Higher Education Precinct Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 1055 – GMATS Higher Education Precinct report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consultation on key routes which run parallel to Oxford Road corridor September 2012 Bus priority package.
Advertisements

Adapting the city. Building & Infrastructure David Hytch Information Systems Director, Transport for Greater Manchester.
CityCo, Piccadilly Hoteliers Forum
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Appraising sub-regional and local growth strategies in the Nottingham-Leicester- Derby Area, UK. Policy applications of a new model of transport and land.
Ian Coles, TRICS Project Manager, JMP Consultants Limited.
Watlington Traffic Study TPP Presentation 24/11/2014.
Canada-U.S. Trade/Traffic Statistics Transport Canada Economic Analysis October 27, 2010.
The scope for sustainable distribution and servicing in the Regent Street area of Central London LRN 2009 Cardiff Business School 10 September 2009 Marzena.
Site Location Site Bus Stop Footbridge 400, 800, 1,200 and 1,600 Metre Walk Distance Primary Shopping Areas
Distance Time Graphs Arithmetic Distance, time graphs. 1.The graph shows the journey of a cyclist who travelled between two towns 40 miles apart. Using.
LONDON TAXIS or BLACK CABS. 7 million people live in London. Some of them like travelling by taxi.  You can stop a taxi when the orange light is on.
The Swedish delegation presents: LundaMaTs - an integrated effort of creating a sustainable environmentally friendly car traffic in the city of Lund.
Three Phases of Commuting Trip 1.Collection Phase – the trip from home to the main travel vehicle Cost: a.basically zero for automobile b.time costs and.
 Travel patterns in Scotland Frank Dixon and Stephen Hinchliffe, Transport Statistics branch, Scottish Executive.
Skill Two:Parked Cars More than 70% of all traffic accidents involving children happen close to Parked Cars. This happens because children are so small.
How to find us Environmental Design Associates. Where we are ► Clicking on the following link shall automatically connect you to Google map. Alternatively.
George Street ETRO Visitor Research Quarter 1 Findings September to November 2014 Key Findings Presentation December 2014.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Changes in Daily Travel Patterns 1994 to 2007/2008 Robert E. Griffiths Technical.
HEADLINES FROM THE GREATER MANCHESTER LEISURE VISITOR SURVEY 2014.
Seminar 23rd November 2001 Other Policies: Demand Management & Highway Investment Professor Marcial Echenique.
CENTRAL ACCESS SCHEME FOR THE CITY OF KILKENNY Traffic Considerations The feed back resulting from public consultation did cause us to revisit the traffic.
Slide 1 of 19 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 1: Attendance, retention,
Key Transport Policy Issues for 2010 Stephen Clark Deputy Clerk to the Authority 18 January 2010.
The TRICS Multi-Modal Survey Methodology KEVIN TRAVERS, HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL.
Ultra at Heathrow & beyond BASE April 2013 Presentation by Adam Ruddle, Key Account Manager, Ultra Global PRT.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics U.S. Department of Transportation Overall Travel Patterns of Older Americans Jeffery L. Memmott
Measure 27 City Centre Access Control Katerina Oktabcova Usti nad Labem Municipality.
GeniUS! Challenge #4 - Utilising footfall & transport 15/3/12 Andy D’Agorne.
Rochdale Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 998 – GMATS Rochdale Key Centre report Whereas report.
Regional Centre Transport Vision 2013 Presentation to Salford City Council Members - 19 August 2008.
Characteristics of Weekend Travel in the City of Calgary: Towards a Model of Weekend Travel Demand JD Hunt, University of Calgary DM Atkins, City of Calgary.
Transport Accessibility Report for Peel House COLIN BUCHANAN.
Period 3 Oxford English 2 Module 1 Getting to know each other.
Business Statistics Seminar Programme- 11th November :30 Registration 14:00 Opening remarks - Richard McMahon, CSO 14:20 Using administrative data.
Wigan Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 1001 – GMATS Wigan Key Centre report Whereas report.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
Tameside Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 999 – GMATS Tameside Key Centre report Whereas report.
Pilot National Travel Survey 2009 Summary Findings Prepared by Mairead Griffin.
Train timetables Time real life problems – Year 4/5.
Stockport Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 947 – GMATS Stockport Key Centre report Whereas.
Bolton Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 974 – GMATS Bolton Key Centre report Whereas report.
Trafford Park Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 995 – GMATS Trafford Park report Whereas report 995 presents.
Roads & Traffic Department College Green Public Transport Priority measure.
Oldham Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 997 – GMATS Oldham Key Centre report Whereas report.
Putting Luas Cross City in context - Public Transport and Sustainable Measures in Dublin Dublin City Council 21 st March 2013 Gerry Murphy.
National Household Travel Survey 2010 Introduction NHTS provides very valuable information for Transport Malta and other entities involved in transport.
Walking between home and school. Leaving home in the morning on your walk to school.
GM Future Transport Objectives – via TIF Reduce congestion on key commuter routes at peak times Transform bus, heavy rail and light rail services –More.
CE 341 Transportation Planning
School Zones School Zones can be located:  On city streets  On busy highways There’s no universal sign design, and some are even rather complicated.
With our help, you won’t get lost! … School Travel.
Trafford Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 1000 – GMATS Trafford Key Centre report Whereas report.
Aim To know a case study of a national sports league – English Premier League To examine the relationship between team location and the residence of its.
Nestrans Regional Parking Strategy NETCF 31 st October 2011.
Manchester Regional Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 996 – GMATS Manchester Regional Key Centre.
David Sutton, Chief Officer Integrated Transport Strategy Directorate.
NEW CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR SCHOOL TRAVEL PLANNING Paul Lucas, Operational Service Planning Manager GMPTE.
Bramley Parish Plan Results and feedback Presented by Cllr Claire Penfold.
Planes, trains & automobiles… Transport. Roads – some facts… Six million more vehicles on our roads now than in 1997 More two car households than no car.
Grand Canyon Fourth Grade Field Trip Friday, April 29, 2016.
EUROPEAN FORUM FOR GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS KRAKOW CONFERENCE October, Krakow, Poland Travel Behaviour in Pristina City Author 1: Naim Kelmendi.
Car Parking Study Hexham Northumberland County Council.
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
Raising the Bar for Integration with Public Transport
Finding your way with MapInfo RouteFinder
Chapter 2 Motion & Speed.
Car Park Survey April 21st-23rd 2016.
Comparative Visualization
Cambourne Village: a SUMMARY OF MAIN FINDINGS
Presentation transcript:

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 1055 – GMATS Higher Education Precinct report Whereas report 1055 presents detailed tabulations, this presentation has been designed to provide a summary of the main aspects of the data GMATS Surveys 2002 Report 1055P – Higher Education Precinct

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 2 The presentation has been designed so that it can be used independently of GMTU Report 1055 for those who want an overview of the traffic movements around the Higher Education Precinct but do not wish to see the detailed tabulations GMTU Reports 1055 & 1055P are part of a series of reports presenting the data from the 2002 GMATS surveys GMATS Surveys 2002 Report 1055P – Higher Education Precinct

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 3 Travellers leaving the Higher Education Precinct by car, bus, train and Metrolink were asked about their journeys as they crossed a cordon This is the same cordon used for the analysis of the regional centre and reported in GMTU reports 996 and 996P Since this cordon encircles both the HEP and regional centre, no information from this survey on trips between the HEP and the City Centre GMATS Surveys 2002 Higher Education Precinct GMATS Surveys

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 4 As part of the study into the effects of the completion of the M60 motorway box, surveys were undertaken in 2003 on buses and cars on three sites lying between the HEP and the City Centre. These sites were on Cambridge Street, Oxford Road and Upper Brook Street Data from these three sites has been analysed to provide information on the movements between the HEP and the City Centre not observed by the GMATS surveys GMATS Surveys 2002 Higher Education Precinct M60 Surveys

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 5 The following slide shows the definition of the HEP used in this analysis together with the Regional Centre and the GMATS cordon sites The M60 sites shown on the slide used in the are analysis towards the end of the presentation to identify movements between the HEP and city centre missed by the GMATS cordon Higher Education Precinct Definition

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 6

7 Over 47,000 people left the HEP and crossed the cordon between 07:00 & 19:00 61% used car 33% used bus 5% used train Visitors to the HEP How many visited and how did they travel?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 8 31% were at a place of education 38% were at work Visitors to the HEP What were they doing there?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 9 67% of those at a place of education travelled by bus In comparison 74% of those at work travelled by car Visitors to the HEP What were they doing there?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 10 33% of car trips ended within Manchester and 17% ended outside the county In contrast 81% of bus trips ended within Manchester 11% of rail trips ended in Bolton, 8% in Stockport and 61% outside the county 39% of Metrolink trips ended in Bury, 34% in Trafford and 12% in Manchester Visitors to the HEP Where did they go after their visit?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 11 66% of those attending a place of education ended their trips in Manchester and 10% outside the county In contrast 33% of workers ended their journeys in Manchester 17% of workers ended their trips outside the county Visitors to the HEP How did their destination vary with their activity?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 12 For most activities, car and Metrolink trips were considerable longer on average than bus trips Bus trips averaged around 5km for all activities, car trips 13km and Metrolink 11km Visitors to the HEP How far did they travel? Car, bus and Metrolink users only

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 13 96% walked to their bus stop compared to 69% walking to the train station and 55% to Metrolink 17% caught a bus to the train station and 41% to Metrolink Visitors to the HEP How did bus users get to their Key Centre bus stop, train station or Metrolink stop?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 14 On average each car carried 1.4 people Occupancy varied widely with activity in the HEP: –Work 1.25 –Education 1.35 –Social/leisure % of drivers leaving work travelled alone Visitors to the HEP What was the average occupancy of visitors’ cars?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 15 For most activities in the HEP more people parked off-street than on-street Only 18% parked on- street 94% of workers and 61% of those who had been at a place of education parked off- street Visitors to the Key Centre Where did they park?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 16 65% of those parking off-street paid to park compared to only 2% who parked on-street 66% of workers and 49% of those at places of education paid to park Visitors to the HEP What percentage of car drivers paid to park?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 17 84% of commercial vehicles leaving the HEP were Light Goods vehicles (LGVs) 43% of all goods trips finished within Manchester and 18% outside the county Commercial Vehicles leaving the HEP Where are they going?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 18 31% of all commercial vehicles were collecting or delivering goods in the HEP 53% were on ‘other business use’ Commercial Vehicles What were they doing in the HEP?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 19 The average distance for all goods vehicles was 12 Km Commercial Vehicles How far did they travel?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 20 76% of all trips leaving the HEP were going home Visitors to the HEP What did they do at their destination?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 21 47% of trips finished in Manchester 19% of people going home lived outside Greater Manchester Visitors to the HEP Where did they go/for what purpose?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 22 All the previous slides have referred to trips starting in the HEP and crossing the cordon around the regional centre This does not pick up trips between the HEP and the city centre The next slides look at the bus and car trips observed at 3 sites between the HEP and the city centre on Cambridge Street, Oxford Road and Upper Brook Street These surveys were undertaken as part of the M60 after study All trips passing through the survey cordon

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 23 57% of trips made between the HEP and the city centre were made by bus In the evening peak period this changed to an almost even split between car and bus trips Trips between the HEP and the City Centre How were they travelling?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 24 35% had been at work, 23% at home and 13% at a place of education Trips between the HEP and the City Centre Why were they in the HEP?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 25 Overall, 36% went shopping 52% of bus users went shopping Trips between the HEP and the City Centre Why did they go to the city centre?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 26 On average there were 1.5 people per car travelling between the HEP and the city centre between 07:00 and 19:00 This varied from an average occupancy of 1 during the morning peak (07:00 to 09:30) to 1.7 in the evening peak (15:30 to 18:30) Car Trips between the HEP and the City Centre What was their average occupancy?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 27 On average there were 18 people per bus crossing the 3 sites between 07:00 and 19:00 This varied from an average occupancy of 16 during the inter-peak (09:30 to 15:30) to 26 in the morning peak (07:00 to 09:30) Buses between the HEP and the City Centre What was their average occupancy?

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 28 Only 140 goods vehicle trips were observed between the HEP and the city centre No trips by heavy goods vehicles were observed 34% of goods vehicle trips were moving goods in the HEP and 53% were being used on other business use The journey purposes of goods vehicles in the city centre were similar to this Commercial Vehicle trips between the HEP and the City Centre

Higher Education Precinct Analysis 29 For further information on the HEP surveys or any other GMATS surveys please contact: John Wharf Peter Bearon GMATS Surveys 2002