Prosecution Group Luncheon May, 2011. General Announcements Version 3 of TBMP now available online; copies in the print rooms USPTO submits “Trademark.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prosecution Lunch October Trademark Bullies? USPTO is requesting feedback from U.S. trademark owners, practitioners, and others regarding their.
Advertisements

Intellectual Property Protection – Critical Issues to Consider in Business Ventures John F. Letchford, Esquire Archer & Greiner, P.C.
Trademark Group Luncheon March, TM Announcements New version of TBMP due online by end of March Eliminating step of furnishing printed copy of published.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademark Updates November, 2011.
Prosecution Group Luncheon June, 2011 Trademarks.
Reputation. Reputation Reputation means that an association has been established between the mark and the source Reputation means that an association.
1 Hatch-Waxman Boot Camp July 19-20, 2010 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
1 Rule 132 Declarations and Unexpected Results Richard E. Schafer Administrative Patent Judge Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
BB30 Business Law 6.01Summer 2013 ES 6 UNDERSTAND SALES, CONSUMER, PROPERTY, AND CYBER LAWS.
Prosecution Group Luncheon July 2012 Trademarks. Failure To Function, the next rejection? MONTICELLO YELLOW In re Thomas Jefferson Foundation, Inc., Serial.
Maintaining Trademark Rights: Policing and Educational Efforts April 7, 2011.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademarks April, 2011.
Branding Elements and Strategies Chapter 31 Branding, Packaging, and Labeling Section 31.1 Branding Elements and Strategies Section 31.2 Packaging and.
 Intangible property  Patents  Copyrights  Trade secrets and know-how  Trademarks © TM.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School September 14, 2004 Trade Dress - Part 2.
Copyright vs. trademark
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 23 Sales and Lease Warranties Chapter 23 Sales and Lease Warranties.
Chapter 25 Intellectual Property Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Public Communications Law Lecture 7 Slide 1 Copyrights In general, copyright protection can apply to: –Original works of authorship –Fixed in any tangible.
Section 31.1 Branding Chapter 31 branding, packaging, and labeling Section 31.2 Packaging and Labeling.
Chapter 18-Internet Law www World Wide Web-Wild,Wild West? New Global Community has caused many ethical dilemmas Unequal Access increasing wealth gap.
Non-Traditional Marks
Trademark & Copyright Licensing Nathan C. Belzer October 12, 2007.
TRADEMARKS. Definition A trademark is any word, name, phrase, symbol, logo, image, device, or any combination of these elements, used by any person to.
Trademark and Copyright Updates July USPTO TMEP Update July 2015 TBMP Update July 2015 Final rule relating to Changes in Requirements for Collective.
Broadening the Scope of the Claims in Gene Therapy Applications Deborah Reynolds Detailee, TCPS
Essentials Of Business Law Chapter 16 Warranties McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 7 Part 2. Consumer Protection Laws A Consumer is someone who buys or leases goods, real estate, or services for personal, family, or household.
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon October USPTO – New Guide for Service Specimens “in direct association with” the services –Used in advertisements.
Model Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.3 Candor Toward The Tribunal (a) A lawyer shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of fact or law to.
35 U.S.C. 112, Second Paragraph Examination Memorandum Robert Clarke Director, Office of Patent Legal Administration United States Patent and Trademark.
Prosecution Group Luncheon January Nice Agreement 10 th ed. Version 2013 developed to classify, most entries are not sufficiently definite to use.
VC-1 Patent Portfolio License Briefing* *This presentation is for information purposes only. Actual license agreements will provide the only definitive.
Prosecution Lunch September Trademark Public Advisory Mtg. Concerns about unauthorized practice of law by document mgmt services and others eFiling-
Product / Price / Promotion / Place Marketing....
In re Phoseon Technology Inc., 103 U.S.P.Q.2d 1822 (TTAB 2012) 1 Failure To Function As Mark SEMICONDUCTOR LIGHT MATRIX.
© 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 5 Intellectual Property.
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon August 21, USPTO – Enhanced Assignment Filing New Conveyance Types –Entity conversion –Merger and change of name.
Asian Patent Attorneys Association By Thomas Q.T. Tsai The Recognized Group of Taiwan Group Report.
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon March Are You A Canadian John Doe? February 2014, Federal Court of Canada ordered an ISP to release the names and.
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon May 15, USPTO April 2014 version of TMEP published – clarifications/ revisions regarding: –Trade dress examination.
Prosecution Luncheon November 2014 (No December luncheon)
Trademark May Pay the USPTO’s ATTORNEY FEES??? Ex parte appeal to D. Ct. for De Novo Review –must name the Director of the PTO as a defendant; and.
Prosecution Luncheon February 13, USPTO – TM Withdrawal Form may use form to request withdrawal. Removes info from the attorney and correspondence.
Prosecution Lunch Trademark January NEXT MEETING – ONE WEEK Friday, February 4, 2011 Imogen Wiseman Cleveland IP - London Discussing recent developments.
Off-Balance-Sheet Activities Chapter 13. OBS Activities  invisible to all but best informed investor or regulator  in accounting terms, OBS activities.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademarks August, 2011.
Milano, TRADEMARK. A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services produced or provided by one company from those of.
LOGO DESIGN. Brand-Identity-Logo Brand Identity Logo Think of your brand, identity and logo like these 3 Russian nesting dolls modeled to look like Star.
Essentials Of Business Law Chapter 25 Intellectual Property McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon May 15, USPTO April 2014 version of TMEP published – clarifications/ revisions regarding: –Trade dress examination.
Prosecution Group Luncheon Trademark Updates October, 2011.
Chapter 18 The Legal Aspects of Sport Marketing. Objectives To introduce the key legal concepts and issues that affect the marketing of the sport product.
Business Law Class Council Rock School District Mr. Sherpinsky – W355 Chapter 14.
Creative Commons terms and definitions By Chelsey Maton.
Trademark Update June 13, No Likelihood of Confusion? TAMAYA is not confusingly similar to MAYA TTAB found dissimilarity based on: –3 syllables.
All My Own Work? Workshop Slides for use in conjunction with the Plagiarism Awareness Pack Centre for Learning & Teaching.
4/20/2016The Banner Firm, LLC (c) th AIPLA TRADEMARK BOOT CAMP Final Refusals & Preparing for Appeals June 9 & 10, 2016 Brian Edward Banner.
Reviewing Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc. and other select 2012 trademark cases of interest Garrett Parks Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Presented to the Alaska.
Person/Business/Agent’s Name Address City, State, Zip
Practice Group Luncheon
George Cotroneo BUSS213 March 23, 2017
Prosecution Luncheon July 2016.
HOW TO AVOID INVALID U.S. TRADEMARK REGISTRATIONS BY BEING ABLE TO PROVE A BONA FIDE INTENT TO USE IN THE U.S. Presented by Howard J. Shire 13 October.
Noteworthy Developments at the TTAB
Chapter 31 branding, packaging, and labeling Section 31.1 Branding
Prosecution Luncheon Trademark
Property in Cyberspace
Chapter 31 branding, packaging, and labeling Section 31.1 Branding
Using Image Recognition Software for Searching Designs
Presentation transcript:

Prosecution Group Luncheon May, 2011

General Announcements Version 3 of TBMP now available online; copies in the print rooms USPTO submits “Trademark Litigation Tactics” report to Congress, April 2011

Eva’s Bridal – 7 th Cir. Owner argued that they never doubted the high standards of the other store owners and had no reason to regulate - all stores sold the same designer dresses - consumers essentially do their own regulating 7 th Cir. affirmed –There is no requirement to ensure “high quality” goods – rather, trademark owners must ensure “consistent and predictable quality” How much control is enough? Case by case basis –In this particular case, there was no control Eva’s Bridal Ltd. v. Halanick Enterprises Inc., 98 USPQ2d 1662 (7 th Cir. 2011) Owner of the EVA’S BRIDAL mark had been licensing the name to relatives for other stores One license agreement expired and owner sued for using the mark without a license and without payment Dist. Ct. – owner had abandoned the mark by engaging in naked licensing (not exercising reasonable control over quality)

The ‘Eddie Bauer Guarantee’ Fails Eddie Bauer filed on the mark: OUR GUARANTEE EVERY ITEM WE SELL WILL GIVE YOU COMPLETE SATISFACTION OR YOU MAY RETURN IT FOR A FULL REFUND Does not function as a trademark –Commercial impression to the relevant public is merely informational In re Eddie Bauer Licensing Services LLC, Serial No (May 2, 2011) [not precedential]

Different Word – Same Meaning ITOWNS and IVILLAGE confusingly similar for news services –TTAB noted the differences in sound and appearance, but ruled that their "similarity or identity" in meaning outweighed the differences so that the marks as a whole are similar in commercial impression. –" The ordinary meaning and usage of the two words are so close as to render the marks similar in the minds of ordinary consumers, who are not likely to be experts in the definitions of municipalities." CLOUDBANKS and FOGBANKS confusingly similar for wine –TTAB ruled that the substantially similar meaning between 'fog' and 'cloud' outweighs any differences in appearance and sound. –"The ordinary meaning and usage of the two words are so close as to render the marks similar in the minds of ordinary consumers, who are not likely to be experts in meteorological terms." In re The Hartford Courant Company, Serial No (April 22, 2011) [not precedential] Fast Forward Brands, LLC v. Houdini, Inc., Opposition No (April 22, 2011) [not precedential]