PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY New Administrator’s Meeting September 23, 2011 Krishnan Sudharsan Office of Career and Technical Education Michigan Department of Education

2 PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY Title I Core Performance Indicators Title II Tech Prep Indicators

3 Section 113. Accountability Purpose “To establish and support State and local performance accountability systems…to assess the effectiveness of the State and the eligible recipients of the State in achieving statewide progress in career and technical education.”

4 PIV: Accountability Focus Indicators of performance must be valid and reliable Technical skill assessments aligned with industry-recognized standards Local accountability of eligible recipients is required

5 PIV: Accountability Focus Local program must agree to accept state adjusted levels of performance or negotiate Professional development to assist in accessing and utilizing data

6 Secretary may withhold all or a portion of a state’s funds if:… –State fails to implement an improvement plan –State fails to make improvement in performance levels –State fails to meet at least 90% of level of performance for 3 consecutive years PIV: Accountability Focus

7 If a local recipient fails to meet at least 90% of a local adjusted level of performance for any of the core indicators, local recipient shall develop and implement a program improvement plan

8 PIV: Accountability Focus State may withhold all or a portion of a local recipient’s funding if: –Recipient fails to implement an improvement plan –Recipient fails to make any improvement in performance levels –Recipient fails to meet at least 90% of agreed upon state adjusted level of performance for 3 consecutive years

9 PIV: Accountability Focus Tech Prep Each Tech Prep consortium shall enter into an agreement to meet a minimum level of performance for each of the Title I and Title II performance indicators

10 PIV: Accountability Focus Tech Prep (Title II) Consortia that do not meet the performance levels for 3 consecutive years shall be to required to resubmit a Tech Prep grant application and may have funding terminated*

Tech Prep (Title II) Indicators Tech Prep indicator data must be submitted for the grant year by October 15, 2011 Tech Prep funding was eliminated for FY No indicator data will be collected 11

12 Tech Prep Data Collection Logistics  Submit on state-prepared and provided spreadsheet by region  Required: Numbers for all numerators and denominators

13 Negotiating Local Adjusted Levels of Performance (ALP)-CPIs 1S1 Acad. Achievement—Reading/LA 1S2 Acad. Achievement—Math –State Perkins targets are NCLB Required Levels

14 Negotiating Local ALP 2S1 Technical Skill Attainment Technical Skills Assessments Major changes every year as % of students/programs report increases

15 3S1 High School Completion Measure –5 year cohort –‘Regular diploma’ plus –GED, certificate –State recognized equivalent

16 4S1 High School Graduation NCLB Measure State Perkins target is state NCLB target Review participating districts’ performance

17 5S1 Placement Postsecondary Education/ Training Military Service Employment

18 6S1 and 6S2 Nontraditional Different CIP Codes identified as ‘Nontraditional’ compared to PIII 6S1 – Participation 6S2 - Completion

Reports Perkins Core Performance Indicator Reports: Click Link: “Core Performance Indicator Reports” 19

Core Performance Indicator Trends Click link: “Data and Reports” Click link: “Michigan Core Performance Indicators: Trends by Region” 20

21

Technical Skills Assessments Current Assessments 22 CTE Cluster/Program Assessment Assessment Items Cut Score Test Publisher Business, Management, Administration ( ) General Business 104 Questions Multiple Choice 53 % NOCTI Finance ( ) Accounting-- Advanced 222 Questions Multiple Choice 46.6 % NOCTI Health Sciences ( , , , ) National Healthcare Foundation Skills 100 Questions Multiple Choice 70 %National Consortium for Health Science Education ealthtest/

Roles and Responsibilities: Administrator Prior to Assessment Communicate assessment value and purpose Oversee planning for test administration During Assessment Monitor administration Support Proctors After Assessment Review assessment results Use assessment data to improve learning 23

Tools and Resources MDE OCTE Website _2629_ ,00.html Business Assessments: NOCTI Website 24

Health Assessment: Oklahoma Career Tech Jacqueline Dannis, – 25

Questions? Krishnan Sudharsan