Regional and Bilateral Arrangements for Labor Mobility: Potentials and Challenges? Md. Shahidul Haque IOM Regional Representative for the Middle East UN ESCWA – ALO Regional Workshop on “Movement of Natural Persons and its Implications on Development in the Arab States” Cairo, 5 – 6 September 2007
MRF Cairo - September Introduction Since the beginning of industrial civilization, people have been moving to provide services or to promote goods/services in foreign markets. It was managed though consular and/or trade arrangements mainly between two countries/entities. International labor mobility is a trans-national process and neither destination nor origin countries can address all related issues acting alone.
MRF Cairo - September Introduction International labor mobility remains a highly regulated affair between or among states. Labor mobility can be viewed from two general perspectives: Trade negotiation perspective Labor market perspective
MRF Cairo - September Migrants worldwide -- all categories labor migrants *ILO estimates (Sept 2006) Temporary labor migrants Mode 4 Overall Migration and Mode million 86 million* ? ?
MRF Cairo - September Overall Migration and Mode 4 In financial terms: considerable impact and potential 3% liberalization for labor mobility may lead to global economic welfare gains of US 300 billions for both developing and developed countries 191 million 86 million* ? ? Mode 4: a very small number of highly-skilled persons
MRF Cairo - September Political Economy of Labor Mobility Migrants (rights) Markets (liberalization/profit) Destination Countries (sovereignty) Transit Countries Origin Countries (benefit)
MRF Cairo - September Arrangements for Labor Mobility Existing arrangements on movements for employment overseas are as follows: Multilateral: no global arrangement for labor mobility. Regional: mainly trade and integration agreements with provisions for labor mobility. Bilateral: agreements for labor mobility and/or trade agreements with provisions for labor mobility. Unilateral: policies of some countries for labor mobility.
MRF Cairo - September Multilateral Arrangements No comprehensive global system or instrument to manage labor mobility. States jurisdiction to regulate migratory flows. Differences exist between labor origin and destination countries.
MRF Cairo - September Regional Arrangements involving Labor Mobility Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) mainly aim at decreasing trade barriers between parties (not to manage labor mobility). It treats mobility mainly in four ways: Comprehensively deals with labor mobility including permanent and temporary mobility. Allows free movement of labor (entry to local labor market). Provides limited movement of labor. Provides limited movement only for service providers (no labor mobility) - GATS
MRF Cairo - September Examples of RTAs and Labor Mobility RTAs providing full mobility of labor: European Union Agreement on the European Economic Area (ECA) European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA)
MRF Cairo - September Examples RTAs….. RTAs providing market access for certain groups: Caribbean Community (CARICOM) North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and Canada – Chile Free Trade Agreement. Group of Three (Colombia, Venezuela and Mexico)
MRF Cairo - September Examples RTAs…. RTAs using the GATS model with some additional elements: ASIA Free Trade Area (AITA) Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreements (Morocco and Tunisia)
MRF Cairo - September Examples RTAs… Agreements using the GATS model Southern Common Market Agreement (MERCOSUR) Agreements providing facilitated entry for labor (no market access) Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Forum. South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation.
MRF Cairo - September Bilateral Arrangements involving Labor Mobility BLA is an arrangement (Treaties and MOU) between states, regions and public institutions that provide for the recruitment and employment of foreign short or long term labor (OECD). Though a common mechanism to regulate inter- state labor mobility and much more widely used than RTAs, most temporary labor mobility takes place outside bilateral state arrangements.
MRF Cairo - September Bilateral Arrangements In post WW – II, industrial nations resolved to labor recruitment from abroad to address domestic labor shortage. By 1900, trading nations or entities concluded bilateral arrangements under “Treaties of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation (FCN)” to provide limited right for establishment/mobility.
MRF Cairo - September Bilateral Arrangements By end of 1960s, a number of European countries and the USA entered into bilateral agreements for employing foreign workers (most of these agreements were discontinued or replaced by the 1970’s). By the early 1990’s: renewed interest in BLAs, faced with labor demand particularly European countries signed agreements with non European countries to facilitate entry of labor. In Asia, by late 70s bilateral agreements have tended to address the labor mobility issues.
MRF Cairo - September Objectives of BLAs Can bring order and predictability in the management of labor markets (recruitment, placement, integration and return). BLAs address flow of low-skilled labor in particular. Origin Countries: increase access to foreign labor market. enhance economic development (remittance, transfer of skill/knowledge). higher protection for migrants.
MRF Cairo - September Objectives … Destination Countries: ease labor shortage and forge commercial and economic relations with origin countries. assist integration of foreign workers in a host economy and society. Reduce irregular migration ensure return of migrants after end of the arrangement/labor market demands
MRF Cairo - September Categories of Bilateral Arrangements The most common categories of BLA are as follows: Seasonal or guest worker agreement. Contract/project linked agreement. Agreements for trainee or other short-term training programs. Working and holiday schemes.
MRF Cairo - September Examples of BAs including BTAs for Labor Mobility Canada Seasonal Agricultural Workers Program. Australia – New Zealand Closer Economic Relations (ANZCERTA). Japan – Singapore Free Trade Agreement. US – Jordan Free Trade Agreement.
MRF Cairo - September Developed along parallel tracks Governmental policies & practices for migration management Mode 4 Migration Management and Mode 4 Two sets of realities Mode 4: not a migration agreement ; it’s about trade in services
MRF Cairo - September Developed along parallel tracks Two sets of realities ; it’s about trade in services Mode 4: not a migration agreement Governmental policies & practices for migration management Mode 4 Migration Management and Mode 4 Framework governing migration Relevant regulatory framework:
MRF Cairo - September Conclusion Regional and bilateral arrangements concerning labor mobility have evolved rapidly through broadening its scope, implementation process and institutional framework. Difficult to measure effectiveness of these arrangements as they often pursue several objectives. Success of these arrangements depend on the “political” will of the states and stakeholders.
MRF Cairo - September Thank you indeed.