Public Health Reporting Initiative Stage 3 Sprint: Implementation Guide Development 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EDOS Workgroup Pilots – Kickoff Teleconference October 2, 2012.
Advertisements

Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday August 19, 2013.
Welcome to Game Lets start the Game. An electronic health record (EHR) is a digital version of a patient’s paper chart. EHRs are real-time, patient-centered.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG)
5/10/2015DRAFT1 Public Health & Clinical LOINC - Feb 17 th 2012 CDC Vocabulary Team Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services (OSELS)
S&I Framework Provider Directories Initiative esMD Work Group October 19, 2011.
Companion Guide to HL7 Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use Stage 2
Overview of Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Presentation to HIT Steering Committee May 24, 2012.
ONC Standards and Interoperability Framework Use Case Simplification Key Steps Forward 3 November 2011.
ONC Standards and Interoperability Framework Use Case Simplification Key Steps Forward 27 October 2011.
S&I Data Provenance Initiative Presentation to the HITSC on Data Provenance September 10, 2014.
Hetty Khan Health Informatics Specialist Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Aug 18, 2010.
Hetty Khan Health Informatics Scientist Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) August 7, 2012 Developing.
Public Health Reporting Initiative January 11, 2012.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Riki Merrick, APHL Anna Orlova, PhD, PHDSC Lise Stevens, FDA Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, MBA – CDC CSTE Conference June 5 th, 2012 The findings and conclusions.
HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.
Query Health Business Working Group Kick-Off September 8, 2011.
Public Health Reporting Initiative June 13, 2012.
Public Health Reporting Initiative – Stage 3 Sprint.
Public Health Reporting Initiative October 3, 2012.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Clinical Oncology Patient Transfer Summary Ballot Development Spring Ballot Clinical Oncology Treatment Plan and Summary, Release 1 Ballot for May 2013.
ONC Standard and Interoperability (S&I) Public Health Reporting Initiative (PHRI) Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH; CDC ONC S&I PHRI Co-Lead November 8, 2012.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Author of Record Workgroup Wednesday, July 18,
Toolkit for Planning an EHR-based Surveillance Program | HL7 Clinical Document Architecture An Introduction.
Standards Analysis Summary vMR – Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts – Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
Proposed S&I Public Health Reporting Initiative 1 Challenge There is a lack of harmonized activities to enable electronic data exchange between clinical.
LCC -Proposal for Next Steps August 28, Discussion Points Recap of Whitepaper Recommendations Critical milestones and activities driving LCC activities.
Public Health Reporting Initiative: Stage 2 Draft Roadmap.
SIM- Data Infrastructure Subcommittee November 14, 2013.
Public Health Reporting Initiative December 12, 2012 Dial in: ; #
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 19, 2014.
Public Health Reporting Initiative Stage 3 Sprint: Implementation Guide Development Phone: x
EHR-S Functional Requirements IG: Lab Results Interface Laboratory Initiative.
10/27/111 Longitudinal Care Work Group (LCWG) Proposal to Re-Scope and Re-Name the LTPAC WG.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Population and Public Health – Subgroup 4 Art Davidson, Chair September 11, 2012.
Public Health Reporting Initiative April 4, 2012.
Call: Wed, 10/05/11 4-5pm ET Agenda: 4:00 – 4:05 Welcome, Riki Merrick, co-lead [Note: attendance will be taken by livemeeting login] 4:05 – 4:15 Initiative.
Public Health Reporting Initiative Stage 3 Sprint: Implementation Guide Development Phone: x
Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.
2012 Annual Meeting “Towards Public Health Sector Transformation and Section Unity” ACHIEVING PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS THROUGH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STANDARDIZATION.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Standards Analysis Summary vMR –Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts –Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
Hetty Khan Health Informatics Scientist Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) September 5, 2012.
Public Health Data Standards Consortium
Larry Wolf Certification / Adoption Workgroup May 13th, 2014.
S&I Provider Directories Initiative Revisions to Initiative Charter July 1, 2011.
Data Provenance Community Meeting November 6, 2014.
S&I PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTING INITIATIVE: DEVELOPING OF A TEAMING APPROACH S&I Public Health Reporting Initiative Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, Co-Lead September,
Standards and Interoperability Framework Primer of S&I Phases, Procedures, and Functions.
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting May 9, 2011.
S&I Public Health Education Series: Data Provenance July 9th, 2014 Johnathan Coleman Initiative Coordinator – Data Provenance ONC/OCPO/OST (CTR)
Public Health Reporting Initiative October 31, 2012.
Public Health Reporting Initiative May 2, Agenda TopicTime Allotted Welcome / Agenda Overview - John Stinn4:00 - 4:05 Use Case – John Stinn Review.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Electronic Determination of Coverage PMD User Story & Harmonization August 7, 2013.
Data Provenance Community Meeting May 15 th, 2014.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD)
Agenda for Wed, 10/12/11 4-5pm ET 4:00-4:05 Welcome & Intro, John Stinn 4:05-4:10 Update from ONC, Riki Merrick 4:10-4:35 PH Reporting Standardization.
Public Health Reporting Initiative June 27, 2012.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Electronic Determination of Coverage Harmonization August 14, 2013.
Public Health Reporting Initiative November 14, 2012 Dial in: ; #
Standards Analysis Summary vMR – Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts – Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
Proposed S&I Public Health Reporting Initiative 1 Challenge -There is a lack of harmonized activities to enable electronic data exchange between clinical.
Public Health Reporting Initiative July 25, 2012.
Public Health Reporting Initiative September 19, 2012.
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting September 12, 2011.
Standards and Interoperability Framework esMD Primer of S&I Phases, Procedures, and Functions S&I F2F Thursday, April 12 th, :00 AM.
EDOS Workgroup Pilots – Engagement Plans. Meeting Etiquette Remember: If you are not speaking keep your phone on mute Do not put your phone on hold –
Public Health Reporting – S&I Framework CEDD Overview
Presentation transcript:

Public Health Reporting Initiative Stage 3 Sprint: Implementation Guide Development 1

Agenda Introductions Objectives Benefits Proposed Report Structure Common Core Data Elements Report Type Specific Data Elements Implementation Specific Data Elements Tiers Scope Approach Proposed Ground Rules Timeline Questions

Introductions Workgroup Lead: Seth Foldy User Story Representation Other Membership Support Team Reportable Conditions HAI Cancer Registry Early Hearing Adverse Event (Drug, Medical, Vaccine, Biologic) Vital Statistics – Birth & Fetal Death National Hospital Care Survey Immunization Registry Tobacco Quit Lines Cancer Genetics

Stage 3 Sprint Objective Develop a harmonized implementation specification for public health reporting that can be tested and implemented in time for MU Stage 3 –Testing by late fall-early winter 2012 –Implementation by Oct 2015 Compatible with needs of multiple report types across multiple public health domains –Specification can serve multiple report types through shared “core” data elements –Also includes harmonized data elements for specific report types

Benefit of the Stage 3 Sprint The Stage 3 Sprint will produce a harmonized specification for consideration for Stage 3 MU incentives & EHR certification –Full specification of some report types ready to have pilot-tested specification by winter 2012/national implementation by 2015 Defined as “Tier 1” for the Stage 3 Sprint –Produce compatible, reusable elements for those less likely to be ready in 2015 Defined as “Tier 2” for the Stage 3 Sprint –Serves multiple reporting programs Development of a set of common core data elements and a consensus on format to streamline reporting programs and enable interoperability

Public Health Report Structure Implementation specific data elements Report-type specific data elements Common core data elements Specific to local or program- specific data needs Desire that these be minimized For a “type of report”: e.g. TB Harmonized when possible Reused as appropriate Harmonized Elements reused by many report-types across several domains Public Health Report = Common Core Data Elements + Report-type Specific Data Elements + Implementation Specific Data Elements

Tiers of Report Type Participation In order to achieve the goal for a pilot-tested implementation specification by winter 2012, user stories for particular report types were assessed for “readiness” and classified into tiers Entire group participates in the development of the common core set of data elements Group also develop Tier 1 report-type specific elements for first release of the PHRI Implementation Guide Tier 2 may develop report type specific elements for subsequent releases Seek full consensus on implementation guidance, but if Tier 2 issues impede consensus may place their issues in “parking lot” for future releases

The PHRI Implementation Specification Release 1 Core Specification –Common core Data Elements –Exchange format(s) selected by Sprint group Tier 1 Report-Type Specifications, potentially including: –Reportable condition case reports (communicable and environmental) –HAI reports –Cancer Registry reports –Early Hearing Detection reports –Birth and Fetal Death report –Adverse Event reports (drug, device, biologic) PHRI Implementation Specification 8

PHRI Implementation Specification Development Approach Select core set of data elements/terminologies/value sets as foundation for many public health report types Align to PHRI Data Harmonization Profile for both common core data elements & report-type specific data elements Analyze and select format standard(s) –Choose standard based on use cases, functional requirements, and capacity to adopt Standards Harmonization –For implementation of both common core selected report-type specific data elements –To accomplish use case and functional requirements –To support more uniform public health reporting infrastructure: sending + receiving 9

Establish Set of Common Core Data Elements Set of common core data elements used widely across different public health reporting domains and report types –Aligned to the Data Harmonization Profile –Intended to serve a wide variety of report types These common core data elements will be mapped into S&I Clinical Element Data Dictionary (CEDD) and other tools to achieve –Reusable collection of public health data elements for Electronic Health Records –Guide coding of public health data elements in EHR –Identification of areas of need for standards development

Format Standards Analysis Depending on use case/functional requirement needs and adoption-readiness, specification based on either or both of: –HL7 v2.x messaging –HL7 CDA (likely “consolidated CDA”) documents Key Considerations –Modularity –Extensibility –Capability of EHR and PH systems to adopt Gaps identified during the analysis will be addressed through standards harmonization

Standards Harmonization The harmonization process seeks to align standards in order to meet the functional and business requirements of public health domains The harmonized core specification needs to take all Tier 1 and as many Tier 2 requirements into consideration as possible –The resulting harmonized core specification will level the playing field to increase HIT adoption and electronic information exchange capabilities across all public health domains The harmonization process: –Builds a consistent representation of required information –Addresses gaps in standards & specifications –Enhances currently-employed standards & specifications –Establishes a uniform specification with broader applicability

Suggested Ground Rules Everyone may speak ID your name & user story (report type) Listen carefully Read assigned work and minutes before each meeting Limit “back-pedalling” to critical issues Yield when it is “good enough”- do not let perfection threaten good Seek consensus quickly; let moderator test consensus If consensus fails, Tier 2 steps back to see if consensus can procede for this first version of the specification Concerns about process? Immediately bring to Foldy’s attention –

Week PHR IG Release 1 Meeting Date (Thursday 2-4 PM EST) 7/197/268/28/98/168/238/309/69/13 Activity Establish common core Set of Data Elements Alignment to PHRI Data Harmonization Profile Analysis of Standards for a Public Health Report Analysis of Standards for Included Report Type Extensions Standards Harmonization Implementation Specification Development (Support Team) Additional Activities Ballot (TBD) Consensus Stage 3 Sprint- Activity Timeline Kick-off Meeting

Next Steps / Questions Work Group Meeting PHRI Stage 3 IG Development: Thursdays 2 – 4 PM EST Wiki Page Or click “Implementation Guide” button from any PHRI wiki page Will post presentations, meeting minutes, “homework”, and documents for review Homework Expect an later this week including a proposed set of common core data elements Review and come prepared to our next meeting as we move towards consensus on this set (note: questions/comments highly encouraged through prior to our next meeting) For questions, contact Lindsay Brown 15