RPPR Guidelines and Component Instructions NOT-OD-13-035.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) Grantees may access a list of progress reports that are due using the Status page in eRA Commons, and selecting.
Advertisements

Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) Office of Sponsored Projects Dartmouth College 2013.
RPPR R ESEARCH P ERFORMANCE P ROGRESS R EPORT The new NIH progress report standard format.
Office of Sponsored Programs VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY The Office of Sponsored Programs has upgraded COEUS to accommodate the new Grants.gov C-Forms About.
Just-in-Time JIT features and UMass approaches. JIT purpose In an effort to focus the NIH review on the science and to save the applicant time and effort,
 August 14, 2012 Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health, HHS Scarlett Gibb, Customer Relationship Manager, eRA Commons Kathy Hancock,
Review Suggested Citations Review Match to PubMed Citation.
Using MyNCBI for Training Grants Stephanie Scott Communications and Outreach Director Sponsored Projects Administration (SPA) Dina Matsoukas Head of Reference.
The NIH Public Access Requirement March 2014 Tara Douglas-Williams, MSLS.
Complying with the NIH Public Access Policy Clemson University Avoid delays with NIH Awards.
RPPR Online in the eRA Commons Public Access Compliance at My NCBI.
Preparing and Submitting Reports Della Brown White, Ph.D. Program Officer, Office of Health Equity Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health.
FEBRUARY 7, 2012 SERIES 2, SESSION 3 OF AAPLS – PART 2: POLICY & APPLICATION COMPONENTS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module E:
NOVEMBER 19, 2013 PRE-AWARD TOPICS MODULE SESSION 8 OF SERIES III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PRE-AWARD LUNCHEON SERIES) How to Use eRA Commons.
NIH Public Access Policy: RPPR and MY NCBI Amanda Snyder, Assistant Director, SPA Alexa Mayo, Associate Director, HS/HSL April 24, 2013.
NIH Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR)
Communicating With Your Program Director : Understanding the Who, Why & How Elisa Woodhouse Division of Cancer Biology New Grantee Workshop March 18, 2015.
NIH’s schedule for MANDATORY electronic submission of applications:  December 15, Support for Conferences & Scientific Meetings (R13 & U13)  June.
Pre-Award Miscellaneous Topics. What happens after the S2S/Cayuse grant is submitted by OCGA/DRA? S2S/Cayuse coverts the data to a Grants.gov acceptable.
University of Pennsylvania 1 1 AGENCY UPDATES Office of Research Services February 7 th, 2013 ORS Brown Bag - Agency Updates.
NANCY ABBOTT CANR GRANTS DEVELOPMENT OFFICER [GDO] CANR Sponsored Project Proposal Process.
Office of Research Information Systems Walk-Thru of Proposal Submission.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 SESSION 8 OF AAPLS – OVERVIEW OF THE APPLICATION FORMS AND MOST COMMON ERRORS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module.
Komen Grants eManagement System GeMS. Why Online Grants  Reduce the amount of administrative paperwork being completed by applicants and grantees. 
Komen Grants eManagement System GeMS. Why Online Grants  Reduce the amount of administrative paperwork being completed by applicants and grantees. 
ERA Commons and Progress Reports How PIs and the NIH Communicate Elisa Woodhouse Division of Cancer Biology New Grantee Workshop March 12, 2014.
NIH Implementation and Guidance Syracuse University Office of Sponsored Programs Stuart Taub.
Complying with the NIH Public Access Policy: From Soup to Nuts
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
POST-AWARD GRANT MANAGEMENT June 23, 2014 Presented by Arina V. Kramer Grants Management Specialist Office of Grants Administration, NCI.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW Changes to Application Forms and Instructions October 6, 2009.
Presented by: Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) and Office of Animal Welfare (OAW) OSP All-Staff Meeting October 2014.
WORKING WITH SPO AND IAO Lynne HollyerNoam Pines Associate Director Research Administrator Industry Alliances OfficeSponsored Projects Office
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research 1 Update on PHS New Rule on Financial Conflicts of Interest (FCOI) Presentation to Business Managers January.
How PIs and the NIH Communicate: eRA Commons and Progress Reports Susan McCarthy DCB New Grantee Workshop March 15, 2013.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
Tracking & Review Attaching Documents, Proposal Review, and Submission Office of Grant & Contract Services 17 January 2012.
The Basics of the Effort Certification and Reporting Technology (ECRT) System.
Social Innovation Fund Creating an Application in eGrants Technical Assistance Call 1 – 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, March 19, ;
NIH UPDATE Reference: NOT-OD Error correction window REDUCED from 5 to 2 business days Proposal “on time” if ALL of the following are met Registrations.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Self Review (SESR) Activity Three: Corrective.
DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN SUBCONTRACTS/SUBAWARDS CITI Training.
DCB New Grantee Workshop: Post-Award Administration of Grants Brett Hodgkins Team Leader National Cancer Institute Office of Grants Administration.
FEDERAL UPDATE Jeff Warner Senior Contract and Grant Officer Alisia Ford Contract and Grant Officer Spring QRAM - Tuesday, March 12, 2013.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
Clinical Research Training Center Office of Training Grants RPPR: Training Grant Focus Training Grant Administrators Working Group July 8, 2015.
Office of Sponsored Projects & Industry Partnerships 1 OSPIP Process Meeting February 3, 2011 NIH Regional Seminar in April New Adobe Forms for NIH Recent.
Richard MocarskiLauren Wilson Coord. of Res. Comms.Senior Associate Dir.OSP.
GCO INFORMATION SESSION: YOU ASK, WE ANSWER NIH R01 A PPLICATION B ASICS P RESENTED BY : M ICHELLE H UMPHREYS G RANTS A NALYST II G RANTS AND C ONTRACTS.
Research Administration Forum Changes to NSF & NIH Proposal Submission and Award Documents December 8, 2015.
1 Mission Impossible: Understanding the Pre-Award Grant Process Monique Foxx, MHSA Manager, Office of Sponsored Programs Stephanie Bair, MS Grants Management.
1 The NIH Public Access Requirement [short presentation] June 2013.
Komen Grants eManagement System GeMS. Why Online Grants  Reduce the amount of administrative paperwork being completed by applicants and grantees. 
Collecting Copyright Transfers and Disclosures via Editorial Manager™ -- Editorial Office Guide 2015.
COBRE Post Award Management Christy Leake Grants Administration Branch National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH.
Office of Sponsored Projects Federal Updates/Reminders ROUNDTABLE FEBRUARY 9, 2016 CAMPUS.
Sponsored Programs Administration (SPA).  Coeus is now updated with the SF424 D-Forms for all NIH submissions due May 25, 2016 and after.  For proposals.
Training Module 5: Budget Modifications Connecticut Advanced Manufacturing Initiative (CAMI) October 12, 2015 Meg Niewinski, Finance Officer Meg Niewinski.
To the ETS – PNG Continuation: Online Training Course
eRA & eRA Commons – Systems & Resource overview
Conducting the performance appraisal
NIH Public Access Policy: RPPR and MY NCBI
Conducting the performance appraisal
Carol Wigglesworth and Emily Linde National Institutes of Health
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS
Just In Time Concepts & Review
To the ETS – PNG Continuation: Online Training Course
K R Investigator Research Question
Annual NIH Progress Reports
Presentation transcript:

RPPR Guidelines and Component Instructions NOT-OD

Due Dates Non-competing SNAP- Due 15 th of the month preceding the budget end period – 05/31/13 budget end period would be due 04/15/13 Fellowships – Due on the 1 st of the month, two months preceding the budget end period – 05/31/13 budget end period would be due 04/01/13 If the due date falls on a weekend or federal holiday, then the due date is the next business day

Formatting Use of Text Boxes – 8000 character limit (3 Pages) NIH prefers text response be limited to one page PDF Attachments/File Names – Generate in MS Word and convert to PDF prior to attaching – Submit as individual files. Do not bundle using Adobe – File names must be 50 characters or less – Only use characters A-Z, a-z, 0-9 and underscore (_) – Only use an underscore for word separation in file names

Routing Error Check – Perform an error check in eRA Commons and correct all errors prior to routing paper copy to OGC. – If changes are made after OGC has returned the paper routing, perform an error check and correct any errors prior to routing to the signing official in eRA Commons Route paper copy to OGC. – A routing form referencing the grant award number, direct cost total, F&A costs and total costs is required for routing to OGC – Paper copy must be routed to OGC prior to routing RPPR to signing official in eRA Commons – It is not necessary to print out the entire RPPR. Submitting the completed routing form is sufficient Route to Signing Official – Once paper routing has been returned by OGC and all suggested corrections have been made, route to Dianthony Davis in eRA Commons for final submission

RPPR Component Instructions  Cover Page  Select Dianthony Davis as Signing Official  Select Christine Ahearn as Administrative Official  All other information should pre-populate from eRA Commons profile

Section B Accomplishments  B.1 What are the major goals of the project?  Use the goals/specific aims in the approved application  If milestones/target dates are listed, identify the actual completion dates or percentage of completion  If awarding agency has approved any changes to goals, list the revised goals  This step is only required in the first non-competing type 5 submission  B.1.a Have the major goals changed since the initial competing award or previous report ?  Select yes or no  If yes, must have written approval from awarding agency  Must be entered in section B.1 for first non-competing type 5 submission  Text box will be provided for changes in the subsequent years

 B.2 What was accomplished under these goals?  For the current reporting period describe ▪ 1) Major Activities ▪ 2) Specific Objective ▪ 3) Significant result ▪ 4) Key Outcomes  For most NIH awards the response should not exceed 2 pages  B.3 For this reporting period, is there one or more Revision/Supplement associated with this award for which reporting is required?  Select yes or no  If yes is selected provide grant number or title and describe aims and accomplishments for revision/supplement Section B Accomplishments

B.4 What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided ? – Select Nothing to Report if the research is not intended to provide training and professional development or if there is nothing significant to report – Otherwise add attachment describing the opportunities for training and professional development provided to anyone who worked on the project or anyone who was involved in the activities supported by the project – Typically for but not limited to T, F, K, R25, R13, and D43 awards Section B Accomplishments

B.5 How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? – Describe how the results have been disseminated to communities of interest – For awards not designed to disseminate information to the public or conduct similar outreach activities, a response is not required and the grantee should select Nothing to Report What do you plan to do for the next reporting period to accomplish goals? – Describe briefly what you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals and objectives Section B Accomplishments

B.6 What do you plan to do for the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? – Describe briefly what you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals and objectives. – Include any important modifications to the original plans. Provide a scientific justification for any changes involving research with human subjects or vertebrate animals. A detailed description of such changes must be provided under Section F. Changes. Section B Accomplishments

Section C Products This sections allows agencies to assess and report both publications and other products to Congress, communities of interest, and the public Note: Publication data in these tables is dynamic until the progress report is submitted to the agency. Any change to the data occurring in PubMed, PubMed Central, the PD/PI’s My Bibliography account, or in the compliance status of a publication will refresh upon saving the C.1 Products section, or opening the RPPR in another session. When the progress report is submitted to the agency, the publication data is frozen in the progress report C.1 Publications – Are there publications or manuscripts accepted for publication in a journal or other publication during the reporting period resulting directly from the award? – PD/PIs are required to report all publications that arise from their NIH award in this section – If there are publications to report select Yes and ensure that the Associate with this RPPR box is checked as appropriate – If there are no publications to report select No My NCBI Accounts – The tables on the RPPR draw information from the PI/PD’s MY NCBI Account – PI/PD’s can create a My NCBI account using their eRA Commons credentials

Table 1: All Publications Associated with this Project in My NCBI – This table will lists all publications in the PI/PD’s My Bibliography collection, publications associated with this award, and publications that have not been in previous electronic progress reports for this award Associate with this RPPR is automatically checked Make sure to uncheck Associate with this RPPR for any publications that need to be disassociated with this award NIH Public Access Compliance Indicates current compliance status with the NIH Public Access Policy Publications that are non-compliant can be brought into compliance within 10 days PI/PD’s are advised to do so within two weeks of the beginning of the new budget period so their award is renewed in a timely manner Section C Products

Table 2: Publications not associated with this project in My NCBI – Lists all other publications that are in the PI/PD’s My Bibliography collection not associated with current award – Can check Associate with this RPPR for any publications that need to be link to current award – Table 3: Publications previously report for this project – Lists publications from previous electronic progress reports – Should ensure these publications comply with the Public Access policy The report may be submitted with noncompliant publications; however the system will generate an automated to the PD/PI (with cc to the AO and SO) requesting that the grantee provide evidence of compliance or an explanation – Due two weeks prior to the next budget start date – Grantee must respond via an to the GMS and PO or via the Progress Report Additional Materials (PRAM) » Found in the eRA Commons status page

Progress Report Additional Materials (PRAM) Means for the grantee to enter, review and submit information in response to specific request from NIH for additional materials following the submission for an RPPR – Currently only used for items that relate to public access – Will be expanded to include additional type of request in the future – PI can enter the PRAM but the PRAM must be submitted by the SO Steps for PI to initiate a PRAM – Access the eRA Commons Status Result – List of Applications screen – Select PRAM link in action column of appropriate grant

Progress Report Additional Materials (PRAM) Steps for PI to initiate a PRAM – Enter a response in the text box in 2,000 characters or less and select the Route button at the bottom of the screen The Public Access Compliance section at the bottom contains guidance for responding to the automated requesting evidence of compliance and a text box in which to enter the response

Progress Report Additional Materials (PRAM) Steps for PI to Initiate a PRAM – Select an SO from the Next Reviewer drop-down list – Enter text into the Comments field as necessary. This is not a mandatory field – Select the Submit button to continue – Read the assurance statement and select the Submit button to agree to the content and continue routing the PRAM to the next reviewer Steps for SO to submit PRAM – Access the Status screen on eRA Commons – Enter the appropriate query parameters to locate the grant and select the Search button – From the Action column, select the link for PRAM – Select the Submit button – Read certification agreement. Select the I Agree button to continue submitting the information – When PRAM is submitted to Agency, an notification is sent to the PD/PI (Contact PI) on the grant, the submitting SO, the SO assigned to the RPPR, and AO assigned to the RPPR

Section C Products.  C.2 Website(s) or other internet site(s)  List the URL for any internet site(s) that disseminates the results of research activities ▪ Provide short description for each site ▪ Select Nothing to Report if award is not designed to create or maintain one or more websites  C.3 Technologies or Techniques  Identify technologies or techniques that have resulted from the research activities  Select Nothing to Report if no results exist for the reporting period

Section C Products.  C.4 Inventions, patent applications and/or licenses  Have inventions, patent applications and/or licenses resulted from the award during this reporting period? Select Yes or No  If yes, has this information been previously provided to the PHS or to the official responsible for patent matters at the grantee organization? Select Yes or No  C.5 Other Products and Resources  Other Products : Identify any other significant products that were developed under this project ▪ Describe the product and how it is available to be shared with the research community ▪ Do not repeat information provided above  Resource Sharing: ▪ PD/PIs and grantee organizations are expected to make the results and accomplishments of their activities available to the research community and to the public at large ▪ See NIH sharing policies at

Section D Participants D.1 What Individuals have worked on the project? – Provide information for the PI and each person who has worked at least one person month per year during the reporting period to the nearest whole person month List personnel at their most senior role on the project Commons ID is required for all Post-Docs Can report 0 effort for PIs that report person months

Section D Participants D.2 Personnel Updates – D.2.a Level of effort Will there be, in the next budget period, either (1) a reduction of 25% or more in the level of effort from what was approved by the agency for the PD/PI(s) or other senior/key personnel designated in the Notice of Award, or (2) a reduction in level of effort below the minimum amount of effort required by the Notice of Award? – Answering Yes constitutes prior approval from agency – D.2.b Are there, or will there be, new senior/key personnel? If yes, upload biosketches and other support for all new senior/key personnel

Section D Participants D.2.c Has there been a change in the active other support of senior/key personnel since the last reporting period? If yes, upload active other support for senior/key personnel whose support has changed and clearly indicate what the change has been D.2.d Are there, or will there be, new other significant contributors? – If yes, upload biosketches for all new other significant contributors D.2.e Will there a change in the MPI Leadership Plan for the next budget period? – Requires prior approval of agency – If yes, upload a revised MPI Leadership Plan that includes a description of the change(s)

Supplemental Instructions 7.1 K Awards – The RPPR Component Instructions in chapter 6 are applicable to individual Career Development Awards (K01, K02, K05, K06, K08, K18, K22, K23, K24, K25, K26, K99, KL1) with the following exceptions: – B.4 What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Describe activities such as teaching, clinical care, professional consultation, service on advisory groups, and administrative activities Indicate percent of time spent in each of these activities and the relationship to the awardee's research career development – B. 6. What do you plan to do for the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Provide a timeline for the activities planned for the next year, including plans to apply for subsequent grant support

Supplemental Instructions – G.2 Responsible Conduct of Research Describe the responsible conduct of research instruction received by formal and/or informal means, during this reporting period – Any activities undertaken to individualize instruction appropriate to career stage should be discussed – Address the five components: Format, Subject Matter, Faculty Participation, Duration, and Frequency – G.3 Mentor’s Report For mentored K awards, provide a letter signed by the mentor, in PDF format, assessing the awardee's progress and performance during this reporting period, both in research and in terms of development into an independent investigator in the area of the award – Include information on the availability of support for the candidate’s research project during the next budget segment – For applicable career transition awards (e.g., K22, K99), the mentor should describe the awardee’s efforts to transition into a permanent research position and the sponsor’s contributions to that process

Supplemental Instructions 7.2 Fellowship Awards – The RPPR Component Instructions in chapter 6 are applicable to Fellowship Awards (F05, F30, F31, F32, F33, F34, F37) with the following exceptions – B.6 What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Include any course work and any important modifications to the original plans. Provide a scientific justification for any changes involving research with human subjects or vertebrate animals

Supplemental Instructions – G.2 Responsible Conduct of Research Describe the responsible conduct of research instruction received (or instruction given as a course director, discussion leader, etc., in the case of senior fellows or senior career awardees) by formal and/or informal means, during this reporting period Any activities undertaken to individualize instruction appropriate to career stage should be discussed Address the five components: Format, Subject Matter, Faculty Participation, Duration, and Frequency – G.3 Sponsor Comments Provide a letter signed by the sponsor, in PDF format, assessing the quality of the research training (including academic work) and research progress made by the Fellow during this reporting period.

Supplemental Instructions 7.3 SBIR/STTR Awards – The RPPR Component Instructions in chapter 6 are applicable to SBIR/STTR awards (R41, R42, R43, R44, U43, U44) with the following exceptions: – B.2 What was accomplished under these goals? Describe milestones or goals achieved

Supplemental Instructions – B.3 Competitive Revisions/Administrative Supplements For this reporting period, is there one or more Revision/Supplement associated with this award for which reporting is required? If yes, identify the Revision(s) by grant number (e.g., 3R01CA S1) or title and describe the specific aims and/or milestones for each Revision – B.6 What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? For FastTrack and Phase II progress reports include a one-page abstract describing the research plan for Phase II and, as necessary, an updated commercialization plan

Supplemental Instructions – 7.3 SBIR/STTR Awards Cont. – C.5.a Other products For SBIR/STTR awards commercial technologies will be addressed under Impact – E.3 What is the impact on technology transfer? Describe ways in which the project made an impact, or is likely to make an impact, on commercial technology or public use, including: – transfer of results to entities in government or industry; – instances where the research has led to the initiation of a start-up company; or – adoption of new practices.

Supplemental Instructions – E.3.a Commercialization Activities Report on the status of commercialization activities resulting from the award – E.3.b FDA Interactions Report on interactions with the Food and Drug Administration during the reporting period related to the technology that is the subject of the award

Supplemental Instructions 7.5 Education Awards – The RPPR Component Instructions in chapter 6 are applicable to Education awards (D42, K30, R13, R25, RL5, T14, T36, U13, U2R) with the following exceptions – B.4 What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided Describe opportunities for training and professional development provided to anyone who worked on the project or anyone who was involved in the activities supported by the project Grantees with NIH institutional training grant awards with the following specified activity codes are required to provide program statistics for doctoral training in Table 12A: D43, TU2, T15, T32, T37, T90, U2R, U90, and U54/TL1

Supplemental Instructions E.1 What is the impact on the development of human resources? – Describe how the project made an impact or is likely to make an impact on human resource development in science, engineering, and technology F.1 Changes in approach and reasons for change – Include, as appropriate, the role of external advisory committees, significant new content, procedures or experiences, and indicate how these aid in strengthening and realizing the objectives and goals of the award G.2 Responsible Conduct of Research – If required in the FOA for this award, describe the nature of the responsible conduct of research instruction and the extent of participant and faculty involvement – Include a description of any enhancements and/or modifications to the five instructional components (Format, Subject Matter, Faculty Participation, Duration, and Frequency) from the plan described in the competing application

Questions? Ryan Holland – PreAward Specialist