Meteorology 415 October 2010. Numerical Guidance Skill dependent on: Skill dependent on: Initial Conditions Initial Conditions Resolution Resolution Model.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Advertisements

Forecasting the weather Weather: The state of the atmosphere at a specific time and plac e. Meteorologist: scientists who study the atmosphere Weather.
Report of the Q2 Short Range QPF Discussion Group Jon Ahlquist Curtis Marshall John McGinley - lead Dan Petersen D. J. Seo Jean Vieux.
John Saltenberger NWCC Lightning Prediction Oregon AMS Feb
Gridded MOS – A Prototype System
Jess Charba Fred Samplatsky Phil Shafer Meteorological Development Laboratory National Weather Service, NOAA Updated September 06, 2013 LAMP Convection.
Gridded OCF Probabilistic Forecasting For Australia For more information please contact © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 Shaun Cooper.
Paul Fajman NOAA/NWS/MDL September 7,  NDFD ugly string  NDFD Forecasts and encoding  Observations  Assumptions  Output, Scores and Display.
Probabilistic Forecasting in Practice
MOS Developed by and Run at the NWS Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) Full range of products available at:
Supplemental Topic Weather Analysis and Forecasting.
MOS What does acronym stand for ? –MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS What is the difference between the GFS and GFS MOS ?
Improving Gridded Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Guidance by Using Emerging Forecast and Observation Systems Judy E. Ghirardelli, Jerome P. Charba,
MOS Performance MOS significantly improves on the skill of model output. National Weather Service verification statistics have shown a narrowing gap between.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Statistical Methods for long-range forecast By Syunji Takahashi Climate Prediction Division JMA.
Weather Forecasting - II. Review The forecasting of weather by high-speed computers is known as numerical weather prediction. Mathematical models that.
1 Localized Aviation Model Output Statistics Program (LAMP): Improvements to convective forecasts in response to user feedback Judy E. Ghirardelli National.
Aviation Cloud Forecasts – A True Challenge for Forecasters v       Jeffrey S. Tongue NOAA/National Weather Service - Upton, NY Wheee !
Probabilistic forecasts of (severe) thunderstorms for the purpose of issuing a weather alarm Maurice Schmeits, Kees Kok, Daan Vogelezang and Rudolf van.
Alpha-Numeric Model Guidance. Two Types of Alpha-Numeric Guidance FOUS (Forecast Output United States): Raw model forecast data interpolated to specific.
Downscaling in time. Aim is to make a probabilistic description of weather for next season –How often is it likely to rain, when is the rainy season likely.
Station Models How Meteorologist can look at a lot of cities’ data at once!
NOAA’s National Weather Service IFP/NDFD Conceptual Overview Michael Tomlinson Office of Climate Water and Weather Services NWS Partners’ Workshop September.
Chapter 13 Weather Forecasting and Analysis. Weather forecasting by the U.S. government began in the 1870s when Congress established a National Weather.
Utilizing Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) for Improved Forecasting Judy E. Ghirardelli National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory.
June 19, 2007 GRIDDED MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS –Essentially the same MOS that is in text bulletins –Number and.
VERIFICATION OF NDFD GRIDDED FORECASTS IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES John Horel 1, David Myrick 1, Bradley Colman 2, Mark Jackson 3 1 NOAA Cooperative Institute.
By John Metz Warning Coordination Meteorologist WFO Corpus Christi.
Model Construction: interpolation techniques 1392.
Chapter 9: Weather Forecasting Acquisition of weather information Acquisition of weather information Weather forecasting tools Weather forecasting tools.
Henry Fuelberg Pete Saunders Pendleton, Oregon Research Region Map Types and Lightning Frequencies.
OUTLINE Current state of Ensemble MOS
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Accounting for Change: Local wind forecasts from the high-
1 An overview of the use of reforecasts for improving probabilistic weather forecasts Tom Hamill NOAA / ESRL, Physical Sciences Div.
MDL Lightning-Based Products Kathryn Hughes NOAA/NWS/OST December 3, 2003
Model Post Processing. Model Output Can Usually Be Improved with Post Processing Can remove systematic bias Can produce probabilistic information from.
CC Hennon ATMS 350 UNC Asheville Model Output Statistics Transforming model output into useful forecast parameters.
Guidance. What is Guidance? If it helps you to decide on a forecast, then it is guidance.
Environmental Overview: Amber/Amberland Coast Monthly Climatology March, April, May This brief is intended for METOC personnel. It is not designed as a.
Meteorology 415 October Numerical Guidance Skill dependent on: Skill dependent on: Initial Conditions Initial Conditions Resolution Resolution Model.
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology Friday 2/8/2013 Quiz & Assignment 2 Results Finish Thermal Wind MOS decoding (Assignment) New England weather.
Insights from CMC BAMS, June Short Range The SPC Short-Range Ensemble Forecast (SREF) is constructed by post-processing all 21 members of the NCEP.
National Weather Service Southern Region Forecast Office’s Operational Experiences Melinda Hinojosa National Weather Service Southern Region Headquarters.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 slide - 1 Analysis of Temperature Basic Calibration Workshop March 10-13, 2009 LMRFC.
Briefing by: Roque Vinicio Céspedes Finally Here! The MOST awaited briefing ever! February 16, 2011.
OPERATIONAL 2-H THUNDERSTORM GUIDANCE FCSTS TO 24 HRS ON 20-KM GRID JESS CHARBA FRED SAMPLATSKY METEOROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY OST / NWS / NOAA.
The LAMP/HRRR MELD FOR AVIATION FORECASTING Bob Glahn, Judy Ghirardelli, Jung-Sun Im, Adam Schnapp, Gordana Rancic, and Chenjie Huang Meteorological Development.
Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Judy E. Ghirardelli National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory February 05, 2009.
Improved Gridded Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Ceiling and Visibility Guidance using HRRR model output Presenting: Judy E. Ghirardelli/Adam Schnapp.
MOS and Evolving NWP Models Developer’s Dilemma: Frequent changes to NWP models… Make need for reliable statistical guidance more critical Helps forecasters.
Bias Correction of RTFDDA Surface Forecasts Presented by: Daran Rife National Center for Atmospheric Research Research Applications Laboratory Boulder,
MDL Requirements for RUA Judy Ghirardelli, David Myrick, and Bruce Veenhuis Contributions from: David Ruth and Matt Peroutka 1.
INCORPORATING AN ENSEMBLE FORECASTING PROXY INTO A KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEM Harvey Stern, Bureau of Meteorology, Australia. Harvey Stern, Bureau of Meteorology,
Introduction to Weather Forecasting Spring 2016 Kyle Imhoff.
Aviation Products from the Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Judy E. Ghirardelli National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory Presented.
NOAA Northeast Regional Climate Center Dr. Lee Tryhorn NOAA Climate Literacy Workshop April 2010 NOAA Northeast Regional Climate.
Translating Advances in Numerical Weather Prediction into Official NWS Forecasts David P. Ruth Meteorological Development Laboratory Symposium on the 50.
Developing GFS-based MOS Thunderstorm Guidance for Alaska Phillip E. Shafer* and Kathryn Gilbert Meteorological Development Laboratory, NWS, NOAA
Estimating Rainfall in Arizona - A Brief Overview of the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing Subsystem Jonathan J. Gourley National Severe Storms Laboratory.
ABC’s of weather forecasting NOAA/NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE WFO BALTIMORE / WASHINGTON OPEN HOUSE – APRIL 30-MAY 1, 2016 RAY MARTIN –– Lead Forecaster.
FORMULATION METHODS FOR STATISTICAL APPLICATION IN WEATHER FORECASTING
Overview of Downscaling
Need to condense this information in a small space
Model Post Processing.
MOS Developed by and Run at the NWS Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) Full range of products available at:
Much information is needed to interpret what is happening with the atmosphere.
Post Processing.
Atmospheric Sciences 452 Spring 2019
Presentation transcript:

Meteorology 415 October 2010

Numerical Guidance Skill dependent on: Skill dependent on: Initial Conditions Initial Conditions Resolution Resolution Model Physics Model Physics Parameterization Parameterization Computational Power Computational Power Boundary values Boundary values

Statistical Guidance There are several techniques that may be used beside multiple linear regression to generate statistical relationships between predictor and predictand. These include There are several techniques that may be used beside multiple linear regression to generate statistical relationships between predictor and predictand. These include Kalman Filters Kalman Filters Neural Networks Neural Networks Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Fuzzy Logic Fuzzy Logic Remember that Poor Model Performance translates into Poor MOS Guidance Remember that Poor Model Performance translates into Poor MOS Guidance

Numerical Guidance Perfect Prog Technique Perfect Prog Technique The development of a Perfect-Prog can make use of the NCEP reanalysis database which provides long and stable time series of atmospheric analyses, which are necessary for building reliable regression equations based solely on past observations.

Outline MOS Basics MOS Basics What is MOS? What is MOS? MOS Properties MOS Properties Predictand Definitions Predictand Definitions Equation Development Equation Development Guidance post-processing Guidance post-processing MOS Issues MOS Issues Future Work Future Work New Packages - UMOS (Canadian) New Packages - UMOS (Canadian) Gridded MOS Gridded MOS

Model Output Statistics (MOS) MOS relates observations of the weather element to be predicted (PREDICTANDS) to appropriate variables (PREDICTORS) via a statistical method MOS relates observations of the weather element to be predicted (PREDICTANDS) to appropriate variables (PREDICTORS) via a statistical method Predictors can include: Predictors can include:  NWP model output interpolated to observing site  Prior observations  Geoclimatic data – terrain, normals, lat/lon, etc. Current statistical method: Multiple Linear Regression (forward selection) Current statistical method: Multiple Linear Regression (forward selection)

MOS Properties Mathematically simple, yet powerful technique Mathematically simple, yet powerful technique Produces probability forecasts from a single run of the underlying NWP model output Produces probability forecasts from a single run of the underlying NWP model output Can use other mathematical approaches such as logistic regression or neural networks Can use other mathematical approaches such as logistic regression or neural networks Can develop guidance for elements not directly forecast by models; e.g. thunderstorms Can develop guidance for elements not directly forecast by models; e.g. thunderstorms

MOS Guidance Production 1. Model runs on NCEP IBM mainframe 2. Predictors are collected from model fields, “constants” files, etc. 3. Equations are evaluated 4. Guidance is post-processed Checks are made for meteorological and statistical consistency Checks are made for meteorological and statistical consistency Categorical forecasts are generated Categorical forecasts are generated 5. Final products disseminated to the world

MOS Guidance GFS (MAV) 4 times daily (00,06,12,18Z) GFS (MAV) 4 times daily (00,06,12,18Z) GFS Ext. (MEX) once daily (00Z) GFS Ext. (MEX) once daily (00Z) Eta/NAM (MET) 2 times daily (00,12Z) Eta/NAM (MET) 2 times daily (00,12Z) Variety of formats: text bulletins, GRIB and BUFR messages, graphics … Variety of formats: text bulletins, GRIB and BUFR messages, graphics …

Samples of Each GFS (MAV) GFS (MAV)

Samples of Each GFS EXT (MEX) GFS EXT (MEX)

Samples of Each NAM (MET) NAM (MET)

Statistical Guidance Most common approach Most common approach

Statistical Approach

Statistical Guidance

Predictand Strategies Predictands always come from meteorological data and a variety of sources: Predictands always come from meteorological data and a variety of sources: Point observations (ASOS, AWOS, Co-op sites) Point observations (ASOS, AWOS, Co-op sites) Satellite data (e.g., SCP data) Satellite data (e.g., SCP data) Lightning data (NLDN) Lightning data (NLDN) Radar data (WSR-88D) Radar data (WSR-88D) It is very important to quality control predictands before performing a regression analysis… It is very important to quality control predictands before performing a regression analysis…

Predictand Strategies 1.(Quasi-)Continuous Predictands: best for variables with a relatively smooth distribution 1.(Quasi-)Continuous Predictands: best for variables with a relatively smooth distribution Temperature, dew point, wind (u and v components, wind speed) Temperature, dew point, wind (u and v components, wind speed) Quasi-continuous because temperature, dew point available usually only to the nearest degree C, wind direction to the nearest 10 degrees, wind speed to the nearest m/s. Quasi-continuous because temperature, dew point available usually only to the nearest degree C, wind direction to the nearest 10 degrees, wind speed to the nearest m/s. 2. Categorical Predictands: observations are reported as categories 2. Categorical Predictands: observations are reported as categories Sky Cover (CLR, FEW, SCT, BKN, OVC) Sky Cover (CLR, FEW, SCT, BKN, OVC)

Predictand Strategies 3. “Transformed” Predictands: predictand values have been changed from their original values 3. “Transformed” Predictands: predictand values have been changed from their original values Categorize (quasi-)continuous observations such as ceiling height Categorize (quasi-)continuous observations such as ceiling height Binary predictands such as PoP (precip amount > 0.01”) Binary predictands such as PoP (precip amount > 0.01”) Non-numeric observations can also be categorized or “binned”, like obstruction to vision (FOG, HAZE, MIST, Blowing, none) Non-numeric observations can also be categorized or “binned”, like obstruction to vision (FOG, HAZE, MIST, Blowing, none) Operational requirements (e.g., average sky cover/P- type over a time period, or getting 24-h precip amounts from 6-h precip obs) Operational requirements (e.g., average sky cover/P- type over a time period, or getting 24-h precip amounts from 6-h precip obs) 4. Conditional Predictands: predictand is conditional upon another event occurring 4. Conditional Predictands: predictand is conditional upon another event occurring PQPF: Conditional on PoP PQPF: Conditional on PoP PTYPE: Conditional on precipitation occurring PTYPE: Conditional on precipitation occurring

MOS Predictands Temperature Temperature Spot temperature (every 3 h) Spot temperature (every 3 h) Spot dew point (every 3 h) Spot dew point (every 3 h) Daytime maximum temperature [0700 – 1900 LST] (every 24 h) Daytime maximum temperature [0700 – 1900 LST] (every 24 h) Nighttime minimum temperature [1900 – 0800 LST] (every 24 h) Nighttime minimum temperature [1900 – 0800 LST] (every 24 h) Wind Wind U- and V- wind components (every 3 h) U- and V- wind components (every 3 h) Wind speed (every 3 h) Wind speed (every 3 h) Sky Cover Sky Cover Clear, few, scattered, broken, overcast [binary/MECE] (every 3 h) Clear, few, scattered, broken, overcast [binary/MECE] (every 3 h)

MOS Predictands PoP/QPF PoP/QPF PoP: accumulation of 0.01” of liquid-equivalent precipitation in a {6/12/24} h period [binary] PoP: accumulation of 0.01” of liquid-equivalent precipitation in a {6/12/24} h period [binary] QPF: accumulation of {0.10”/0.25”/0.50”/1.00”/2.00”*} CONDITIONAL on accumulation of 0.01” [binary/conditional] QPF: accumulation of {0.10”/0.25”/0.50”/1.00”/2.00”*} CONDITIONAL on accumulation of 0.01” [binary/conditional] 6 h and 12 h guidance every 6 h; 24 h guidance every 12 h 6 h and 12 h guidance every 6 h; 24 h guidance every 12 h 2.00” category not available for 6 h guidance 2.00” category not available for 6 h guidance Thunderstorms Thunderstorms 1+ lightning strike in gridbox (size varies) [binary] 1+ lightning strike in gridbox (size varies) [binary] Severe Severe 1+ severe weather report (define) in gridbox [binary] 1+ severe weather report (define) in gridbox [binary]

MOS Predictands Ceiling Height Ceiling Height CH ft [binary/MECE- Mutually Exclusive and Collectively Exhaustive] CH ft [binary/MECE- Mutually Exclusive and Collectively Exhaustive] Visibility Visibility Visibility < ½ mile, < 1 mile, < 2 miles, < 3 miles, < 5 miles, < 6 miles [binary] Visibility < ½ mile, < 1 mile, < 2 miles, < 3 miles, < 5 miles, < 6 miles [binary] Obstruction to Vision Obstruction to Vision Observed fog (fog w/ vis 5/8 mi), haze (includes smoke and dust), blowing phenomena, or none [binary] Observed fog (fog w/ vis 5/8 mi), haze (includes smoke and dust), blowing phenomena, or none [binary]

MOS Predictands Precipitation Type Precipitation Type Pure snow (S); freezing rain/drizzle, ice pellets, or anything mixed with these (Z); pure rain/drizzle or rain mixed with snow (R) Pure snow (S); freezing rain/drizzle, ice pellets, or anything mixed with these (Z); pure rain/drizzle or rain mixed with snow (R) Conditional on precipitation occurring Conditional on precipitation occurring Precipitation Characteristics (PoPC) Precipitation Characteristics (PoPC) Observed drizzle, steady precip, or showery precip Observed drizzle, steady precip, or showery precip Conditional on precipitation occurring Conditional on precipitation occurring Precipitation Occurrence (PoPO) Precipitation Occurrence (PoPO) Observed precipitation on the hour – does NOT have to accumulate Observed precipitation on the hour – does NOT have to accumulate

Stratification Goal: To achieve maximum homogeneity in the developmental datasets, while keeping their size large enough for a stable regression Goal: To achieve maximum homogeneity in the developmental datasets, while keeping their size large enough for a stable regression MOS equations are developed for two seasonal stratifications: MOS equations are developed for two seasonal stratifications: COOL SEASON: October 1 – March 31 COOL SEASON: October 1 – March 31 WARM SEASON: April 1 – September 30 WARM SEASON: April 1 – September 30 * EXCEPT Thunderstorms 3 seasons * EXCEPT Thunderstorms 3 seasons (Oct. 16 – Mar. 15, Mar. 16 – Jun. 30, July 1 – Oct. 15)

Pooling Data Generally, this means REGIONALIZATION: collecting nearby stations with similar climatologies Generally, this means REGIONALIZATION: collecting nearby stations with similar climatologies Particularly important for forecasting RARE EVENTS: Particularly important for forecasting RARE EVENTS: QPF Probability of 2”+ in 12 hours QPF Probability of 2”+ in 12 hours Ceiling Height < 200 ft; Visibility < ½ mile Ceiling Height < 200 ft; Visibility < ½ mile Regionalization allows for guidance to be produced at sites with poor, unreliable, or non- existent observation systems Regionalization allows for guidance to be produced at sites with poor, unreliable, or non- existent observation systems  All MOS equations are regional except temperature and wind

Example of Regions GFS MOS PoP/QPF Region Map, Cool Season Note that each element has its own regions, which usually differ by season Note that each element has its own regions, which usually differ by season

Transform Point Binary Predictor FCST: F24 MEAN RH PREDICTOR CUTOFF = 70% INTERPOLATE; STATION RH ≥ 70%, SET BINARY = 1; BINARY = 0, OTHERWISE RH ≥70% ; BINARY AT KBHM = 1 KBHM (71%)

Transform Grid Binary Predictor FCST: F24 MEAN RH PREDICTOR CUTOFF = 70% WHERE RH ≥ 70%, SET GRIDPOINT VALUE = 1, OTHERWISE = 0 INTERPOLATE TO STATIONS < VALUE AT KBHM < 1 KBHM (0.21)

Binary Predictands If the predictand is BINARY, MOS equations yield estimates of event PROBABILITIES… If the predictand is BINARY, MOS equations yield estimates of event PROBABILITIES… MOS Probabilities are: MOS Probabilities are: Unbiased – the average of the probabilities over a period of time equals the long-term relative frequency of the event Unbiased – the average of the probabilities over a period of time equals the long-term relative frequency of the event Reliable – conditionally (“piece-wise”) unbiased over the range of probabilities Reliable – conditionally (“piece-wise”) unbiased over the range of probabilities Reflective of predictability of the event – range of probabilities narrows and approaches relative frequency of event as predictability decreases, for example, with increasing projections or with rare events Reflective of predictability of the event – range of probabilities narrows and approaches relative frequency of event as predictability decreases, for example, with increasing projections or with rare events

Post-Processing MOS Guidance Meteorological consistencies – SOME checks Meteorological consistencies – SOME checks T > Td; min T Td; min T < T < max T; dir = 0 if wind speed = 0 BUT no checks between PTYPE and T, between PoP and sky cover BUT no checks between PTYPE and T, between PoP and sky cover Statistical consistencies – again, SOME checks Statistical consistencies – again, SOME checks Conditional probabilities made unconditional Conditional probabilities made unconditional Truncation (no probabilities 1) Truncation (no probabilities 1) Normalization (for MECE elements like sky cover) Normalization (for MECE elements like sky cover) Monotonicity enforced (for elements like QPF) Monotonicity enforced (for elements like QPF) BUT temporal coherence is only partially checked BUT temporal coherence is only partially checked Generation of “best categories” Generation of “best categories”

Unconditional Probabilities from Conditional If event B is conditioned upon A occurring: If event B is conditioned upon A occurring: Prob(B|A)=Prob(B)/Prob(A) Prob(B|A)=Prob(B)/Prob(A) Prob(B) = Prob(A) × Prob(B|A) Prob(B) = Prob(A) × Prob(B|A) Example: Example: Let A = event of >.01 in., Let A = event of >.01 in., and B = event of >.25 in., then if: and B = event of >.25 in., then if: Prob (A) =.70, and Prob (A) =.70, and Prob (B|A) =.35, Prob (B|A) =.35, U A B then Prob (B) =.70 ×.35 =.245

Truncating Probabilities 0 < Prob (A) < < Prob (A) < 1.0 Applied to PoP’s and thunderstorm probabilities Applied to PoP’s and thunderstorm probabilities If Prob(A) < 0, Prob adj (A)=0 If Prob(A) < 0, Prob adj (A)=0 If Prob(A) > 1, Prob adj (A)=1. If Prob(A) > 1, Prob adj (A)=1.

Normalizing MECE Probabilities Sum of probabilities for exclusive and exhaustive categories must equal 1.0 Sum of probabilities for exclusive and exhaustive categories must equal 1.0 If Prob (A) 1.0. If Prob (A) 1.0. Set: Prob adj (A) = 0, Set: Prob adj (A) = 0, Prob adj (B) = Prob (B) / D, Prob adj (B) = Prob (B) / D, Prob adj (C) = Prob (C) / D Prob adj (C) = Prob (C) / D

Monotonic Categorical Probabilities If event B is a subset of event A, then: If event B is a subset of event A, then: Prob (B) should be < Prob (A). Prob (B) should be < Prob (A). Example: B is > 0.25 in; A is > 0.10 in Example: B is > 0.25 in; A is > 0.10 in Then, if Prob (B) > Prob (A) Then, if Prob (B) > Prob (A) set Prob adj (B) = Prob (A). set Prob adj (B) = Prob (A). Now, if event C is a subset of event B, e.g., C is > 0.50 in, and if Prob (C) > Prob (B), Now, if event C is a subset of event B, e.g., C is > 0.50 in, and if Prob (C) > Prob (B), set Prob adj (C) = Prob (B) set Prob adj (C) = Prob (B)

Temporal Coherence of Probabilities Event A is > 0.01 in. occurring from 12Z-18Z Event A is > 0.01 in. occurring from 12Z-18Z Event B is > 0.01 in. occurring from 18Z-00Z Event B is > 0.01 in. occurring from 18Z-00Z A  B is > 0.01 in. occurring from 12Z-00Z A  B is > 0.01 in. occurring from 12Z-00Z Then P(A  B) = P(A) + P(B) – P(A  B) Then P(A  B) = P(A) + P(B) – P(A  B) Thus, P(A  B) should be: Thus, P(A  B) should be: < P(A) + P(B) and < P(A) + P(B) and > maximum of P(A), P(B) > maximum of P(A), P(B) ABC

MOS Best Category Selection PROBABILITY (%) THRESHOLD EXCEEDED? TO MOS GUIDANCE MESSAGES An example with QPF… An example with QPF…

Other Possible Post-Processing Computing the Expected Value Computing the Expected Value used for estimating precipitation amount used for estimating precipitation amount Fitting probabilities with a distribution Fitting probabilities with a distribution Weibull distribution used to estimate median or other percentiles of precipitation amount Weibull distribution used to estimate median or other percentiles of precipitation amount Reconciling meteorological inconsistencies Reconciling meteorological inconsistencies Not always straightforward or easy to do Not always straightforward or easy to do Inconsistencies are minimized somewhat by use of NWP model in development and application of forecast equations Inconsistencies are minimized somewhat by use of NWP model in development and application of forecast equations

MOS Weaknesses / Issues MOS can have trouble with some local effects (e.g., cold air damming along Appalachians, and some other terrain-induced phenomena) MOS can have trouble with some local effects (e.g., cold air damming along Appalachians, and some other terrain-induced phenomena) MOS can have trouble if conditions are highly unusual, and thus not sampled adequately in the training sample MOS can have trouble if conditions are highly unusual, and thus not sampled adequately in the training sample  But, MOS can and has predicted record highs & lows MOS typically does not pick up on mesoscale-forced features MOS typically does not pick up on mesoscale-forced features

MOS Weaknesses / Issues Like the models, MOS has problems with QPF in the warm season (particularly convection near sea breeze fronts along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts) Like the models, MOS has problems with QPF in the warm season (particularly convection near sea breeze fronts along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts) Model changes can impact MOS skill Model changes can impact MOS skill MOS tends toward climatology at extended projections – due to degraded model accuracy MOS tends toward climatology at extended projections – due to degraded model accuracy CHECK THE MODEL…MOS will correct many systematic biases, but will not “fix” a bad forecast. GIGO (garbage in, garbage out). CHECK THE MODEL…MOS will correct many systematic biases, but will not “fix” a bad forecast. GIGO (garbage in, garbage out).

Why do we need Gridded MOS? Because forecasters have to produce products like this for the NDFD…

Traditional MOS Graphics This is better, but still lacks most of the detail in the Western U.S.

Objectives Produce MOS guidance on high- resolution grid (2.5 to 5 km spacing) Produce MOS guidance on high- resolution grid (2.5 to 5 km spacing) Generate guidance with sufficient detail for forecast initialization at WFOs Generate guidance with sufficient detail for forecast initialization at WFOs Generate guidance with a level of accuracy comparable to that of the station-oriented guidance Generate guidance with a level of accuracy comparable to that of the station-oriented guidance

BCDG Analysis Method of successive corrections Method of successive corrections Land/water gridpoints treated differently Land/water gridpoints treated differently Elevation (“lapse rate”) adjustment Elevation (“lapse rate”) adjustment

MOS Max Temperature Forecast

NDFD Max Temperature Forecast

Statistical Guidance UMOS – Updateable MOS UMOS – Updateable MOS Updating concept As described by Ross (1992), a UMOS system is intended to facilitate the rapid and frequent updating of a large number of MOS equations from a linear statistical model, either MLR or MDA. Both of these techniques use the sums-of-squares- and-cross-products matrix (SSCP), or components of it. The idea of the updating is to do part of the necessary recalculation of coefficients in near–real time by updating the SSCP matrix, and storing the data in that form rather than as raw observations.Ross (1992) Weather and Forecasting Article: pp. 206–222 | Abstract | PDF (560K)AbstractPDF (560K) The Canadian Updateable Model Output Statistics (UMOS) System: Design and Development Tests Laurence J. Wilson and Marcel Vallée Meteorological Service of Canada, Dorval, Quebec, Canada (Manuscript received April 19, 2001, in final form October 12, 2001)

Statistical Guidance UMOS – Updateable MOS UMOS – Updateable MOS

Future of Gridded MOS Evaluation (objective & subjective) Evaluation (objective & subjective) Expansion (area & elements) Expansion (area & elements) Improvement –make Updateable Improvement –make Updateable Use of remote-sensing observations Use of remote-sensing observations