Design for the Environment (DfE) Program April 1, 2008 NEWMOA Green Cleaning Web Conference Libby Sommer Design for the Environment (DfE) U.S. Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P2 Program Update and Opportunities Tanya Mottley Pollution Prevention Division March 17, 2010.
Advertisements

Jim Jones Acting Assistant Administrator Office of Chemical Safety & Pollution Prevention 1.
PBT – P2 Preventing Pollution: A Tool to Reduce and Eliminate Persistent Toxic Substances in the Great Lakes Basin.
A program of the National Pollution Prevention Roundtable.
GREEN CHEMISTRY GREEN CHEMISTRY Presentation Courtesy of the American Chemical Society PREVENTING POLLUTION SUSTAINING THE EARTH 1.
LTJG Kazuhiro Okumura US Public Health Service Division of Environmental Protection Office of Research Facilities National Institutes of Health Reducing.
1 Brominated Flame Retardant (BFR) Use in Electrical and Electronic Equipment.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan Chief, Existing Chemicals Branch, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program – Future Directions Jim Willis Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and.
Green Chemistry Section 18.5
Harmonization and implementation of the directives about dangerous substances, carcinogens and explosive atmospheres Difficulties and suggestions Dr. Gyula.
P2 Framework Models Overview Jan P2 Framework Models Overview Bill Waugh U.S. EPA
Toxics Use Reduction Institute Chemicals Policy in Europe: New Directions Rachel Massey Policy Analyst April 2006.
U.S. EPA Design for the Environment Program NPPR Webinar June 23, 2011 Libby Sommer Environmental Scientist.
Design for the Environment Felicia Kaminsky ESM 595F 2 November 2000.
EPA Tier I Screening Process and
Green Cleaning in Health Care. Enviro-Solution Overview 12 years Proven Solutions Single Focus Many Major Customer 7+ years Key Hospitals: MUHC Chinese.
The Path Forward: Green Chemistry and Chemicals Policy Reform Ken Zarker, Manager Pollution Prevention & Regulatory Assistance Section
Chemicals Policy – A View from the United States Joel Tickner, ScD, Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts.
Material Health and Green Chemistry Northwest Green Chemistry Roundtable Lauren Heine Ph.D. Co-Director Clean Production Action Director GreenScreen Program.
P2 Best Practices that Benefit Employee and Community Health EPA Design for the Environment Program Automotive Refinishing Partnership Mary Cushmac Office.
Advancing environmental sustainability in WHO/PAHO and in the health sector.
US EPA’s Chemical Management Wendy Cleland-Hamnett, Acting Director Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
U.S. EPA Design for the Environment (DfE) Program WERCS June 9-11, 2009 Melanie Vrabel, U.S. EPA.
Characterizing Chemical in Commerce: Using Data on High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals December 12, 2006 L. Twerdok, Ph.D, DABT NPPTAC Member Report.
U.S. EPA Design for the Environment Program NEWMOA November 18, 2010 Clive Davies.
NJ Green Cleaning b Executive Order 76 (EO 76) Issued January 2006Issued January 2006 Directs state agencies to purchase environmentally preferable cleaning.
Understanding the green marketplace Sustainability 101: Paul Dennis Mid-America Distributor Sales.
“ GREEN” FLOOR CARE “ GREEN” FLOOR CARE Resource Center Presentations & Reports Other Helpful Sites.
1 Discussion of the 2006 Inventory Update Reporting Data December 12, 2006 Nhan Nguyen U.S. EPA.
Design for the Environment Improving Health & Environmental Decision Making.
Oregon Toxics Reduction Strategy: Tools and Initiatives June 25, NW NAHMMA Conference Kevin Masterson, Oregon DEQ Agency Toxics Coordinator
Collaborative Environmental Procurement Strategies May 24, 2006 Pamela Brody-Heine Eco Stewardship Strategies Zero Waste Alliance.
U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency October 25, 2005 Region 2 Emerging Chemicals Workshop.
Creating a Healthy School Environment Schools Chemical Cleanout Campaign (SC3) AASA Urban and Rural Healthy Schools Coalition 19 May 2010.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings PowerPoint® Lectures Lectures by Greg Podgorski, Utah State University Protecting.
Sustainable Business and Safer Chemistry Through the Supply Chain How SC Johnson Uses Greenlist ™ To Reduce Our Environmental Footprint Innovators RoundtableNovember.
1 Selected Current and Suggested Ideas on Uses of HPV Challenge Data Nhan Nguyen US EPA Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce: Using Data on High Production.
Understanding Green: Getting To Know Your Green Products Cynthia Vallina OFPP Deputy Associate Administrator Office of Management and Budget Sueanne Pfifferling.
Research & Science Advancing Risk Assessment Presentation March Association of Chemical Industry of the Czech Republic Monique Marrec Fairley.
E NERGY S TAR ® Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machine Industry Meeting Rachel Schmeltz, US EPA Georgia World Congress Center October 22, 2002.
Identifying “Greener” Analytical Methods in NEMI for More Environmentally Friendly Monitoring Jennifer L. Young 1, Paul T. Anastas 1 and Lawrence H. Keith.
Phasing Out PFOS and PBDEs: Voluntary and Regulatory Steps Kenneth Moss Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, EPA HQ October.
Chemistry making a world of difference Responsible Care ® - Thrusts in Europe Dr Richard Robson Cefic Director APRCC, Manila, Philippines 17 th November.
Green Chemistry & Commerce Council (GC3) A project of the Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, University of Massachusetts Lowell.
CALIFORNIA proposed SAFER CONSUMER PRODUCT REGULATIONS Marjorie MartzEmerson October 24, 2012.
Overview of the NSF 375 Draft Sustainability for the Water Treatment and Distribution Industry October 30, 2012.
Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Jesse Eaves US EPA
1 Lauren Heine, Ph.D. Director of Applied Science Tarek Rached Database Engineer and UVA Systems Engineering MS Candidate Green Blue Institute (GreenBlue)
WHAT IS THE GC3? The Green Chemistry and Commerce Council (GC3) is a project of the Chemical Policy & Science Initiative at the Lowell Center for Sustainable.
Background Innovators Roundtable on Sustainable Business and Safer Chemistry Through the Supply Chain discussing barriers and opportunities in the application.
THIRD ECENA EXCHANGE PROGRAMME Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Key Findings and Major Trends (EEA expert workshop, January 2009) Istanbul.
Toxics Use Reduction Institute Tools for Substitution How to find an alternative cleaning product that will work for you – both for performance and safety.
Design for the Environment Program Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce Austin, Texas December 13, 2006 Clive Davies U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Environmentally Preferable Approaches for Meeting Furniture Fire Safety Standards Mark Buczek Supresta American Fire Safety Council Furniture Flame Retardancy.
Prioritization Process and Development of the Hazard Characterization Documents Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics U.S. Environmental Protection.
Region 3 Successes: Reducing Toxics with NPEP Partnerships Sharon Pérez-Suárez, PMP, CHMM U.S. EPA Region 3 Implementing EO 13423: Opportunities to Reduce.
Design for the Environment – Recognition for Safer Products Federal Environmental Symposium East Breakout Session 2.8: “Developing, Testing, and Deploying.
Keys for Building a Collaborative and Transparent Supplier Relationship President, Senior Scientist McFadden and Associates, LLC (Former Vice President,
Design for the Environment Program Overview April 6 th, 2005.
Chemical Product Evaluation and Screening Tools for Real World Decision Making Marilyn Johnson, Director Environmental Initiatives and Corporate Sustainability.
Identify Tribal Exposures to Toxics (To think about)
Communication: Safety Summary
MID-COURSE REPORT Risk Assessment and Monitoring for Environmental Chemicals ( JICA HIC, 1st June 2007) MUCHLIS (INDONESIA)
Multidisciplinary nature of environmental studies Lecture #1
Alec Gosse GreenBlue ACS Green Chemistry & Engineering Conference
The Consortium for Environmental Risk Management, LLC
Cleaner production Assessment in Dairy Processing
Air Toxics Program Laura McKelvey.
Chemicals of concern Session 3 – looking across product sectors to track and manage chemicals of concerns. A thought starter Sandra Averous and Jacqueline.
Presentation transcript:

Design for the Environment (DfE) Program April 1, 2008 NEWMOA Green Cleaning Web Conference Libby Sommer Design for the Environment (DfE) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC

Presentation Outline DfE Program Overview DfE Product Recognition – Overview and Purpose – What is Green Chemistry? – DfE Approach to Safer Chemicals Assessment – What does the logo mean? – Industry Partners CleanGredients™ – Overview – Screenshots Environmentally Preferable Purchasing

DfE Program Overview

Overview of DfE Program Focus – Chemicals of concern – Informed Substitution – OPPT technical tools and expertise Considerations – Business client – Multi-stakeholder participation – Business realities – Potential benefits for industry and the environment Results – Industry partners reduced about 180 million pounds of chemicals of concern last year

DfE Partnerships DfE Alternatives Assessments – Furniture Flame Retardancy Partnership – Flame Retardants in Printed Circuit Boards – Lead-Free Solder in Electronics – Wire & Cable DfE Product Recognition Program – Recognizing Safer Formulations – Safer Detergents Stewardship Initiative DfE Auto Refinishing Best Practices

DfE Product Recognition – Overview and Purpose

DfE Product Recognition Program Overview and Purpose Level the Playing Field -Information on chemicals of concern currently in commerce used to regulate new, pre-commerce chemicals. Suggest Safer, Green-Chemistry Alternatives -Use Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics chemical knowledge and expertise to guide formulators toward safer substitutes. Recognize Innovation -Many leading raw material manufacturers and formulators are innovators, using safer alternatives to develop new technologies. -They deserve ratification and recognition for their success. -Recognition encourages further innovation across the industry.

Be a Science Resource for Companies Leading the Way to Sustainability It’s your government – we’d like to share our chemical expertise. Knowledge base and expertise acquired over many years, estimation models expertly applied, access to subject area experts, unique data sources Apply the principle of “informed substitution” to guide chemical choices and product reformulation – provide sound scientific information on chemical alternatives, avoid unintended consequences Present that information as part of a continuum of improvement, moving toward safer ingredient alternatives and sustainable products

Work with Formulators to Make the Safest Possible High-performing, Cost-effective Products Approach product formulation the way formulators do – Consider every chemical in the formulation as part of its functional class and how it contributes to the overall product performance Make continuous improvement driven by green chemistry innovation part of the sustainability plan

Recognize Only those Products Using the Safest Chemistry Offer chemical consultation to all, but recognition only to those companies whose products use the safest possible ingredients Give formulators the incentive to reach for the best possible formulations by only recognizing those products that use the safest ingredients Help formulators respond to purchaser demand for safer products through product differentiation-the DfE logo

Green Chemistry

What is Green Chemistry? Green Chemistry is the design of chemical products and processes to reduce and/or eliminate substances hazardous to human health and the environment.

Green Chemistry “ Because everything is chemical but heat and light…” PTA

Risk = Hazard x Exposure Why Focus on Hazard?

So, Minimize the Hazard If it’s not there, you don’t have to worry about it! But how do you… – …decide if a chemical is “bad”? – …find an alternative? – …know the alternative is better?

DfE Approach to Safer Chemicals Assessment

Apply Informed Substitution… Identify the Functionality of an Ingredient – Every chemical in a product is there for a reason. – For many ingredients, there are a number of chemicals that can provide similar functionality (e.g. many different surfactants for cleaning products). Understand the Hazard Profile of an Ingredient and its Alternatives – What data are available? Persistent in the environment? Bioaccumulates in animals? Toxicity, e.g. acute toxicity, carcinogenicity – Can models or analogs fill data gaps?

…Then Green Chemistry Principles Which Chemicals have the Lowest Hazard Potential in their Functional Class? Continuum of Improvement Formula Ingredient by Functional Class Of Concern Improved Sustainable Characteristics of Ingredient of Concern Characteristics of Improved Ingredient Characteristics of Sustainable Ingredient

Example: Surfactants Toxic to fish; biodegrades slowly or to more toxic byproducts Continuum of Improvement Surfactants Of Concern Improved Sustainable Toxic to fish; biodegrades readily to less toxic byproducts Less toxic to fish; biodegrades readily to nontoxic byproducts

DfE Screen for Surfactants Safer surfactants degrade quickly to low toxicity degradates. Acute Aquatic Toxicity (L/E/IC50 Value) Rate of Biodegradation ≤1 ppm May be acceptable if biodegradation 1 occurs within a 10-day window >1 ppm and ≤10 ppmBiodegradation 1 occurs within a 10-day window >10 ppm Biodegradation 1 occurs within 28 days without products of concern 2 1 Generally, >60% mineralization (to CO2 and water) in 28 days. 2 Products of concern are compounds with high acute aquatic toxicity (L/E/IC50 ≤ 10ppm) and a slow rate of biodegradation (greater than 28 days).

DfE Screen for Solvents (draft) General Attributes of Concern for All Solvents Carcinogenicity Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Aquatic Toxicity (PBaT) Acute Mammalian Toxicity Key Attributes of Concern for 4 Solvent Classes* Repeated-Dose Toxicity Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity (covered above) Neurotoxicity * Ethylene Glycol Ethers (EGEs), Propylene Glycol Ethers (PGEs), Alcohols, Esters Safer solvents demonstrate low impacts to human health and the environment.

DfE Screen for Fragrances (draft) Human Health and Safety – Carcinogenicity – Reproductive/Developmental Toxicity Fertility Developmental Effects Endocrine Disruption – Acute mammalian toxicity (oral, dermal, inhalation) – Mutagenicity – Systemic Toxicity (Target Organ Effects and Neurotoxicity) – Sensitization (Dermal, Respiratory) Environmental Fate & Toxicity – Persistence/Biodegradation Degradation Products/Metabolites of Concern – Bioaccumulation – Aquatic toxicity (fish, crustacea, and/or algae) Note: DfE Fragrance Screen criteria apply to aroma chemicals and fragrant extracts (essential oils) only

Structure-Activity Relationships (SARs) 2-Butoxyethanol Human health concerns include hemolysis leading to toxicity in kidney, spleen and liver. LOAEL (rat, oral, 6 wks): 222 mg/kg/d LOAEL (rat, inhalation, 13 wks): 77 ppm (0.37 mg/L) n-Propoxyethanol Similar human health concerns including hemolysis leading to toxicity in kidney, spleen and liver. LOAEL (rat, oral, 6 wks): 195 mg/kg/d LOAEL (rat, inhalation, 14 wks): 200 ppm (0.85 mg/L)

Suggesting Safer Substitutes - Fragrances Musk xylol Appears designed for maximum environmental persistence—nitro and t- butyl groups May bioaccumulate Potentially toxic to aquatic organisms May be an indirect toxicant, inhibiting the ability of cells to excrete harmful chemicals Ethylene brassylate Faster biodegradation—ester linkages Fragrance houses have worked with EPA’s Design for the Environment Formulator Program to replace musk xylol with ethylene brassylate

Scrubbing Bubbles ®, A Safer Cleaning Product Ingredients Surfactant Solvent Chelating Agent Preservative Surfactant Solvent Chelating Agent Preservative

When you see the DfE logo on a product, what does it mean? It means that the DfE technical workgroup has screened each ingredient in the product for potential human health and environmental effects and that – based on currently available information, predictive models, and expert judgment – the product contains only those ingredients that pose the least concern among chemicals in their class.

Sampling of DfE Partners DfE has more than 80 Partners representing nearly 500 recognized products (for a complete list go to:

CleanGredients™

CleanGredients™ and the DfE Screens are Defining Safer Chemistry CleanGredients™ is a marketplace… – for suppliers to showcase safer chemical ingredients for cleaning products, and – for formulators to find those ingredients. CleanGredients™ is at the intersection of safer chemistry and high performance ingredients (resource for informed substitution) DfE Screens for Safer Chemical Ingredients – Defined for functional classes of ingredients (e.g. surfactants, solvents) – Chemicals that are acceptable under the DfE Product Recognition Program.

Search by Performance/Physical Properties

Search Results

Detailed Ingredient View

Detailed Ingredient View (continued)

Environmentally Preferable Purchasing

Several states and municipalities include DfE recognition in their procurement standards – State of New Jersey – State of Oregon – State of Colorado – State of Washington – State of Utah – State of Hawaii – State of Illinois (in draft) Additional states and entities are considering DfE recognition for inclusion in their purchasing programs North American Green Purchasing Initiative’s Fact Sheet on Green Cleaners Executive Order 13101: Greening the Government – DfE recognition will be part of EPA’s goals under this EO – Implemented internally through the EPA’s Environmental Management System Home Depot Eco Options

Summary and Conclusions DfE recognition is a leadership standard – only the safest possible ingredients can be used. Its continuous improvement approach promotes innovation. Value-added through DfE’s approach – Informed substitution complements formulators’ own approach to product development – Consider all ingredients regardless of percentage – Engage in life-cycle thinking (green-chemistry chemicals protect throughout the life cycle, from chemical production, to transportation, to disposal) DfE (as part of EPA) has a unique role in providing expert advice, advancing green chemistry, and meeting ever-evolving demands of sustainable product design.

Libby Sommer Design for the Environment Program Thank you. Questions?

Backpocket Slides

What’s Unique About the DfE Formulator Product Review DfE considers chemicals of concern that can be masked by raw material blends or by dilution in water. – E.g.: Acute aquatic toxins. DfE spots negative synergies between product components. – E.g.: Reaction between nitrosating agents and amines to create carcinogenic nitrosamines. DfE uses EPA’s expert knowledge and predictive tools. – E.g.: Structural similarities between chemicals and predictive models used to flag product components with similar potential effects including mutagenicity, developmental toxicity, carcinogenicity, etc. DfE screens all fragrances and dyes for chemicals that may pose health or environmental effects of concern.

Testimonials for DfE “One of the reasons we are so excited about working with DfE is that we can get explanations and recommendations from you and the organization on ways to continually improve our products, both from a performance AND an environmental standpoint.” – Joel Sugarman, Saric Solutions, Inc. “We are delighted to continue to partner with the EPA. Design for the Environment Program supports SC Johnson’s commitment to put the environment and human health at the center of product development and formulation. Companies can and should continue to look closely at making investments that are about doing what’s right for the business and the environment.” – Fisk Johnson, SC Johnson “I personally want to thank you and commend your group and the efforts you are putting into this program. It is refreshing to see this type of work between the government and business. It also is refreshing to see the government offer a program that literally saves us thousands of dollars…” – Scott Jarden, President, The Bullen Companies