Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Drs Natalie Lloyd and Reva Ramiah Cementing the Discipline.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Calera Intermediate School Parent – Culture Survey.
Advertisements

Completing the cycle: an investigation of structured reflection as a tool to encourage student engagement with feedback Jackie Pates Lancaster Environment.
The Course experience questionnaire (P. Ramsden) Designed as a performance indicator 24 statements relating to 5 aspects 1 overall satisfaction statement.
Making Feedback a positive learning experience Joint Academy/NUS Special Interest Group Professor Brenda Smith Senior Associate
School Development Day, 16 th July 2012 L White E FFECTIVE F EEDBACK.
Competencies for beginning teachers
CRAMLAP Reflective Practice Steve Walsh. Learning Outcomes To provide participants with an overview of the main principles of RP; To consider the advantages.
Quality Enhancement and Communications The development and delivery of a research active curriculum will be promoted as a core and high quality activity.
Alex Bols, Assistant Director (Research) & Head of Higher Education, NUS Assessment feedback: changing student attitudes.
Assessment of Group Work University of Warwick 27/28 March 2003 Cordelia Bryan Project Director
Information Literacy and Inquiry-based learning Pamela McKinney Learning Development and Research Associate (Information Literacy) at CILASS CILASS identifies.
Making Sense of Assessments in HE Modules (Demystifying Module Specification) Jan Anderson University Teaching Fellow L&T Coordinator SSSL
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Politics and International Studies FACULTY OF EDUCATION, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW Students Engaging Students:
Academic Writing Support in Geography Kirsty Williams 17 th June 2009.
Tutorials via Social Networking. Samer El-Daher, Lucie Pollard School of Science.
Improving Students’ understanding of Feedback
Clara Fowler University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
ACE TESOL Diploma Program – London Language Institute OBJECTIVES You will understand: 1. The difference between a course, curriculum, and syllabus. 2.
The London Metropolitan University Writing Centre: An overview of teaching and research Savita Bakhshi School of Psychology, Faculty of Life Sciences,
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Psychology students’ experiences of peer tutoring in academic writing European Congress of Psychology, Oslo, July 2009 Kathy Harrington, Savita Bakhshi.
Improving Literacy and Numeracy the JCU Way Litnum Group James Cook University AALL Conference 25 Nov 2011.
Principles of Assessment
Curriculum Reform Professor WONG Yuk-shan Chairman of the Curriculum Development Council 11 December 2004.
Patricia Campbell and Jonathan Sly
CRICOS No.00213J Division of Technology Information and Learning Support Collaborating effectively – what do we really need? Sue Collins, Liaison Librarian,
Teaching for excellence Personal reflections Barbara de la Harpe RMIT University, College of Design and Social Context.
Research Strategy Options Workshop FECM Strategic Review 2009.
Lessons learnt and changed understanding: Can Machine Dynamics students survive without my lectures? Ian Howard Mechanical Engineering.
The “subject savvy” librarian?: making IL skills relevant at Kingston University Lyn Porteous Gill Sims Kristy Widdicombe.
Becoming legitimate: promoting the use of reciprocal peer learning for early career academics Stuart McGugan & Christos Petichakis Centre for Lifelong.
'Learner Autonomy through the production of a public history resource' Emma Robertson.
HEA Conference June 22nd – 23rd 2010 Shaping the Future: Future Learning It’s all in the words: the impact of language on the design and development of.
Inducting Architectural and Built Environment students into a new world Helen Farrell.
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results Dr Pam Wells Adviser, Evidence-Informed Practice.
CPLA Video Case Studies Making Media Nursing. Making Media - Background First year, semester long 20 credit core module Involved 200 students with 4 staff.
Group work – why do it? Rachel Horn – Civil & Structural Engineering.
May 2012 Asking the questions.. Ruth Watkins Pauline Keith Student Learning Services (Image from
Clare Saunders and Danielle Lamb Subject Centre for Philosophical and Religious Studies.
Coleg Gwent Curriculum & Quality Internal Review Feedback (March 2010) Nicola Gamlin (Vice Principal) Tuesday 29 June 2010.
Joined up Thinking: Integrating eLearning with QA and Enhancement Emma Rose: Teaching and Learning Office Linda Irish: eLearning Team Cath Dyson : eLearning.
Students seizing responsibility: A revolution of collegiality Amie Speirs, Zoe Welsh, Julia Jung and Jenny Scoles Introduction: In our project Students.
C ENTRE FOR E XCELLENCE IN T EACHING & L EARNING A SSESSMENT FOR L EARNING Assessment for Learning in Practice: case studies from Northumbria's CETL Gill.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Whole School Planning Lecturer: Pete Sanders Week 11: 19 July 2010 EDU4PIB – Issues in Education.
Blackboard Training. Aim To equip teachers with the skills to use Blackboard to enhance student learning.
Building a Culture of Leadership at Belmont High School Michael M. Harvey, Ed.D. Principal, Belmont High School.
Total Teaching (Feedback and assessment ) Paul Gibson.
1 Welcome to the Team : Tutor and Demonstrator Development Program Faculties of Science.
Zoe Yates​​ 13/14 Teaching Development Project Will weekly themed activities, on-going group feedback and more self-reflection improve engagement and skill.
Feedback in University Teaching Prof. Arif Khurshed Division of Accounting and Finance.
Active learning –Students create, answer, discuss and rank questions –High student engagement –Benefits from large class numbers –Minimal instructor intervention.
Critical Thinking From Written Outcomes to Classroom Practice.
RMIT Life Sciences Focus on life Evaluation in action learning as a powerful force in development towards a learning organisation: small beginnings, giant.
REDESIGNING FRESHMAN COMPOSITION The Redesign Alliance Annual Conference March 19, 2007 Sally P. Search, Ph.D. Tallahassee Community College.
Company LOGO ATP Connected Learning in an Open World ‘‘Developing new ideas and escaping from the old ones’ - A collaborative E learn course development.
Monitor and Revise Teaching. ObjectivesObjectives Describe how to monitor teaching List ways to contribute to broader evaluations Explain how to review.
School of Teaching & Learning Development Advanced Lecturer in Education: Julie-Ann Stobo BA (Hons)
Assessment for Learning Centre for Academic Practice Enhancement, Middlesex University.
Enhancing Students’ Collaborative Learning Through Podcasts Libby Rothwell Kingston University Dr. Ming Nie University of Leicester.
 Is this a remedial course?  How long is the course? How many hours a week do I have to study on the course?  Who is the teacher on the course?  What.
Can You Enhance Knowledge and Stimulate Excellence One STEM Unit at a Time? AEA – October 16, 2014 Panel: Evaluating STEM Professional Development Interventions.
Course Work 2: Critical Reflection GERALDINE DORAN B
‘How flipping difficult can it be?’ - an update
First Year in Maths Workshop 4 – 11 July 2016
Applying for UTS Vice-Chancellor’s Learning and Teaching grants 2017
Learning Intentions and Success Criteria
Calera Intermediate School
Workshop Set-Up: The aim is that at each table we have a variety of disciplines / subjects represented by (ideally) four participants. Ensure a mixture.
Giving Effective Feedback and Feedforward
Presentation transcript:

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Drs Natalie Lloyd and Reva Ramiah Cementing the Discipline and Language Specialist Relationship July 2013

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J What relationships ? Natalie Lloyd and unit teaching colleague; Prabir Sarker Miri academic staff Engineering Academics Reva Ramiah and team; Clare Freeman Coordinator, English Language Development Faculty of Science and Engineering Lecturer The Learning Centre Language T&L Academics 170 (+60 Miri) Civil 2 nd Year Structural Analysis 267 Students post graduate students and recent graduate Tutors Prof Hamid Nikraz Managers Cementing the Relationship

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Delivery Change Flipped classroom Short lead time Reduced lectures from 6 hours to 2 or 4 hours/week (over-all by 30%) Workshop– student focused active peer learning more time ( 90 min) more sessions (5/week) decreased max student number (av. 35) increased staff (1-2 academics and 3 of 5 tutors) abandoned “tutorial” new teaching spaces Cementing the Relationship

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Outcomes Communication Embedding language across the curriculum University priority / personal priority / funding priority Workshop last year and T&L Forum Murdoch this year Reflected on the unit Not sufficient to assess & expect outcome Must equip students to achieve learning outcome Need a language specialist Cementing the Relationship

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Process of Embedment Inform - Team teaching Lectures and Workshops Practice and Review Assess and Value Cementing the Relationship

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Reflect on attempts and encourage peer-learning Constructive feedback on our own work rather than reflections of what other class members did Cementing the Relationship

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Equip the tutors and students Discipline and Language Team marking One marking rubric Exemplars Additional sessions to support Cementing the Relationship

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Feedback / Outcomes / Observations  Students expected to be doing mostly calculations  Writing was unexpected and came as a bad shock  Improved confidence and skill in written communication  After performing poorly in the first essay but then doing well in the second essay gave me a huge confidence boost Cementing the Relationship

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Feedback / Outcomes / Observations  Students value communication  The communication also put a realistic aspect on structural analysis and allowed for thought on why members were acting in ways that they were  Workshops positive achieving ULO on communication  The workshops in combination with good written examples on Blackboard helped consolidate what was taught Cementing the Relationship

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Feedback / Outcomes / Observations The language resources provided on BlackBoard Video lecture feedback on assessment Lecture (on essay structure) Group work in the Workshop Tutors’ support in workshops Cementing the Relationship Learning Centre Support Additional Support Session

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Change 1. Learning outcomes in this unit are clearly identified The learning experiences help me to achieve The learning resources help me to achieve The assessment tasks evaluate my achievement Feedback on my work helps me to achieve The workload is appropriate The quality of teaching helps me to achieve I am motivated I make best use of the learning experiences I think about how I can learn more effectively Overall, I am satisfied with this unit Cementing the Relationship

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Cementing the Discipline and Language Specialist Relationship Cementing the Relationship Change the workshop class back to normal tutorial class Run a proper tutorial

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Cementing the Discipline and Language Specialist Relationship Cementing the Relationship I expected the usual tutorial session, but the workshops were developed to be more learning-effective, and enhanced communication skills