COSMO Sibiu 2013 Matthias Raschendorfer Towards Separated Turbulence Interacting with Circulations (STIC):

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parametrization of surface fluxes: Outline
Advertisements

Parametrization of PBL outer layer Martin Köhler Overview of models Bulk models local K-closure K-profile closure TKE closure.
Introduction Irina Surface layer and surface fluxes Anton
Subgrid-Scale Models – an Overview
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimatologie Universität Hannover
What’s quasi-equilibrium all about?
Training course: boundary layer IV Parametrization above the surface layer (layout) Overview of models Slab (integral) models K-closure model K-profile.
Louisiana Tech University Ruston, LA Slide 1 Time Averaging Steven A. Jones BIEN 501 Monday, April 14, 2008.
Boundary Layer Flow Describes the transport phenomena near the surface for the case of fluid flowing past a solid object.
Session 2, Unit 3 Atmospheric Thermodynamics
Convection Convection Matt Penrice Astronomy 501 University of Victoria.
Turbulent Scalar Mixing Revisiting the classical paradigm in variable diffusivity medium Gaurav Kumar Advisor: Prof. S. S. Girimaji Turbulence Research.
Atmospheric Analysis Lecture 3.
Boundary Layer Meteorology Lecture 4 Turbulent Fluxes Energy Cascades Turbulence closures TKE Budgets.
GFS Deep and Shallow Cumulus Convection Schemes
FUNDAMENTAL EQUATIONS, CONCEPTS AND IMPLEMENTATION
Wind Driven Circulation I: Planetary boundary Layer near the sea surface.
Monin-Obukhoff Similarity Theory
Xin Xi. 1946: Obukhov Length, as a universal length scale for exchange processes in surface layer. 1954: Monin-Obukhov Similarity Theory, as a starting.
Structure and dynamical characteristics of mid-latitude fronts.
Matthias Raschendorfer DWD  Mixed water/ice phase in the SGS condensation scheme and the moist turbulence scheme Matthias Raschendorfer COSMO Cracow 2008.
Comparison of convective boundary layer velocity spectra calculated from large eddy simulation and WRF model data Jeremy A. Gibbs and Evgeni Fedorovich.
Horizontal Mixing and Convection. 1st order prognostic PDE Q is the quadratic fluid dynamics term called the “Dynamical Core”. F is the Forcing “Physics”
Governing equations: Navier-Stokes equations, Two-dimensional shallow-water equations, Saint-Venant equations, compressible water hammer flow equations.
Matthias Raschendorfer DWD About the results of UTCS Tasks (ii)a,c and (iii)a As far as attended by COSMO Offenbach 2009 Matthias Raschendorfer.
Turbulent properties: - vary chaotically in time around a mean value - exhibit a wide, continuous range of scale variations - cascade energy from large.
Towards a evaluation of a tensor eddy-diffusivity model for the terra incognita grey gray zone Omduth Coceal 1, Mary-Jane Bopape 2, Robert S. Plant 2 1.
Budgets of second order moments for cloudy boundary layers 1 Systematische Untersuchung höherer statistischer Momente und ihrer Bilanzen 1 LES der atmosphärischen.
Mass Transfer Coefficient
Modeling the Atmospheric Boundary Layer (2). Review of last lecture Reynolds averaging: Separation of mean and turbulent components u = U + u’, = 0 Intensity.
Xin Xi Feb. 28. Basics  Convective entrainment : The buoyant thermals from the surface layer rise through the mixed layer, and penetrate (with enough.
A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas O. COCEAL and S. E. BELCHER University of Reading, UK.
Physics of turbulence at small scales Turbulence is a property of the flow not the fluid. 1. Can only be described statistically. 2. Dissipates energy.
COSMO Sibiu 2013 Matthias Raschendorfer Some Challenges related to physical parameterizations Current WG3a-Activity towards solving the problems 1-st Part:
Further steps towards a scale separated turbulence scheme: Matthias Raschendorfer DWD Aim: General valid (consistent) description of sub grid scale (SGS)
1 Large Eddy Simulation of Stable Boundary Layers with a prognostic subgrid TKE equation 8 th Annual Meeting of the EMS, Amsterdam, 2008 Stephan R. de.
Matthias Raschendorfer DWD Recent extensions of the COSMO TKE scheme related to the interaction with non turbulent scales COSMO Offenbach 2009 Matthias.
Georg A. Grell (NOAA / ESRL/GSD) and Saulo R. Freitas (INPE/CPTEC) A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air.
COSMO Sibiu 2013 Matthias Raschendorfer Towards a consolidated turbulence and surface coupling for COSMO and ICON: Technical issues preparing the common.
Continuous treatment of convection: from dry thermals to deep precipitating convection J.F. Guérémy CNRM/GMGEC.
CHANGSHENG CHEN, HEDONG LIU, And ROBERT C. BEARDSLEY
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Component testing of the COSMO model’s turbulent diffusion.
Mesoscale Modeling with a 3D Turbulence Scheme Jocelyn Mailhot and Yufei Zhu (Claude Pelletier) Environment Canada MSC / MRB 3 rd Annual Meeting on CRTI.
Basic concepts of heat transfer
Work Status: The project implementation is somewhat delayed due to the uncertainty about the future of some project participants A review about analogies.
HYBRID LARGE EDDY SIMULATION/REYNOLDS AVERAGED NAVIER-STOKES FORMULATION FOR NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICITON H. A. Hassan North Carolina State University,
Direct numerical simulation has to solve all the turbulence scales from the large eddies down to the smallest Kolmogorov scales. They are based on a three-dimensional.
A revised formulation of the COSMO surface-to-atmosphere transfer scheme Matthias Raschendorfer COSMO Offenbach 2009 Matthias Raschendorfer.
Introduction to the Turbulence Models
Development of the two-equation second-order turbulence-convection model (dry version): analytical formulation, single-column numerical results, and.
Performance of ALARO0 baseline in pre-operational testing
Pier Siebesma Today: “Dry” Atmospheric Convection
Shifting the diurnal cycle of parameterized deep convection over land
Similarity theory 1. Buckingham Pi Theorem and examples
Turbulence closure problem
“Consolidation of the Surface-to-Atmosphere Transfer-scheme: ConSAT
Convergence in Computational Science
Lecture Objectives LES Multizone modeling.
Models of atmospheric chemistry
Analysis of Parameterization in Single-Column Model
New insights into turbulence dynamics under stabilizing
Matthias Raschendorfer 2007
PURPOSE OF AIR QUALITY MODELING Policy Analysis
Lecture 1: Introduction
Turbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE)
Turbulent properties:
Asst. Prof. Dr. Hayder Mohammad Jaffal
A buoyancy-based turbulence mixing length technique for cloudless and cloudy boundary layers in the COSMO model Veniamin Perov and Mikhail Chumakov.
Basic concepts of heat transfer: Heat Conduction
transport equations for the scalar variances
Presentation transcript:

COSMO Sibiu 2013 Matthias Raschendorfer Towards Separated Turbulence Interacting with Circulations (STIC):

- slope in case of TKE turbulence microphysicsresolved structures : largest turbulent wave length convective peak neutral stabile labile Spectral characteristics of turbulence and circulations: - circulations generally are related with …………………………………… additional spectral peaks - or they cause different peak wavelengths in vertical direction compared to the horizontal directions: …. larger peak wavelength in vertical direction in case of labile stratification at least a two-scale-problem anisotropic peak wave length catabatic peak unresolved structures BL workshop Matthias Raschendorfer circulations smaller peak wavelength in vertical direction in case of stabile stratification COSMO Sibiu 2013

Principle of a general valid GS parameterization by scale separation:  Closure of the 2-nd order budget equationsclosure assumptions = further information  Limited (not general valid ) solution: e. g. for sub grid scale turbulence  General valid sub grid scale closure:  General valid 2-nd order closure assumptions can’t exist!  Assumptions can only be valid for special conditions: or for sub grid scale convection! Separation of sub grid scale flow in different classes Application of specific (rather easy) closure assumptions for each class Combination of particular parameterizations Consideration of interaction between different classes use of different schemes for turbulence, convection or SSO blocking usually missing in current models! Spectral separation by - averaging these budgets along the whole control volume ( double averaging ) - considering budgets with respect to the separation scale turbulent budgets Matthias Raschendorfer DWD Separated Turbulence Interacting with Circulations COSMO Sibiu 2013

average of the non linear turbulent shear terms circulation shear term Additional circulation terms in the turbulent 2-nd order budgets: BL workshop Matthias Raschendorfer turbulent shear term COSMO Sibiu 2013

Separated semi parameterized TKE equation (including scale interaction sources): buoyancy production eddy- dissipation rate ( EDR ) labil: neutral: stabil: time tendency transport (advection + diffusion) shear production by sub grid scale circulations expressed by turbulent flux gradient solution to be parameterized by a non turbulent approach shear production by the mean flow : with respect to the separation scale L buoyant part of buoyant and wake part of mean (horizontal) shear production of circulations, according Kolmogorov : correction factor in case of sloped model layers Matthias Raschendorfer DWD COSMO Sibiu 2013

 Separated horizontal shear production term: effective mixing length of diffusion by horizontal shear eddies velocity scale of the separated horizontal shear mode scaling parameter  Equilibrium of production and scale transfer towards turbulence: scaling parameter horizontal shear eddy isotropic turbulence horizontal grid plane TKE-production by separated horizontal shear modes: grid scale ……….effective scaling parameter separated horizontal shear additional TKE source term Matthias Raschendorfer DWD  Already used for EDR forecast ;to be tuned and verified for operational use COSMO Sibiu 2013

 SSO-term in filtered momentum budget: blocking term TKE-production by separated wake modes due to SSO: currently Lott und Miller (1997)  Pressure term in kinetic energy budget: wake source sources of mean kinetic energy MKE buoyancy production sources of sub grid scale kinetic energy SKE pressure transport expansion production from inner energy DWD Matthias Raschendorfer  Contribution taken form SSO scheme:already operational COSMO Sibiu 2013

virtual potential temperature of ascending air circulation scale temperature variance ~ circulation scale buoyant heat flux TKE source term TKE-Production by thermal circulations:  Circulation scale 2-nd order budgets with proper approximations valid for thermals : separated thermals virtual potential temperature of descending air vertical velocity scale of circulation buoyant production of sub grid scale kinetic energy can be derived directly form current mass flux convection scheme Matthias Raschendorfer DWD  Two contributions: - one taken form convection scheme:already used for EDR forecast ; to be verified - one being a crude estimate of surface induced density flows:active since years COSMO Sibiu 2013

Matthias Raschendorfer DWD pot. temperature [K] Wind speed [m/s] reference including horizontal shear – and SSO- production including horizontal shear –, SSO- and convective production mountain ridge COSMO-US: cross section across frontal line and Appalachian mountains COSMO Sibiu 2013

 A single 2-nd order scheme for the whole SGS range requires horizontal grid scales being sufficient small to allow turbulence closure as a general valid asumption.  We can’t do it without a convection scheme, in particular if we think for global simulations (ICON)  A 2-nd order scheme for non precipitating (shallow) convection only, might be an option.  Mass flux approach is better adapted to coherent flows than 2-nd order closure  Convection may be partly resolved (grey zone) and fundamental assumptions applied to classical mass flux schemes are no longer fulfilled.  Mass flux convection scheme needs to be reformulated to be scale adaptive. What’s about the turbulence interaction in the convection scheme? Matthias Raschendorfer DWD COSMO Sibiu 2013

Matthias Raschendorfer COSMO Conditional domain closure (CDC) : : domain of dimension : volume fraction of : mass budget (continuity equ.) L s : largest non- convective wave length  Foundation of alternative mass flux equations  Solvable also for volume fraction, if conditions for sub –domain definition are used  Turbulent properties can be used for lateral mixing and triggering  Separation against turbulence and grid scale possible COSMO Sibiu 2013

Non-turbulent (convective) modulation of normal distributed patterns in a statistical condensation scheme: cloud turbulent variation normal distr. non turbulent variation bi/tri-modal convective variation grid scale horizontal direc. range of up to L- scale patterns range of up to L s - scale pat- terns multimodal common PDF : separation scale for turbulence : horizontal scale of largest normal distr. patterns (turbulence, wakes, gravity waves, etc) : local over saturation Matthias Raschendorfer DWD COSMO Sibiu 2013

Conclusion: Matthias Raschendorfer DWD  Generalization of the closure scheme by scale separation -Classical turbulence closure will only be valid, if all sub-grid structures are in accordance with turbulence closure assumptions -Usually other sub-grid processes are present and in the near surface SBL they are even dominant  The presence of non-turbulent sub-grid scale structures needs to be considered  Physical reason for the problems with a classical scheme -Separation of turbulence by a sub-filter only smoothing “turbulence” provides variance equations for turbulence automatically containing shear production terms by non-turbulent sub-gird processes ( scale transfer terms )  The non-turbulent structures can’t be described by turbulence closure, rather we necessarily need separate schemes for them with specific closure assumptions, in particular specific length scales.  The additional production terms can’t be introduced only by treating all scalar variances by prognostic equations that introduce turbulent transport of them (UTCS-extension) but no additional sources for TKE.  Turbulent fluxes remain in flux gradient form, those by non-turbulent flow structures do not.  Already (partly) implemented TKE-production by scale transfer from kinetic energy of … - wakes generated by surface inhomogeneity (from SSO-blocking scheme) already operational - thermal circulation by surface inhomogeneity (due to differential heating/cooling)only crude approximation - horizontal eddies generated by horizontal shear (e.g. at frontal zones)not yet verified - Convection circulation (buoyant production from convection scheme)not yet verified COSMO Sibiu 2013

 Switching on the implemented scale interaction terms after verification against SYNOP data (operational verification)  Reformulation of the surface induced density flow term (circulation term) in the current scheme to become a thermal SSO production dependent on SSO parameters  Expression of direct sub grid scale transport by SSO eddies and horizontal shear eddies  Considering TKE-transport by circulations  Setting up a first estimate of convective modulation of a turbulent saturation adjustment  Integration of prognostic equations for scalar variances (and skewness of oversaturation) as an option  Implementation of a scale separated mass flux convection interacting with turbulence and providing volume fractions of convective sub domains (final step of STIC)  All further implementations in the common CÓSMO/ICON module not before this is ready for use in COSMO! Next steps: Matthias RaschendorferCOSMO Sibiu 2013 DWD

Matthias Raschendorfer Moscow: COSMO L s : largest non- convective wave length Simplified diagnostic budgets in advection form do not contain volume fractions and are solved by vertical integration Substitute pure mass flux equation ( continuity equation ) of traditional mass flux scheme by equation for vertical velocity -Direct buoyancy impact using Boussinesq-approximation instead of dynamical de- and entrainment parameterization using grid scale humidity convergence Boundary values from largest non convective mode - No parameterization of boundary mass flux using humidity convergence - No artificial vertical displacement or lateral mixing for boundary values - No distinction between shallow and deep convection ; each level can be a starting point for updrafts or downdrafts -Automatic trigger of convection by turbulence using largest non convective wave mode Solving for volume fractions by using construction constraints for the convective sub domains - Explicit expression of convective flux densities and total source terms (clouds and precipitation) by convective averaging Performing scale interaction and scale separation against turbulence and grid scale convection -Stopping integration when single cell diameter > horizontal grid scale: cut off against grid scale convection -Reducing separation scale when single cell diameter < separation scale: reduction of turbulence due to convection -Identification of the lateral mixing sink of convective kinetic energy (detrainment) to be the convective source of TKE -Stopping integration when vertical velocity < that of turbulence triggered initial cell: cut off of against turbulence : generalized velocity including molecular and slope effects