Navigating System Performance Review and Improvement (SPR&I) Oregon Department of Education Fall 2015 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disproportionality in Special Education
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Addressing the Disproportionate Representation of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Students in Special Education SPR&I Regional Training.
Navigating the SPR&I Database Oregon Department of Education Fall
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
1 Determinations EI/ECSE SPR&I Training ODE Fall 2007.
Disproportionality of Racial and Ethnic Groups in Special Education Significant Disproportionality and EIS versus Disproportionate Representation due to.
IDEA Reauthorization and Disproportionality Sammie Lambert, DECS KYCASE Summer Institute Lexington, Kentucky July 16, 2007.
Special Education Data In the Era of Accountability & District Improvement Steve Smith ODE IDEA Data Manager Fall 2007.
Indicator 4A & 4B Rates of Suspension & Expulsion Revised Methodology Identification of Significant Discrepancy DE-PBS Cadre December 1, 2011.
Special Education Data Collection and Reporting Data Collection, Verification, and Reporting Timelines Sara Berscheit / Steve W. Smith 2009 COSA Conference.
Presented by the Part C- Kristie Musick, Part C Coordinator Dr. Lesly Wilson, Part C Data Manager Part B- Lori James, Part B Data Manager Part C & B March.
Systems Performance Review & Improvement (SPR&I) Training Oregon Department of Education Fall 2007.
WHAT IS EMIS? Education Management Information System Established by law in 1989, the Education Management Information System (EMIS) provides the architecture.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Verification Review (VR) 2013−14 TRAINING.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
Oregon Department of Education October 2015 Fall Regional Training: Special Education Data Collections.
Monitoring Significant Disproportionality in Special Education Systems Performance Review & Improvement Fall Training 2011.
Oregon’s K-12 ELL/SPED students: Data & outcomes.
Timeline Changes and SPR&I Database Updates SPR&I Fall Training Day Two.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Data Analysis & Disproportionality Nancy Fuhrman & Dani Scott Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
SPR&I: Changes, New Measures/Targets, and Lessons Learned from Focused Monitoring Visits David Guardino, SPR&I Coordinator Fall 2009 COSA Conference.
Fall 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 SPP/APR Updates.
IDEA & Disproportionality Perry Williams, Ph.D. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Data Slides for Children & Students with IEPs in 2010 Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
SPP/APR Updates June SPP – State Performance Plan –Establishes baseline data and sets targets through school year for 20 Indicators APR.
Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson A NNUAL P ERFORMANCE R EPORT U PDATE Richard O’Dell Division of Special Education Idaho State Department of Education.
Data Management for Students with DisabilitiesData Management for Students with Disabilities Rachel Wilkinson – Data Coordinator, TDOERachel Wilkinson.
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Required Services, Procedures, and Data Presented by Scott Hall 2009 Special Education Fall Conference Suspension & Expulsion.
Special Ed Reporting 101 An Introduction to Special Education Data Reporting.
Special Education Data Review February February –APR submitted February 15 –Indicator 4 (Discipline) review of policies, procedures, and practices.
YEAR #2 DETERMINATIONS ISD Special Education Directors’ Meeting September 18, 2008.
Spring 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 SPP/APR Update.
West Virginia Department of Education Introducing ……. Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction State of California Annual Performance Report Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004.
Annual Desk Audit (ADA) March 31, 2015 Webinar. Agenda  Purpose/Introduction of the ADA  Indicator Reviews  With Five-year trends  Navigating the.
Presented by Special Education Data Unit Jackie McKim.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
Special Education Performance Profiles and SPP Compliance Indicator Reviews Office for Exceptional Children.
State Performance Plan ESC-2 Presentation For Superintendents September 19, 2007.
Special Ed Reporting 101 An Introduction to Special Education Data Reporting Greg Hess / Candice Schuld.
THE APR AND SPP--LINKING SPECIAL EDUCATION DATA TO ACCOUNTABILITY FOR EDUCATION RESULTS Building a Brighter Tomorrow through Positive and Progressive Leadership.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Oregon Department of Education April 2016 ECR Audits in Consolidated Special Education Spring Collection Data Conference.
Special Education General Supervision, Support and Compliance
What is “Annual Determination?”
Disproportionality: Tier Two Monitoring Activities
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004
New Significant Disproportionality Regulations
Special Education Data Reporting Greg Hess / Candice Felton
Assessment, Evaluation and Support
SPR&I Regional Training
Due Dates subject to change. Watch for dashboard updates.
in Correcting Noncompliance
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
SECN – Transition Role Group Meeting
OSE-EIS MAASE Summer Institute 2010
Significant Disproportionality Stakeholder Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Navigating System Performance Review and Improvement (SPR&I) Oregon Department of Education Fall

By the end of this session, participants will be able to: Access the SPR&I system; Navigate the SPR&I system; Enter data into the SPR&I system; Access SPR&I system reports; and, Read SPR&I system reports. 2 Session Objectives

3 SPR&I Dashboard

Directory information available for agency contact information Findings and Determinations posted on dashboard Due dates for each required activity posted on dashboard ODE updates are posted periodically on the dashboard, check for these frequently 4 General System Features

EI/ECSE and School-age lock in screens have additional questions that help identify applicable standards and include them in for the individual student file review. 5 General System Features

Student File Selection

7 Number of Student Files for Review

Student File Confirmation

Student File Selection (continued)

Student File Confirmation

ALL the following responses must be “yes” in order to review the file:  Student is currently enrolled in your district;  Student is currently eligible for special education;  Student was enrolled in the district on Dec. 1, 2014 with the exception for YCEP, JDEP & LTCT programs Student File Confirmation (continued)

Lock In

Lock In (continued)

PCR Review Form

Data Entry

Data Entry (continued)

Final Review

Submit for ODE Verification

ODE Verification

 ALL noncompliance must be reported.  ALL noncompliance will require individual file correction, followed by additional file reviews to determine if the noncompliance is a systemic issue.  Correction must occur as soon as possible, but no later than one year from written notification from ODE of a finding.  ODE tracks and reports all noncompliance through 100% correction in the Annual Performance Review (APR) submitted to the US Dept. of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP).  Completing the SPR&I process allows districts a chance not only to identify noncompliance, but more importantly it identifies staff development needs and provides a link between compliance in student files with progress in the indicators. Correction of Noncompliance

Correcting Individual Student Files

Additional File Reviews

Additional File Reviews: Student File Selection

Additional File Review: Data Entry

Systemic Issues

Systemic Issues: File Review

SPR&I Reports

Data Reports: 4 Year & 5 Year Cohort Graduation Rates 4 Year Change in Graduation Rate Dropout Rate SPR&I Process, if flagged: Improvement Plan Required 36 Indicator B1/B2: Graduation & Dropout Rates

Data Reports: Students w/Disabilities – Participation Math and ELA Students w/Disabilities – Performance Math and ELA SPR&I Process, if flagged: Worksheet Required Improvement Plan determined by ODE 37 Indicator B3: Assessment

 B4(a): Significant Discrepancy (IDEA students vs. Non-IDEA students)  B4(b): Significant Discrepancy by Race/Ethnicity (IDEA students vs. all students in LEA) SPR&I Process, if flagged: Policy-to-Practice Review Required Corrective Action Plan, if non-compliance is identified 38 Indicator B4: Discipline

 Significant Discrepancy: IDEA students vs. Non-IDEA students  Significant Discrepancy: IDEA students by Race/Ethnicity vs. all students in LEA  Detailed Data by Disability and Grade Level (reported by both the # of IDEA students and by Disciplinary Action types)  Discipline Incident Details from SET Data Collection (Student Specific Information) 39 B4: Discipline Data Reports

Data Reports: 3 year placement distribution Placement Distribution by: Disability type, Grade level and Race/Ethnicity Weighted Risk Ratios by Race/Ethnicity SPR&I Process if flagged: Worksheet required Improvement Plan determined by ODE 40 Indicator B5: Placement in the LRE

Data Reports: IDEA by Race/Ethnicity (#, %, WWR) IDEA by Disability Type (#, %, WWR) Disability Type by Grade Level & Race/Ethnicity Eligibility Determination by Race/Ethnicity SPR&I Process, if flagged: Worksheet required Policy-to-Practice Review determined by ODE Corrective Action Plan, if noncompliance is identified 41 Indicator B9/B10: Disproportionate Representation

Data Reports: Initial Referrals (# and %) Initial Referrals by Race/Ethnicity Students Found Eligible by Disability Type w/timeline data (# and %) Reasons for Exceeding 60 School-Day Timeline SPR&I Process if flagged: Corrective Action Plan required 42 Indicator B11: Child Find

Data Driven B4 Discipline B5 Placement B9 Disproportionate Representation in Special Education B10 Disproportionate Representation in Specific Eligibility Categories SPR&I Process if flagged: Policy-to-Practice required Corrective Active Plan required 43 Significant Disproportionality

May all your lights be green!

SPR&I Contacts EI/ECSE: Alan Garland at School Age: Laura Petschauer at Questions?