Instructional Development for Teachers in Special Education Introduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By: Edith Leticia Cerda
Advertisements

A Systems Approach To Training
Good Evaluation. Good Evaluation Should … be simple be fair be purposeful be related to the curriculum assess skills & strategies set priorities use multiple.
1 Designing a training programme Module 6 Sessions 9&10.
J. farrington consulting Instructor Training/Skills Dr. Jeanne Farrington, CPT ICT Immersive Training Workshop January 27, 2010.
What is the ADDIE Model? By San Juanita Alanis. The ADDIE model is a systematic instructional design model consisting of five phases: –Analysis –Design.
Instructional System Design.  The purpose of instructional design is to maximize the value of instruction for the learner especially the learner's time.
Expert Appraisal. Types of Expert Appraisal Some modifications of the instructional material are based on the developer’s hindsight; Most should be based.
Formative and Summative Evaluations
HOW TO DESIGN EFFECTIVE TRAINING PROGRAM
Tutorial of Instructional Design
Understanding Validity for Teachers
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
La Naturaleza.  The generic term for the five-phase instructional design model consisting of Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation.
ADDIE: Design & Development Nancy H. Dewald Pennsylvania State University Berks Campus June 24, 2005.
Developing Evaluation Instruments
Instructional System Design
Revising instructional materials
Click to edit Master title style  Click to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third level  Fourth level  Fifth level  Click to edit Master text.
1 Development of Valid and Reliable Case Studies for Teaching, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Other Purposes Margaret Lunney, RN, PhD Professor College of.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Training and Procedural Manuals Section B 1.
Robert Reid Torri Ortiz Lienemann.  Session I: ◦ Introductions of group members, facilitators, and text ◦ Review format for the book study ◦ Choose partners/small.
Instructional System Design
Importance of Lesson planning in ESL Teaching 1. It gives a bird’s eye of view of things to be taught and learned everyday. 2. It makes you organized.
Barry Williams1 Analyzing Learners & Context Dick & Carey, Chp. 5.
PLAN AND ORGANISE ASSESSMENT. By the end of this session, you will have an understanding of what is assessment, competency based assessment, assessment.
Introduction to Interactive Media The Interactive Media Development Process.
Evaluating a Research Report
Understanding Meaning and Importance of Competency Based Assessment
The Analysis of the quality of learning achievement of the students enrolled in Introduction to Programming with Visual Basic 2010 Present By Thitima Chuangchai.
CCSSO Criteria for High-Quality Assessments Technical Issues and Practical Application of Assessment Quality Criteria.
Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8th edition
Human Learning Asma Marghalani.
Evaluating Teacher Training changing classroom practices Richard Lambert, Ph.D.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
What is design? Blueprints of the instructional experience Outlining how to reach the instructional goals determined during the Analysis phase The outputs.
D1.HRD.CL9.06 D1.HHR.CL8.07 D2.TRD.CL8.09 Slide 1.
Designing a Training Program RATIONALE OF THE TRAINING Background or introduction of what the training is all about –Developments in the field/discipline/area.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Development of Training and Procedural Manuals Section B 1.
What are competencies?  Emphasize life skills and evaluate mastery of those skills according to actual leaner performance.  Competencies consist of.
COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Module 1: Read and Know the Standard.
By Mario Carrizo. Definition Instructional design is define basically as the person who teaches, designs or develops instructions. Instructional designers.
Developing Assessment Instruments Instructional Design: Unit, 3 Design Phase.
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS: PRINCIPLES, DESIGN, UTILIZATION AND EVALUTION ASSOCIATE PROF. DR. ABU BAKAR IBRAHIM EDU 555 CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION.
Assistant Instructor Nian K. Ghafoor Feb Definition of Proposal Proposal is a plan for master’s thesis or doctoral dissertation which provides the.
CEIT 225 Instructional Design Prof. Dr. Kürşat Çağıltay
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Design Evaluation Overview Introduction Model for Interface Design Evaluation Types of Evaluation –Conceptual Design –Usability –Learning Outcome.
ICAD3218A Create User Documentation.  Before starting to create any user documentation ask ‘What is the documentation going to be used for?’.  When.
Learning Objectives for Senior School Students. Failing to plan is planning to fail. / Psychology of Achievement /
Courses of instruction are usually divided into learning units as reflected in textbooks, manuals, modules, and other instructional materials that are.
Open Math Module 3 Module 3: Approaches to Integrating OER into Math Instruction Planning Instruction with OER 1.0 Introduction.
Stages of Research and Development
EVALUATING EPP-CREATED ASSESSMENTS
Provide instruction.
APPROACH TO INSTRUCTIONAL SYSTEM DESIGN
MATERIALS ASSESSMENT AND TEACHING
Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments
Model of instructional systems design: Dick & Carey model
COMPETENCIES & STANDARDS
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
Analyzing Learners & Context
Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments
LESSON PLANNING In ESL.
Chapter 4 Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning
Providing feedback to learners
Univ. Prof Dr Viktor Jakupec
Presentation transcript:

Instructional Development for Teachers in Special Education Introduction

A preparation program is effective if one can document... zThat it has been instrumental in generating a relatively permanent change in the behavior of its trainees, and zThat this change is a function of the experiences the program has provided

To meet this criterion of effectiveness... zThe objectives of the program must be stipulated in behavioral terms, and zThe objectives must be appropriate to the entry behaviors of trainees.

The program must... zDescribe and/or demonstrate the critical defining attributes of the training procedures (so that) zReplication can be assured.

Further... zThe program should produce objective evidence for trainee attainment of the objectives.

In other words... zA program is deemed effective if it can be demonstrated that it has met its objectives as a function of a set of clearly definable experiences.

A Model for Instructional Development zDefine yInstructional requirements zDesign yPrototypical instructional material zDevelop yTrainee -tested & reliable instructional material zDisseminate yInstructional material to interested others

Stage I: Define zThe purpose of this stage is to stipulate and define instructional requirements. zStep 1 Front-end analysis zStep 2 Learner analysis zStep 3 Task analysis zStep 4 Concept analysis zStep 5 Specifying instructional objectives

Step 1 Front-end analysis zIs the study of the basic problem facing the trainer... zRaising the level of performance and/or knowledge base of trainees yInstructional alternatives are considered ySearch for relevant instructional materials yDevelopment of instructional materials

Step 2 Learner analysis zIs the study of the target population (trainees) zTrainee characteristics relevant to the design and development of instruction are identified, and include: yEntering competencies and background experiences yGeneral attitude toward topic yMedia, format, and language preferences

Step 3 Task analysis zIs identifying the main skill to be acquired by trainees and zAnalyzing it into a set of necessary and sufficient subskills zThis analysis ensures comprehensive coverage of the task in the instructional material.

Step 4 Concept analysis zIs identifying ymajor concepts to be taught; yArranging them in hierarchies; and yAnd breaking down individual concepts into critical and irrelevant attributes. zThis analysis helps to identify a rational se of examples and nonexamples to be portrayed in protocol development.

Step 5 Specifying instructional objectives zThis is converting the results of task and concept analyses into behaviorally stated objectives. zThis set of objectives provides the basis for test construction and instructional design. zLater, it is integrated into the instructional materials for instructors and trainee use.

Stage II: Design zThe purpose of this stage is to design prototype instructional material. zThis stage begins after instructional objectives have been established. zSelection of media and formats for the material and the initial production are the major aspects of this stage.

Step 1: Construct criterion-referenced tests zCriterion-referenced tests convert behavioral objectives into an outline for the instructional material.

Step 2: Media selection zIs the selection of appropriate media for the presentation of instructional content. zMedia selection involves matching: ytask and concept analyses yTarget-trainee characteristics yProduction resources, and yDissemination plans zwith various attributes of different media

Step 3: Format selection zClosely related to media selection and typically determined concurrently zIncludes, for example: ySelf-instructional yMultimedia ySmall group yComputer based, etc.

Step 4: Initial design zIs presenting the essential instruction through appropriate media and in a suitable sequence. zIt also involves structuring various learning activities such as yreading a text, yinterviewing trainees, and ypracticing different instructional skills.

Stage III: Develop zThe purpose of this stage is to modify the prototype instructional material. zFeedback is received through formative evaluation and the materials are revised using yExpert appraisal, and yDevelopmental testing

Step 1: Expert appraisal zA technique for obtaining suggestions for the improvement of the material. zA number of “experts” are asked to evaluate the material from instructional and technical points of view. zBased on feedback, material is modified to improve: yappropriateness, effectiveness, usability, and quality

Step 2: Developmental testing zInvolves trying out the material with actual trainees to locate sections for revision. zThe material is modified based on trainee yresponses yreactions ycomments zContinue test/revise/retest until material works consistently and effectively.

Stage IV: Disseminate zInstructional materials reach their final production stage when development testing yields consistent results and expert appraisal yields positive comments. zThis process involves: yValidation testing yPackaging yDiffusion

Step 1: Validation testing zA summative evaluation, that is the material is used under replicable conditions to demonstrate “who learns what under what conditions in how much time” (Markle, 1967)

Step 2: Packaging zInvolves preparing the instructional material for final packaging by obtaining necessary permission and releases zConsidering authorship rights and obtaining a copyright (if applicable). zRationale for high production standards.

Step 3: Diffusion zAccomplishing dissemination, demonstration, and adoption facilitation. zIncorporating audience analysis, strategy for gaining acceptance of material, timing, and media in dissemination efforts. zPlan for demonstration activities. zStrategies for user assistance.