Nominations and Campaigns Chapter 9

The Nomination Game Nomination: the official endorsement of a candidate for office by a political party Generally, success requires momentum, money, and media attention. Campaign Strategy: the master game plan candidates lay out to guide their electoral campaign

The Nomination Game Deciding to Run Campaigns are more physically and emotionally taxing than ever. Other countries have short campaigns, generally less than 2 months. American campaigns are much longer. Whoever is elected president in November 2016 will likely have declared their intention to run in early 2015.

The Nomination Game Competing for Delegates Nomination game is an elimination contest Goal is to win a majority of delegates’ support at the national party convention, or the supreme power within each of the parties The convention meets every four years to nominate the party’s presidential and vice-presidential candidates. Conventions are but a formality today. ZiIshttp:// ZiIs

The Nomination Game Competing for Delegates The Caucus Road Caucus: meetings of state party leaders for selecting delegates to the national convention Organized like a pyramid from local precincts to the state’s convention A handful of states use a caucus—open to all voters who are registered with a party The Iowa caucus is first and most important. caucuses 1. Local Delegates from precinct voting 2. County Convention selects delegates 3. State Convention select delegates 4. Delegates from state attend National Convention

The Nomination Game Competing for Delegates The Primary Road Primary: elections in which voters in a state vote for a nominee (or delegates pledged to the nominee) Began at turn of 20 th century by progressive reformers McGovern-Fraser Commission led to selection of delegates through primary elections Most delegates are chosen through primaries. Superdelegates: democratic leaders who automatically get a delegate slot Frontloading is the tendency of states to hold primaries early to capitalize on media attention. New Hampshire is first. Generally primaries serve as elimination contests. Delegate Count

Discussion What are the advantages and disadvantages to a long campaign process? Do you think it is a good thing or a bad thing? Why?

The Nomination Game Competing for Delegates Evaluating the Primary and Caucus System Which of the following criticisms is the worst thing about our primary/caucus system: Disproportionate attention to early ones Prominent politicians do not run. Money plays too big a role. Participation in primaries and caucuses is low and unrepresentative; 20 percent vote in primaries The system gives too much power to the media.

The Nomination Game The Convention Send-off National conventions once provided great drama, but now are a formality, which means less TV time. Significant rallying point for parties Key note speaker on first day of Convention Party platform: statement of a party’s goals and policies for next four years Debated on the second day of the Convention Formal nomination of president and vice- president candidates on third and fourth days

Keynote speakers 2004 Keynote AddressKeynote Address 2012 Keynote AddressKeynote Address

The Nomination Game

The Campaign Game The High-Tech Media Campaign Direct mail used to generate support and money for the candidate Get media attention through ad budget and “free” coverage Emphasis on “marketing” a candidate News stories focus more on the “horse race” than substantive policy issues

The Campaign Game Organizing the Campaign Get a campaign manager Get a fund-raiser and campaign counsel Hire media and campaign consultants Assemble staff and plan logistics Get research staff, policy advisors, and pollsters Get a good press secretary Establish a website

Money and Campaigning Campaigns are expensive Campaigns need money to get their message out Many people and groups who want things from government are willing to give $ How much influence does money buy?...

Money and Campaigning The Maze of Campaign Finance Reforms Federal Election Campaign Act (1974) Created the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to administer campaign finance laws for federal elections Created the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Provided partial public financing for presidential primaries Matching funds: Contributions of up to $250 are matched for candidates who meet conditions, such as limiting spending. Barack Obama rejected matching funds (McCain accepted) Provided full public financing for major party candidates in the general election – Barack Obama was the first major party candidate to turn down government funds ever (McCain accepted the $84 million dollar grant) Required full disclosure and limited contributions ( $1000 – now $ 2,300)

Buckley v. Valeo, 1976 Challenged the constitutionality of the 1974 campaign reforms The SC struck down the portion that limited how much and individual could contribute to their own campaigns. Ross Perot – $60 million – 1992 Mitt Romney - $44 million – 2008 primary Another loophole in 1979…

Money and Campaigning The Maze of Campaign Finance Reforms Soft Money: political contributions (not subject to contribution limits) earmarked for party-building expenses or generic party advertising The McCain-Feingold Act (2002) banned soft money, increased amount of individual contributions, and limited “issue ads.” A new loophole… 527s: independent groups that seek to influence political process but are not subject to contribution restricts because they do not directly seek election of particular candidates

Money and Campaigning The Proliferation of PACs Political Action Committees (PACs): created by law in 1974 to allow corporations, labor unions and other interest groups to donate money to campaigns; PACs are registered with and monitored by the FEC. $5000 per candidate in both primary/general As of 2006 there were 4,217 PACs. PACs contributed over $288.6 million to congressional candidates in PACs donate to candidates who support their issue. PACs do not “buy” candidates, but give to candidates who support them in the first place.

Money and Campaigning

Debate Side One: There is too much money in politics and it needs to be regulated and restricted, or removed Side Two: Limiting money in politics is a violation of freedom of speech and goes against the capitalistic nature of our society

Citizens United v. FEC, 2008 Citizens United sought and injunction against the FEC to prevent the application of the BCRA to its film – Hillary:The Movie

Money and Campaigning Are Campaigns Too Expensive? “Money is the mothers milk of politics” Fundraising takes a lot of time. Incumbents do worse when they spend more money because they need to spend to defeat quality challengers. The doctrine of sufficiency suggests that candidates need just “enough” money to win, not necessarily “more.”

The Impact of Campaigns Campaigns have three effects on voters: Reinforcement, Activation, Conversion Several factors weaken campaigns’ impact on voters: Selective perception: pay most attention to things we agree with Party identification still influence voting behavior Incumbents begin with sizeable advantage

Understanding Nominations and Campaigns Are Nominations and Campaigns Too Democratic? Campaigns are open to almost everyone. Campaigns consume much time and money. Campaigns promote individualism in American politics. Do Big Campaigns Lead to an Increased Scope of Government? Candidates make numerous promises, especially to state and local interests. Hard for politicians to promise to cut size of government

Summary Campaigns are media-oriented and expensive. Delegates are selected through caucuses and primaries. Money and contributions from PACs regulated by the FEC are essential to campaigns. Campaigns reinforce perceptions but do not change minds.

Campaign Finance Debate Assignment: Read pages Read McConnell v. FEC Research the McCain-Feingold Law (BCRA) Visit Prepare arguments both for and against campaign finance