat quality Habitat monitoring

Acknowledgements National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station National Natural Science Foundation of China

Reference Remote Sensing of Environment (doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.03.008 ) http://www.csis.msu.edu/Publications/

International Network of Research on Coupled Human and Natural Systems (CHANS-Net) Sponsored by The National Science Foundation Coordinators Jianguo (Jack) Liu and Bill McConnell

Advisory Board Stephen Carpenter (University of Wisconsin at Madison) William Clark (Harvard University) Ruth DeFries (Columbia University) Thomas Dietz (Michigan State University) Carl Folke (Stockholm University, Sweden) Simon Levin (Princeton University) Elinor Ostrom (Indiana University) Billie Lee Turner II (Arizona State University) Brian Walker (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Australia)

Objectives of CHANS-Net Promote communication and collaboration across the CHANS community. Generate and disseminate comparative and synthesis scholarship on CHANS. Expand the CHANS community.

Example Activities of CHANS-Net

CHANS Workshops First Workshop “Challenges and Opportunities in Research on Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems” at the 2009 conference of US-IALE

CHANS Symposia 2009 Conference of US-IALE (US Regional Association, International Association for Landscape Ecology) 2010 Conference of AAG (Association of American Geographers) 2010 National Science Foundation 2011 Conference of AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science)

CHANS Fellows Program Opportunities for junior scholars interested in CHANS to attend relevant meetings, symposia, and workshops. CHANS Fellows 14 at the 2009 US-IALE meeting 10 at the 2010 US-IALE meeting 10 at the 2010 AAG meeting

Web-based Resource Center (www.CHANS-Net.org)