TM Best Practices—2007 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Deborah Houston McCall, MSPH, Program Consultant Program Services Branch Office on Smoking.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute Technical Assistance to North Carolinas Health & Wellness Trust Funds TUPC.
Advertisements

Attacking the #1 Cause of Preventable Death and Disease: Using CDCs Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Best Practices for Comprehensive.
Best Practices for Tobacco Control. Background.
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Restructuring the Cancer Programs and Task Force Workgroups.
EESE O&E Committee Update & Next Steps May 14, 2010.
1 Comprehensive Cancer Control In Action. What to expect today? Provide state-level forum for networking & sharing your org’s current survivorship initiatives.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP): Current Progress and Future Action Temeika L. Fairley, Epidemiologist Comprehensive Cancer Control.
Natasha M. Jamison, MPH, CHES Health Scientist, Epidemiology Branch Office on Smoking and Health TM Utility of Key Outcome Indicators: Future Directions.
Office of Health Promotion Tobacco Use Prevention Program The Kansas Tobacco Use Prevention Program provides resources, technical assistance and education.
Program Evaluation in Public Health California’s Efforts to Reduce Tobacco Use David Hopkins Terry Pechacek.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
The Use of Commercial Tobacco Among Minority Populations Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health Sydney Lee.
EVOLVING PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE LANDSCAPE AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CANCER COMMUNICATION NCI Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch CPCRN.
Essential Service # 7:. Why learn about the 10 Essential Services?  Improve quality and performance.  Achieve better outcomes – improved health, less.
Source: Massachusetts BRFSS Prepared by: Health Survey Program Using the BRFSS to Track Healthy People 2010 Objectives Highlights from the 2004 Massachusetts.
Edward Anselm, MD Medical Director Public Health Perspectives of Accountable Care: Opportunities for Alignment.
Claire Brindis, Dr. P.H. University of California, San Francisco American Public Health Association- Annual Meeting November 10, 2004 Adolescent Health:
Integration of 5 Public Health Programs Jan Norman, RD, CDE Chronic Disease Prevention Unit Washington State Department of Health.
Program Collaboration and Service Integration: An NCHHSTP Green paper Kevin Fenton, M.D., Ph.D., F.F.P.H. Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral.
HRSA’s Oral Health Goals and the Role of MCH Stephen R. Smith Senior Advisor to the Administrator Health Resources and Services Administration.
Cara McNulty, MS Manager Office of Statewide Health Improvement Initiatives Julie Ring Director Local Public Health Association Statewide Health Improvement.
CDC’s Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Jerelyn Jordan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health.
NCI’s Cancer Information Service Program Mary Anne Bright Office of Cancer Information Service, NCI June 25, 2007.
York District Local Public Health System Assessment Sharon Leahy-Lind District Public Health Liaison-York York District Public Health Sanford DHHS Office.
TOBACCO PREVENTION AND CONTROL PROGRAM Mike Maples, Assistant Commissioner Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services.
Sabrina Dosanjh-Gantner and Theresa Healy Facilitating Relationships: Northern Health’s Partnering for Healthier Communities Approach.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Kansas Tobacco Prevention Workgroup for Specific Populations May 17 and 18, 2007 Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Becky Tuttle,
Potential Alcohol Strategies March 20, 2008 Sheila Nesbitt.
Tobacco Use In Kansas Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
Diane Justice National Academy for State Health Policy October 5, 2011 Advancing Health Equity through State Implementation of Health Reform Show Me..New.
1 Sandy Keenan TA Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health(SOC) National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention(SSHS/PL)
Social Context of Tobacco Use among Asian Americans in Ohio: Policy Implications Surendra Bir Adhikari, Ph.D. “Impact of Tobacco Use on Special Populations”
Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) Minnesota Department of Health Cara McNulty, MS SHIP Manager
“Maryland’s Fight Against Cancer: A Cigarette Restitution Fund Update” “Maryland’s Fight Against Cancer: A Cigarette Restitution Fund Update” THE MARYLAND.
Analysis of MDS Data Deborah J. Ossip-Klein, Ph.D. University of Rochester Medical Center 2005 NAQC Annual Membership Meeting Chicago.
Evaluating Local Tobacco Control Organizations. David Ahrens, Research Program Manager Research conducted by: Barbara.
Why a CPCRN? CDC Expectations Katherine M. Wilson, PhD, MPH CPCRN Technical Monitor Division of Cancer Prevention and Control CDC.
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs State Incentive Grant Project Overview Michael Cunningham Deputy Director, Program Services.
Maryland’s Cigarette Restitution Program Georges C. Benjamin, MD FACP, Secretary Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene November 2000 Protecting.
A Comprehensive Approach for Reducing Illegal Tobacco Sales to Youth Kevin A. Alvarnaz, Cessation Program Manager Bureau of Chronic Diseases & Injury Prevention.
Citizens of Harvestland Against Tobacco (CHAT) Coalition Harvestland, Missouri Teaming Up To End Tobacco Use.
Tobacco 101. Evolution of Tobacco Evolution of Tobacco.
Promoting a Coordinated Approach for the Health and Well-Being of Children and Youth Carolyn Fisher, Ed.D., CHES Elizabeth Haller, M.Ed. Division of Adolescent.
Covered California: Promoting Health Equity and Reducing Health Disparities Covered California Board Meeting March 21, 2013.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Utilizing Community Indicators To Link Process Measures To Program Outcomes T.M. Hinman, M.P.H., H.R. Juster, Ph.D., A.M. Beigel, M.F.A. New York State.
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs Continuum of Services System Re-Engineering Taskforce Phase II Planning Meeting December 6,
CDC Recommendations for Comprehensive Programs. Comprehensive Programs CDC, Office on Smoking and Health.
Comprehensive Tobacco Action Group Summary December 16, 2005.
Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Control Program 3/10/2015 Program Monitoring and Evaluation Activities Short-Term Outcomes Long-Term Outcomes Intermediate.
Tobacco Disparities: Issues of Inequity & Social Injustice
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Implementing & Sustaining A Focus on Specific Populations Through Systems Change K Moore, J Brandes, B Skidmore, J Hunter, C Satzler, G Park, C Cramer,
Multnomah County Employee Wellness Initiative Committee Board of County Commissioners Briefing September 4, 2012.
A Program of the Health Education Council Ayanna L. Kiburi, MPH Consultant.
Overview: Evidence-based Health Promotion and Disease Management Programs.
CDC’s Investments in Community Initiatives Division of Adult and Community Health National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Lynda.
How well are we addressing Asthma Disparities
5/29/2018 2:19:19 AM Infrastructure development for the continued provision of evaluation technical assistance through the establishment of a national.
NCI’s Cancer Information Service Program
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHRONIC DISEASE DIRECTORS (NACDD)
What is NASOMH? The National Association of State Offices of Minority Health (NASOMH) is the national association for the 47 existing State Offices.
Introduction to Public Health Nutrition
The Arizona Chronic Disease Plan:
Public/Population Health Approach to Substance Abuse Prevention & Treatment Determine the Burden of Substance Abuse and Service Barriers to Develop Plan.
Building Public Health Nursing Capacity through Shared Services
Dr Timothy Armstrong Coordinator
Presentation transcript:

TM Best Practices—2007 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Deborah Houston McCall, MSPH, Program Consultant Program Services Branch Office on Smoking and Health National Associations of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) and the National Associations of Local Boards of Health (NALBOH) Webcast: Attacking the #1 Cause of Preventable Death and Disease: Using the CDC Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs December 8, 2008

TM Best Practices 1999  Evidence-based providing: —A blueprint for program components  Community Programs  Chronic Disease Programs  School Programs  Enforcement  Statewide Programs  Counter-Marketing  Cessation Programs  Surveillance and Evaluation  Administration and Management

TM. Evidence Base

TM Comprehensive Programs Work  Integrated programs influence social norms, systems, and networks.  The more states invest, the greater the reductions in smoking prevalence and consumption.  The longer states invest, the greater and faster the impact.

TM Updating Best Practices  States requested updated guidance  Cost of living has increased 30%  Evidence-based reviews of specific strategies  Broader range of state experience

TM Best Practices 2007  State and Community Interventions —Statewide Programs —Community Programs —Tobacco-Related Disparities —Youth (Schools and Enforcement) —Chronic Disease Programs  Health Communication Interventions  Cessation Interventions  Surveillance/Evaluation  Administration/Management

TM Best Practices 2007  Provides recommended level of annual investment within the funding range  Factors in state-specific characteristics

TM State and Community Interventions  Community resources must be the foundation of sustained solutions to pervasive problems like tobacco use  Making tobacco less desirable, less accepted, and less accessible  Importance of grassroots support for social norm change “All Prevention is local”

TM

State and Community Interventions  Consolidates Statewide, Community, School, Enforcement, and Chronic Disease into one category  Cost parameters include: —Duplication of 1999 cost parameters —Adjusting for cost of living increases, population shifts, smoking prevalence, and school enrollment  More explicit integration of policy interventions  Emphasis on eliminating disparities

TM State and Community Interventions: COMMUNITY PROGRAMS  Funding community organizations  Facilitating local coalitions  Collaborating with partners to build capacity  Supporting local strategies to educate  Promote public discussion  Establish local strategic plan  Ensure support for local PH infrastructure  Ensure grantees measure social norm change outcomes

TM State and Community Interventions: YOUTH PROGRAMS  Increase unit price of tobacco  Conduct mass media with community interventions  Mobilize community to restrict minors’ access  Implement school-based interventions with media and community efforts

TM The Community Guide’s Tobacco Control Strategies in Communities Goal Recommended Interventions When Implemented ALONE Increase CessationIncrease the price (excise tax) Reduce InitiationIncrease the price (excise tax) Reduce SHS ExpSmoking bans

TM The Community Guide’s Tobacco Control Strategies in Communities GoalInterventions with Insufficient Evidence Increase Cessation Smoking cessation contests Broadcast smoking cessation series Reduce Initiation Retailer education Youth point of purchase laws Active enforcement Community education / access Student delivered community education Reduce SHS Exp Community-wide efforts to reduce SHS exposure in the home

TM State and Community Interventions: CHRONIC DISEASE PROGRAMS  Collaborating with related PH programs  Implement interventions that link to other programs  Develop communications that link SHS to health outcomes  Use tax revenue to fund tobacco and other chronic disease programs  Link other programs to tobacco interventions (e.g., promoting quitline)  Promote insurance coverage of preventive services

TM State and Community Interventions: TOBACCO-RELATED DISPARITIES  Conduct population assessment  Seek consultation from specific populations  Ensure disparities addressed in strategic plan  Fund organizations that can reach and involve specific populations  Provide culturally competent TA  Provide communication to reach disparate populations  Ensure quitlines can meet the required needs of population subgroups

TM Health Communication Interventions  Health communication interventions are powerful tools to prevent initiation, promote cessation, and shape social norms.  Effective messages can stimulate public support and create a supportive climate for policy change.

TM Cessation Interventions

TM Cessation Interventions  Sustain, expand, and promote services such as quitlines  Coverage of treatment under public and private insurance  Eliminating cost barriers for underserved populations  Making the PHS-recommended health care system changes

TM  Current cost parameters include: —Updating 1999 cost parameters for health system changes and quitlines  State-specific characteristics —State population —Smoking prevalence  Recommended level of intensity: —6% of tobacco users enrolled into counseling Cessation Interventions

TM Surveillance and Evaluation  Current cost parameters include: —Maintain 10% of total program budget  Additional funds may be needed for: —Process evaluation —Local-level evaluation —Specific populations

TM Core Surveillance Systems  Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System  Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System  Youth Tobacco Survey  Adult Tobacco Survey

TM Administration and Management  Current cost parameters include: —Maintain 5% of total program budget  Should fund: —Coordinated guidance and TA across program elements —Collaboration and coordination with other state agencies in public health programs

TM Disparities  Costs captured in multiple budget categories  State and Community Interventions —Fund local organizations to reach diverse populations —Support participation in coalitions —Fund multi-cultural organizations and networks  Health Communication Interventions —Use culturally appropriate messages and targeted media channels  Cessation Interventions —Develop culturally appropriate and translated materials —Provide access to multi-lingual quitline counselors  Administration and Management —Support participation in strategic planning

TM State Examples  Recommended Annual Investment Louisiana: $12.46 per capita $53.5 million Alaska:$16.11 per capita$10.7 million Utah: $9.23 per capita $23.6 million Oklahoma:$12.54 per capita $45.0 million New York: $13.15 per capita$254.3 million

TM “Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.” - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” - Margaret Mead

TM Best Practices—2007 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health Deborah Houston McCall, MSPH Program Consultant