PROGRAM Welcome Remarks Quality Assurance in the Graduate Process Discussion LUNCH Makerere Reforms General Discussion & Way forward Research & Innovations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Research Office Roadshows John Green June 2008 Chief Co-ordinating Officer.
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
Alexandria, 2005 NQAAC Quality Assurance and Accreditation for Higher Education Dr. Salwa EL Magoli National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee.
Offices of the Provost & Deputy Vice-Chancellor (S&E) Introduction New policies, procedures and guidelines Key drivers OADRI Cycle Quality Management.
SEM Planning Model.
1 EFCA - 21th March 2002 Raul Mateus Paula. 2 This presentation underlines: The key objectives of the Relex Reform The division of the responsibilities.
15 april 20081Herhaling titel van presentatie University governance and autonomy September 2008 PRIUM site visit Rosette S’Jegers Vice rector for Education.
West Bengal State Council of Higher Education (WBSCHE)
1 PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY AND RESPONSEBILITIES Dr. Fred Mugambi Mwirigi JKUAT.
Application to Graduate Process—MS, Ph.D. Approved by GSC Chair on or before 3 rd Friday of term Ph.D. Master’s MS w/o Thesis Report on Final Examination.
WELCOME TO THE PROCUREMENT SEMINAR Procurement and Contracts An Overview of Contract Administration.
UK higher education: quality assurance at home and abroad Carolyn Campbell The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
Professor Dolina Dowling
Fundamentals of Trusteeship. Welcome Michael Mizzoni Deputy General Counsel Department and Board of Higher Education.
Education Sector Strategic Plan DOSE VISION STATEMENT: By 2015 universal access to relevant and high quality education has been achieved.
Presented by: Act DIRECTOR-GENERAL Date: 04 AUGUST 2015 STATUS/PROGRESS REPORT ON NELSON MANDELA MUSEUM 2015.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND ADMINISTRATION Budget Briefing BRANCH: MONITORING AND EVALUATION Ms Tumi Mketi 07 May 2007.
MERLOT PRESENTATION Northeast State Technical Community College A METHOD FOR ENSURING QUALITY IN ONLINE COURSES Dr. Tom Wallace – Director of Academic.
The Global Fund- structure, function and evolution February 18, 2008.
ATEM Victoria Conference 2004 Preparing Tomorrow’s Leaders Collaborating for success in developing postgraduate attributes Teresa Tjia and Fiona Zammit.
Keeping Up-to-Date with SACSCOC MAC Meeting Fall 2013.
Review Search Committee Process Ensure knowledge of Search Process so assistance may be provided to Search Chair and Committee Members Partner with Diversity.
Republic of Slovenia Ministry of Finance Ministry of Finance Budget Supervision Office of the Republic of Slovenia 1 Miran Gostiša Ljubljana, 27th January.
F&A SUB-COMMITTEE REPORT TO 3RD RETREAT OF URAFR COMMITTEE, OCTOBER 2009.
CHANGE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Samuel Kyamanywa J. Ddumba Ssentamu.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
FOR THE 6 TH URAFRC RETREAT AT IMPERIAL BOTANICAL BEACH HOTEL 8 TH -10 TH APRIL,
RESEARCH SUB COMMITTEE REPORT TO THE 3 rd URAFR RETREAT OCTOBER 29 TH, 2009.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Aligning Institutional Strategic and SEM Plans: Indiana State University November 12, 2012 Tom Green, Ph.D. Senior Consultant.
Format for Guidelines Preamble – Why the need for the guideline – Relate legal and policy framework Body of the guideline.
The Big Picture Getting Started The Process Follow-Up – 5 Year Action Plan Program Review.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
BUSINESS PROCESS RE- ENGINEERING OF THE RESEARCH & INNOVATIONS FUNCTION AT MAKERERE UNIVERSITY PRESENTATION AT THE JOINT RETREAT 8 TH -10 TH APRIL, 2010.
+ using Integrated Planning & Budget In a Participatory Governance Context Realizing our Foothill Vision 20/20.
New Frameworks for Strategic Enrollment Management Planning
ACP Finance DC FB 4.Appointment of Taskforce Team Taskforce Team 5.Environment Scanning Plan (ESP) 8.Potential & feasible? 7.Confirm the ESP Result 10.Detailed.
CREATING GOOD GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE TO STRENGTHEN CONSORTIA: KENYA LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SERVICES CONSORTIUM (KLISC) BY Rosemary Otando Eifl Country Coordinator.
Quality Assurance Project Makerere University Report on Activities of the No Cost Extension Dr Ddembe Williams Project Manager Dr Lillian Tibatemwa-Ekirikubinza.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
WASC “All Hands” Meeting Overview and Update November 12, 2007 D. Jonte-Pace.
FOR URAFRC RETREAT 21 ST -23 RD OCTOBER, 2010 BY DR. EDITH NATUKUNDA TLC PROGRESS REPORT ARE YOU READY FOR CHANGE??
Program Services Coordinator Transfer Center Hiring Justification Soraya Sohrabi.
Review of the Report of the October Retreat.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee Establishment of an Agency for Social Security 26 February 2003 Department of Social Development.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Thirteenth Board Meeting Geneva, April 2006 Executive Director Recruitment and Transition Report of the ad hoc committee of Chair and Vice Chairs.
November | 1 CONTINUING CARE COUNCIL Report to Forum Year
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
CATS Self Review and Planning Tool An Introduction and Overview Alison Poot and Melody West, CATS Project Team (University of Tasmania)
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Embedding the golden threads that lead to quality care every time……
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
IT Governance Planning Overview
11/18/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE – 02 MAY 2018.
12/5/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Select COMMITTEE – 19 June 2018.
Overview of Sabbatical Leave Policies and Procedures
CORPORATE & ACADEMIC GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
Human resource and Work flow of the Research Office, RUPP
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee - Labour
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
BRIEFING THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE OF WATER AND SANITATION
Director-General: Mr. E Africa
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Presentation transcript:

PROGRAM Welcome Remarks Quality Assurance in the Graduate Process Discussion LUNCH Makerere Reforms General Discussion & Way forward Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

Overview of University Reform Process Updates –Administration & Financial Reforms –Research & Innovations Reforms –Teaching, Learning & Colleges Reforms General Discussion & Way forward

MAKERERE UNIVERSITY Business Re-engineering of Research & Innovations processes Presentation to Deans & Deputy Deans by George Nasinyama Deputy Director. Research & Publications, SGS Hotel Africana, May 18, 2010 Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

ToR TO REVIEW THE CURRENT RESEARCH FUNCTION TO MAKE IT MORE EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

Objectives Align with the objectives and strategies in the Makerere Strategic plan and Research policy Design processes that promote transparency, accountability and good management of the University Resources to support research Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

Objectives… Develop process descriptions that are supportive of the overall research objectives To collect all the process descriptions in a research manual Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

Membership  Prof W. Banage  Prof. E. Katunguka Rwakishaya  Dr G. Nasinyama  Dr M. Musoke  Dr C. Kabonesa  Dr Lynn Atuyambe  Hon. Ruth Kavuma  Dr. Pontiano Kaleebu  Prof. E.K. Mbidde (Alt)   Mr. Gabriel Komakech   Mr. A. Owinyi, Rep COGS   Consultants  Mr. Wabwire  Mr. G. Muhumuza   Secretariat  Mr. Michael Kagumba  Ms. Christine Akello – Research Assistant Research & Innovations Sub – Committee of URAFR

Methods of Work  Sub-committee meetings  Sub- Committee Retreats  Main Committee meetings & Retreats  Benchmarking visits  Drafting of the Research Manual Research & Innovations Sub- Committee of URAFR

ACHIEVEMENTS

Achievements a)Policies/Regulations/Laws impacting research & innovation function identified Research & Innovations Sub- Committee of URAFR

Legal framework Universities and Other Tertiary Institutions Act, 2006 (as amended) The University Strategic Plan 2008/ /2019 The Research & Innovations Policy, 2008 The Intellectual Property Management Policy, 2008 Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

Legal framework… Policy on Appointments & Promotions of Academic Staff, 2006 The Human Resource Manual, 2009 The Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Policy 2004 The Quality Assurance Policy, 2008 Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

Achievements b)Identified 30 Processes and Reviewed them Research & Innovations Sub- Committee of URAFR

Identified Processes Main Process Research CoordinationPost-award (10) Periodic needs assessment Publishing Research AgreementsPreservation & Conservation Recruitment (7)Access to Research Information Pre-award (3)Protection (4) Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

Achievements c)Described the 30 Processes Research & Innovations Sub- Committee of URAFR

Description of the Processes Process/sub- process Performance Baseline Performance Gap Desired Outcome Performance Indicators Research Coordination Several centers – MISR, MUARIK, HURIPEC, IDI, MUIENR, SGS Lack of a university- wide research coordination unit Well- structured organisation managing research & innovations Directorate of Research & Graduate Studies Approved Research Grants Unit Research Agreements Different formats exist Lack of a uniform format Generic research agreement document All agreements conforming Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

Achievements d)Mapped 23 processes (See example - Process for Requisition of Research Funds] Research & Innovations Sub- Committee of URAFR

Requisition of Funds Process Applicant with approved proposal submits application for research funds to the Faculty Research & Higher Degrees committee Min of 1day FR&HDC considers the application and makes a recommendation to the SGS Min of 1 week – 3 months Applicant submits application for funds together with signed minutes of the FR&HDC to the SGS Min of 1day Application is screened to conform to requirementsMin 1 day Application considered by the Board of Research & Publications 3 months Applicant is informed of decision of the Board1 week Release warrant is prepared and signed by the DDRMin of 3days Accountant prepares the voucher and chequeMin of 2 days Voucher and cheque approved by the DirectorMin of 1 day Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

Requisition of Funds Process … Accountant prepares voucher and cheque accompanied with a letter to the Director for approval of the voucher and first signature on the cheque Min of 2 days Documents are forwarded to the internal audit for verification Min of 2days Internal audit verifies and endorsesMin of 5days The SGS accountant picks the documents and forwards them to the bursar for second signature and keeps custody of cheque until the applicant appears to collect and sign for it Min of 3 days Accountant writes a letter of confirmation to the bankMin of 2 days Accountant delivers letter of confirmation to the bankMin of 1day Applicant collects cheque from the SGS accountantMin of 2 day

Process Map Request for Research Funds Applicant submits application FR & HDC 1wk- 3months SGS Revise 2 Days Board of R &P Reject ed Revise 3months DDR Candidate is informed of the decision Accountant Director SGS 1 day Accountant submits cheque and voucher for signing Internal Audit 5 Days Accountant Applicant collects cheque from the Accountant 2 Days

Achievements cont.. e)Critically examined the 23 processes Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

PRIMARY QUESTIONSSECONDARY QUESTIONS SELECTED POSSIBILITIE S What is achieved Is it necessaryWhat else could be done What else should be done Where is it done Why thereWhere else could it be done Where should it be done When is it doneWhy thenWhen else can it be done When should it be done Who does itWhy that person Who else can do it Who should do it How is it doneWhy in that way How else could it be done How should it be done Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

Achievements cont.. f)Seven (7) processes require development of guidelines Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

Guidelines… Authorship & Documentation of research findings Publication Preservation and conservation of research findings Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

Guidelines… Distribution of research findings Delivery of Research findings –Conferences –Workshops –Breakfast meetings Marketing Access to Research Information Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

The Draft Research Manual 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Legal Framework 3.0 Re-designed/To-be processes –Guiding Principle for each re-designed process 4.0Conclusions and Way forward Annexes Research & Innovations sub-committee of URAFR

THANK YOU Research & Innovations Sub- Committee of URAFRC as ‘We Build for the Future’