LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library ALA Conference Washington DC June 25, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
Advertisements

LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Bound for Disappointment Faculty and Journals at Research Institutions Jim Self University of Virginia Library USA 7 th Northumbria Conference Spier, South.
Library Service Quality Survey Results Yeo Pin Pin Li Ka Shing Library April 2013.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
. The Balanced Scorecard and MIS— Strategy Development and Evolution Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library 20 th Pan.
LibQUAL+ Data for Learning Commons Focus Groups University Libraries Assessment Committee.
Effective, Sustainable and Practical Library Assessment
Two Decades of User Surveys The Experience of Two Research Libraries from 1992 to 2011 Jim Self, University of Virginia Steve Hiller, University of Washington.
2006 LibQUAL+ Survey Results Information Services Concept Review on Assessment November 9, 2006.
1 Wymagania informacyjne uzytkownikow bibliotek akademickich 21 wieku Maria Anna Jankowska University of Idaho Library Biblioteki XXI wieku. Czy przetrwamy?
TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Selena Killick ARL/SCONUL LibQUAL+ Administrator Cranfield University Introduction to LibQUAL+
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2008 LIBQUAL RESULTS. Number of Respondents UAAAPU Undergraduate1,388 Graduate267 Faculty233 Library Staff33 Staff157 Total2,078.
The votes are in! What next? Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
WVU Libraries LibQual Surveys 2003, 2005, 2007 “ The WVU library system is outstanding. I honestly cannot think of anything that needs improvement within.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Five Years of Keeping Score What are the Results? Jim Self Donna Tolson University of Virginia Library ALA Annual Conference Washington DC June 23, 2007.
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
January 22, 2007 ALA Midwinter, Seattle Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College LibQUAL+ Results: What Now? Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results American Library Association (ALA) Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 14, 2008 Martha Kyrillidou, Director Statistics.
U SING ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES TO GUIDE LIBRARY SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS Diane Wahl Beth Avery Annie Downey University of North Texas.
Testing the LibQUAL+ Survey Instrument James Shedlock, AMLS, Dir. Linda Walton, MLS, Assoc. Dir. Galter Health Sciences Library Northwestern University.
January 17, 2005 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University Libraries University of Connecticut Libraries LibQual+™ Management Information.
LIBQUAL+ and Library Summit: The Clemson Experience.
Project URL – TM Score Norms 17 th Greek Academic Libraries Conference 24 September, 2008 Presented by: Bruce Thompson, M. Kyrillidou.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2011 LIBQUAL RESULTS APU Faculty Assembly – February 15, 2012.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
Using LibQUAL+™ Results Observations from ARL Program “Making Library Assessment Work” Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries ARL Visiting Program.
Going Beyond The Numbers How We Are Benefiting From Our Experience With LibQUAL+® The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey Carolyn Gutierrez Associate.
Effectively utilising LibQUAL+ data J. Stephen Town.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
June 25, 2007 ALA Washington, DC Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College Using Your LibQUAL+ Results Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
User Needs Assessment to Support Collection Management Decisions Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries For ALCTS-CMDS.
Library Satisfaction Survey Results Spring 2008 LibQUAL Survey Analysis User Focus Team (Sharon, Mickey, Joyce, Joan C., Paula, Edith, Mark) Sidney Silverman.
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
Monmouth University LibQUAL Survey Results Lead to Improvements in Library Services October 31, 2007 Eleonora Dubicki
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Leeds University Library LibQUAL+ at Leeds - one year on Pippa Jones Head of Customer Services, Leeds University Library.
TM Project web site Presented by Colleen Cook June 26, 2004 Orlando, FL ALA.
Your LibQUAL+ ® Community: A Results Meeting American Library Association (ALA) Annual Conference Washington, DC June 25, 2007 Martha Kyrillidou, Director.
LibQUAL + ™ 2004 Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2004 survey with comparisons to past surveys.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics and Service Quality Programs Association of Research.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference.
LibQual Survey. The CUC Group Resp.% Calvin College & Theological Seminary1, % Cedarville University Centennial Library % Geneva College %
A half decade of partnership and the love affair continues….. LibQual+: A Total Market Survey with 22 Items and a Box ALA Midwinter Meeting January 17,
Library Assessment Tools & Technology
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
International Results Meeting LibQUAL+TM
LibQUAL+® 2008 A summary of results from the Consortium of Church Libraries and Archives.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
Texas A&M University, Colleen Cook Dean
Reading Radar Charts.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2007
Using LibQUAL+® as a Foundation for the Library’s Support of
Using the LibQUAL+ Survey to Inform Strategic Planning
LibQUAL+® Survey Results
Your LibQUAL+® Community: A Results Meeting
LibQual+ Survey Results 2002
Presentation transcript:

LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library ALA Conference Washington DC June 25, 2007

Initial Examination Focus on the separate user categories  Faculty  Undergraduates  Graduate students Tally the number of responses  100+ needed in each category

UVa 2006 Responses per category  Faculty  Undergraduates  Graduate students – 244  Library staff -- 74

The 22 core questions Examine the notebooks  Scan results for each user category  Scan the summary charts by dimension  Rearrange the dimension charts Create thermometer graphs  Question by question  22 bars for each user category Identify the red zones

Red Zones at UVa Journal Collections  Faculty  Grad Students Website  Faculty Remote access  Grad students

Following up with Journals Who is unhappy?  Drill down by discipline and user category. Why are they unhappy?  Read the comments  Conduct targeted interviews

Among the 22 core questions, the most desired are: Faculty  Journal collections 8.60  Web site 8.49 Grad Students  Journal collections 8.61  Remote access 8.53 Undergrads  Modern equipment 8.35  Comfortable and inviting location 8.29  Space that inspires study and learning 8.29

Among the 22 core questions, the least desired are: Faculty  Community space for group learning 6.56  Quiet space for individual activities 7.03 Grad Students  Community space for group learning 6.86  Giving users individual attention 7.27 Undergrads  Giving users individual attention 7.06  Employees who instill confidence 7.30

Benchmarking with Peers: General Satisfaction Questions In general, I am satisfied with the way I am treated at the library. In general, I am satisfied with library support for my learning, research, and/or teaching. How would you rate the overall quality of the service provided by the library?

Thank you! Jim Self 