Support for Personalized Learning Dr. Christina Chambers, Assistant Director Office of Special Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
Bringing it all together!
Parents as Partners in Education
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Consortium Patti Whetstone Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation University of Kansas The present publication.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: ADDRESSING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES AND ENGLISH LEARNERS January 11, 2012.
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Improving Secondary Education and Transition Using Research-Based Standards and Indicators An initiative of the National Alliance on Secondary Education.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program (SRCL) SRCL is a comprehensive literacy development education program to advance literacy skills for students.
PEP and Programs of Study: Secondary Learning Update Dr. Barbara Brady School Counseling Coordinator and Office of Secondary Learning Staff.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Moving Our Numbers Examining the Gaps that Exist for Today’s Learners; Tomorrow’s Wage Earners.
COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
General Considerations for Implementation
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
INCREASING PROFICIENCY FOR ALL STUDENTS RESA 3 PRINCIPAL FORUM 2014.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Gifted Education (GATE) and Response to Intervention (RtI)
Presentation II A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
Support for Personalized Learning Presented by Dr. Sarah Lee RESA 4 Technical Assistance Specialist A recorded version of this presentation will be posted.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
 Implementing Best Practice Strategies New Licensed Staff Induction Program.
Support for Personalized Learning Dr. Christina Chambers, Assistant Director Office of Special Programs Nancy Cline, Coordinator Office of School Improvement.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Building Inclusive Schools Boston Public Schools Department of Special Education and Student Services.
West Virginia’s Adoption of the Common Core State Standards for High School Mathematics Lou Maynus, NBCT Mathematics Coordinator Office of Instruction,
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Developed and implemented by the multidisciplinary team (MDT)
An Overview March Wh y Wh at Ho w Wh ere Wh en Wh o ?
Response to Intervention (RtI) How can we make it work in Wisconsin?
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
The Comprehensive Literacy Plan Pennsylvania KeystonestoOpportunity Tom Corbett Governor Ron Tomalis Secretary.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
2012 Parent Engagement Summit. Common Core State Standards in Mathematics.
Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.
A Resource Guide for Parents. play&list=UUF0pa3nE3aZAfBMT8pqM5PA&playnext=1
The Teacher- Child Interaction Linking Developmentally Appropriate Practices to the Characteristics of Effective Instruction.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
(MTSS) Multi-Tiered System of Supports Charles R. Eccleston, District MTSS Trainer.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
The Year of Core Instruction
NJCU College of Education
Developed by: Silvia C. Dorta Duque de Reyes
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Radford City Schools School Board Presentation
An Overview April 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Support for Personalized Learning Dr. Christina Chambers, Assistant Director Office of Special Programs

Schools Across West Virginia Get a Snapshot of Student Growth as Part of State's New Accountability System Posted: September 04, 2013 "It is important for our schools to understand that the new accountability system is not about comparing one school to another," added Phares. "The system is about keeping your eye on the finish line despite where a student starts and moving that individual student forward to proficiency."

WESTEST 2 Mathematics All Percent Proficient Grade %44%41%49%42% 4 46%47%48% 542%45% 50%46% 639%43%45%48% 739%47%44%51%47% 835%37%40%42%43% 933%36%39%41%43% 1037%39%42%43%42% 1137%41%44%48%44%

WESTEST 2 RLA All Percent Proficient Grade %44%46%49%44% 439%40%48%44%47% 540%43%46%51%42% 640%43%50%51%53% 740%43%51%49%50% 840%42%49%47%50% 940% 47%48%52% 1040%43%47%48%51% 1135% 44%45%47%

How Student Groups Overlap

Percentage of WV Students with Disabilities Who Belong to Other Groups

State Board Goal The West Virginia Board of Education will provide a statewide system of education that ensures all students graduate from high school prepared for success in high-quality postsecondary opportunities in college and/or careers.

Rationale The future quality of life for the citizens of West Virginia is directly linked to the performance of our students. Today's students are tomorrow's wage earners and tax payers. Low student achievement levels, decreasing graduation rates and ranking among the nation's lowest levels of post-secondary transition are all bleak predictors of West Virginia's future. We must strive to prepare our graduates to meet the requirements of high quality jobs needed within West Virginia and nationally. In addition to career preparedness, many systemic public issues like obesity, drug dependence, teen pregnancy, and crime are statistically linked to the overall level of education. Thus, unless our education system improves and our young people are prepared to be productive and responsible members of our society, the state will have decreasing resources to support the infra-structure and services essential to attracting economic growth and elevating the overall quality of life of its citizens.

Subgroup Intervention for Low SES Subgroup Intervention for SWD

Purpose of SPL The West Virginia Support for Personalized Learning (SPL) framework is a state-wide initiative that suggests flexible use of resources to provide relevant academic, social/emotional and/or behavioral support to enhance learning for ALL students. SPL is designed to improve outcomes for students with a variety of academic and behavioral needs.

Purpose of SPL SPL incorporates and builds on processes formerly implemented as RTI.

Purpose of SPL SPL, at its strongest, will look different for each student. SPL, at its strongest, will be customized for each district, school and classroom.

Purpose of SPL SPL is characterized by a seamless system of high quality instructional practices allowing all students to make significant progress: at-risk, exceeding grade level expectations or at any point along the continuum.

Purpose of SPL The SPL framework supports shared responsibility between general and special education teachers for the learning outcomes of all students.

WV Standards for High Quality Schools WVBE Policy 2322 Standard 3: Standards-Focused Curriculum, Instruction and Assessments Function C: Instructional Planning: Teachers design long and short term instructional plans for guiding student mastery of the Content Standards and Objectives based on the needs, interests and performance levels of their students.

CORE Provides foundation of curriculum and school organization that has a high probability (80% of students responding) of bringing students to a high level of achievement in all areas of development/content Choose curricula that has evidence of producing optimal levels of achievement (evidence-based curriculum) TARGETED Supplemental curriculum aligned with CORE and designed to meet the specific needs of targeted group (15%) INTENSIVE Focused curriculum designed to meet the specific needs of the targeted group and/or individual (5% ) Curriculum and Instruction

CORE

CORE Instruction Utilizes differentiated and scaffolded instruction to meet students’ needs Incorporates small group activities Focuses on the most critical standards and objectives Utilizes evidence from summative and ongoing formative assessment to make instructional decisions Maximizes instructional time ; students are engaged Emphasizes 24/7 learning

ESEA Flexibility Waiver Menu of Interventions

Universal Design Defined… “ Consider the needs of the broadest possible range of users from the beginning” Architect, Ron Mace

Universal Design for Learning: Creating a Learning Environment that Challenges and Engages All Students 23

UDL as a Framework for Learning 24 Principle 1 Representation Principle 2 Action and Expression Principle 3 Engagement Presenting information and course content in multiple formats so that all students can access it Allowing students alternatives to express or demonstrate their learning Stimulating students' interests and motivation for learning in a variety of ways

TARGETED

TARGETED Support SPL endorses the value of instructional supports at the TARGETED level including: – Differentiating, scaffolding and using multi-modal strategies to engage students – Providing explicit instruction that emphasizes skill building as well as contextualized instruction that emphasizes application of skills – Peer interaction to scaffold student understanding – Teacher use of learning progressions within the standards and objectives as guidance for constructing scaffolding – Accommodations that affect how a student learns, not what they are expected to learn

ESEA Flexibility Waiver Menu of Interventions

Question???? “… the question is not whether teachers recognize that such differences exist in virtually every classroom, or even whether they impact student success.” “The question that plagues teachers is HOW to attend to the evident differences in a room that contains so many young bodies.” Leading and Managing A Differentiated Classroom by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Marcia B. Imbeau

Differentiated Instruction DI involves Giving students a range of ways to access curriculum, instruction, and assessment; Interacting and participating in the classroom; demonstrating and expressing what they learn; and Understanding and taking in information.

Differentiated Instruction Differentiated instruction is based on the assumptions that students differ in their learning styles, needs, strengths, and abilities, and that classroom activities should be adapted to meet these differences.

Differentiation Includes High expectations for all students Presenting information and course content in multiple formats so that all students can access it Allowing students alternatives to express or demonstrate their learning Stimulating students' interests and motivation for learning in a variety of ways Utilizing Bloom’s Taxonomy based on learner level of understanding Assigning activities geared to different learning styles, interests

Differentiated Instruction Providing Access to the Core

Access to the General Curriculum Accommodations that affect how a student with disabilities learns, not what they are expected to learn.

INTENSIVE

INTENSIVE Support SPL endorses the value of instructional supports at the INTENSIVE level including: – Intensified scaffolding and time: suggested to occur 3 to 5 times per week for class sessions of 30 to 60 minutes – Smaller groups of similarly-skilled and needs-alike students or one-to-one – Most likely to occur outside the general education classroom – May occur before, during or after the school day dependent on available resources and personnel.

Intensive Support SPL does not promote: – INTENSIVE support replacing opportunity to receive instruction in science, social studies, physical education and the arts – Isolated skill drill requiring students to independently make generalizations and connections back to the CORE content.

ESEA Flexibility Waiver Menu of Interventions

What is Scaffolding? An instructional technique, in which the teacher breaks a complex task into smaller tasks, models the desired learning strategy or task, provides support as student learn to do the task and then gradually shifts responsibility to the students. In this manner, a teacher enables students to accomplish as much of a task as possible without adult assistance.

Learning Progressions – English Language Arts – NxGCSOs Learning Progressions are the : Picture of the path students typically follow as they learn. The college and career readiness anchor standards are the focal point for the learning trajectories embedded in the RLA NxGCSO document. The grade-specific standards provide guidance to all K-12 teachers regarding the special role that each grade level teacher holds in establishing the building blocks for the more complex learning to come. The learning progressions articulated in the RLA NxGCSOs are useful verbal descriptions of how learning is expected to progress over time.

Learning Progressions – Mathematics - NxGCSOs Learning progressions are the picture of the path students typically follow as they learn. The learning progressions in mathematics are not vertically aligned by anchor standards as in RLA but are vertically centered on individual topics. Learning progressions move from one topic to another, objectives need to be mastered, and standards are interwoven and interdependent. One objective impacts many and many objectives impact one.

Supports for Students with Disabilities

Cognitive Strategies Instruction In SPI, Cognitive Strategies Instruction is described as a specific form of scaffolding that supports learners in using thinking processes that are typically overt and even sub-conscious for highly skilled users. While many learners independently work their way to successful management of these cognitive processes, others have been found to benefit from instructional supports, customized to their personal needs.

Thank You for Your Attention! If you need further assistance you can contact the Office of Special Programs.