Ch 173-218 WAC Geologic Sequestration of Carbon dioxide John Stormon Hydrogeologist Washington Department of Ecology Seattle, WA October.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Water Planning Senate Bill 1 Introduction and Status as of August 01, 1999.
Advertisements

EPA’s Proposed Rules for Geo-Sequestration of CO 2 Ben Knape Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
1 Results Based Regulation Implications for Municipal Solid Waste Management Presented By: Blake E. Nesbitt Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment SUMA Convention.
EPA CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS GUIDELINES Tim Ryan, P.E. Water Resources Engineer Water Resources Engineer Wisconsin Department of.
Jerevan November Tailing dams inspection Juliane Knaul Legal Expert, Agency of Mining, Geology and Minerals of Brandenburg, Germany AGENCY.
CWAG 2010 WATER LAW CONFERENCE The Broadmoor Colorado Springs, Colorado April 29 – 30, 2010.
The Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Presentation for the Radionuclide Webcast August 4, pm.
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
REGULATORY ACCEPTANCE OF POST-CLOSURE CARE INNOVATION Mr. Charles G. Johnson Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Hazardous Material and.
What options do states have? What is Georgia planning to do? What are some of the other states doing? What are the possible implications to permit fees?
CO 2 Sequestration Options for California Larry Myer WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission (916) ; ETAAC.
Robert C. Trautz Principal Technical Leader CREA Energy Innovation Summit Denver, Colorado October 27, 2014 Commercial CO 2 Storage: Around the Corner.
Oregon Climate Change Regulatory Activities and Policy Initiatives Bill Drumheller -- Oregon Department of Energy University of Oregon School of Law Climate.
1 Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Rules.
Challenges to the Development and Commercialization of CCS Cheyenne A. Alabanzas 2009 ASME Intern University of Alaska – Anchorage.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
American Legislative Exchange Council America’s Clean Air Success Story and the Implications of Overregulation November 28, 2012 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E.,
OSM CCB Placement in Coal Mines - Proposed Rulemaking John R. Craynon, P.E. Chief, Division of Regulatory Support Office of Surface Mining Reclamation.
NEI Issues & Current Events George Oliver June 22, th Annual RETS – REMP Workshop South Bend, Indiana.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Region 10 Regional Response Team Northwest Area Committee Seattle, WA February 12, 2014 EFSEC.
Environmental Laws 1900 to Between 2001 to 2004 George Bush Backed by republican congress weakened many environmental laws. George Bush withdraws.
Developing Green Stormwater Design Solutions For UIC Compliance Presented by: Adam Zucker PE, CWRE 819 SE Morrison Street ● Suite 310 ● Portland, Oregon.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Medical Waste Management Rulemaking Open Participation Meeting Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Waste Permits Division August 18, 2015, Austin.
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
EPA’s Proposed Geologic Sequestration Rule  Administrator Johnson signed July 15, 2008  120 day comment period  Final rule in 2010 or 2011.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Jim Luce, EFSEC Chair Port Of Vancouver Presentation Vancouver, WA June 27, 2013 EFSEC These Slides.
EPA's Regulatory Approach : Climate Mitigation via Sequestration of CO2: by Rob Ferri (EPA - Underground Injection Control) This presentation has not been.
Jeopardy $100 Land + SeaTrash/MinesPollutionWater Miscellaneous $200 $300 $400 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
EU Legislation in the field of environment – key developments in 2007 and rd ECENA Plenary Meeting 18 September 2008.
Game Changers. Technology Game Changer Barriers Many technologies are capable of significant deployment as “Game Changers” (energy efficiency, CH&P, renewables,
Welcome Revisions of Chapter WAC Sections -035 and -036 Rule advisory committee workshop #5 Lacey, WA October 28, 2009.
-EU Climate and Energy Package- Mihai Tomescu Policy Officer, Unit ‘Energy and Environment’ Directorate-General Environment European Commission Enabling.
1. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) – Naturally occurring and man- made. 5,505.2 mmts emitted in 2009, GWP = 1 Methane (CH 4 ) - Naturally occurring and man-made.
“STEWARDSHIP IN FORESTRY” Forestry Projects for Terrestrial Sequestration -- Regulatory and Public Acceptance Issues -- Jim Cathcart, Ph.D. Oregon Department.
DRAFT Proposal for a European Directive on the Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide Subject to modification on adoption by the Commission.
Washington State: Climate Initiative
ARKANSAS ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION GHG EMMISSIONS TRADING CONFERENCE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MARCH 2006 Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission.
IPPC vs Emissions Trading Lesley James Friends of the Earth (England, Wales & N.Ireland) and the European Environmental Bureau.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
IDEM Update Indiana Industrial Operators Association April 9, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Understanding the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Hazardous Waste Definition Exemption Jeff Bowman, TEEX.
S Carbon Storage Stewardship Trust Fund Act of 2009 Presented to Washington Coal Club September 9, 2009 Tom Feeley Chris Tomassi.
Presentation to Association Municipalities of Ontario Implementation of Management of Excess Soil - A Guide for Best Management Practices Ministry of the.
Environmental Regulation.  Complex set of laws  Constantly changing  Cover: Release, treatment, storage and disposal of Hazardous materials Into air,
Air Pollution Challenges Kentucky Coal Association April 29, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Energy Choices: Non-fossil vs. Fossil The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 Senate Energy Committee February 6, 2007 V. John White, Executive.
Water Quality Rulemaking in Response to S.L
Recent progress and big ideas on geologic sequestration US/international perspective Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center Jackson School of Geosciences.
Recent progress and big ideas on CCS US/international perspective.
Global Warming – The Broad Legal Reach of Initiatives to Reduce Carbon Emissions Worldwide Legal Issues Associated with Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage.
Draft Year: 1974 Amended: 1984& 1996 National legislation.
Water Quality/Stormwater Seminar September House Bill 2031 Requires TCEQ to adopt an expedited permitting process for discharge permits for treated.
Climate: ANPR, SIPs and Section 821 WESTAR October 2, 2008.
Evan Kane, DWR Ken Pickle, DEMLR Jon RisGAARD, DWR
2015 Definition of Solid Waste Rule
Clean Air Act Glossary.
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
Rules for Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Water Quality Rulemaking in Response to S.L
WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2, 2008
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Clean Water Act/NPDES Regulatory Updates
16MN056 - Public Hearing August 26 to 29, 2019 Baker Lake, Nunavut
Wastewater Permitting Updates
Presentation transcript:

Ch WAC Geologic Sequestration of Carbon dioxide John Stormon Hydrogeologist Washington Department of Ecology Seattle, WA October 2, 2008

Washington Climate Change Legislation: ESSB 6001 Adopts the emissions-reduction goals and policy recommendations in Gov. Chris Gregoire’s “Climate Change Challenge” executive order 07-02, issued Feb. 7, Requires Ecology and EFSEC to develop rules for the Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide. Rule adoption deadline June 30, 2008.

ESSB 6001 Summary: The bill sets an Emissions Performance Standard (EPS) that limits electric utilities’ ability to sign new or renewed long-term contracts with power plants whose greenhouse- gas emissions exceed those of a modern natural gas-fueled power plant. New facilities can meet the standard by sequestering (capturing and permanently storing) CO2 emissions, but not by purchasing offsets.

Air & Water Quality Programs Air Quality and Water Quality worked together in a single rule revision process. Stakeholders met between August and December Draft Rules filed early 2008 to meet our legislative due date. Final Rules adopted on June 19, 2008.

Potential Areas for Geologic Sequestration in Washington State.

Deep Saline Aquifers

Columbia River Basalt Group

Mineralization of Basalt

Washington Water Pollution Control Ch RCW Requires the Department of Ecology to prevent the pollution of all waters of the State, including “underground waters”. Requires a permit for the discharge of polluting materials into waters of the state. Limits permit duration to no more than 5 years.

Water Quality Standards for Ground Water Ch WAC Protects the existing quality of all Ground Waters, not just those with public water supply wells. Sets narrative and numeric ground water quality standards. Allows limited flexibility for “naturally non- potable ground water” Allows permit limits exceeding the standards only where necessary to provide greater benefit to the environment as a whole and to protect other media such as air, surface water, soil or sediments. [WAC (3)(b)(vi)]

Ch WAC Underground Injection Control Program Prohibit the use of Class I, Class III and most Class IV injection wells. Controls the injection of any fluids, including Carbon Dioxide, into an aquifer. UIC wells are either rule authorized or require a State Waste Discharge Permit.

Ch WAC UIC Rules for Geologic Sequestration Uses existing Washington UIC permit structure: State Waste Discharge Permits Standards modeled on: Model Regulations developed by the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission AND Federal UIC Rules for Class I Wells (40 CFR part 146)

Ch WAC UIC Rules for Geologic Sequestration Carbon Sequestration wells: Class V UIC wells. Are not “rule authorized” and must be permitted through the State Waste Discharge Permit Program. (Ch WAC). May only inject into “Naturally Non- Potable Ground Water.

Ch WAC UIC Rules for Geologic Sequestration Injected Carbon Dioxide held in “Geologic Containment System”. Caprock must provide an effective barrier to prevent migration of carbon dioxide or non- potable water into shallower aquifers. Must include a program to identify leakage to the atmosphere, surface water or ground water. Wells and facilities must be constructed to withstand expected conditions and reactive fluids.

Ch WAC UIC Rules for Geologic Sequestration Pilot Studies for potential Geologic Sequestration projects are encouraged to collect site characterization, risk assessment and feasibility information. Pilot Studies may be permitted if: Limited time duration (no more than 5 years). Public Health and Environment are protected. Intended to collect information, not full scale sequestration.

Ch WAC UIC Rules for Geologic Sequestration Carbon Sequestration Projects must have Closure and Post-Closure plans and include a financial assurance account to cover costs. Mitigation plans are required that identify trigger thresholds and corrective actions to be taken if the containment system is breached, if water quality is degraded or if carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere.

Geologic Sequestration in Washington Issues Storage Rights: Not clearly defined or regulated. Liability: Currently liability rests with operator. Industry desire for some limits.

Federal UIC Rules for Geologic Sequestration In September of 2007, USEPA announced that they would begin to draft federal rules for the Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide. Ecology requested USEPA input throughout our rule development process. USEPA provided no feedback or input. On July 15, 2008, the USEPA released proposed federal rules for Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide. These draft rules are similar to Washington's recently adopted rules, though not exactly the same.

Federal UIC Rules for Geologic Sequestration Significant Differences Between Washington and Federal rules: EPA creates Class VI wells for geologic sequestration and prohibits use of Class V wells for sequestration. Washington's rules uses Class V wells for Geologic Sequestration. Well construction, operation and testing: many details are different, but similar conceptually. Washington does not allow disposal of non-CO2 contaminants along with the carbon dioxide. EPA may allow as long as the contaminants don't qualify as hazardous waste. Post Closure Period: EPA calls out a 50 year post-closure period with the ability of the director to shorten or lengthen. Washington has performance standard with no set post-closure length.

Next Steps for Washington USEPA predicts that Federal Rules for Geologic Sequestration will be final in 2010 or When Federal Rules are final, Washington intends to apply for program delegation. Program delegation will require Washington’s rules to be at least as stringent. Rule amendment is likely to be required for federal delegation of Washington’s program.