1 EPA’s Project Plan for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers Region 2 Science Day Workshop October 25, 2005 Daniel Axelrad U.S. EPA Office of Policy, Economics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 Christopher Dang Mr. Bodas P.4.
Advertisements

Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976(TSCA) *passed by the United States Congress in 1976 *The TSCA is found in United States law at *addresses the production,
Chapter 8 AP Environmental Science. * 1. Gives the EPA the authority to control pesticides. Which act is this? * A. Toxic Substances Control Act * B.
PBDEs: Update on Current Issues NAHMMA Tacoma, Washington September 22, 2005.
Chemicals Management Forum San Antonio, Texas May 15-16, 2012 Implementation of Risk Reduction Strategies PBDE Team Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
Toxic Substances Control Act TSCA Current Events Heighten Awareness for Semiconductor Industry SESHA Hill Country Chapter December 5, 2002.
1 Brominated Flame Retardant (BFR) Use in Electrical and Electronic Equipment.
Kooperationsstelle Hamburg Substitution of Hazardous Chemicals in Products and Processes Conference on Substitution Hamburg, June 2002 Introduction.
AHFA Flammability Update Bob Luedeka March 20, 2008.
Assembly Member Brian Kavanagh Environmental Conservation Committee Member NYS Assembly District 74.
Toxicity of flame–retardants on Daphnia magna. Namuun Bayaraa, Leona Scanlan, Chris Vulpe Department of Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology; University.
U.S. EPA Design for the Environment Program NPPR Webinar June 23, 2011 Libby Sommer Environmental Scientist.
Page 1 Regulating Nanomaterials under CEPA CIELAP Workshop February 22, 2008 Bernard Madé, New Substances Program Environment Canada.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Is the.
Canada’s approach to Chemicals Management under the CMP – Domestic Update CEC SMOC Public Session San Antonio April 1&2, 2009.
Chemical Screening Programs Ted Smith Dale Phenicie.
Persistent Organic Pollutants in Marine Ecosystems.
Chemicals Management in a Transatlantic Perspective Henrik Selin November 10, 2008.
Presented By: By: By: Web Address: Topic Number: Topic Number: Date: Date:
1 REACh Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals and Restriction! Ohio Valley SOT Wednesday, August 26, 2009 REACh: The New Toxicology Frontier.
EPA Office of Water Source Water Protection Initiative Elizabeth Corr, Associate Director Drinking Water Protection Div. Office of Ground Water and Drinking.
A Small Dose of PBDEs 10/15/05 A Small Dose of Toxicology Phasing Out Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) and PBTs “Out of Harm’s Way: Preventing Toxic.
Brominated Flame Retardants: International Restrictions Liz Harriman MA Toxics Use Reduction Institute TURI TOXICS USE REDUCTION INSTITUTE Oct. 25, 2005.
Emerging Contaminants in the Environment Jennifer Davis, MPH, LEHP Environmental Toxicologist Illinois Department of Public Health.
U.S. EPA Design for the Environment Program NEWMOA November 18, 2010 Clive Davies.
The Role of Research in the Business of the Environmental Protection Agency Steven Bradbury, Director Environmental Fate & Effects Division Office of Pesticide.
Quill Law Group LLC1 EDSP Compliance EDSP Phase 2 Policies and Procedures Terry F. Quill Quill Law Group LLC 1667 K St, NW Washington, DC
1 European Stakeholders Workshop: Brussels, Oct 2001 Human & Environmental Risk Assessment HERA in the global chemical management scene Lothar Kistenbrügger.
Oregon Toxics Reduction & Green Chemistry PPRC Roundtable – October 24, 2012 Kevin Masterson, Oregon DEQ Agency Toxics Coordinator
Alex Stone Chemist, WA Dept. of Ecology EPA Prioritization Workshop April 6-7,
1 Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program Update July 30, 2008 Jim Alwood Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT.  History of the Act ◦ The primary purpose of TSCA is to regulate chemical substances and mixtures  It does so by regulating.
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Environmental Health Informatics William Sonntag Office of Environmental Information U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
A project of the Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition: Breast Cancer Fund, Healthy Building Network, People For Puget Sound, Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility,
Barbara Cunningham Office of Pollution Prevention & Toxics 1.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA) Yunmi Lee (period 6 )
Phasing Out PFOS and PBDEs: Voluntary and Regulatory Steps Kenneth Moss Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, EPA HQ October.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation Sound Management of Chemicals Initiative Updates on Current Activities 2008.
Measurement and Targeting – Design and Implement Programs to Track Results and Accountability National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 Wednesday,
Moving past one-at-a-time chemical “de-selection”.
Kathleen A. Curtis, LPN Policy Director, Clean New York
Toxic Substance Control Act of 1976 (TSCA) By Don Bingham.
CALIFORNIA proposed SAFER CONSUMER PRODUCT REGULATIONS Marjorie MartzEmerson October 24, 2012.
North American Sound Management of Chemicals Initiative Commission for Environmental Cooperation Ned Brooks, Chemicals Program Manager Commission for Environmental.
Chlorinated Paraffins
September 22, 2011 Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics1.
ROPES & GRAY LLP Chemical Policy Reform: State/Federal Approaches Mark Greenwood.
AB 32 Implementation Nuts and Bolts IEP Annual Meeting September 22, 2008 Kevin Kennedy Office of Climate Change California Air Resources Board.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
Department of Transportation City Council August 31, 2015 Annual Self Certification Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County.
Design for the Environment Program Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce Austin, Texas December 13, 2006 Clive Davies U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program Environmental Summit May 20, 2008 Jim Alwood Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Environmentally Preferable Approaches for Meeting Furniture Fire Safety Standards Mark Buczek Supresta American Fire Safety Council Furniture Flame Retardancy.
State Responses to BFRs Towards an Integrated Chemicals Policy Ken Geiser University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Emerging Problems? Progress on Identifying Contaminants of Concern in San Francisco Estuary Susan Klosterhaus San Francisco Estuary Institute RMP Annual.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Future Science Issues of BFRs Linda S. Birnbaum Director, Experimental Toxicology Division NHEERL Research Triangle Park, NC Region 2 Science Day/Non-Regulated.
Flame Retardant Product Risk Assessments Veronique Steukers, 1 April 2003.
The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA) Draft year: October 11, 1976; Amendment years: 1976; National.
Design for the Environment Program Overview April 6 th, 2005.
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
Stockholm Convention Webinar 12 June 2012
Toxic Substances control act.
Region 2 Science Day Workshop
Shanghai, China February 21–22, 2011
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
Chemicals of concern Session 3 – looking across product sectors to track and manage chemicals of concerns. A thought starter Sandra Averous and Jacqueline.
© 2016 Global Market Insights, Inc. USA. All Rights Reserved Global Decabromodiphenyl Ether Market to exceed $430 Mn by 2025: Global.
Presentation transcript:

1 EPA’s Project Plan for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers Region 2 Science Day Workshop October 25, 2005 Daniel Axelrad U.S. EPA Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation

2 Uses of PBDEs zPentaBDE yFoam in furniture, mattresses, automobile seats yPrior to U.S. phaseout: 8,000 tons/year worldwide; 95% used in the U.S. zOctaBDE yPlastics in electronics yPrior to U.S. phaseout: 4,000 tons/year worldwide; 40% used in U.S. zDecaBDE yPlastics in electronics, wire/cable insulation, textiles y62,000 tons/year worldwide; 44% used in U.S. (industry data for 2001)

3 PBDEs Status - U.S. zU.S. production of pentaBDE/octaBDE phased out yTSCA Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) – will require premanufacture notification to EPA zMany initiatives in states, such as: yCalifornia 2006 ban on products with penta/octa yNew York, Maine and Hawaii have adopted laws similar to California’s, and other states are considering similar actions zCPSC flammability standards for residential upholstered furniture - potential to increase demand for decaBDE and other flame retardants yEPA intends to propose a TSCA SNUR – prior notification to EPA of flame retardants for use in residential upholstered furniture

4 Activities of Other Federal Agencies zNTP: Conducting toxicology studies of commercial pentaBDE and selected congeners zCDC: Measuring U.S. body burdens of PBDEs ySampling in ; data may be available in 2006 zNIST: Studying migration of PBDEs from plastics in electronics components zCPSC: furniture flammability standard zUSDA: Methods for measuring PBDEs in meats and poultry; research on PBDEs metabolism zFDA: Planning a program to measure PBDEs in food and feed

5 Developing EPA’s Project Plan for PBDEs zWorkgroup members from across the Agency zIdentifies current activities and next steps for PBDEs yWhat is being done in EPA’s programs yAdditional activities to be initiated yNot a detailed strategy zFocus on four objectives 1.Assess substitutes for pentaBDE/octaBDE 2.Assess and evaluate decaBDE 3.Assess risks of pentaBDE and octaBDE 4.Track other brominated flame retardants

6 Objective 1: Assess Substitutes for pentaBDE and octaBDE zBackground: Market is in transition; industry is choosing alternatives. What are the potential risks of substitutes? zKey Activities include: EPA’s Furniture Flame Retardancy Partnership has conducted a screening level hazard/exposure assessment of pentaBDE substitutes. The Partnership will develop a process for identifying and developing data needed to assess potential risks of flame retardant chemicals used in furniture.

7 Objective 2: Assess and Evaluate Decabromodiphenyl Ether (decaBDE) zBackground: Use of decaBDE continues. Key issues include risk from decaBDE itself and its contribution to formation of lower-brominated breakdown products. zKey Activities include: yIRIS review of decaBDE toxicology – completion in 2006 yThrough the Voluntary Children’s Chemical Evaluation Program (VCCEP), EPA is seeking the development of data needed to address the environmental fate of decaBDE. yCPSC furniture flammability standard would potentially increase demand for decaBDE. EPA intends to will propose a TSCA SNUR that will enable EPA to review decaBDE (and other flame retardants) in this use before use begins.

8 Objective 3: Assess Risks of pentaBDE and octaBDE zBackground: Voluntary phaseout of US production of pentaBDE and octaBDE as of the end of 2004; stocks are stored in existing products. zKey Activities include: yEPA proposed a TSCA SNUR in Fall 2004, enabling EPA to receive advance notification of plans to manufacture or import pentaBDE or octaBDE. yEPA is conducting IRIS reviews for tetra-, penta-, and hexaBDE congeners - completion in yUnder VCCEP, EPA has identified 2-generation reproductive toxicity studies as data needs for pentaBDE and octaBDE.

9 Objective 4: Track Developments Concerning Other BFRs of Interest zBackground: PBDEs are not the only BFRs of potential interest. zKey Activities include: yEPA will review scientific developments on other brominated flame retardants, and will engage in further research, risk assessment and risk management as the need develops. yEPA will continue to scrutinize new flame retardants proposed for manufacture and import into the U.S. market and, where appropriate, will seek development of additional data on such chemicals by their manufacturers under TSCA Section 5 authorities.

10 Next Steps zComplete drafting and review of Project Plan zRelease plan on EPA web site – projected for December zImplement Key Activities identified in the plan