Coaching Case 10 Group 6 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Advertisements

Pythagorean Theorem Group 7 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Committed Listening Learning Focused Conversations October,
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Building Capacity as a Presenter Presenter Skills November.
Division of Fractions: Balancing Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge Part 2 January 15, 2013 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics2 (CCLM) This material.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
Volume Group 5 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
Academic Coaches – Math Meeting April 12, 2013 Beth Schefelker Bridget Schock Connie Laughlin Hank Kepner Kevin McLeod Multiplication With Fractions Part.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Middle School Leadership Teams February 6, 2014.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Shape Group 1 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, School Year Learning- Focused Interactions Probes and Prompts.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Coaching Case 3 Group 4 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Ratio and Proportional Relationships April 30, 2013 Common.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, School Year Learning-Focused Interactions “Putting it all.
Understanding Angle Group 3 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer Institute 2012 Fractions: Teaching with Understanding Part 2 This.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Reflecting Conversations Lee Ann PruskeLaura Maly Astrid Fossum Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Math Teacher Leader Training February
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
+ What Should I Expect to See During Mathematics Instruction? Helping Elementary Principals Recognize and Support Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning.
Collaborative Grouping 6-12 Math Teachers. Workshop Outcomes Participants will gain effective strategies for forming and facilitating a classroom culture.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Division with Fractions – Part 3 “Partitive Division Tools”
Volume Measurement Core Mathematics Partnership
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Algebraic Reasoning Inquiry Project
Classroom Discussions to Support Problem Solving
Surfacing MP6, MP7 and MP 5 Core Mathematics Partnership
Pathways to Teacher Leadership in Mathematics
Project & Syllabus.
Exploring Symmetry Core Mathematics Partnership
Number Talks: Building Fluency with Division
Please sit at the appropriate table with your IC/Principal.
Developing Linear Thinking & Extending to a Ruler
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Multiplication Concept Development & Word Problem Structures
Smarter Balanced Assessment Items
Use the next 10 minutes to share.... Goal…
Number Talks: Focusing in Computational Fluency
Using Talk Moves to Help Students Engage in the Reasoning of Others
Number Talks: Developing Computational Fluency
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks
Number Talks: An Instructional Strategy used to Create a Classroom Culture of Listening, Sharing and Flexible Thinking Core Mathematics Partnership.
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks (part 2)
Learning-Focused Interactions
Understanding Ratios as Percents
Moving From Multiplicative Comparisons to Proportional Reasoning
A Language-Rich Math Class
Access & Equity Core Mathematics Partnership
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Tuesday December 13, 2011 Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM)
Single-Digit Addition Fluency: Part 2 Grades K-2
Student Work Presentation and Reflection Project Due: July 31
Student Work Analysis: Looking for Growth in Thinking
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Presentation transcript:

Coaching Case 10 Group 6 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material was developed for the Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics project through the University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee, Center for Mathematics and Science Education Research (CMSER). This material may be used by schools to support learning of teachers and staff provided appropriate attribution and acknowledgement of its source. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. This project was supported through a grant from the Wisconsin ESEA Title II Improving Teacher Quality Program.

Welcome!  As you wait, please familiarize yourself with the content included in Cultivating a Math Coaching Practice Case #10 (pp. 103 – 107) (Evaluations Course #560102)

 Case #10: Maintaining a Focus on Mathematics Struggling to Keep Math at the Center CCLM Group Presentation: Jane Maliszewski, Gregory Coleman, Jodi Brekke, Sherrie Griffin April 30, 2013

Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Learning Intentions/Success Criteria 3. “The First Moment” Coaching Scenario 4. Coaching Moves 5. “The Second Moment” Coaching Scenario 6. A Strategy for Keeping the Focus on Math 7. Let’s Review

Learning Intention & Success Criteria  We are learning to analyze, identify and understand coaching moves and strategies used to maintain the focus on mathematics during math coaching.  We will be successful when we can apply coaching moves and strategies to plan a coaching session/meeting with math as the focus.

Planning a “Successful” Meeting?! LU

Reflecting on Our Own Experiences  Reflect on a time when you were part of a group and the focus of the meeting was derailed.  What may have been some reasons why the meeting did not stay focused?  Jot some notes about this experience on an index card and put it aside. We will return to this later.

“The First Moment”  At your table, discuss the First Moment coaching scenario in Case #10 that you read.  Guiding Questions:  How could Ivy have addressed Maria’s decision about instruction while still maintaining the focus on math?  What coaching moves might have been helpful to create this outcome? Be prepared to share your ideas with the whole group.

Coaching Moves  Pausing  Paraphrasing  Inquiring  Probing  Extending Thinking

“The Second Moment”  In this scenario, the coach felt that she was more successful at keeping the focus on mathematics.  What occurred during this meeting that helped her feel more successful?  Turn and talk with a neighbor.

A Strategy for Keeping a Focus on the Math  Using a protocol for examining student work.

Steps to Follow 1. Read the standard(s) being assessed 2. Everyone completes the prompt 3. Discuss the expectations and possible misconceptions 4. Study the work samples 5. Record student successes and challenges 6. Decide on next steps.

Read the standard  3.NF.1: Understand a fraction as a number on the number line; represent fractions on a number line diagram.  a. Represent a fraction 1/b on a number line diagram by defining the interval from 0 to 1 as the whole and partitioning it into b equal parts. Recognize that each part has size 1/b and that the endpoint of the part based at 0 locates the number 1/b on the number line.  b. Represent a fraction a/b on a number line diagram by marking off a lengths 1/b from 0. Recognize that the resulting interval has size a/b and that its endpoint locates the number a/b on the number line.

Complete the Math Prompt

Expectations/Misconceptions

Looking at the Student Work  Look at the student work samples  What do you see?  What are the successes and challenges?  What are your next steps?

Let’s Review  Go back to the index card that you completed at the beginning of the session.  How might some of the strategies or coaching moves that we discussed today have improved the meeting in your situation?

Learning Intention & Success Criteria  We are learning to analyze, identify and understand coaching moves and strategies used to maintain the focus on mathematics during math coaching.  We will be successful when we can apply coaching moves and strategies to plan a coaching session/meeting with math as the focus.

Resources  Cultivating a Math Coaching Practice book  Mentoring Matters book  “Protocol for Analyzing Student Work” adapted from the MMP protocol  Constructed Response Class Summary Report adapted from the MMP CABS Class Summary Report

Thank you!  Thank you for your hard work today. We appreciate your focus and attention! Any questions? Please contact us:  Jodi Brekke:  Gregory Coleman:  Sherrie Griffin:  Jane Maliszewski: