Doc.: IEEE 802.19-11/0099r0 Submission Sept. 2011 Slide 1 Geo-location Database Issues of CEPT Date: 2011-09-20 Authors: Notice: This document has been.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /0128r1 Nov Slide 1 Geo-location Database Issues of FCC Date: Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0003r0 Submission January 2013 S. Filin H. Harada, NICTSlide 1 Introduction to Contributions Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE Jan07-RR-TAG_Liaison_Report.ppt _RR-TAG_802.22_Liaison_Report_Jan07 Submission January 2007 Peter Murray,
Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r0 Submission November 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Comments on PAR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE Submission Month Year Changwen Liu et al, IntelSlide 1 [Reflections on TGn Development and Proposals for ] Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0054r0 Submission May 2011 Slide 1Hyunduk Kang, et al, ETRI Discussion on mode of management service Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /2237r0 Submission July 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D1.0 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /1212r0 Submission TGT and MEF Liaison Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for.
Doc.: IEEE /0003r0 Submission January 2006 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Multiple Access and Effects of Aggregation Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0197r0 Submission March 2005 Nancy Cam-Winget et alSlide 1 TAP & JIT Merge Process Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0460r1 Submission March 2006 Fujio Watanabe, DoCoMo USA LabsSlide 1 Japanese Emergency Call Regulation Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0652r1 Submission May 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D0.12 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Geo-location Database Issues of Ofcom
CX_DME_SAP Primitives
Overview of IEEE Date: Authors: September 2014
Overview of IEEE Date: Authors: August 2014
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
IEEE WG Status Report – July 2005
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
WRAN Protocol Reference Model(PRM)
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
Geolocation Database Interface
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Channel Set Transition for Logical Entities
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Output from Wireless Architecture discussions
November Opening Report
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
TGp Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
On Coexistence Mechanisms
WRAN Protocol Reference Model(PRM)
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
Contribution on Location Privacy
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Negotiation between neighbor CMs
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
September Opening Report
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Addressing White Spaces Across all of IEEE 802
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2007 Month Year
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Negotiation between neighbor CMs
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
IEEE White Space Radio First Call for Contributions
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0099r0 Submission Sept Slide 1 Geo-location Database Issues of CEPT Date: Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the TAG of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE TAG. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Donghun Lee, et al, ETRI

doc.: IEEE /0099r0 SubmissionSlide 2 Abstract This material summarizes geo-location database issues of CEPT The key issues to be addressed are given as follows: –Database topology –Database information from WSDs –Database information to WSDs –Database update frequency –Database architecture Sept Donghun Lee, et al, ETRI

doc.: IEEE /0099r0 Submission Abbreviations and acronyms CEPT : European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications WSD : White Space Devices PMSE : Program Making and Special Events Slide 3 Sept Donghun Lee, et al, ETRI

doc.: IEEE /0099r0 Submission Geo-location database principles The geo-location database is a management system that, on the basis of information on available frequencies associated with locations received from licensed users and location information received from WSD, assists these devices in selecting their operational frequencies This approach would need to take into account the changes in the protected use and the timing of the changes, to ensure that the database has valid content and that the WSD’s have valid information about the available channels Slide 4 Sept Donghun Lee, et al, ETRI

doc.: IEEE /0099r0 Submission Key issues of geo-location database Key issues to be addressed in developing a geo-location approach are given as follows: –Database topology –Database information from WSDs –Database information to WSDs –Database update frequency –Database architecture Slide 5 Sept Donghun Lee, et al, ETRI

doc.: IEEE /0099r0 Submission Database topology (CEPT) Possible options for the management of database –It is possible to have one or more databases and they could be provided by the regulator or third parties authorized by the regulator –Single open database One option is to have a single database for the entire country or for the whole of Europe All WSDs consult this database using a pre-defined and standardized message format The database would be open to all users In practice a European database may not be practical due to differences in national approaches Slide 6 Sept Donghun Lee, et al, ETRI

doc.: IEEE /0099r0 Submission Database topology (CEPT) –Multiple open database Second option is to have multiple databases In this case, WSDs could select their preferred database but there would be no difference between them in the information related to the allowed frequencies One benefit could be an improved availability as a result of redundancy of databases In addition, if some of the databases are operated by third parties, they could offer also other information and value-added services to the WSDs –Proprietary closed database A third option is to have “closed” databases corresponding to different types of devices For example, a manufacturer of WSDs might also establish a database for those devices it had made Multiple manufactures might work together to share a single closed database or one manufacturer might “open up” its protocols and database for others to use if they wish Slide 7 Sept Donghun Lee, et al, ETRI

doc.: IEEE /0099r0 Submission Database information from WSDs (CEPT) The following information needs to be provided by the WSDs to the geo-location database: –Location (minimum requirement) The location is the current position of the WSD expressed in terms of geographical coordinates –Location accuracy (minimum requirement) The location accuracy is the absolute accuracy, with which the geographical position of the WSD is determined, which expressed in terms of an uncertainty radius around the location –Device type (minimum requirement) Providing information about the type of device, such as the device class will allow information to be returned according to device capabilities and interference characteristics –Device model (minimum requirement) –Device ID and expected area of operation (optional) Slide 8 Sept Donghun Lee, et al, ETRI

doc.: IEEE /0099r0 Submission Database information to WSDs (CEPT) The following information needs to be provided by the geo- location database to the WSDs: –Available frequencies (minimum requirement) –Maximum transmit power (minimum requirement) –The appropriate national/regional database to consult (optional) During roaming, the database may return information about which database to consult for available frequencies –Time of validity of the information provided (minimum requirement) –If sensing is required (optional) This information flags the need of sensing in conjunction with the geo-location at a given frequency. For example, license exempt wireless microphones that operate in some countries without being registered in the database. If sensing is needed then the database could also return details of what type of device it is necessary to sense and sensitivity level required in that country Slide 9 Sept Donghun Lee, et al, ETRI

doc.: IEEE /0099r0 Submission Database update frequency (CEPT) Database update frequency is the periodicity with which the database should be updated so that the information it contains remains valid –This will depend on the rate at which the assignments of the protected services/systems change and the notice provided –In general, protected services may need a rapid update as this will provide them with flexibility to make rapid changes to their assignment –WSD users, however, would prefer updates to be infrequent as possible to avoid the overheads associated with database access Slide 10 Sept Donghun Lee, et al, ETRI

doc.: IEEE /0099r0 Submission Database architecture (CEPT) ‘Clear house’ model –The ‘clear house’ model partitions the process of providing information on available channels to WSDs, in order to facilitate the development of multiple database service providers –The key element is the clearing house, which aggregates and hosts the raw data needed to perform database calculations. Data held by the clearing house could comprise: Essential data on television transmitters – location, power etc. The location and extent of area where PMSE is in use, with dates and time as needed –The database service providers would use the raw data together with other required regulatory inputs (algorithms, parameters and exceptions) in the process of calculating the contents of their own databases Slide 11 Sept Donghun Lee, et al, ETRI

doc.: IEEE /0099r0 Submission Database architecture (CEPT) –‘Clearinghouse’model A-between the clearing house and database service providers B-between the database service provider and WSDs Slide 12 Sept Donghun Lee, et al, ETRI