1 Task 2.3 - particle simulations studies: preliminary results of D2 field quality M. Giovannozzi Setting up of simulations Results Outlook NB: numerical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Advertisements

The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Energy deposition in Q0 Elena Wildner 19/04/07. Strategy 1. Define a TAS to protect the Q0 2. Optics:  *= 0.25m 3. Calculate, with some optimization.
Simulation priorities for 2015 R. Bruce for task 5.2.
Spectrometer compensation in IR2 and IR8 during the 450 GeV collision run September 11, 2006 LOC meeting Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to S. Fartoukh, W. Herr,
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
* IP5 IP1 IP2 IP8 vertical crossing angle at IP8 R. Bruce, W. Herr, B. Holzer Acknowledgement: S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, S. Redaelli, J. Wenninger.
The LHC dynamic aperture saga: overview, ideas and recent developments Massimo Giovannozzi CERN – Beams Department Definition and physics/computational.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Bernhard Holzer * IP5 IP1 IP2 IP8 IR 7 ”Beam Dynamics for Nb3Sn dipoles... latest news"
E. Todesco HL-LHC: OUTLOOK ON PROTECTION FOR IR MAGNETS (WP3) E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland CERN, 23 rd April 2015 MPE meeting.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Orbit Correctors in D2 and Q4 Update J. Rysti and E. Todesco 1 4/11/2014.
Beam-beam effects for round and flat optics: DA simulations D.Banfi, J.Barranco, T.Pieloni, A.Valishev Acknowledgement: R.DeMaria,M.Giovannozzi,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
E. Todesco MAGNET (RE)Training E. Todesco Magnets, Superconductors and Cryostats Group Technology Department, CERN LHC risk review, 5 th March 2009 Acknowledgements:
BENE MECC detector Pasquale Migliozzi INFN – Napoli.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
1 Task particle simulations studies: progress report M. Giovannozzi Objectives To study the field quality tolerances for new magnetic elements for.
Controlling non-linear effects in circular particle accelerators and the dynamic aperture saga: the case of the CERN LHC Massimo Giovannozzi CERN – Beams.
Principle of Wire Compensation Theory and Simulations Simulations and Experiments The Tevatron operates with 36 proton bunches and 36 anti-proton bunches.
WP2: Beam dynamics and optics Workflow between Work Packages 1 O. Brüning – BE-ABP WP2 HL-LHC meeting 17. November 2011.
Criteria for dynamic aperture limits and impact of the multipolar errors: summary of the simulations with beam-beam for levelling scenarios at 5 and 7.5x10.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
E. Todesco LAYOUT FOR INTERACTION REGIONS IN HI LUMI LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Acknowledgements: B. Dalena, M. Giovannozzi, R. De Maria,
08/11/2007M. Giovannozzi – CARE-HHH-APD IR’071 Optics issues for Phase 1 and Phase 2 upgrades Massimo Giovannozzi, CERN Outline: –Option for Phase 1 and.
Proposal for change of the reference emittance for the estimate of apertures, DA, etc. G. Arduini with input from: C. Bracco, R. Bruce, H. Burkhardt, R.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
Expected field quality in LHC magnets E. Todesco AT-MAS With contributions of S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, A. Lombardi, F. Schmidt (beam dynamics) N. Catalan-Lasheras,
Dynamic aperture studies for LHC and its upgrade Massimo Giovannozzi CERN – Beams Department Definition and physics/computational issues LHC: layout and.
Field Quality Specifications for Triplet Quadrupoles of the LHC Lattice v.3.01 Option 4444 and Collimation Study Yunhai Cai Y. Jiao, Y. Nosochkov, M-H.
Issues related to crossing angles Frank Zimmermann.
Effect of high synchrotron tune on Beam- Beam interaction: simulation and experiment A.Temnykh for CESR operating group Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
Y.Papaphilippou Thanks to
High Gradient Magnet Design for SPring-8 Upgrade Plan
Task 2. 5: Beam-beam studies D. Banfi, J. Barranco, T. Pieloni, A
JLEIC simulations status April 3rd, 2017
Parameters and tolerances
Multi-Turn Extraction studies and PTC
Field quality update and recent tracking results
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
Status and needs of dynamic aperture calculations
Field quality to achieve the required lifetime goals (single beam)
Optics Development for HE-LHC
(CMS GEANT4 simulation)
UPDATE ON DYNAMIC APERTURE SIMULATIONS
Error and Multipole Sensitivity Study for the Ion Collider Ring
Progress of SPPC lattice design
DESIGN OPTIONS FOR ORBIT CORRECTORS IN D2 and Q4
HL LHC WP3 (magnets) TASK 2 ADVANCEMENT
Collimation margins and *
Magnetic axis tolerances for the SSS magnets
Thanks to S. Fartoukh, W. Herr, B. Jeanneret, M. Giovannozzi
Task 2.3 Particle simulations studies
Triplet corrector layout and strength specifications
Orbit Correctors in D2 and Q4 Design options
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
First Look at Error Sensitivity in MEIC
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov, M-H. Wang (SLAC)
Discussions on DA with tune scan
Status of IR / Nonlinear Dynamics Studies
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
Presentation transcript:

1 Task particle simulations studies: preliminary results of D2 field quality M. Giovannozzi Setting up of simulations Results Outlook NB: numerical simulations performed by Y. Nosochkov et al. WP2 TLM MG 27/08/2013

Setting up of simulations - I Usual goal: –Check the impact of the FQ estimated for the new D2 magnet on DA. –Perform scan over multipoles aiming at making the impact of D2 FQ in the shadow of the one of the IT, i.e., DA drop of few percent. Conditions: –Collision configuration (round optics, 15 cm  *) –IT FQ included as specified. –D2 FQ included as specified by E. Todesco. In the following the multipoles are relative to the official values. –Measured FQ in the rest of the machine. –Feed down from orbit in separation dipoles not included. 27/08/2013 WP2 TLM MG 2

Setting up of simulations - II Usual goal: –Check the impact of the FQ estimated for the new D2 magnet on DA. –Perform scan over multipoles aiming at making the impact of D2 FQ in the shadow of the one of the IT, i.e., DA drop of few percent. Conditions: –Collision configuration (round optics, 15 cm  *) –IT FQ included as specified. –D2 FQ included as specified by E. Todesco. In the following the multipoles are specified relative to the official values. –Measured FQ in the rest of the machine. 27/08/2013 WP2 TLM MG 3

Results - I Summary table The factor 1/4 in the multipoles corresponds to: –Reduced field (10 m magnet) –Reduced aperture (95 mm) 27/08/2013 WP2 TLM MG 4 Courtesy Y. Nosochkov

Results - II 27/08/2013 WP2 TLM MG 5 Courtesy Y. Nosochkov Non-zero b 2 seems to improve DA! To be checked

Outlook Found strong impact of the D2 FQ on DA, even for the most optimistic case, i.e., 10 m long magnet with reduced aperture. b 3 and b 4 are the most dangerous multipoles: scans will be performed to set upper bounds. Change of tune tested and found to improve DA. Found impact of b 2 on DA: zero value provides the worse DA! Details to be checked. 27/08/2013 WP2 TLM MG 6