The VegBank taxonomic datamodel Sponsored by: The Ecological Society of America - Vegetation Classification Panel Produced at: The National Center for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Landcare Research LCR Manage 7 of 25 Nationally Significant Collections & Databases –CHR (plants, mosses etc) - 600k collections –PDD (fungi) - 80k collections.
Advertisements

The VegBank taxonomic datamodel Robert K. Peet Sponsored by: The Ecological Society of America US National Science Foundation Produced at: The National.
What is a Flora? Peter Hovenkamp. What is not a Flora? Labwork/ecology paper Species selection on non-taxonomic criteria No identification tool Character.
4D4Life Opening Meeting, September, Reading, UK The Global Multi-Hub Network in Concept Frank Bisby An EC Seventh Framework Scientific Data Infrastructures.
To share data, all providers must agree upon a data standard.
OVERVIEW OF DATA FLOW IN NVC PROCESS Field sheets NVC Proceedings.
Taxonomic data issues: An ecologist’s experience R.K. Peet The University of North Carolina Adapted by J Kennedy.
Publish or perish? Linking Scratchpads and the new Biodiversity Data Journal for streamlining publication of botanical data D.N Koureas 1, L. Penev 2 &
The Species 2000 Protocols for a Distributed System by Yuri Roskov, Species 2000 Secretariat 20th International CODATA Conference, Session K2, 25 October.
VegBank.org: a Permanent, Open-Access Archive for Vegetation Plot Data. Michael T. Lee 1, Michael D. Jennings 2, Robert K. Peet 1. Interacting with the.
Integrated Taxonomic Information System Janet Gomon, Deputy Director, ITIS Smithsonian Institution Museum of Natural History The.
Scaling up The International Plant Names Index (IPNI) James A. Macklin Harvard University Herbaria Paul J. Morris Harvard University Herbaria & Museum.
Vegetation databases Lessons from VegBank, SEEK, TDWG, IAVS, & NCEAS Robert Peet University of North Carolina.
Transition to taxon concepts from a world of legacy data --- R.K. Peet 1, A.S. Weakley 1,2, X. Liu 1,3, & N. Franz 4,5 1 The University of North Carolina.
Plant Systematics databases: Users perspectives Robert K. Peet, University of North Carolina In collaboration with The National Center for Ecological Analysis.
Null models and observed patterns of native and exotic diversity: Does native richness repel invasion? Rebecca L. Brown, 1,2 Jason D. Fridley, 1 and John.
Data Integration Issues in Biodiversity Research Jessie Kennedy Shawn Bowers, Matthew Jones, Josh Madin, Robert Peet, Deana Pennington, Mark Schildhauer,
Names are not sufficient: the challenge of documenting organism identity R.K. Peet, J.B.Kennedy, and N.M. Franz and The Ecological Society of America Vegetation.
Improving Restoration Using CVS-Designed Web-Based Tools 7 October 2009 M. Forbes Boyle University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Data models for Community information Robert K. Peet, University of North Carolina John Harris, Nat. Center for Ecol. Analysis & Synthesis Michael D. Jennings,
VegBank A vegetation field plot archive Sponsored by: The Ecological Society of America - Vegetation Classification Panel Produced at: The National Center.
EEP wants to do a better job creating natural ecosystems. CVS provides improved reference data, target design, monitoring, and data management and analysis.
EcoInformatics & Vegetation Science. The symposium message Plant community ecology is on the brink of a dramatic transformation that will be made possible.
VegBank and the ESA Cyber-infrastructure for Vegetation Science Robert K. Peet & The Ecological Society of America Vegetation Panel.
North American initiatives in Ecoinformatics: Vegbank and SEEK Robert K. Peet and The Ecological Society of America Vegetation Panel The SEEK development.
The VegBank taxonomic datamodel Robert K. Peet Sponsored by: The Ecological Society of America US National Science Foundation Produced at: The National.
Vegetation Plot Management: A National Plots Database Demo Funding: National Science Foundation (DBI ) John Harris - NCEAS Robert K. Peet - University.
115 October 2005Richard White - Sp2000/ENBI - Stockholm Litchi: interlinking species information systems Richard White, Andrew Jones, Ed Donovan Computer.
Introduction to Ecoinformatics: Past, Present & Future William Michener LTER Network Office, University of New Mexico January 2007.
Scratchpads Publication Module - A paradigm shift in publishing RBG Kew, Seminar,
Use case lessons: Components of the SEEK architecture Robert K. Peet University of North Carolina.
A new floristic atlas for the Southeast based on taxon concept relationships Robert K. Peet 1, Alan S. Weakley 1,2 & Xianhua Liu 1,3 1 The University of.
Indexing the Species Names of the World - for the World Frank Bisby (Species 2000), Michael Ruggiero (ITIS) Per de Place Bjørn (GBIF - ECAT)
The National Park Service's Information Management Strategy, Infrastructure, and Software Applications.
Brian J. Enquist Dept. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Arizona, Tucson, A.Z. and The Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, N.M. Brian J. Enquist.
GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION FACILITY Cataloging and using Taxonomic Data The Global Names Architecture David Remsen Senior Programme Officer, ECAT.
[] Where Did Those GBIF Occurrences Come From? Providing Digital Access to NatureServe's Reference Database: Report on a Project in the Early Stages of.
By David Marquardt. Kingdom PlantaePlantae Subkingdom TracheobiontaTracheobionta Superdivision SpermatophytaSpermatophyta Division MagnoliophytaMagnoliophyta.
Standardizing Mansfeld's World Database of Agricultural and Horticultural Crops by Implementing a Concept-Based Data Model Ram Narang and Helmut Knüpffer.
Synopsis of current BIEN and Enquist projects managed by Martha iPlant 2014.
Overview of progress in Ecoinformatics Susan Wiser Landcare Research, Lincoln New Zealand.
Experience from Mapping Existing Models to the Transfer Schema Robert Kukla.
Global Biodiversity Information Facility GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION FACILITY Larry Speers Global Biodiversity Information Facility Arthur Chapman.
Vegetation Data Management: VegBank Funding: National Science Foundation (DBI ) January 8, 2002 John Harris - NCEAS.
Collections. Vegetation sampling We observe and collect data on soil.
BiodiversityWorld GRID Workshop NeSC, Edinburgh – 30 June and 1 July 2005 Taxonomic verification: Species 2000 and the Catalogue of Life Frank Bisby.
Multi-institutional collaborative program. Established in 1988 to document the composition and status of natural vegetation of the Carolinas. Provides.
The VegBank Data Model. Biodiversity data structure Taxonomic database Plot/Inventory database Occurrence database Plot Observation/ Collection Event.
The challenge of biodiversity: Plot, organism and taxonomic databases Robert K. Peet University of North Carolina The National Plots Database Committee.
Acronym Soup GBIF, TDWG & GUIDs Jerry Cooper. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Established in 2000 through non-binding MOU (25 countries.
The role of persistent identifiers in tracking taxon changes Andrew C. Jones, Richard J. White, Ewen R. Orme, School of Computer Science, Cardiff University,
Transition to taxon concepts from a world of legacy data --- R.K. Peet 1, A.S. Weakley 1,2, X. Liu 1,3, & N. Franz 4,5 1 The University of North Carolina.
VegBank A vegetation field plot archive Produced at: The National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis Principal Investigators: Robert K. Peet,
General Requirements for GUIDs for Taxonomic Names and Concepts Jessie Kennedy.
AUSTRALIA’S VIRTUAL HERBARIUM A national collaborative model for integrated access to distributed biological information Australian National Herbarium.
The challenge of organism identity --- The flora of the Southeast The flora of the Southeast as a case study Robert K. Peet University of North Carolina.
VegBank and the ESA Cyber-infrastructure for Vegetation Science R.K. Peet, Don Faber-Langendoen, Michael Jennings, & Michael Lee Ecological Society of.
Dave Thau - Mills College - Technology for a Better World111/24/2009 Biodiversity Informatics Dave Thau.
The challenge of biodiversity: Plot, organism and taxonomic databases Robert K. Peet University of North Carolina The National Plots Database Committee.
Globally Unique Identifiers: What, why, when, which and what now? Dave Thau University of Kansas
A vision for community involvement and integration Robert K. Peet & Alan S. Weakley Alan S. Weakley.
VegBank A vegetation field plot archive Produced at: The National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis Principal Investigators: Robert K. Peet,
Data sharing and exchange: Experiences within the
Vegetation Data Management:
CLASSIFICATION VOCABULARY
NutNet data update 15 Aug 2011 Data management update
Taxonomic and Community Classification Resources and Standards
Hurricanes and Hatchlings Don’t Mix
Towards a Logic Formalization of Taxonomic Concepts
Sharing information between projects
Presentation transcript:

The VegBank taxonomic datamodel Sponsored by: The Ecological Society of America - Vegetation Classification Panel Produced at: The National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis Principal Investigators: Robert K. Peet, University of North Carolina John Harris, National Center for Ecological Analysis & Synthesis Steve Taswell, NatureServe (ret.) Larry Morse, NatureServe Janet Goman, ITIS

Biodiversity data structure Taxonomic databases Plot/Inventory databases Specimen databases Observation/Collection Event Object or specimen BioTaxon Locality SynTaxon Community type databases

The Taxonomic database challenge: Standardizing organisms and communities The problem: Integration of data potentially representing different times, places, investigators and taxonomic standards. The traditional solution: A standard list of organisms / communities.

Standard lists are available Representative examples for higher plants include: * North America / US USDA Plants ITIS NatureServe * World IPNI International Plant Names Checklist IOPI Global Plant Checklist

Most standardized taxon lists fail to allow effective integration of datasets The reasons include: The user cannot reconstruct the database as viewed at an arbitrary time in the past, Taxonomic concepts are not defined (just lists), Multiple party perspectives on taxonomic concepts and names cannot be supported or reconciled.

Carya ovata (Miller)K. Koch Carya carolinae-sept. (Ashe) Engler & Graebner Carya ovata (Miller)K. Koch sec. Gleason 1952sec. Radford et al Three concepts of shagbark hickory Splitting one species into two illustrates the ambiguity often associated with scientific names. If you encounter the name “Carya ovata (Miller) K. Koch” in a database, you cannot be sure which of two meanings applies.

R. plumosa R plumosa v. intermedia R. plumosa v. plumosa R. intermedia R. plumosa v. interrupta R. pineticola R. plumosa R. sp. 1 R. plumosa v. plumosa R. plumosa v. pineticola Multiple concepts of Rhynchospora plumosa s.l. Elliot 1816 Gray 1834 Kral 1998 Peet Chapman 1860

NameReferenceAssertion An assertion represents a unique combination of a name and a reference “Assertion” is equivalent to “Potential taxon” & “taxonomic concept”

Names Carya ovata Carya carolinae-septentrionalis Carya ovata v. ovata Carya ovata v. australis Assertions (One shagbark) C. ovata sec Gleason ’52 C. ovata sec FNA ‘97 (Southern shagbark) C. carolinae-s. sec Radford ‘68 C. ovata v. australis sec FNA ‘97 (Northern shagbark) C. ovata sec Radford ‘68 C. ovata (v. ovata) sec FNA ‘97 References Gleason 1952 Britton & Brown Radford et al Flora Carolinas Stone 1997 Flora North America Six shagbark hickory assertions Possible taxonomic synonyms are listed together

NameAssertionUsage A usage represents a unique combination of an assertion and a name. Usages can be used to track nomenclatural synonyms

NameAssertionUsage A usage (name assignment) and assertion (taxon concept) can be combined in a single model Reference

1. Carya ovata 2. C. carolinae 3. C. ovata var. ovata 3. C. ovata var. australis A.ovata sec. Gleason B.ovata sec. FNA C.carolinae sec. Radford D.ovata australis sec. FNA E.ovata sec. Radford F.ovata (ovata) sec. FNA 1-F OK 2-D OK 3-F Syn 4-D Syn Names Assertions ITIS Usage ITIS likely views the linkage of the assertion “Carya ovata var. australis sec. FNA 1997” with the name “Carya ovata var. australis” as a nomenclatural synonym.

Party Perspective The Party Perspective on an Assertion includes: Status – Standard, Nonstandard, Undetermined Correlation with other assertions – Equal, Greater, Lesser, Overlap, Undetermined. Lineage – Predecessor and Successor assertions. Start & Stop dates.

ITIS FNA Committee NatureServe USDA Plants Carya ovata sec Gleason 1952 Carya ovata sec FNA 1997 Carya ovata sec Radford 1968 Carya carolinae sec Radford 1968 Carya ovata (ovata) sec FNA 1997 Carya ovata australis sec FNA 1997 PartyAssertion PartyAssertionStatusStart Name ITIS ovata – G52 NS1996 ITIS ovata – R68 St1996C. ovata ITIScarolinae – R68 St1996C. carolinae-sept. ITIScarolinae – R68 NS2000 ITISovata aust – FNA St2000C. carolinae-sept. ITISovata – R68 NS2000 ITISovata ovata – FNA St2000C. ovata Status Application of Party Perspective

Name Assertion Interpretation Party Usage StatusCorrelation Publication Lineage Data relationships VegBank taxonomic data model

(Inter)National Taxonomic Database? An upgrade for ITIS & Species 2000? Concept-based Party-neutral Perfectly archived Synonymy and lineage tracking