GPSD - What Has Changed? Andrew Edgar, Clifford Chance LLP BICCL, 14 February 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Nicholas Kissen Thomas Frith Islington Leaseholders Association 12 th June 2013.
Advertisements

Security of Payment workshop Andrew Robertson Important Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is comment of a general nature only and.
The Mutual Recognition Regulation (EC) 764/2008 Rita L’ABBATE 6th MARS Group meeting Bratislava, 2 October 2008.
BLG Environmental Liabilities and the Professions Valerie Fogleman Partner and Head of Environmental Liability Group Barlow Lyde & Gilbert solicitors,
Model Act: Proposed Provisions for a Transparent, Effective and Workable Biosafety Regulatory Framework Stanley H. Abramson, Esq. Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin.
The Brussels II Regulation The jurisdiction of courts.
The View of European Business Stuart Popham 14 March 2008 Survey Results.
Refusal to Enrol: Risk to Safety or Wellbeing EGPA (2006) Implementation and New Policies and Procedures Workshop – November 2006.
Admissibility of air accident investigation reports: does it really matter? ROBERT LAWSON QC.
Hogan Lovells EU Product Safety and Market Surveillance Reforms How will this impact businesses – Lawyers' view BIICL seminar, 2 October.
Cross Border Internal Investigations Roger Best 06 July 2011.
Time for a new standard - AS General Conditions of Contract
Fire Safety Jonathan Harrison Fire Protection Inspector West Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Authority.
European Commission Enterprise and Industry Market surveillance and automotive type-approval legislation - 28/06/2012 | ‹#› WP.29 Enforcement Working Group.
Attorney-Client Privilege in International Disputes “Groundhog Day – Episode III” Ian Meredith Partner, International Arbitration Practice Group Co-ordinator,
Data Protection Paul Veysey & Bethan Walsh. Introduction Data Protection is about protecting people by responsibly managing their data in ways they expect.
How the Information Commissioner’s office operates as a regulator David Smith Deputy Information Commissioner.
Erik Hansson DG Health and Consumer Protection (DG SANCO) European Commission Developments on product safety in the EU.
The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order RR(FS)O 2005 Part 1 –General Part 2 - sections –8 Duty to take general fire precautions –9 Risk Assessment.
Acte clair and Taxation Paul Farmer. Introduction Personal impressions (not Commission position) General comments on acte clair doctrine and the attitude.
THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT 2007 Implications for the medical treatment of patients in the community Richard Jones Consultant in Mental Health and Community.
THE NATIONAL SITUATION ON THE HEALTHAND THE SAFETY AT WORK in Poland prepared by: Małgorzata Żydło Danmar Computers.
Practising open procurement of IT Thomas Vinje, Partner, Clifford Chance LLP, Brussels 10 June 2010.
Markets in Financial Instruments Directive Chris Bates September 2005 Interaction with the CRD.
Appeals to the Upper Tribunal Against a Traffic Commissioner’s decision (Goods Vehicle Operator’s Licence) Jared Dunbar BSc, MA, LLB Associate, Dyne Solicitors.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Lecture 4. OUTCOMES What must the equity plan include?. What must affirmative action measures include? Which factors are taken into account in determining.
Preparing Russian Companies for UK Bribery Act Enforcement - The Defence of “Adequate Procedures” Nicholas Munday 14 December 2010 Moscow.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations Health and Safety Representative (HSR) Contribute to the implementation of the OH&S consultation.
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING 1 Environmental Law. Environmental Permitting 2 Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2007 introduced a new.
BVC Civil Procedure Security for Costs Consent Orders Discontinuance.
The New Approach and GPSD. Council Resolution of 7 May 1985 on a new approach to technical harmonization and standards [OJ C136 of June 1985] New Approach.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Business seminar on export to Europe Support to the Modernisation.
Richard Moules A Look into the Future for Contaminated Land.
Malcolm Crompton APEC Information Privacy Framework: review, impact, & progress APEC Symposium on Information Privacy Protection in E Government & E Commerce.
BVC Civil Procedure Interim Applications Interim Payments.
© Warwick University 2005 Housing health and safety rating system One Day Course: Enforcement.
Disciplinary Procedures
Product Liability Forum Thursday 12 October 2006.
Access to File – An Effective Right of Defence? Martin Bechtold 27 June 2005.
Ethics Key Terms  Confidentiality  Privileged communication  Privacy.
Westminster Homeless Health Co-ordination project 02/02/2016
Unit 4 Seminar. Key Terms  Confidentiality  Privileged communication  Privacy.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
The Directive on Enforcement and The Customs Regulation Warsaw May 2006 Martin Ekvad Community Plant Variety Office Head of Legal Affairs.
The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: 25 Years 4 June 2010 “The Influence of the UNCITRAL Model Law in Hong Kong and China”
TAIEX GPSD Free Movement and Safety Vitomir Fister Beograd,
Education Queensland SMS-PR-021: Safe, Supportive and Disciplined School Environment pr/students/smspr021/
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 9 – Financial services Bilateral screening:
Health & Safety in Schools Ray Jones. Grad IOSH Senior Health & Safety Advisor. Corporate Heath & Safety Team. Bournemouth Borough Council.
Health and Social Care Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.
Every employer must ensure, as far as is reasonable practicable, the health, safety and welfare of all his employees More specifically, employers must.
Substance Addiction(Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 2017 Processes
Seminar on EU Service Directive Budapest, 3 May 2007 Thibaut Partsch
E&O Risk Management: Meeting the Challenge of Change
Wottakar’s The Panda Says “No”
The Mutual Recognition Regulation
The Economic Regulation of Transport Bill, 2018
EU action after Deepwater Horizon accident - Gulf of Mexico – April 2010
National remedies and national actions
Katherine Edwards Colin Biggers & Paisley Lawyers
OHSC 2018 CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOPS CERTIFICATION AND ENFORCEMENT
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
Arbitration Proceedings II
PERFECT RECALL Jonathan Kirk QC Alison Lambert GOUGH SQUARE CHAMBERS.
OHSC 2018 CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOP - GAUTENG PROVINCE ENFORCEMENT
Health and Safety Law Module 4.
Fines, Sanctions and Compensation The teeth in the GDPR & Data Protection Act 2018 by Simon McGarr, CIPP/E Data Compliance Europe.
The principle of proportionality and the contents of a contract
Presentation transcript:

GPSD - What Has Changed? Andrew Edgar, Clifford Chance LLP BICCL, 14 February 2005

GPSD - What Has Changed · BICCL, 14 February Introduction New provisions in draft Regulations include: “Last resort” compulsory recall Unilateral action by authority for “serious risks” Decision-making on whether a product is “dangerous” by: –The authority –A person appointed by the CIArb before a recall notice is issued –A magistrate, possibly a judge, after a recall notice is appealed –An arbitrator in a claim for compensation by the producer/distributor

GPSD - What Has Changed · BICCL, 14 February Recalls for dangerous products Authority may issue a recall notice where it has reasonable grounds for suspecting that a product is a “dangerous product” (defined as “any product other than a safe product”) Further, (Reg. 15(5) criteria): Other action would not suffice to prevent the risks Action by producer/distributor is unsatisfactory/insufficient to prevent the risks At least 7 days notice has been given of intention to serve notice Advice has been sought by the authority (on producer/distributor’s request) from a person appointed by CIArb to determine whether the product is dangerous or a recall notice is proportional to the seriousness of the risk

GPSD - What Has Changed · BICCL, 14 February Special provisions for serious risks A serious risk is “any serious risk, including one the effects of which are not immediate, requiring rapid intervention” (Reg. 2) Where the product poses a serious risk (Reg. 15(6)): action taken by producer/distributor is irrelevant no 7 days’ notice of intention to serve recall notice is given no referral to determine whether the product is dangerous and recall proportional

GPSD - What Has Changed · BICCL, 14 February Special provisions for serious risks (2) Authority, when enforcing through a safety notice, must act in a manner proportional to the seriousness of the risk + take account of the precautionary principle but … it may take any action under the Regulations urgently and without encouraging voluntary action (Reg. 10(4))

GPSD - What Has Changed · BICCL, 14 February Appeals Right of appeal to Magistrates’ Court to vary or set aside notice within 21 days (Reg. 17(1)) Order will be granted if: The product is not dangerous Reg. 15(5) (criteria for recall notice) has not been complied with; and Serving of the notice was not proportional to the seriousness of the risk Right of appeal to suspend recall notice pending appeal within 7 days of notice (Reg. 17(5)) Authority may appeal any order to suspend Magistrates’ Court Crown Court

GPSD - What Has Changed · BICCL, 14 February Right to compensation Authority liable to pay compensation to the person on whom a recall notice has been served in respect of “any loss or damage” if (Reg. 16(6)): The product was not a dangerous product; and The exercise of the power is not attributable to any neglect or default by that person Compensation to be determined by arbitration (Reg. 16(7)) Impact on authority’s decision to order a recall? Limits on compensation: loss or damage incurred only in UK as a consequence of authority’s decision where recall in other EU MS following RAPEX procedure?

GPSD - What Has Changed · BICCL, 14 February Recalls in practice? Initial decision by authority can be challenged before and after a recall is issued … but in public? Scope for different assessments of risk? How likely is authority to: Issue a recall notice Take unilateral action in cases of perceived urgency?

Clifford Chance, 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5JJ, UK © Clifford Chance LLP 2004 Clifford Chance Limited Liability Partnership GPSD - What Has Changed? UK/208961