Economics of Product Liability. Product defects Defect in design Defect in manufacture Defect in warning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prevention and Treatment of Athletic Injuries Westfield High School Houston, Texas.
Advertisements

Chapter 21: Strict Liability
Hippocratic Oath. Mandates physicians to always take in consideration the well-being of their patients. If a doctor fails to live up to this precept,
Negligence The Unintentional Tort (The most common civil action) Negligence.
Regulatory due care standard Statutory due care standard Common law due care standard  Reasonable man  Custom  Hand rule.
Product Liability When goods cause injury, there is a question of product liability. There are three main issues related to product liability cases: –
Tort Law – Unintentional torts
Torts: Negligence and Strict Liability OBE 118, Section 3, Fall 2004 Professor McKinsey When a wrong was not intended but creates liability nonetheless.
Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
BRUCE DOMAZLICKY PROFESSOR OF ECONOMICS SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY Products Liability in the United States.
Tort Law – Unintentional Torts. Negligence Action was unintentional Action was unintentional It is planned It is planned Injury occurs Injury occurs anyone.
Negligence and Unintentional Torts
Chapter 6 Strict Liability and Product Liability
CIVIL LAW 3.2 TYPES OF TORTS. Types of Torts  There are three categories of torts:  Intentional Wrong  Negligence  Strict Liability.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 6 Strict Liability and Product Liability Chapter 6 Strict Liability and.
 1. Duty-The accused wrongdoer owed a duty of care to the injured person  2. Breach of Duty- the defendant’s conduct breached that duty  3. Causation-defendant’s.
Welcome to Unit Eight Intro to Torts What Are We Studying This Unit? Strict (also called Absolute) Liability Strict (also called Absolute) Liability.
14 - 1Copyright 2008, The National Underwriter Company Product Liability Insurance  What is it?  Liability exposure of the manufacturer whose malfunctioning.
Chapter 14 Negligence and Unintentional Torts LAW 120.
The Courts: Procedure and damages for negligence cases Outline of civil courts and appeal system for a negligence case.
NEGLIGENCE AND STRICT LIABILITY Chapter 4. Which tort? 1.You enter a department store where they have just cleaned the floor. The floor is still wet,
Chapter 6.  A tort is a wrong  There are three categories of torts  Intentional torts  Unintentional torts (negligence)  Strict liability 6-2Copyright.
Torts Dennis J. Kehm, Jr.. Welcome to………. Tort…….
NEGLIGENCE (Unintentional Torts). The elements of negligence: * Negligence * Duty of Care * Standard of Care * Foreseeability * “reasonable person” *
Part 2 – The Law of Torts Chapter 5 – Negligence and Unintentional Torts Prepared by Michael Bozzo, Mohawk College © 2015 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 5-1.
Torts.
CHAPTER 7 Negligence And Strict Liability.
I. Negligence A. Characteristics 1. definition 2. elements 3. defenses.
1 Unit 5 Torts ARE Definition n Civil Wrong.
Negligence: Review Dr. Steiner Defining the Standard of Care The standard of care measures the duty owed Standard of care is the level of expected conduct.
1. 2 NEGLIGENCE CONDUCT THAT INVOLVES AN UNREASONABLY GREAT RISK OF HARM THAT FALLS BELOW THE STANDARD OF CARE THE LAW ESTABLISHES FOR THE PROTECTION.
Manufacturing (Strict Liability) Was it made with a defect? Product must be substantially unaltered. Ø modifications Ø damages Ø wear & tear The General.
Jeopardy Negligence 101 Negligence 201 Negligence 301 Negligence 401 Res Ipsa Loquitor Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q.
Chapter 20 Negligence. The failure to exercise a reasonable amount of care in either doing or not doing something resulting in harm or injury.
By Elaine M. Deering. Personal injury cases often involve items or products that the plaintiff had no reason to fear—a vacuum cleaner, a lawnmower, or.
 Development of Strict Liability.  Defendant’s liability for strict liability is without regard to: Fault, Foreseeability, Standard of Care or Causation.
Chapter 6 Torts and Strict Liability. Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.6-2 Three Kinds of Torts A tort is a wrong.
Chapter 09 Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
PA 165 Introduction to Torts Unit 4 Lecture 1. Unit 4 Graded Items Lecture 1 (10 points) Lecture 2 (10 points) Quiz (40 points) Discussion (20 points)
Chapter 3: Sports Torts. Tort Law Generally Tort = Personal Injury law Tort = Personal Injury law Latin: to “twist” or “twisted” Latin: to “twist” or.
Strict Liability and Product Liability Chapter 7.
By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts
Prentice Hall © PowerPoint Slides to accompany The Legal Environment of Business and Online Commerce 4E, by Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 6 Product.
PA 165 Introduction to Torts Unit 4 Seminar. Unit 3 Follow Up Unit 3 Paper Intentional Torts Defenses to Intentional Torts.
TYPES OF LIABILITY CLU3M: Civil Law. Special Types of Liability Negligence is the broad term for any type of tort law Within negligence are various types.
1 BUSINESS LAW 1 NEGLIGENCE - BREACH OF DUTY OF CARE.
PSI’s liability is based on the following doctrines applied in medical malpractice cases:  Doctrine of Ostensible agent  Doctrine of Corporate Negligence.
Negligence Elements Duty Breach of duty (negligent conduct) Actual harm Cause-in-fact Proximate cause / Scope of risk.
Personal Injury Laws Objective: Define negligence and strict liability Bellwork: What was conversion? How do you think the name came about?
TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Chapter 18. TORTS: A CIVIL WRONG Under criminal law, wrongs committed are called crimes. Under civil law, wrongs committed are called.
Negligence Tort law establishes standards for the care that people must show to one another. Negligence is the conduct that falls below this standard.
Certain professionals, such as doctors, pilots, and plumbers, are held to the standards of reasonably skilled professionals in their field. Even minors.
Legal Liability Issues
Liability in negligence for injury to people and damage to property
Bell-work 1/27/17 Read one of the two quotes under World Government and give a brief meaning.
Negligence Mr. Lugo.
Strict Liability and Public Policy
Chapter 7: Strict Liability and Product Liability
Strict Liability Chapter 21.
Chapter 13: Product Liability
Chapter 6 Tort Law Chapter 6: Tort Law.
Burden and Standard of Proof
Liability in a Personal Injury Accident
Alex Stein (coauthored with Gideon Parchomovsky)
Corporations and Trusts Law Chapter 2
Chapter 7 Strict Liability and Product Liability
Chapter 6 Product and Strict Liability
Prevention and Treatment of Athletic Injuries
What To Expect From Your Car Accident Lawyer
Negligence and Other Torts
Presentation transcript:

Economics of Product Liability

Product defects Defect in design Defect in manufacture Defect in warning

What standard would economics recommend for product related accidents? In most cases the defects with respect to design and manufacturing are unilateral The producer is also the one most likely to be aware of special dangers

Escola v. Coca Cola (1944) While placing bottles of Coca Cola in the refrigerator, a bottle explodes in the hand of a grocer store clerk, seriously injuring her hand. There is no evidence that the bottle was mishandled and there is evidence that other bottles have exploded spontaneously. The court concludes that the bottle was defective. Given that the bottle was defective is that sufficient proof that Coca Cola was negligent?

Escola v. Coca Cola (1944) res ipsa loquitur (rayz ip-sah loh-quit-her) n. Latin for "the thing speaks for itself," Does the defect prove negligence? –(1) defendant had exclusive control of the thing causing the injury and –(2) the accident is of such a nature that it ordinarily would not occur in the absence of negligence by the defendant.

Escola v. Coca Cola (1944) “…the evidence appears sufficient to support a reasonable inference that the bottle here involved was not damaged by any extraneous force after delivery to the restaurant by defendant. It follows, therefore, that the bottle was in some manner defective at the time defendant relinquished control, because sound and properly prepared bottles of carbonated liquids do not ordinarily explode when carefully handled.”.

The Thing Speaks for Itself Suppose there was no way of producing bottles that were 100 percent safe? How would we know this without examining production standards and the cost of production?

Product related accidents These are most likely bilateral in nature Suppose the manufacturer could not avoid liability for customer misuse –All customers would pay a higher price –Careful customers would subsidize careless customers –The cost of insurance is tied to the price of the product –Careful customers may be denied products that produce a consumer surplus

Enterprise liability Manufacturers are responsible for all accidents arising from the use of their product