Using the evolution of dimming regions to probe the global magnetic field topology A new interpretation of the 12 th May 1997 event G. Attrill 1, M. Nakwaki.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The flare-CME relationship – determining factors (if any!) Sarah Matthews, Lucie Green, Hilary Magee, Louise Harra & Len Culhane MSSL, University College.
Advertisements

Observational evidence of a magnetic flux rope eruption associated with the X3 flare on 2002 July 15 Liu Yu Solar Seminar, 2003 June 16.
Observations on Current Sheet and Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares Haimin Wang and Jiong Qiu BBSO/NJIT.
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Trend of the magnetic helicity flux during the formation and the destabilization of flux ropes F. Zuccarello 1, S.L. Guglielmino 1, P. Romano 2 and F.P.
TRACE and RHESSI observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of Wrocław.
An overview of the cycle variations in the solar corona Louise Harra UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.
Jan 13, 2009ISSI1 Modeling Coronal Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A Collaborators:
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
The Hemispheric Pattern of Filaments and Consequences for Filament Formation Duncan H Mackay Solar Physics Group University of St. Andrews.
Erupting flux rope, rising X-ray source and CME on 16 April 2002 C. Goff 1, L. van Driel-Gesztelyi 1,2,3, L. K. Harra 1, S. A. Matthews 1, and C.H. Mandrini.
Active Region Evolution and the Removal of Magnetic Helicity by CMEs Len Culhane Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
Computer Vision for Solar PhysicsSDO Science Workshop, May 2011 Computer Vision for Solar Physics Piet Martens Montana State University Center for Astrophysics.
Intense Flares Without Solar Energetic Particle Events N. V. Nitta (LMSAL), E. W. Cliver (AFRL), H. S. Hudson (UCB) Abstract: We study favorably located.
High-latitude activity and its relationship to the mid-latitude solar activity. Elena E. Benevolenskaya & J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University Abstract.
Interaction between emerging flux and large scale loop systems observed with Hinode XRT Abstract Hinode XRT reveals ubiquitous large-scale connections.
Observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope – a direct application of the quadrupolar model for a solar flare Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Solar-B XRT XRT-1 The Science and Capability of the Solar-B / X-Ray Telescope Solar-B XRT Presenter: Ed DeLuca Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
1Yang Liu1997 May 12 Event The 1997 May 12 Event Yang Liu – Stanford University
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
Homologous large-scale activity in the solar eruptive events of November 24–26, 2000 I. M. Chertok a, V. V. Grechnev b, H. S. Hudson c, and N.V. Nitta.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
The nature of impulsive solar energetic particle events N. V. Nitta a, H. S. Hudson b, M. L. Derosa a a Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory.
Magnetic Reconnection Rate and Energy Release Rate Jeongwoo Lee 2008 April 1 NJIT/CSTR Seminar Day.
EUV vs. B-field Comparisons Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Coauthours: Leon Golub, Aad Van Ballegooijen, Maurice Gros. HMI/AIA Science.
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
Coronal holes as seen in soft X-rays H. S. Hudson (UCB and SPRC) SOHO-11, Davos, March 13, 2002.
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Magnetic Structures of Active Regions and their Link to Coronal Mass Ejections Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Big Bear Solar Observatory, Big Bear City, CA 92314,
Review of Conditions for the Formation and Maintenance of Filaments Paper by Sara F. Martin, 1998 Review presented by Samuel Tun October 13, 2005
Predictions of Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Using Near-Real-Time Solar Magnetic Field Updates C. “Nick” Arge University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/SEC.
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
The Asymmetric Polar Field Reversal – Long-Term Observations from WSO J. Todd Hoeksema, Solar Observatories H.E.P.L., Stanford University SH13C-2278.
MAGNETIC TWIST OF EUV CORONAL LOOPS OBSERVED BY TRACE RyunYoung Kwon, Jongchul Chae Astronomy Program, School of Earth and Environmental Science Seoul.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Quick changes of photospheric magnetic field during flare-associated surges Leping Li, Huadong Chen, Suli Ma, Yunchun Jiang National Astronomical Observatory/Yunnan.
High Resolution Imaging and EUV spectroscopy for RHESSI Microflares S. Berkebile-Stoiser 1, P. Gömöry 1,2, J. Rybák 2, A.M. Veronig 1, M. Temmer 1, P.
Probing Energy Release of Solar Flares M. Prijatelj Carnegie Mellon University Advisors: B. Chen, P. Jibben (SAO)
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
RHESSI and Radio Imaging Observations of Microflares M.R. Kundu, Dept. of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD G. Trottet, Observatoire.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
A Presentation to the SHINE ’02 Workshop by J.G. Luhmann (August 19, 2002) CME initiation: A zoo not an animal (Images from the on-line CDAW CME catalogue.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
Solar System Physics Group IPS Using EISCAT and MERLIN: Extremely-Long Baseline Observations at Multiple Frequencies R.A.Fallows, A.R.Breen, M.M.Bisi,
Analysis Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares: the Importance of Spines and Separators Angela Des Jardins 1, Richard Canfield 1, Dana Longcope 1, Emily.
The Rise of Solar Cycle 24: Magnetic Fields from the Dynamo through the Photosphere and Corona and Connecting to the Heliosphere Part 2: Corona & Heliophere.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Detailed comparison of active regions AR9906 and AR0069 in the build-up to the SEP events of 21 Apr 2002 and 24 Aug 2002 D.
NoRH Observations of RHESSI Microflares M.R. Kundu, Dept. of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD E.J.Schmahl, Dept. of Astronomy, University.
Properties of CME Acceleration in the Low Corona Jie Zhang George Mason University SHINE June 28 – July 2, 2004 Big Sky - Montana Address.
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Scientific Interests in OVSA Expanded Array Haimin Wang.
Observations of the Thermal and Dynamic Evolution of a Solar Microflare J. W. Brosius (Catholic U. at NASA’s GSFC) G. D. Holman (NASA/GSFC)
Shine 2004, A. Sterling CME Eruption Onset Observations: Dimmings Alphonse C. Sterling NASA/MSFC/NSSTC.
17 th November, 2005STEREO/Solar-B Workshop 1 Related Solar Imaging and Near-Earth In-situ Observations of an ICME A. N. Fazakerley 1, L.K. Harra 1, J.L.
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
CME rate: 1/3 (4) day -1 at solar min (max) [LASCO CME catalogue. Yahsiro et al., 2005] |B| at 1 AU: 5 (8) nT at solar min (max) [OMNI data] D (fraction.
Dimming analysis 13/05/05 Gemma Attrill
Multiwavelength Study of Solar Flares Chang Liu Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT Seminar Day November 2, 2007.
Anemone Structure and Geo-Effective Flares/CMEs
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
Direct Observations of the Magnetic Reconnection Site of an Eruption on 2003 November ,ApJ, 622,1251 J. Lin, Y.-K. Ko, L. Sui, J. C. Raymond, G.
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Magnetic connection between the photosphere and the corona
On the nature of EIT waves, EUV dimmings and their link to CMEs
Presentation transcript:

Using the evolution of dimming regions to probe the global magnetic field topology A new interpretation of the 12 th May 1997 event G. Attrill 1, M. Nakwaki 2, L. Harra 1, L. van Driel-Gesztelyi 1, C. Mandrini 2, S. Dasso 2, J. Wang 3 1 MSSL, UCL 2 Instituto de Astronomia y Fisica del Espacio 3 National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

Coronal Dimming Regions Dimming seen as a decrease in intensity in both EUV and X-ray images. Dimmings appear relatively suddenly (10s minutes) Good correlation with CME events 1 st observation by Skylab mission ( ): “Transient Coronal Holes” (Rust, 1983) POSSIBLE CAUSES: Density depletion due to an evacuation of plasma Temperature variation

Link with CMEs “Double Dimmings” – footpoints of erupted magnetic flux rope? Mass studies Dimming typically observed 30 minutes before CME seen in LASCO Motivation: Given the close relationship between coronal dimming regions and CMEs; drive to understand magnetic nature of CMEs naturally requires the magnetic nature of coronal dimming regions…..

This Study Analyse intensity of coronal dimming regions using 195 A data from SOHO/EIT. Measure magnetic flux in dimming regions using SOHO/MDI data. Compare to magnetic flux in the associated magnetic cloud. Probe magnetic character of coronal dimming regions Asymmetrical temporal evolution of two main dimmings “Unidentical Twins”! Extend overview using Yohkoh soft x-ray data. Present a model to explain the observational measurements Indirect calculation of the magnetic reconnection rate Demonstrate that study of the evolving magnetic nature of coronal dimming regions can be used to probe the large-scale magnetic structure involved in the eruption of a CME

Event of 12 th May 1997 Simple magnetic structure AR 8038 LDE flare GOES class C 1.3 Strong coronal wave signature Brightening along (& shrinkage of) north polar coronal hole boundary Filament eruption Full Halo CME Associated magnetic cloud reaches Earth 15 th May 1997

Pre-eruption EIT on 11 th May 1997 Magnetogram Northern end of sigmoidal structure embedded in negative polarity Southern end embedded in positive polarity

Base difference images 05: :12 UT Bright coronal wave front 05:41 – 00:12 UT Maximum extent of the dimming

Defining the boundary of the dimming regions A transient coronal hole is defined as a region where there is an intensity decrease from a “normal” intensity to a region with an intensity close to that of a coronal hole, so we set our contours to lie halfway between the intensity of an area of quiet Sun and the intensity of an existing coronal hole. Potential source of error is selected base difference image: Base difference images showing the main dimming regions. The left panel shows the base difference image (05:41 UT - 00:12 UT). The centre panel shows the base difference image (05:41 UT - 03:59 UT).

Selected Regions Base difference image (05:41 UT - 00:12 UT) at the maximum extent of the dimming, showing the regions selected for analysis defined by our contour boundary method. Temporal intensity evolution of the dimming regions Temporal variation in EUV intensity (counts/pixel) - a tool that allows us to visualise the physical restructuring of the magnetic field topology.

Evolving dimming regions The boundaries of transient coronal holes are constantly evolving Overlaid our contours from images at successive intervals throughout our dataset Asymmetric temporal evolution of the unidentical twin dimmings Fast expansion Slow Contraction

Evolution of the area of the two main dimming regions. The dashed line shows the change in area of region 1 and the solid line shows the change in area of region 2. The graph clearly shows the rapid expansion of the dimming regions and the gradual recovery. Region 1 (the northern-most dimming region) starts to recover before dimming region 2, the (southern-most dimming region).

Region 1 (northern dimming) Region 2 (southern dimming) Time of maximum dimming

Intensity line profiles A change in the average intensity of a dimming region can be caused by two things: An actual change in the intensity of the region A change in the size of the region Change in intensity of each pixel with respect to its location (rather than the averaged intensity)

Change in intensity WITHIN the dimming regions is clearly visible. Increase in intensity is partly due to the contraction of the dimming region boundary, but there is also a contribution from some internal mechanism. Likely candidate is the reconnection related process of chromospheric evaporation.

Measuring the magnetic flux within the dimming regions Method described in Mandrini et al. (2005) – filtering quiet sun flux for noise MDI significantly underestimates the magnetic flux. Following the work of Green et al. (2003), we used the correction factors: MDI full-disk image at 06:28 UT on 12 May The colour white indicates regions of positive polarity and black indicates regions of negative polarity.

The net flux is the sum of the magnitude of the positive and the magnitude of the negative fluxes The “open” flux is the difference between the flux of the two polarities Magnetic flux within each dimming region at the maximum extent of the dimming Since the majority of small-scale mixed polarities close in their direct vicinity, calculating the “open” flux provides an estimate of how much magnetic flux is potentially free for connection with magnetic flux outside of the selected region.

If the interpretation of Webb et al. (2000), is correct, so that the main dimming regions (1 and 2) do indeed mark the footpoints of the magnetic flux rope that erupts as the core of the CME, our calculation of the total net flux should be halved to account for the fact that we are measuring the flux through both footpoints, and so effectively measuring the flux twice. This yields a net flux of 2.02 x10 21 Mx and is substantially larger than the “total linked flux” 1.0 ± 0.2 x10 21 Mx result of Webb et al. (2000). Our measurement of the open flux through region 1 is in agreement with that measured by Webb et al. (2000) for this event, but our measurement through region 2 is double their result. (They found the flux for region 1 to be -9 x10 20 Mx and region 2 to be 1.2 x10 21 Mx). From these measurements, a “total linked flux” of 1.0 ± 0.2 x10 21 Mx is estimated by Webb et al. (2000).

Evolution of the quiet Sun magnetic flux in the 2 main regions from 04:50 UT to 14:59 UT defined by the evolving contours Only the magnetic flux measurements for the quiet Sun component of the regions are shown. The active region component has been removed due to its uncertainty. Region 1 shows an increase in flux, peaking at 05:41 UT and then a gradual decrease. Region 2 shows an increase, peaking at the same time, before a slight decrease is indicated. Region 2 does not immediately decrease sharply after its maximum (as does region 1), but rather remains at a plateau.

Building a detailed picture of the global nature of the event 2D intensity profile made along the thick white line shown in the left panel of this Figure. The centre panel shows the intensity change along the selected line profile with time. The right panel is a contour plot of the intensity profile. The shinking of the north polar coronal hole and the brightening along the shrinking boundary is clearly visible.

Calculation of the magnetic flux contained in the 15th May 1997 magnetic cloud Total axial magnetic flux = 4.8 ± 0.8 x10 20 Mx Total azimuthal magnetic flux = 1.3 ± 0.6 x10 21 Mx (assuming a 1 AU length) The total magnetic flux contained within the cloud is calculated at 1.8 ± 0.7 x10 21 Mx (assuming a 1 AU length). c.f. Estimate by Webb et al. (2000): Axial magnetic flux = 7.35 x10 20 Mx

Magnetic topology scenario Using our analysis of the magnetic character and evolution of the dimmings, we propose a scenario which links the formation of the CME with the formation of the coronal dimming regions (TCHs). Webb et al. (2000) propose that the two main dimming regions of 12 May 1997 mark the footpoints of the flux rope that erupts to form the CME. Kahler & Hudson (2001) state that the formation and expansion of TCHs occurs by the opening of closed magnetic field and that the contraction must be at least partially due to magnetic reconnection. Interestingly, they suggest that larger- scale newly opened magnetic field does not re-close in the arcade or even in the vicinity of the neutral line, but with an independent source of open magnetic field of opposite polarity. They propose that such a magnetic field could be found in previously existing coronal holes. Applying these ideas to our event suggests the following scenario with respect to the evolution of the global magnetic field topology….

Magnetic topology scenario North Polar Coronal Hole Region 2Region 1 Dashed lines represent the pre-event magnetic structure and the solid lines the post-event magnetic structure. The hashed regions represent the main dimming regions.

Implications of our scenario The total open flux from dimming region 2 is measured as 2.12 x10 21 Mx. The total magnetic flux contained within the cloud is calculated as 1.8 ± 0.7 x10 21 Mx (assuming a 1 AU length). Therefore the magnetic flux contained in the magnetic cloud measured at Earth on 15 May 1997 comes mainly from dimming region 2, the southern-most, long-lived, positive polarity dimming region. The absence of bi-directional electron streams in this magnetic cloud is noted by Webb et al. (2000). In view of our new interpretation of this event, we suggest that this absence is most likely due to the source of the magnetic cloud coming only from the southern-most dimming region (one footpoint of the erupted flux rope), rather than jurisdiction for a questionable correspondence between bi-directional electron flows and such solar ejecta. Interaction with the north polar coronal hole magnetic field effectively closes dimming region 1 (the northern most dimming region). Thus dimming region 2 (the southenmost dimming region) that remains “open”, becomes the main source region of the developing magnetic cloud at the (solar) Western leg of the expanding CME.

Rotation of the Filament Partial Filament Eruption N-S alignment E-W alignment Webb et al. (2000) COUNTER CLOCK-WISE ROTATION

Rotation of Coronal “Wave” signature Podladchikova & Berghmans (2005) Entire structure of CME from core to “skirt” exhibits writhe as it erupts. COUNTER CLOCK-WISE ROTATION

N-S alignment changes to E-W alignment Webb et al. (2000) S Flux rope 0 degree pitch angle electrons. Electrons travel parallel to B from the (solar) West

Given the CCW rotation, solar WEST maps back to the Sun as SOUTH. Ie. South leg is connected. Electrons travel parallel to B from the (solar) West. Ie. West leg is connected to the Sun, East leg is disconnected.

Indirect calculation of the magnetic reconnection rate Assuming the validity of our proposed model, then the contraction of the negative polarity outer boundary of region 1 (O1) occurs directly as a result of reconnection with the positive open magnetic field of the north polar coronal hole (OCH). The rate of contraction for the north polar coronal hole boundary is measured as 2 km s −1. Conservation of magnetic flux :

This scenario is derived from study of the evolution of the coronal dimming regions. The total open flux from dimming region 2 is measured as 2.12 x1021 Mx. The total magnetic flux contained within the cloud is calculated as 1.8 ± 0.7 x1021Mx (assuming a 1 AU length).