Shapelets for shear surveys

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Advertisements

1 COSMOS Dark Matter Maps with COSMOS Jason Rhodes (JPL) January 11, 2005 San Diego AAS Meeting For the COSMOS WL team : (Justin Albert, Richard.
Weak Lensing Tomography Sarah Bridle University College London.
Using DELPHI for Weak Lensing Measurements: Science Return and Mirror Size Jes Ford, JPL, UNR SURF /21/07 Mentor: Jason Rhodes Co-mentor: David Johnston.
Galaxy and Mass Power Spectra Shaun Cole ICC, University of Durham Main Contributors: Ariel Sanchez (Cordoba) Steve Wilkins (Cambridge) Imperial College.
Weak lensing mass-selected cluster catalogues Richard Massey (CalTech) with Jason Rhodes (JPL), Alexie Leauthaud (Marseille), Justin Albert (CalTech),
Cosmological Information Ue-Li Pen Tingting Lu Olivier Dore.
3D dark matter map z=0.5 z=0.7 z=1 z=0.3 Right ascension Declination z=0 Mapping dark matter with weak gravitational lensing Richard Massey CalTech.
1 COSMOS Weak Lensing With COSMOS: An Overview Jason Rhodes (JPL) May 24, 2005 For the COSMOS WL team : (Justin Albert, Richard Ellis, Alexie Leauthaud,
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
Cosmic Shear with HST Jason Rhodes, JPL Galaxies and Structures Through Cosmic Times Venice Italy March 27, 2006 with Richard Massey, Catherine Heymans.
Jason Rhodes, JPL 207 th AAS Meeting, January 10, 2006 Nick Scoville, COSMOS PI COSMOS Lensing Team: Jean-Paul Kneib, Jason Rhodes, Justin Albert, David.
September 22, 2006 Natalia Kuznetsova Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory The Super/Nova Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Natalia Kuznetsova Natalia Kuznetsova.
Weak lensing mass-selected cluster catalogues Richard Massey (CalTech) with Justin Albert (CalTech), Joel Berge (Saclay), Richard Ellis (CalTech), Takashi.
Galaxy-Galaxy lensing
Relating Mass and Light in the COSMOS Field J.E. Taylor, R.J. Massey ( California Institute of Technology), J. Rhodes ( Jet Propulsion Laboratory) & the.
May stars be the actors and dark energy direct shoot a movie in the sky Chihway Chang Oct.8 ‘2008.
LSST and the Dark Sector: Image processing challenges Tony Tyson University of California, Davis ADASS September 25, 2007.
Statistics of the Weak-lensing Convergence Field Sheng Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory Columbia University Collaborators: Zoltán Haiman, Morgan May,
Weak Gravitational Lensing and Cluster Counts Alexandre Refregier (CEA Saclay) Collaborators: Jason Rhodes (Caltech) Richard Massey (Cambridge) David Bacon.
Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure Alexandre Refregier (Cambridge) Collaborators: Richard Ellis (Caltech) David Bacon (Cambridge) Richard.
Progress on Cosmology Sarah Bridle University College London.
The Statistical Properties of Large Scale Structure Alexander Szalay Department of Physics and Astronomy The Johns Hopkins University.
Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.
STEP2 simulated images Richard Massey with Molly Peeples, Will High, Catherine Heymans, etc. etc.
Weak Lensing 3 Tom Kitching. Introduction Scope of the lecture Power Spectra of weak lensing Statistics.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Robust cosmological constraints from SDSS-III/BOSS galaxy clustering Chia-Hsun Chuang (Albert) IFT- CSIC/UAM, Spain.
Cosmic scaffolding and the growth of structure Richard Massey (CalTech ) with Jason Rhodes (JPL), David Bacon (Edinburgh), Joel Berg é (Saclay), Richard.
Methods in Gravitational Shear Measurements Michael Stefferson Mentor: Elliott Cheu Arizona Space Grant Consortium Statewide Symposium Tucson, Arizona.
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
Update to End to End LSST Science Simulation Garrett Jernigan and John Peterson December, 2004 Status of the Science End-to-End Simulator: 1. Sky Models.
SNAP Integration Model V. S14 The SNAP Integration Model Mechanical [ SC4 Breakout ] Robin Lafever LBNL Engineering.
Axial Flip Invariance and Fast Exhaustive Searching with Wavelets Matthew Bolitho.
ST–ECF UC, Dec 01 1 NGST support at the ST-ECF Bob Fosbury
1 System wide optimization for dark energy science: DESC-LSST collaborations Tony Tyson LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration meeting June 12-13, 2012.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
Weak Lensing from Space with SNAP Alexandre Refregier (IoA) Richard Ellis (Caltech) David Bacon (IoA) Richard Massey (IoA) Gary Bernstein (Michigan) Tim.
Berkeley, 16 th – 18 th May 2004Wide-Field Imaging from Space Weak lensing with GEMS Galaxy Evolution from Morphologies and SEDS Catherine Heymans Max-Planck-Institute.
Weak Lensing 2 Tom Kitching. Recap Lensing useful for Dark energy Dark Matter Lots of surveys covering 100’s or 1000’s of square degrees coming online.
Shapelets analysis of weak lensing surveys Joel Bergé (CEA Saclay) with Richard Massey (Caltech) Alexandre Refregier (CEA Saclay) Joel Bergé (CEA Saclay)
Cosmology with Gravitaional Lensing
DES Cluster Simulations and the ClusterSTEP Project M.S.S. Gill (OSU / CBPF / SLAC) In collaboration with: J. Young, T.Eifler, M.Jarvis, P.Melchior and.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
Constraining Cosmography with Cluster Lenses Jean-Paul Kneib Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
Simulating the SZ Sky Predictions for Upcoming Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect Galaxy Cluster Surveys Eric J. Hallman CASA, University of Colorado 16 February,
HST ACS data LSST: ~40 galaxies per sq.arcmin. LSST CD-1 Review SLAC, Menlo Park, CA November 1 - 3, LSST will achieve percent level statistical.
Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.
3rd International Workshop on Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry NTHU & NTU, Dec 27—31, 2012 Likelihood of the Matter Power Spectrum.
Weak Lensing Alexandre Refregier (CEA/Saclay) Collaborators: Richard Massey (Cambridge), Tzu-Ching Chang (Columbia), David Bacon (Edinburgh), Jason Rhodes.
Weak Gravitational Flexion from HST GEMS and STAGES Barnaby Rowe with David Bacon (Portsmouth), Andy Taylor (Edinburgh), Catherine Heymans (U.B.C.), Richard.
Probing Cosmology with Weak Lensing Effects Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
ISWG - December 7, Destiny, The Dark Energy Space Telescope.
Cosmological Weak Lensing With SKA in the Planck era Y. Mellier SKA, IAP, October 27, 2006.
August 23, 2007JPL WL from space meeting1 Shear measurements in simulated SNAP images with realistic PSFs Håkon Dahle, Stephanie Jouvel, Jean-Paul Kneib,
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Measuring shear using… Kaiser, Squires & Broadhurst (1995) Luppino & Kaiser (1997)
Jochen Weller Decrypting the Universe Edinburgh, October, 2007 未来 の 暗 黒 エネルギー 実 験 の 相補性.
Measuring Cosmic Shear Sarah Bridle Dept of Physics & Astronomy, UCL What is cosmic shear? Why is it hard to measure? The international competition Overview.
Euclid Big Data Opportunities Tom Kitching (UCL MSSL) – Euclid Science Lead.
Seeing the Invisible: Observing the Dark Side of the Universe Sarah Bridle University College London.
Cosmology with gravitational lensing
STEP: THE SHEAR TESTING PROGRAMME
Shapelets shear measurement methods
Probing the Dark Universe with Weak Gravitational Lensing
Some issues in cluster cosmology
Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and Weak Lensing Cluster Surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Presentation transcript:

Shapelets for shear surveys Taking shear and faking images : Shapelets for shear surveys Richard Massey (IoA, Cambridge) Alexandre Refregier (CEA Saclay), Richard Ellis (CalTech), Chris Conselice (CalTech), David Bacon (Edinburgh), & SNAP team: Jason Rhodes (GSFC), Justin Albert (CalTech), Mike Lampton (LBL), Alex Kim (LBL), Gary Bernstein (U.Penn) & Tim McKay (Michigan)

Shapelet (Gauss-Hermite) basis fns Orthonormal basis set of 2D ‘Gauss-Hermite’ functions; AKA the eigenfunctions of the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator. Fourier transform invariant (easy image manipulation e.g. convolution). Powerful bra-ket notation already exists. Gaussian-weighted multipole moments (many astronomical uses). m =rotational oscillations (c.f. QM Lr momn) n=radial oscillations (c.f. QM energy) m=rotational oscillations (c.f. QM Lr momn) n =radial oscillations (c.f. QM energy) Refregier (2001)

Modelling HDF galaxy shapes Any image I(x) can be represented as a Taylor series (like a Fourier transform): > | = a00 + a01 +… Orthogonal Basis functions Decomposition of a galaxy image into shape components: < > | Refregier (2001) Refregier & Bacon (2001)

HDF galaxies in “shapelet space” Real space Shapelet space (series is in practise truncated at finite nmax) Complete, 1-to-1 uniquely specified map < > |

PSF deconvolution Shapelets are not necesarily convenient for the physics of galaxy morphology, but the mathematics of image manipulation. PSF convolution is trivial in shapelet space: a bra-ket multiplication. Can implement deconvolution from the WFPC2 PSF via a matrix inversion. Dilations, translations and shears can also be represented as QM ladder operations (â, â†) in shapelet space. SNAP PSF Shapelet NB: logarithmic scale! Circular core in the m=0 coefficients. 6-fold symmetry due to refraction around the 3 secondary support struts appears as power in the m=±6, ±12 coefficients. Bacon & Refregier (2001) Kim et al. (2002) Lampton et al. (2002) Rhodes et al. (2002)

Shapelets for shear measurement Shapelets is a logical extension of traditional methods. We automatically deconvolve the PSF and can use extra information to form a more robust shear estimator with ~2S/N. KSB uses Gaussian-weighted quadrupole moments of a galaxy image to measure ellipticities, and octupole moments to convert into shears. Kaiser, Squires & Broadhurst (1995) Refregier & Bacon (2001)

Shapelet parameter space of HDF galaxies Do combinations of shapelet parameters correlate with ‘eye-balled’ morphological Hubble types? Quantitative galaxy morphology classification? Parameter space of galaxy morphology c.f. Hubble tuning fork! In doing this, we’ve built up a catalogue of all HDF galaxy shapes in n parameters… -functions representing every HDF galaxy are placed into an n-dimensional parameter space, with each axis corresponding to a (polar) shapelet coefficient or size/magnitude.

Galaxy morphology classification (PCA) Average HDF galaxy: First 10 principal components of morphology distribution in shapelet space: As before but with galaxies rotated and flipped, so that they are aligned with the x-axis and have the same chirality, before being stacked: First 10 principal components of morphology distribution in shapelet space.

Galaxy morphology classification (estimators) Gravitational lensing shear Size Chirality (asymmetry) Concentration Invariant under flux change, rotations. Changes linearly with dilations. Invariant under dilations, rotations. Changes sign under parity flip. Invariant under rotations, shears. Slope of “shapelet power spectrum” Conselice et al. (2000) Bershady et al. (1998)

SuperNova/Acceleration Probe Door Assembly Secondary Mirror Hexapod Bonnet 300sq.degree optical +NIR survey is planned to R=28: yielding 150 million resolved galaxies! Need new high precision, robust shear measurement algorithm (current limiting factor in weak shear surveys). Algorithms need calibrating: old methods also required this, using simulated images and entire mock DR pipeline. Light Baffles Secondary Metering structure Solar Array, ‘Sun side’ Primary Mirror Optical Bench Instrument Metering Structure Tertiary Mirror Solar Array, ‘dark side’ Fold-Flat Mirror Instrument Radiator Spacecraft Instrument Bay ACS CD & H Comm Power Data CCD detectors NIR detectors Spectrograph Focal Plane guiders Cryo/Particle shield Solid-state recorders Perlmutter et al. (2002) Lampton et al. (2002) Shutter Hi Gain Antenna

Simulated SNAP images HDF is deep (R=28.6), but too small to do this. Most importantly, the properties of objects in it are not known. We need deep images, containing realistic galaxies – but with known sizes, magnitudes & shears. Calibrate future shear (astrometry) measurement algorithms. Optimise telescope design (SNAP, GAIA) and survey strategy. Estimate errors upon cosmological parameter constraints which will be possible with the real data. Fake Simulated Image Who needs a real • telescope now?! A bit like IRAF.noao.artdata, but much better!

HDF galaxy morphology PDF Parameter space of galaxy morphology c.f. Hubble tuning fork! -functions representing every HDF galaxy are placed into an n-dimensional parameter space, with each axis corresponding to a (polar) shapelet coefficient or size/magnitude. The PDF is: kernel-smoothed (assume a smooth underlying PDF exists) Monte-Carlo sampled, to synthesise new ‘fake’ galaxies.

Morphing in shapelet space smoothing param space smoothing param space Used in sims Real HDF Used in sims Real HDF Oversmoothed galaxies become random junk… Massey et al. (2002)

Objects have known positions, magnitudes and added shear: Simulated images Objects have known positions, magnitudes and added shear: Animation shows 0%-10% shear in 1% steps. ftp://ftp.ast.cam.ac.uk/pub/rjm/simages/

Proof of the pudding I Blind test: run SExtractor on HDFs and simulated images.

Proof of the pudding II Even second-order statistics match, including morphology parameters. Non-trivial that this should work: shapelet modelling is capturing something important, & simulations are realistic! Asymmetry Concentration Concentration Conselice et al. (2000)

Simulating SNAP sensitivity Model HDF galaxies Morphology parameter space Simulated images SNe Catalogue of objects before observational noise shear Add SNe on top of galaxies Add varying PSF, and stars from which to measure it Try to detect them Detection efficiency Add instrumental distortions due to telescope optics Cosmological parameter constraints Gravitationally shear galaxies (by known amount)

SNAP Weak Lensing sensitivity

Mapping the Dark Matter CDM (Jain, Seljak & White 1997) CDM: 1’ smoothed WHT SNAP-deep Statistical errors based on realized performance

Cosmological constraints with SNAP Combining constraints based on DM power spectrum with those from CMB (and SNe) breaks degeneracies between M and w and directly tests for growth of structure