Doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 1 Proposal for extension of the IEEE 802.11b PHY to Higher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /389r1 Submission November 2000 Steve Halford and Mark WebsterSlide 1 Overview of OFDM for a High Rate Extension Steve Halford Mark.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /320r0 Submission May 2002 Gerhard Fettweis, Systemonic AGSlide 1 ¼ Giga-Bit/s WLAN Gerhard Fettweis Gunnar Nitsche Systemonic AG.
An approach to the problem of optimizing channel parameters March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /152 Submission.
Doc.: IEEE /0534r1 Submission Duration in L-SIG Date: Youhan Kim, et al.Slide 1 Authors: May 2010.
Chapter : Digital Modulation 4.2 : Digital Transmission
Doc.: IEEE /148 Submission March 2001 J. Lauer, C. Hansen, R. Gubbi, M. Fischer, BroadcomSlide 1 Interleaving for Reed Solomon Coding for the.
a By Yasir Ateeq. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TASKS OF TRANSMITTER PACKET FORMAT PREAMBLE SCRAMBLER CONVOLUTIONAL ENCODER PUNCTURER INTERLEAVER.
Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum. Spread Spectrum Spread power of signal over larger than necessary bandwidth in order to: 1. Reduce interference by signal.
6.375 Project Arthur Chang Omid Salehi-Abari Sung Sik Woo May 11, 2011
Submission May, 2000 Doc: IEEE / 086 Steven Gray, Nokia Slide Brief Overview of Information Theory and Channel Coding Steven D. Gray 1.
Digital Voice Communication Link EE 413 – TEAM 2 April 21 st, 2005.
Doc.:IEEE /0206r0 Submission January 2015 Shiwen He, Haiming Wang Pilot Design for OFDM PHY for aj(45 GHz) Authors/contributors: Date:
Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course
Department of Computer Engineering University of California at Santa Cruz Data Compression (2) Hai Tao.
Module contents Technologies overview Spread Spectrum Modulation
Multilevel Coding and Iterative Multistage Decoding ELEC 599 Project Presentation Mohammad Jaber Borran Rice University April 21, 2000.
Abdul-Aziz.M Al-Yami Khurram Masood Case Study: Phase III Transmitter Receiver Simulation.
Lecture 71 Today, we are going to talk about: Some bandpass modulation schemes used in DCS for transmitting information over channel M-PAM, M-PSK, M-FSK,
Dr. Carl R. Nassar, Dr. Zhiqiang Wu, and David A. Wiegandt RAWCom Laboratory Department of ECE.
Doc.: IEEE /180r0 Submission March 2002 Monisha Ghosh, et al., Philips Slide 1 On The Use Of Multiple Antennae For Monisha Ghosh, Xuemei.
Doc.: IEEE /102r0 Submission January 2002 M. Webster, et al IntersilSlide 1 Proposed Change to CCK-OFDM Signal Extension Mark Webster Steve Halford.
A Novel one-tap frequency domain RLS equalizer combined with Viterbi decoder using channel state information in OFDM systems Advisor: Yung-an Kao Student:
Basic Characteristics of Block Codes
Doc.: IEEE /383 Submission November1998November 1998 Jamshid Khun-Jush, ETSI-BRANSlide 1 BRAN#11 PHY Decisions & Issues to Resolved with
Introduction of Low Density Parity Check Codes Mong-kai Ku.
Doc.: IEEE /270 Submission July 2003 Liang Li, Helicomm Inc.Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Dept. of EE, NDHU 1 Chapter Four Bandpass Modulation and Demodulation.
Doc.: IEEE /663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE ah lowest MCS Date: Authors:
Information Theory Linear Block Codes Jalal Al Roumy.
1 Coded modulation So far: Binary coding Binary modulation Will send R bits/symbol (spectral efficiency = R) Constant transmission rate: Requires bandwidth.
Doc.: IEEE /0112r0 Zhanji Wu, et. Al. January 2013 Submission Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for the Next Generation WLAN Date:
802.11b PHY Wireless LANs Page 1 of 23 IEEE b WLAN Physical Layer Svetozar Broussev 16-Feb-2005.
Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course Term Catharina Logothetis Lecture 9.
Doc.: IEEE /1398r0 Submission November 2014 Slide 1 Shiwen He, Haiming Wang Preamble Sequence for IEEE aj (45GHz) Authors/contributors:
Doc.: IEEE /0130r0 Submission January 2010 Yung-Szu Tu, et al., Ralink Tech.Slide 1 Proposed TGac Preamble Date: Authors:
Muhammad Shoaib Bin Altaf. Outline Motivation Actual Flow Optimizations Approach Results Conclusion.
Bandpass Modulation & Demodulation Detection
Park et al. May, 2009 Submission doc.: IEEE g Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 RCPI: Improved RSSI Measurement a quantized power measurement to support network management Joe Kwak InterDigital Communications.
Doc.: IEEE /0929r1 Submission August 2004 Patrik Eriksson et. al., WaveBreaker ABSlide 1 A “High Throughput” Partial Proposal Patrik Eriksson,
Doc.: IEEE /0929r0 Submission August 2004 Patrik Eriksson et. al., WaveBreaker ABSlide 1 A “High Throughput” Partial Proposal Patrik Eriksson,
Case Study (ZigBee): Phase IV Transmitter & Receiver Simulation.
January 2016 Kookmin UniversitySlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Kookmin University.
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /0806r0 K. Ishihara et al.,(NTT) Slide 1 July 2010 Slide 1 CSI Feedback Scheme using DCT for.
Doc.: IEEE /0370r0 Submission January 2012 Haiguang Wang et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 TIM Compression Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0929r2 Submission September 2004 Patrik Eriksson et. al., WaveBreaker ABSlide 1 A “High Throughput” Partial Proposal Patrik Eriksson,
Doc.: IEEE /0213r1 Submission Slide 1 David Tung, et al. (Ralink Technology) March 2005 On the Efficiency of TGnSync Preambles David Tung,
Block Coded Modulation Tareq Elhabbash, Yousef Yazji, Mahmoud Amassi.
FEC decoding algorithm overview VLSI 자동설계연구실 정재헌.
CHAPTER 4. OUTLINES 1. Digital Modulation Introduction Information capacity, Bits, Bit Rate, Baud, M- ary encoding ASK, FSK, PSK, QPSK, QAM 2. Digital.
© Tallal Elshabrawy Trellis Coded Modulation. © Tallal Elshabrawy Trellis Coded Modulation: Introduction Increases the constellation size compared to.
Digital Communications Chapter 13. Source Coding
Technical Feasibility of Spreading Codes for HRb
Rate 7/8 LDPC Code for 11ay Date: Authors:
Source :Journal of visual Communication and Image Representation
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Chapter 10. Digital Signals
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Irregular Structured LDPC Codes and Structured Puncturing
Miguel Griot, Andres I. Vila Casado, and Richard D. Wesel
Performance Investigation on Wake-Up Receiver
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Joint Coding and Modulation Diversity for ac
Reseeding-based Test Set Embedding with Reduced Test Sequences
CSI Feedback Scheme using DCT for Explicit Beamforming
11ac 80MHz Transmission Flow
9-July-2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DecaWave Proposal for TG3c Alternative PHY]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
IV. Convolutional Codes
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 1 Proposal for extension of the IEEE b PHY to Higher Rates (>20 Mbps) V.S. Somayazulu, S. Kandala, J.M. Kowalski, C.K. Park Sharp Laboratories of America, Inc.

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 2 Introduction b Extends DSSS to 5.5 and 11 Mbps, while maintaining some backwards compatibility. Purpose of the Study Group is to extend to rates higher than 20 Mbps with the same level of compatibility. i.e., maintain the same chip rate and continue to employ the same CCK codes

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 3 Introduction employed for 5.5 and 11 Mbps rates of b. Ensures that the receiver design is mostly unchanged.

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 4 Proposal (1) CCK codes currently used are 8 chips long. Same symbol rate and codeword length for higher rates through bandwidth efficient multi-level modulation. M-PSK in this case. Same structure for the CCK codes. To achieve 22 Mbps, we need 16 bits/codeword.

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 5 Proposal (2) To encode these 16 bits with the four phase parameters  1,  2,  3,  4, each of the phase parameters must encode 4 bits, and thus each needs to be a 16-PSK symbol. The mapping that we propose is very close to the existing mapping.  1 is differentially encoded using the four bits d 0 to d 3 as shown in Table 1.

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 6 Proposal (3)

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 7 Proposal (4)

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 8 Proposal (5) For each of the remaining phases  2,  3, and  4, we obtain the mapping from successive groups of 4 input bits d 4 … d 7, d 8 … d 11, and d 12 … d 15 respectively, as shown in Table 2. The minimum Euclidean distance, normalized for the same E b, is 1.56.

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 9 Proposal (6) Results in higher E b /N 0 requirement to meet the same PER.

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 10 Fast Transform Receiver : Method 1 The received signal vector is pre-weighted with a vector formed by the 64 combinations of the triple (  2,  3,  4 ) and presented to the same butterfly hardware as in the 5.5/11 Mbps and the largest result for each presentation is stored.

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 11 Fast Transform Receiver : Method 1 The largest among this set of “local” maxima is selected, and the data bits are decoded from the associated  i and  i values for that maximum correlation result.

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 12 Fast Transform Receiver : Method 2 The butterfly/fast transform hardware is changed so that each stage of the butterfly has an additional “twiddle factor” exp(j  i ) (multiplying the existing +/- 1, +/- j twiddle factor).

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 13 2 Chip Butterfly (  2 ) 4 Chip Butterfly (  3 ) 8 Chip Butterfly (  4 ) 8 Input Samples  2  3 4 Select the Largest Correlation Value. Decode bits. Fast Transform Structure of Method 2, Using Modified Buttefly

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 14 Sample 1 Sample 2 1 e jj 1 je jj 1 -e jj 1 -je jj Modified 2-Chip butterfly. 

doc.: IEEE /069 Submission May 2000 V. S. Somayazulu et. al., Sharp LaboratoriesSlide 15 Conclusions A simple extension of b can be made to accommodate high rates, through the use of bandwidth efficient higher level modulation. Receiver structures are preserved with only minor changes needed to accommodate 16 level as opposed to 4 level decision making.