Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Characterization of scattered celestial signals in SMOS observations over the Ocean J. Gourrion 1, J.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BIAS TRENDS IN THE 1-SLOPE (REPROCESSING) AND CALIBRATED L1 BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURES Joe Tenerelli SMOS Payload Calibration Meeting September 2012.
Advertisements

SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Commissioning Plan, 07/05/2009 Level 2 Ocean Salinity Processor Commissioning Plan 7 May 2009 ARGANS ACRI-ST ICM-CSIC.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity – Reprocessing Level 2 Ocean Salinity Reprocessing 17 September 2008.
1 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 Galactic noise model adjustment Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN) Xiaobin Yin (LOCEAN)
UPDATE ON BIAS TRENDS, DIRECT SUN CORRECTION, AND ROUGHNESS CORRECTION Joe Tenerelli May 10, 2011.
AN INITIAL LOOK AT THE IMPACT OF THE NEW ANTENNA LOSS MODEL Joe Tenerelli SMOS QUALITY WORKING GROUP #4 7-9 March 2011.
UPDATE ON SMOS LONG-TERM BIASES OVER THE OCEAN AND ROUGH SURFACE SCATTERING OF CELESTIAL SKY NOISE Joe Tenerelli SMOS L2OS Progress Meeting Arles, France,
PART 2: A QUICK COMPARISON OF V504 AND V620 GLOBAL MAPS Joe Tenerelli SMOS Calibration Meeting 18 26/05/2014.
F. Wentz, T. Meissner, J. Scott and K. Hilburn Remote Sensing Systems 2014 Aquarius / SAC-D Science Team Meeting November ,
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity Using TEC estimated from Stokes 3 24 October 2012 ACRI-st, LOCEAN & ARGANS SMOS+polarimetry.
1 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 TEC estimation Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN)
On Estimation of Soil Moisture & Snow Properties with SAR Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa.
Aquarius Status Salinity Retrieval and Applications D. M. Le Vine NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD E. P. Dinnat, G. Lagerloef, P. de Matthaeis, H. Kao, F.
The Aquarius Salinity Retrieval Algorithm Frank J. Wentz and Thomas Meissner, Remote Sensing Systems Gary S. Lagerloef, Earth and Space Research David.
MIRAS performance based on OS data SMOS MIRAS IOP 6 th Review, ESAC – 17 June 2013 Prepared by: J. Font, SMOS Co-Lead Investigator, Ocean Salinity – ICM-CSIC.
IFREMER EMPIRICAL ROUGHNESS MODEL Joe Tenerelli, CLS, Brest, France, November 4, 2010.
ElectroScience Lab Studies of Radio Frequency Interference in SMOS Observations IGARSS 2011 Joel T. Johnson and Mustafa Aksoy Department of Electrical.
Maintaining and Improving the AMSR-E and WindSat Ocean Products Frank J. Wentz Remote Sensing Systems, Santa Rosa CA AMSR TIM Agenda 4-5 September 2013.
Sea water dielectric constant, temperature and remote sensing of Sea Surface Salinity E. P. Dinnat 1,2, D. M. Le Vine 1, J. Boutin 3, X. Yin 3, 1 Cryospheric.
An Update on A Few Issues Relevant to Ocean Salinity Retrieval for SMOS Joe Tenerelli SMOS Quality Working Group 11 July ESA ESRIN.
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Validation Working Group Summary Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Mission Simulators - Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Error Validation and Early Orbit Corrections Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
Stephen J. Katzberg † And Jason Dunion ‡ † Distinguished.
Offline Assessment of NESDIS OSCAT data Li Bi 1 Sid Boukabara 2 1 RTI/STAR/JCSDA 2 STAR/JCSDA American Meteorological Society 94 th Annual Meeting 02/06/2014.
SMOS Validation Rehearsal Campaign Workshop, 18-19/11/2008, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands SMOS Validation Rehearsal Campaign Mediterranean flights C.
Galactic noise model adjustment Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN) Xiaobin Yin (LOCEAN)
MWR Roughness Correction Algorithm for the Aquarius SSS Retrieval W. Linwood Jones, Yazan Hejazin, Salem Al-Nimri Central Florida Remote Sensing Lab University.
SMOS Science Workshop, Arles, th Sept, 2011 IMPROVING SMOS SALINITY RETRIEVAL: SYSTEMATIC ERROR DIAGNOSTIC J. Gourrion, R. Sabia, M. Portabella,
SMOS QWG-5, 30 May- 1 June 2011, ESRIN Ocean Salinity 1 1.Commissioning reprocessing analysis 2.New processor version: improvements and problems detected/solved.
SMOS+ STORM Evolution Kick-off Meeting, 2 April 2014 SOLab work description Zabolotskikh E., Kudryavtsev V.
SMOS SSS and wind speed J. Boutin, X. Yin, N. Martin -Optimization of roughness/foam model -Comparison of new-old ECMWF wind speeds -SSS anomaly in the.
What are the four principal windows (by wavelength interval) open to effective remote sensing from above the atmosphere ? 1) Visible-Near IR ( );
Calibration and Validation Studies for Aquarius Salinity Retrieval PI: Shannon Brown Co-Is: Shailen Desai and Anthony Scodary Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
UPDATE ON THE SUN GLINT Joe Tenerelli Ocean Data Lab SMOS Level 2 OS Progress Meeting 26 SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Barcelona, Spain April 2015.
A REVIEW OF BIAS PATTERNS IN THE MIRAS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURES OVER THE OCEAN Joe Tenerelli SMOS Quality Working Group # Feb 2013 ESRIN.
APPLICATIONS OF THE INTEGRAL EQUATION MODEL IN MICROWAVE REMOTE SENSING OF LAND SURFACE PARAMETERS In Honor of Prof. Adrian K. Fung Kun-Shan Chen National.
Satellite Sea-surface Salinity: Data and Product Biases and Differences Eric Bayler and Li Ren NOAA/NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research.
A. Montuori 1, M. Portabella 2, S. Guimbard 2, C. Gabarrò 2, M. Migliaccio 1 1 Dipartimento per le Tecnologie (DiT), University of Naples Parthenope, Italy.
SMOS QWG-11, ESRIN 4-5 July 2013 L2OS v600 status and evolution 1 The SMOS L2 OS Team.
SMOS L2 Ocean Salinity Level 2 Ocean Salinity L2OS planning 2 July 2014 ARGANS & SMOS L2OS ESL 1.
1 / 13 Current activities at ICM-SMOS-BEC J. Gourrion, C. Gabarró, R. Sabia, M. Talone, V. González, S. Montero, S. Guimbard, F. Pérez, J. Martínez, M.
T. Meissner, F. Wentz, J. Scott, K. Hilburn Remote Sensing Systems ESA Ocean Salinity Science and Salinity Remote Sensing Workshop November.
SPCM-9, Esac, May 3 rd, 2012 MODEL-INDEPENDENT ESTIMATION OF SYSTEMATIC ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES J. Gourrion, S. Guimbard, R. Sabia,
Level 2 Algorithm. Definition of Product Levels LevelDescription Level 1 1A Reconstructed unprocessed instrument data 1B Geolocated, calibrated sensor.
OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 OTT sensitivity study and Sun correction impact J. Gourrion and the SMOS-BEC team SMOS-BEC, ICM/CSIC.
EXTENDING THE LAND SEA CONTAMINATION CHARACTERIZATION TO THE EXTENDED ALIAS- FREE FIELD OF VIEW Joe Tenerelli (CLS) and Nicolas Reul (IFREMER) SMOS Quality.
Optimization of L-band sea surface emissivity models deduced from SMOS data X. Yin (1), J. Boutin (1), N. Martin (1), P. Spurgeon (2) (1) LOCEAN, Paris,
SMOS QWG-6, ESRIN October 2011 OTT generation strategy and associated issues 1 The SMOS L2 OS Team.
2011 IEEE International Geoscience And Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS’11  July 24-29, 2011  Vancouver, C ANADA A synergy between SMOS & AQUARIUS: resampling.
USING SMOS POLARIMETRIC BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURES TO CORRECT FOR ROUGH SURFACE EMISSION BEFORE SALINITY INVERSION.
SMOS-BEC – Barcelona (Spain) LO calibration frequency impact Part II C. Gabarró, J. Martínez, V. González, A. Turiel & BEC team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre.
Cal/Val Discussion. Summary No large errors in rain, freshening observed by Aquarius can be significant and real (up to about 3 hours on average after.
Simulator Wish-List Gary Lagerloef Aquarius Principal Investigator Cal/Val/Algorithm Workshop March GSFC.
SMOS QWG-9, ESRIN October 2012 L2OS: Product performance summary v550 highlights 1 The SMOS L2 OS Team.
Jason-1/Envisat cross-calibration Y. Faugere (CLS) J. Dorandeu (CLS) N. Picot (CNES) P. Femenias (ESA) Jason-1 / Envisat Cross-calibration.
T. Meissner and F. Wentz Remote Sensing Systems 2014 Aquarius / SAC-D Science Team Meeting November , 2014 Seattle. Washington,
Use of AMSR-E Land Parameter Modeling and Retrievals for SMAP Algorithm Development Steven Chan Eni Njoku Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting Telluride, Colorado.
A step toward operational use of AMSR-E horizontal polarized radiance in JMA global data assimilation system Masahiro Kazumori Numerical Prediction Division.
QWG-10 – 4-6 February 2013 – ESRIN (Italy) SMOS Level3 and Level 4 Research Products Provided by the Barcelona Expert Center Jordi Font and BEC team SMOS.
Impact of sea surface roughness on SMOS measurements A new empirical model S. Guimbard & SMOS-BEC Team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta.
Errors on SMOS retrieved SSS and their dependency to a priori wind speed X. Yin 1, J. Boutin 1, J. Vergely 2, P. Spurgeon 3, and F. Gaillard 4 1. LOCEAN.
UPDATE ON GALACTIC NOISE CORRECTION Joe Tenerelli SMOS Quality Working Group #9 ESA ESRIN 24 October 2012.
Dependence of SMOS/MIRAS brightness temperatures on wind speed: sea surface effect and latitudinal biases Xiaobin Yin, Jacqueline Boutin LOCEAN.
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya CORRECTION OF SPATIAL ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES L. Wu, I. Corbella, F. Torres, N. Duffo, M. Martín-Neira.
HSAF Soil Moisture Training
(2) Norut, Tromsø, Norway Improved measurement of sea surface velocity from synthetic aperture radar Morten Wergeland Hansen.
SOLab work description
Blending multiple-source wind data including SMOS, SMAP and AMSR-2 new products Joe TENERELLI, Fabrice COLLARD OceanDataLab, Brest, France.
Roughness Correction for Aquarius (AQ) Sea Surface Salinity (SSS) Algorithm using MicroWave Radiometer (MWR) W. Linwood Jones, Yazan Hejazin Central FL.
Presentation transcript:

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Characterization of scattered celestial signals in SMOS observations over the Ocean J. Gourrion 1, J. Tenerelli 2, S. Guimbard 1, V. Gonzalez 1 1 SMOS-BEC, ICM/CSIC 2 CLS

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané an Earth Explorer mission (ESA) for Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity Sun synchronous orbit, 3-days repeat cycle, 32.5º tilt MIRAS payload : a polarimetric and interferometric radiometer at L-band, 72 receivers SMOS Field of View Concept

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Retrieving salinity

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Retrieving salinity

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Forward model

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané The problem Spatio-temporal systematic biases in SMOS salinities sun-synchronous orbit  the orbital plane makes one complete rotation relative to the stars per year. the instrument views roughly the same portion of the sky in successive orbits.

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Spatio-temporal systematic biases in Aquarius salinities Version 2.0 Inner beam Descending passes The problem

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané GEOMETRICAL OPTICS GALACTIC MODEL Fitted galactic model High-frequency limit of the Kirchhoff approximation for scattering cross sections: Express in terms of slope probability distribution: Assume Gaussian slope pdf. Then fit the slope variance (MSS):

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané SMOS descending passes example SSS bias using the old (pre-launch) galatic model GO model impact

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané SMOS descending passes example SSS bias using the new galatic model GO model impact

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané GO model impact AQUARIUS inner beam (ascending passes only) Aquarius galactic reflection model

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané AQUARIUS inner beam (ascending passes only) GO model impact SMOS ascending pass fit galactic reflection model

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané DescendingAscending GO model adjustment to SMOS data Geometrical optics fitted to the data - slope variance : increases with wind speed (expected) changes with incidence angle (unexpected) changes with pass orientation (unexpected)

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané 1 - Systematic underestimation at high incidence angle  Imperfect model physics (GO, Gaussian slope pdf ?) Remaining issues with the GO mss fit the fitted mss depends on incidence angle and pass orientation

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Remaining issues with the GO mss fit 2 - Potential phasing between biases and model errors  Need to uncouple bias estimation and model improvement tasks Estimate biases from expected low model errors dataset Update galactic model using a corrected dataset

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Faraday : Dielectric : Roughness : Atmosphere : Direct sun : Radiometric noise : Celestial reflections : use 1 st Stokes parameter cancel contribution using Klein-Swift model latitude band with low SST seasonal variations thin interval of wind speed values thin bands of latitude (sea state) model for emission/attenuation contributions remove sun alias and sun tails (0.05) average over 18-days and longitude [ -180º -100º ] ? Variability sourceReduction approach 1 - phasing between T B biases and model errors Variability reduction strategy

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané 1 st Stokes T B time series : an example centered (zero mean) Galactic (KA) 1 - phasing between T B biases and model errors

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Faraday : Dielectric : Roughness : Atmosphere : Direct sun : Radiometric noise : Celestial reflections : use 1 st Stokes parameter cancel contribution using Klein-Swift model latitude band with low SST seasonal variations thin interval of wind speed values thin bands of latitude (sea state) model for emission/attenuation contributions remove sun alias and sun tails (0.05) average over 18-days and longitude [ -180º -100º ] select xi/eta points with low annual variations (as predicted by the KA) Variability sourceReduction approach Variability reduction strategy 1 - phasing between T B biases and model errors

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané highly consistent throughout the field of view Temporal bias estimates 1 - phasing between T B biases and model errors

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané 2 - Underestimation at high incidence angle 55º incidence angle

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané 2 - Underestimation at high incidence angle A fully-empirical correction of the bistatic coefficients

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané 2 - Underestimation at high incidence angle 55 º incidence, 8 m/s data GO modified GO

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané 2 - Underestimation at high incidence angle 55 º incidence, 4 m/s 55 º incidence, 12 m/s data GO modified GO

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Non gaussian slope distribution The model is still physically inconsistent : the slope variance is still incidence angle dependent the slope variance is still a filtered value (the surface slope pdf is frequency-dependent) Preliminary results for a more physically-based approach … Use a non gaussian pdf which variance is based on Cox and Munk’s results

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Non gaussian slope distribution 35 º incidence, 8 m/s data GO non Gaussian GO 45 º incidence, 8 m/s 55 º incidence, 8 m/s using Cox and Munk’s results mss = for all incidence angles

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Summary Accurate modeling of the scattered celestial signal is of importance for salinity retrieval at L-band The pre-launch Kirchhoff scattering model strongly underpredicts the scattered brightness near the galactic plane and overpredicts the brightness away from the galactic plane under most surface roughness conditions A gaussian GO model fitted to SMOS residuals significantly improves the scattering description near the specular lobe BUT remaining inaccuracy at high incidence angle AND physically inconsistent slope variance values A methodology was developed to characterize separately T B biases and sea surface scattered celestial signal  consistent SMOS celestial residuals It is shown that problems come from off-specular contributions modeling Preliminary results suggest that most inconsistencies may be removed when accounting for non-gaussian slope statistics

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Incidence 55º 45º 35º FOV/latitude location of the low galactic time series

Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané 1 - phasing between biases and model errors Objective : uncouple bias estimation and model improvement tasks estimate the temporal “instrumental” bias from a specific dataset with low model errors (to build a corrected dataset) Strategy : build T B signals with reduced environmental variability low environmental (geophysical + foreign sources) variability  expected to be constant in a perfect world Environmental variability is reduced through either data selection or correction based on reliable model components Data 30-month time series (June’10 to Jan’13, Pacific) processed at BEC Noise reduction: 18-days and 5 o x 80 o averages, circular apodisation