Controlling for Baseline

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mediation: Multiple Variables David A. Kenny. 2 Mediation Webinars Four Steps Indirect Effect Causal Assumptions.
Advertisements

The STARTS Model David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
G Lecture 10 SEM methods revisited Multilevel models revisited
1 Regression as Moment Structure. 2 Regression Equation Y =  X + v Observable Variables Y z = X Moment matrix  YY  YX  =  YX  XX Moment structure.
Topic 12: Multiple Linear Regression
Structural Equation Modeling. What is SEM Swiss Army Knife of Statistics Can replicate virtually any model from “canned” stats packages (some limitations.
Structural Equation Modeling Using Mplus Chongming Yang Research Support Center FHSS College.
Structural Equation Modeling
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Standardized Change Score Analysis David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
Linear Regression and Binary Variables The independent variable does not necessarily need to be continuous. If the independent variable is binary (e.g.,
APIM with Distinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation
Moderation: Assumptions
Structural Equation Modeling
Correlational Research 1. Spare the rod and spoil the child 2. Idle hands are the devil’s workplace 3. The early bird catches the worm 4. You can’t teach.
LINEAR REGRESSION: Evaluating Regression Models. Overview Standard Error of the Estimate Goodness of Fit Coefficient of Determination Regression Coefficients.
Common Factor Analysis “World View” of PC vs. CF Choosing between PC and CF PAF -- most common kind of CF Communality & Communality Estimation Common Factor.
“Ghost Chasing”: Demystifying Latent Variables and SEM
Topics: Regression Simple Linear Regression: one dependent variable and one independent variable Multiple Regression: one dependent variable and two or.
The Autoregressive Model of Change David A. Kenny.
Analysis of Covariance Goals: 1)Reduce error variance. 2)Remove sources of bias from experiment. 3)Obtain adjusted estimates of population means.
PSY 307 – Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences Chapter 7 – Regression.
1 Chapter 17: Introduction to Regression. 2 Introduction to Linear Regression The Pearson correlation measures the degree to which a set of data points.
Change Score Analysis David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
Structural Equation Modeling Intro to SEM Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Review Guess the correlation. A.-2.0 B.-0.9 C.-0.1 D.0.1 E.0.9.
Mediation: Sensitivity Analysis David A. Kenny. 2 You Should Know Assumptions Detailed Example Solutions to Assumption Violation.
Factor Analysis Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Using SPSS
Issues in structural equation modeling Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 7: fitting a model, fit indices, comparingmodels, statistical power.
Multiple Regression: Advanced Topics David A. Kenny January 23, 2014.
Regression Analyses II Mediation & Moderation. Review of Regression Multiple IVs but single DV Y’ = a+b1X1 + b2X2 + b3X3...bkXk Where k is the number.
Completing the ANOVA From the Summary Statistics.
Simple Linear Regression One reason for assessing correlation is to identify a variable that could be used to predict another variable If that is your.
Cross-lagged Panel Correlation (CLPC) David A. Kenny December 25, 2013.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Mediation: Solutions to Assumption Violation
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 12: Wrap Up: Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions for SEM.
Aron, Aron, & Coups, Statistics for the Behavioral and Social Sciences: A Brief Course (3e), © 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter 12 Making Sense of Advanced Statistical.
HLM Models. General Analysis Strategy Baseline Model - No Predictors Model 1- Level 1 Predictors Model 2 – Level 2 Predictors of Group Mean Model 3 –
G Lecture 81 Comparing Measurement Models across Groups Reducing Bias with Hybrid Models Setting the Scale of Latent Variables Thinking about Hybrid.
Environmental Modeling Basic Testing Methods - Statistics III.
UNDERSTANDING DESCRIPTION AND CORRELATION. CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS: DESCRIBING THE STRENGTH OF RELATIONSHIPS Pearson r Correlation Coefficient Strength.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
LESSON 6: REGRESSION 2/21/12 EDUC 502: Introduction to Statistics.
4 basic analytical tasks in statistics: 1)Comparing scores across groups  look for differences in means 2)Cross-tabulating categoric variables  look.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Longitudinal Data David A. Kenny December
Multiple Regression David A. Kenny January 12, 2014.
Example of Models for the Study of Change David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Final Lecture: Multiple-Group Models, a Word about Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions.
Testing the Equality of Means and Variances in Over-Time Data David A. Kenny.
Mediation: Assumptions David A. Kenny davidakenny.net.
Multiple Regression.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
12 Inferential Analysis.
Chapter 6 Predicting Future Performance
Quantitative Methods Simple Regression.
Making Sense of Advanced Statistical Procedures in Research Articles
APIM with Indistinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation
Multiple Regression.
عنوان عنوان فرعی.
Social Relations Model: Estimation of Relationship Effects
Measuring Change in Two-Wave Studies
12 Inferential Analysis.
Power in Measuring Change in Two-Wave Studies
Regression & Prediction
Chapter 6 Predicting Future Performance
Structural Equation Modeling
Presentation transcript:

Controlling for Baseline David A. Kenny

Variables Outcome variable Y Baseline measure: Y1 Follow-up measure: Y2 Causal variable X measured at time 1 The question is how to measure the effect of X on Y2 and control for Y1.

Equation Y2 = a + bY1 + bX + e X and Y1 as predictors

Comparable Analyses Analysis of Covariance with Y1 as a covariate. Control for Y1, but make the outcome change or Y2 – Y1 Residualized change (or gain) score analysis Regress Y2 on Y1 and compute residuals Regress X on Y1 and compute residuals (usually not done) Regress the first residual on the second Reduce df by 1. (usually not done)

b

Measurement Error in Y1 Assume Y1 mediation of the Z (the assignment variable) to Y2. The measurement error in Y1 attenuates (pushes it toward zero) b. The estimated b equals br where r is the reliability of the pretest (controlling for X). Not enough of the “gap” is subtracted.

Solutions to the Measurement Error Problem Known Reliability Solutions Lord-Porter Correction Williams & Hazer Strategy Reliability Estimation Solution Latent Variable Analysis with Multiple Indicators

Known Reliability Reliability or r must be known. Perhaps use an internal consistency estimate. Lord-Porter uses the reliability of Y1 controlling for X not the reliability of Y1. Must adjust r by (r - rXY12)/(1 - rXY12). Williams & Hazer uses the reliability of Y1 so no adjustment is necessary.

Lord-Porter Correction Reliability or Y1 controlling for X or r must be known. Regress Y1 on X (and covariates) and compute the predicted score (P) and the residual (R) Compute: Y1ʹ = P + rR (r is the reliability) Regress Y2 on Y1ʹ and X Hardly ever done, but does not require a SEM program.

Williams & Hazer Error variance of for the T1 latent variable is fixed to sY12(1- r) where r is the known reliability of Y1. b

Latent Variable Multiple indicators of latent Y at each time Set up a Latent Variable Model Test to see that the loadings are the same at each time. To be safely identified, need at least 3 indicators at each time. Correlate errors of the same indicator at different times.

b

More Technically need only a Time 1 latent variable and no Time 2 latent variable. If latent variables at two times, do not necessarily need temporally invariant loadings though you do with CSA.