1 Service Standards & Measurement Status Report MTAC: February 18, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
® Service Performance Measurement using Intelligent Mail & Seamless Acceptance.
Advertisements

1 Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2008 It’s Time for Intelligent Mail ® : Overview and Value of Intelligent Mail ®
Global Systems Management Surface Visibility Presented by USPS at July 10 Packages Subgroup Meeting.
Service Performance Measurement using Intelligent Mail & Seamless Acceptance.
Price Change 2015 USPS Pricing Overview May 2015.
® Confidential and Privileged Five-Day Delivery MTAC Briefing Sam Pulcrano, Vice President, Sustainability Bob Michelson, Manager, Program Management and.
Price Change Effective April 26, 2015 Northeast Area Mailing Industry Focus Group Meeting February 25,
Full Service and The Future of Mail Acceptance Anthony Loera Supervisor, Business Mail Entry 1.
Visibility Strategy September, Visibility Today CONFIRM provides piece level mail processing data that can be used for tracking for letters and.
MTAC WG 114 MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement Update – May 16, 2007.
MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement First-Class Mail Measurement July 24, 2007 FCM Subgroup Meeting.
Take The Guesswork Out Of Shipping 1 Holiday Shipping Options: The USPS Advantage Lower Costs and Maximize Value!
Service Measurement – SPMS PO Box Up Time Measurement at Delivery Units Presented by: Kathy Ainsworth Vice President, Retail Operations and Jordan Small.
® Product Visibility Baltimore PCC Jeff Freeman Manager, Network Visibility Systems March 16, 2012.
® Intelligent Mail Update Measurement & Barcodes Periodicals Subgroup June 25.
Network Rationalization Mail Moves, Labeling Lists and Mail Direction File Industry Webinar July 1, 2013 To listen to a recording of this presentation.
USPS.com Focus on Business and Let Your Desktop Deliver Annual Postal Customer Council (PCC) Mailer’s Education Seminar University of Baltimore March 18,
® Service Measurement & Reporting Format MTAC November 7, 2007.
November 01, 2005 MTAC 93 Design & Concept Testing Workgroup Status.
® MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement USPS Service Measurement Capability July 31, 2007.
Presentation of the Office of the Consumer Advocate,Postal Regulatory Commission MTAC Full Workgroup May 15, 2007.
Seamless Acceptance Pilot February 20, Agenda Pilot Status Pilot Findings Business Entity Identifier (BEI) Assessment Approach Feedback Options.
® Service Standards and Targets September 19, 2008.
Corporate Automation Plan PHASE 2 February 4, 2004Washington D.C.
Mailing Services Price Change Effective April 17, 2011 January Mailing Services Price Change GBPCC L & L Andrée Kater Manager, Business Mail.
Mailing Services Price Change Effective Jan. 22, 2012 Prepared by Product Classification, U.S. Postal Service October 2011 January 2012 Mailing Services.
® Intelligent Mail NPPC May 13, Intelligent Mail Vision Provide end-to-end visibility, throughout the entire supply chain, using:  Standardized.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
® Webinar 6 Expanded EXFC Presented by Delores Killette Vice President, Consumer Affairs and David Williams Manager, Processing Operations Friday, November.
MTAC WG 114 MTAC Workgroup 114 DRAFT Recommendations Review and Discussion Full Workgroup Meeting August 29, 2007.
Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC #87 Update Washington, D.C. November 2, 2006.
1 Service Standards and Measurement Webinar Series Summary March 6, 2009.
Intelligent Mail February Vision Provide end-to-end visibility and a seamless process for mail acceptance and delivery, using standardized intelligent.
1 PACKAGE VISIBILITY PROJECT Jim Cochrane & Gary Reblin Mailer’s Technical Advisory Committee.
® 1 Agenda SPM Exclusion Process & Exclusion Definitions Update SPM Matrix Data Sources Open Discussion.
USPS Product Information MTAC Jim Cochrane Vice President, Product Information February 17, 2011.
Mail Acceptance and Induction Seamless Mailing with Intelligent Mail Barcodes Debbie A. Cooper Quebecor World Logistics.
Postal Logistics & Transportation Jeff Kruepke Quad/Transportation Services (414)
The Future of Presort MSMA August 15,2007 Alison HallDennis Shults General ManagerOwner Pitney Bowes PSI Presort Services KC Presort.
® Customer Supplier Agreements Presented by Pritha Mehra Vice President, Business Mail Entry Friday, October 17, 2008.
® Intelligent Mail® and Start-the-Clock (101) Presented by Pritha Mehra, Vice President, Business Mail Entry Friday, October 10, 2008.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
1 Shaping a More Efficient Future Price Change Proposal Mailers’ Technical Advisory Committee Stephen M. Kearney Vice President Pricing & Classification.
Mailing Services Prices Mailers’ Technical Advisory Committee February 19, 2009 Maura Robinson VP Pricing.
MTAC WG 114 MTAC Workgroup 114 Service Performance Measurement Review and Discussion Full Workgroup Meeting July 31, 2007.
GLA FOCUS GROUP August 20, MAILING INDUSTRY ECOSYSTEM 2 Mail Owners E-Commerce Logistics Printers & Mailers Software Vendors Equipment Manufacturers.
® Intelligent Mail Measurement Readiness. Letters - Automation Data Capture PointTechnologyTimelineBarrier Start the Clock: Induction Acceptance scans.
MTAC Workgroup #87 - Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process August 3, 2006.
Confirm/PLANET Codes  MTAC Summary Confirm Program Office
MTAC Work Group #82 Parcel Delivery Performance Measurement Effectiveness.
® Service Standards and Performance Measurement MTAC Workgroup 114 Status Report.
1 Service Performance Measurement System & Intelligent Mail® Barcodes MTAC – January 31, 2008.
® Confidential and Privileged Five-Day Delivery MTAC Briefing Sam Pulcrano, Vice President, Sustainability Bob Michelson, Manager, Program Management and.
® Intelligent Mail Measurement Readiness June 13, 2007 Full WG Meeting.
1 Move Update February Move Update Nov. 23, 2008  Move Update required for mailpieces claiming Presorted or Automation prices for First-Class®
® Webinar #10 Commercial First-Class Mail and Standard Mail Measurement Presented by Tom Day Senior Vice President, Intelligent Mail and Address Quality.
SERVICE STANDARDS MTAC Work Group #114 February 21, 2007 Jeffrey C. Williamson Manager, Network Development & Support.
Changes By Class of Mail
1 Start-the-Clock for Non Full-Service Mailings MTAC 139 November 17, 2010 Rose FlanaganChris Simone Data-Mail IncUSPS.
1 Service Measurement Status Report MTAC: November 19, 2008.
Simplifying the Commercial Mailing Experience Heather Dyer Program Manager Major Mailer Support HQ.
Copyright © 2010 USPS. All rights reserved. CONFIDENTIAL AND RESTRICTED Presented to IMPC 1.
June 30, Agenda Review new postal rates for May 11, Update on SMDS Energy Savings Plan. Post Office Boxes on zip code Interoffice delivery.
Express Mail Offers: Overnight delivery to most locations Money back guarantee Receives expedited handling from acceptance to delivery Express Mail label.
… January 14 – 16, 2014 Wanda Senne NAAD Meeting, February 28, 2014
USPS Pricing October 24, 2011 | 12:30 – 1:30 pm Eastern Time
Price Change 2018 October 2017.
Price Change 2019 January 2019.
Intelligent Mail.
Presentation transcript:

1 Service Standards & Measurement Status Report MTAC: February 18, 2009

2  Postal Act of 2006 required USPS to “establish modern service standards”  By December 20, 2007, in consultation with the PRC for all Market Dominant Products  Consideration of Various Objectives and Factors  Value, access, reliability, measurability  New Service Standard Business Rules  Based on Operating and Logistics capabilities by product  Class based, independent of shape  Integrate origin entry and destination entry standards Modern Service Standards Established Service Standards

3  Two Levels of Service Standard Review  Ongoing Maintenance - Quarterly  Localized adjustments  National Systemic Review - Annual Review  System wide review  First annual internal review Oct - Dec  Evaluate business rules  Considerations  Operationalizing service standard initiatives  Network plan  Full year of performance measurement data Ongoing Review Process Service Standards

4  External: Single-piece Domestic and International First-Class Mail, Periodicals  Hybrid: Presort First-Class, Standard  Internal: Packages (Parcel Post, Library Mail, Media Mail, and Bound Printed Matter), Special Services Gathering data through three approaches: Service Measurement

5 External Measurement:  Applies to:  First Class Mail® (Single-Piece) - EXFC  Single Piece International – IMMS  Third-party vendor creates “test mail”  “Test Mail” anonymously dropped into USPS network; date/time recorded  “Test Mail” received by panel of recipients; date recorded Service Measurement

6 USPS Mail Processing Test Mail Fabrication Test Mail Induction Test Mail Receipt Collection Origin Processing Destination Processing Delivery Single-piece First Class Mail / External First-Class (EXFC ) Service Measurement

7 EXFC Points of Emphasis:  As of October 1, 2009, virtually all 3-Digit SCF’s are included in EXFC  99.9% mail coverage; 891 three-digit ZIP Code spans  Reported quarterly to the district level  IMMS reported at the area level  Specific 3-Digit, and in limited cases 5- Digit, exclusions submitted to PRC Service Measurement

8 Hybrid Measurement:  Will take effect with the implementation of Intelligent Mail® – Release 2  First-Class Mail (Presort)  Standard  Periodicals  Supplements mail scans from internal Intelligent Mail® system with externally collected data Service Measurement

9 Hybrid Measurement Approach Origin Processing Destination Processing Delivery Acceptance Transport to Delivery Unit Transport to Destination Delivery Unit Processing Stop-the-Clock External reporters scan IMb on mail at delivery Visible through Intelligent Mail, up to final MPE Operation Code or other scan event  External Measurement  External Reporters will scan live mail  Contractor will calculate last mile delivery factor for each mail class  Factor combined with IM data to form end-to-end service measurement Delivery Factor External Stop-the-Clock Service Measurement

10 FCM Presort and Standard Interim Approach  Uses “first processing scan” at point of entry as a proxy for Start-the-Clock; “last processing scan” plus last mile delivery factor, based on EXFC reporters, as Stop  Processing scan on USPS automated equipment clearly demonstrates the mailing has been entered into USPS Network  As Mailers/USPS demonstrate capability, we will transition to container scans at entry  Pilot data being used to calculate performance; data reported at the area level, quarterly Service Measurement

11 Periodicals Interim Approach  Use two external systems -  Red Tag and DelTrak  Measurement reported by external provider  Data reported quarterly at the area level  Once IMb adoption is sufficient, measurement process similar to commercial letters and flats Start-the-ClockStop-the-Clock FAST appointment and container scans Delivery date reported by each system’s monitors Service Measurement

12 Internal Measurement:  Applies to:  Package Services  Special Services  Package Services rely upon Delivery Confirmation data (Retail and Bulk Entry)  Data reported quarterly to the district level  Special Services cover a broad range of products with distinctly different data Service Measurement

13 Special Services  PO Box Uptimes  Percent on time reported quarterly to the district level  Delivery Services (eReturn Receipt, Del Con, Certified, Registered, etc.)  Scans available within 24 hours of scanned event; reported quarterly to the district level  Insurance Claims, CONFIRM, Money Order Inquiry, Address Correction Services, Address List Services  Reported quarterly at the national level Service Measurement

14  Implementing saturation flat mail measurement  “Home Depot” method  Start the clock: saturation mail barcode scanned to indicate “arrival at unit”  Stop the clock: saturation mail barcode scanned when delivered  Developing remittance mail analytics  Supplements EXFC diagnostic data  Uses sort plan data from postal processing equipment Measurement Enhancements: Service Measurement

15 Observations  Work in progress  Multiple systems  Cost implications  Communication  Monthly consultations with PRC  Dialogue with customers, mailing community  Bi-weekly SSMOC  Results posted on usps.com Service Measurement

16 FY09 Targets - Market Dominant Products Annual Targets

17 National Performance PQ 1, FY 2009 Source: IBM Global Business Services Market Dominant Mail Class Overnight % On-Time Two-day % On-Time Three-Five Day % On-Time Single-Piece First-Class Mail M.D. Mail Class Within +1 day Within +2 days Within +3 days Within +1 day Within +2 days Within +3 days Within +1 day Within +2 days Within +3 days Single-Piece First-Class Mail OvernightTwo-DayThree-Five Day PQ1 Results

18 Source: IBM Global Business Services M.D. Mail Class % On-Time Overnight % On-Time Two-Day % On-Time Three-Day Presort First-Class Mail M. D. Mail Class Within +1 day Within +2 days Within +3 days Within +1 day Within +2 days Within +3 days Within +1 day Within +2 days Within +3 days Presort First-Class Mail OvernightTwo-DayThree-Five Day National Performance PQ 1, FY 2009 PQ1 Results

19  Presort First-Class Mail®  Pilot data  Limited district induction points  Mostly letters  Representation limited  Customer identification possible  Area level public reporting  Remittance Mail to begin in 2009 Issues and Challenges PQ1 Results

20 Source: IBM Global Business Services Market Dominant Mail Class Percent On-Time Single-Piece First-Class Mail International86.2 Market Dominant Mail Class Within +1 day Within +2 days Within +3 days Single-Piece First-Class Mail International Inbound/Outbound National Performance PQ 1, FY 2009 PQ1 Results

21 Source: IBM Global Business Services Market Dominant Mail Class % On-Time Destination Entry % On-Time End-to-End Standard Mail M. D. Mail Class Within +1 day Within +2 days Within +3 days Within +1 day Within +2 days Within +3 days Standard Mail Destination EntryEnd-To-End National Performance PQ 1, FY 2009 PQ1 Results

22  Standard Mail  Mostly letters  Limited induction points  Excludes destination entry and saturation flats  Representation limited  Customer identification possible  Area level public reporting Issues and Challenges PQ1 Results

23 Source: IBM Global Business Services Market Dominant Mail Class% On-Time Periodicals69.8 Market Dominant Mail Class Within +1 day Within +2 days Within +3 days Periodicals National Performance PQ 1, FY 2009 PQ1 Results

24  Periodicals  Temporary process  Very limited validation for start the clock  Lack of rigorous reporter discipline  Sampling error is a concern  Address Change Service for FY 2009 Issues and Challenges PQ1 Results

25 Source: IBM Global Business Services Market Dominant Mail Class% On-Time Ground Package Services64.7 Market-Dominant Mail Class Within +1 day Within +2 days Within +3 days Ground Package Services National Performance PQ 1, FY 2009 PQ1 Results

26 Source: IBM Global Business Services Delivery Information Special Services Combined Score Post Office Box Up-Time % On-Time Special Services CONFIRMAddress Correction Insurance Claims Processing Address- List Services Money Order Inquiry % On- Time Special Services National Performance PQ 1, FY 2009 PQ1 Results

27  Special Services  ACS customers converting to daily fulfillment  Completion in Quarter 2  Denominator programming changes will be completed for Quarter 2 Issues and Challenges PQ1 Results

28  Standards in Place  Measurement Systems Developed and Working  Service Opportunities Identified  Issues and Challenges Identified Summary PQ1 Results