Risk Management Project Survey’s preliminary results Face to face meeting MCOFE Warsaw 28 May 2015 Fabrizio Rotundi
Page 2 Nov ‘14 Dec ‘14 Mar ‘15 May ‘15 Sep ‘15 Template Framework Survey output Benchmark analysis Best practice Guidelines Nov ‘15 Road map proposal for developing Risk Management among NSIs
Page 3 Reading-key Criteria Project’s subdivisions and links between output’s variables 3READING-KEY CRITERIA To analyse the experiences 3READING-KEY CRITERIA To analyse the experiences 2PARAMETERS To elaborate the questionnaire 2PARAMETERS To elaborate the questionnaire SEVERAL FACTORS describing each parameter To set the questions SEVERAL FACTORS describing each parameter To set the questions
Page 4 Track 1 - Defining the Template’s Reading-Key Criteria The Reading-Key Criteria are the lens to analyze the experiences through 2.The “Uncertainty experts” dimension refers to the actors, roles, organizational units or structures to which the organization assigns the responsibility to conceptualize and control uncertainty and, consequently, the responsibility for Risk Management. 3.The “Technologies” dimension reveals the extent to which the Risk Management System becomes embedded or decupled in the organization and refers to the practices, procedures and tools adopted by an organization to implement Risk Management. 1.The “Risk rationalities” dimension reflects the main purpose which any organization grounds its own risk strategy on (i.e. compliance, performance, company value, etc.).
Page 5 Track 2 – Describing the Parameters which guide the Questionnaire a)Level of effectiveness in context analysis and of consistency with identified risks b)Cost planning level c)Level of consistency with the statistics production Quality model d)Thoroughness level in implementing a Risk Management practice e)Etc. etc. a)Accordance level with international standards b)Financial sustainability c)Detection of key steps resulting from a thorough and methodical application of Risk Management d)Etc. etc.
Page 6 Integrated Common Framework GSBPM 5.0 The organisational Risk Management encourages practices based on the early planning of activities, anticipating possible obstacles in achieving objectives, instead of the logic of urgency.
Page 7 Survey’s statistical analysis
Page 8 Survey’s statistical analysis
Page 9 Survey’s statistical analysis
Page 10 Survey’s statistical analysis
Page 11 Survey’s statistical analysis
Page 12 Survey’s statistical analysis
Page 13 Survey’s statistical analysis
Page 14 Strategy
Page 15 Experiences
Page 16 Governance
Page 17 Impacts on organization
Page 18 Communication
Page 19 Functions and Accountabilities
Page 20 Stakeholders Involvement
Page 21 Treatment and monitoring
Page 22 Internal Environment
Page 23 Growth and training
Page 24 Mapping Organization
Page 25 Resources
Page 26 Example of conceptual map: Rationalities
Page 27 Example of conceptual map: Uncertainty Experts
Page 28 Example of conceptual map: Technologies
Page 29 The expected outcomes 1.Building and sharing questionnaire (2 nd half of February) 2.Survey (8 th of April) 3.Collecting data (15 th of May) 4.Data Analysis & Report processing (end of June 2015) 5.Program implementation case studies (max 3) analysis (July-Sept) 6.Development of guidelines (September) 7.Sharing of Guidelines final draft (End of October)
Page 30 Thank you for your attention !!! Fabrizio ROTUNDI Alessandro HINNA