3D Numerical Simulations of Thermohaline Mixing in Low-Mass Red Giants Pavel Denisenkov, UVic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stellar Evolution. The Mass-Luminosity Relation Our goals for learning: How does a star’s mass affect nuclear fusion?
Advertisements

Stellar Evolution. Evolution on the Main Sequence Zero-Age Main Sequence (ZAMS) MS evolution Development of an isothermal core: dT/dr = (3/4ac) (  r/T.
Stellar Evolution: Low Mass Stars
Factors affecting Fusion Rate Density –Since protons are closer together, the mean free path between collisions will be smaller Temperature –At higher.
Introduction to Astrophysics Lecture 11: The life and death of stars Eta Carinae.
Sakurai’s Object Dr H F Chau Department of Physics HKU Dr H F Chau Department of Physics HKU A Case Of Superfast Stellar Evolution.
Asymptotic Giant Branch. Learning outcomes Evolution and internal structure of low mass stars from the core He burning phase to the tip of the AGB Nucleosynthesis.
Ch. 9 – The Lives of Stars from Birth through Middle Age Second part The evolution of stars on the main sequence.
Thermohaline circulation ●The concept of meridional overturning ●Deep water formation and property Antarctic Bottom Water North Atlantic Deep Water Antarctic.
Lithium abundance in the globular cluster M4: from the Turn-Off up to the RGB Bump Collaborators: M. Salaris (University of Liverpool, UK) L. Lovisi, F.R.
Stars and the HR Diagram Dr. Matt Penn National Solar Observatory
Chemical evolution of Super-AGB stars The Giant Branches Lorentz Center, May 2009 Enrique García-Berro 1,2 1 Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya 2 Institut.
PHYS390 (Astrophysics) Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 14
Center for Stellar and Planetary Astrophysics Monash University Summary prepared by John Lattanzio, Dec 2003 Abundances in NGC6752.
Stellar Structure Section 6: Introduction to Stellar Evolution Lecture 15 – Cluster HR diagrams Main-sequence lifetime Isochrones Evolution during H burning.
Stars science questions Origin of the Elements Mass Loss, Enrichment High Mass Stars Binary Stars.
Post Main Sequence Evolution PHYS390 (Astrophysics) Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 15.
The Formation and Structure of Stars Chapter 9. Stellar Models The structure and evolution of a star is determined by the laws of: Hydrostatic equilibrium.
Properties of stars during hydrogen burning Hydrogen burning is first major hydrostatic burning phase of a star: Hydrostatic equilibrium: a fluid element.
Stellar Structure Section 6: Introduction to Stellar Evolution Lecture 16 – Evolution of core after S-C instability Formation of red giant Evolution up.
Lecture 15PHYS1005 – 2003/4 Lecture 16: Stellar Structure and Evolution – I Objectives: Understand energy transport in stars Examine their internal structure.
The Effects of Mass Loss on the Evolution of Chemical Abundances in Fm Stars Mathieu Vick 1,2 Georges Michaud 1 (1)Département de physique, Université.
Marc Pinsonneault (OSU).  New Era in Astronomy  Seismology  Large Surveys  We can now measure things which have been assumed in stellar modeling 
Astronomy 1 – Fall 2014 Lecture 12; November 18, 2014.
Improving our understanding of Stellar Evolution with PLATO 2.0
Properties of stars during hydrogen burning Hydrogen burning is first major hydrostatic burning phase of a star: Hydrostatic equilibrium: a fluid element.
Life Track After Main Sequence
Lecture 1 Time Scales, Temperature-density Scalings, Critical Masses.
Astronomy 1020 Stellar Astronomy Spring_2015 Day-33.
Dust Envelopes around Oxygen-rich AGB stars Kyung-Won Suh Dept. of Astronomy & Space Science Chungbuk National University, Korea
Stellar Fuel, Nuclear Energy and Elements How do stars shine? E = mc 2 How did matter come into being? Big bang  stellar nucleosynthesis How did different.
Lecture 13. Review: Static Stellar structure equations Hydrostatic equilibrium: Mass conservation: Equation of state: Energy generation: Radiation Convection.
Evidence of Stellar Evolution
Lecture 17 Post-ms evolution II. Review Review Review.
1 Stellar Lifecycles The process by which stars are formed and use up their fuel. What exactly happens to a star as it uses up its fuel is strongly dependent.
1 The structure and evolution of stars Lecture 10: The evolution of 1M  mass stars.
Composition and Mass Loss. 2 Two of the major items which can affect stellar evolution are Composition: The most important variable is Y – the helium.
Lecture 24: Life as a High-Mass Star. Review from Last Time: life for low-mass stars molecular cloud to proto-star main sequence star (core Hydrogen burning)
OBJECTIVES OF TODAY’S ACTIVITY
Chapter 17 Star Stuff.
A Star Becomes a Star 1)Stellar lifetime 2)Red Giant 3)White Dwarf 4)Supernova 5)More massive stars October 28, 2002.
Yields from single AGB stars Amanda Karakas Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics Mt Stromlo Observatory.
The Red Giant Branch. L shell drives expansion L shell driven by M core - as |  |, |  T| increase outside contracting core shell narrows, also L core.
The Sun in the Red Giant Phase (view from the Earth!)
Our Place in the Cosmos Lecture 12 Stellar Evolution.
Lecture L08 ASTB21 Stellar structure and evolution Prepared by Paula Ehlers and P. Artymowicz.
Chapter 12 Star Stuff Evolution of Low-Mass Stars 1. The Sun began its life like all stars as an intersteller cloud. 2. This cloud collapses due to.
Dept. of Astronmy Comparison with Theoretical CM diagram Galactic Astronomy #6.1.3 Jae Gyu Byeon.
What are ocean currents?
Globular Clusters. A globular cluster is an almost spherical conglomeration of 100,000 to 1,000,000 stars of different masses that have practically.
6 - Stellar Evolution-I. The life history of a star is determined by its mass…..
18-19 Settembre 2006 Dottorato in Astronomia Università di Bologna.
Lecture 16 Post-ms evolution. Overview: evolution.
Water Properties Surface Tension Viscosity Changes in State.
Origin of the elements  Which reactions  Which physical conditions  Which astrophysical sites  Which quantities Yields depend on reaction rates, M,
Universe Tenth Edition Chapter 19 Stellar Evolution: On and After the Main Sequence Roger Freedman Robert Geller William Kaufmann III.
Lives in the Balance Life as a Low Mass Star. Star mass categories: Low-mass stars: born with less than about 2 M Sun Intermediate-mass stars: born with.
Stellar Evolution Please press “1” to test your transmitter.
Naomi Pequette.  Goals:  Use Hansen’s Stellar Evolution Demo to follow the sun on its post-main sequence evolutionary track  Better understand the.
Naomi Pequette. 1.Core Hydrogen Burning 2.Shell Hydrogen Burning 3.First Dredge Up 4.The Bump in the Luminosity Function 5.Core Helium Flash 6.Core Helium.
Convective Core Overshoot Lars Bildsten (Lecturer) & Jared Brooks (TA) Convective overshoot is a phenomenon of convection carrying material beyond an unstable.
The Adventures of a Thermally Pulsating AGB Star
Giants reveal what dwarfs conceal:
Electromagnetic Spectrum
THERMOHALINE CIRCULATION
Composition of Stars Classify stars by their color, size, and brightness. Other properties of stars are chemical composition and mass. Color and Temperature.
Nucleosynthesis and stellar lifecycles
The Giant Branches Workshop - Lorentz Center,
Bellwork 12/13 Thinking about our simulation last class…
Composition and Mass Loss
Presentation transcript:

3D Numerical Simulations of Thermohaline Mixing in Low-Mass Red Giants Pavel Denisenkov, UVic

3D Numerical Simulations of Thermohaline Mixing in Low-Mass Red Giants Pavel Denisenkov, UVic A story about how important and difficult it is to take account of mixing in stars when studying stellar nucleosynthesis

(From Bania, T. M., Rood, R. T., and Balser, D. S. 2007, Space Science Review, 130, 53) The abundance of 3 He should have increased by an order of magnitude since the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, but it has been remaining nearly constant

The incomplete pp-chain reactions produce a lot of 3 He far from the centre of a low-mass star on the main sequence, and low-mass stars are the most abundant species of stellar populations

Left: Evolution of a low-mass star in the HR diagram (M = 0.83M , Z = ) Right: Changes of abundance profiles inside the star that drive its evolution Data points are field stars with M = 0.8 – 0.9M , Z = – from Gratton et al. (2000) Arrow in the right panel shows the bottom of convective envelope

Left: Evolution of a low-mass star in the HR diagram (M = 0.83M , Z = ) Right: Changes of abundance profiles inside the star that drive its evolution on the MS, 3 He is produced in a wide pocket (blue curve in the right panel) after the MS, convection spreads 3 He all over the envelope (the 1 st dredge-up) mass-loss on the RGB and AGB will deliver this 3 He into ISM

Left: Evolution of a low-mass star in the HR diagram (M = 0.83M , Z = ) Right: Changes of abundance profiles inside the star that drive its evolution on the MS, 3 He is produced in a wide pocket (blue curve in the right panel) after the MS, convection spreads 3 He all over the envelope (the 1 st dredge-up) mass-loss on the RGB and AGB will deliver this 3 He into ISM

Low-mass red-giant-branch (RGB) stars show evidence of extra-mixing operating in their radiative zones between the hydrogen-burning shell and convective envelope that starts above the so-called “bump luminosity”. This RGB extra-mixing is most likely to reduce the envelope 3 He abundance back to its BBN value. How to explain the fact that the abundance of 3 He in the ISM has not changed since the BBN?

Left: Evolution in the HRD around the bump luminosity (M = 0.83M , Z = ) Right: H-burning shell erases abundance discontinuities What happens at the bump luminosity?

Left: Evolution in the HRD around the bump luminosity (M = 0.83M , Z = ) Right: H-burning shell erases abundance discontinuities What happens at the bump luminosity?

Left: Evolution in the HRD around the bump luminosity (M = 0.83M , Z = ) Right: H-burning shell erases abundance discontinuities What happens at the bump luminosity? On upper RGB, above the bump luminosity, the radiative zone has uniform chemical composition, which facilitates fluid buoyancy of any origin

Thermohaline convection as a mechanism for extra mixing in RGB stars Reaction 3 He( 3 He,2p) 4 He decreases µ locally byΔµ ≈ − Thermohaline convection is driven by a small difference in salinity S between a fluid element and its surrounding medium when the atomic diffusivity is much lower than the heat diffusivity K. In the ocean, it develops when both S and T decrease with depth and it takes a form of salt fingers, hence “salt-fingering convection” is another term for it. P ( µ *, ρ 1 *,T ) Double-diffusive (  K) instability leads to growing salt fingers in water

Thermohaline convection as a mechanism for extra mixing in RGB stars Reaction 3 He( 3 He,2p) 4 He decreases µ locally byΔµ ≈ − The RGB thermohaline convection is driven by a small difference in µ between a fluid parcel and its surrounding medium because the atomic diffusivity is much lower than the heat diffusivity K. It develops when µ decreases with depth (usually, µ increases with depth in stars)

Thermohaline convection as a mechanism for extra mixing in RGB stars The RGB thermohaline convection is driven by a small difference in µ between a fluid parcel and its surrounding medium because the atomic diffusivity is much lower than the heat diffusivity K. It develops when µ decreases with depth (usually, µ increases with depth in stars)

Thermohaline convection as a mechanism for extra mixing in RGB stars Reaction 3 He( 3 He,2p) 4 He decreases µ locally by |Δµ | ‹ (Eggleton et al. 2006) The RGB thermohaline convection is driven by a small difference in µ between a fluid parcel and its surrounding medium because the atomic diffusivity is much lower than the heat diffusivity K. It develops when µ decreases with depth (usually, µ increases with depth in stars)

2D numerical simulations of thermohaline convection in the oceanic and RGB cases (a change of color from red to blue corresponds to an increase of S and µ) Salinity fieldMean molecular weight field

3D numerical simulations of the oceanic and RGB thermohaline convection Ocean (S)RGB (µ)

The empirically constrained rate of RGB extra-mixing is D µ ≈ 0.01K which is a factor of 50 higher than the value estimated in our 2D and 3D numerical simulations Therefore, the physical mechanism of RGB extra-mixing is most likely to be different from thermohaline convection driven by 3 He burning A promising alternative mechanism is the buoyant rise of magnetic flux rings (Parker’s instability)

The End