IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Revision of ECE R41 ASEP Concept for Motorcycles By Heinz Steven 20.02.2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some observations on the base of the ASEP dBase Prepared by the Netherlands ASEP meeting jan 2008 USA.
Advertisements

WLTP Elaborated by the WLTP downscaling issues task force OIL #5 Proposal for modifications of the calculation parameter/coefficients.
Further modifications on the gearshift calculation tool
ECE R41 revision Outline of main modules with crossreference to draft amending text Presentation by Data Expert Group to R41WG 19 February 2008 Informal.
Th e E u r o p e a n T y r e a n d R i m T e c h n i c a l O r g a n i s a t i o n 1 Torque Influence on C3 category tyres Geneva WP29 / GRB 51 st session.
Measures for reducing vehicle noise
Datum (Tag.Monat.Jahr) OICA Method – short overview IG ASEP, Japan – Draft for an OICA presentation FG. GRBIG-ASEP
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
Movement on Noise Regulation – Alignment with R 51.03
WLTP-DHC Validation Phase I Results and Recommendations by India
19-21 September 2011 JASIC Kei-truck of N1 Informal document GRB (54th GRB, September 2011, agenda item 3(b))
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Transmitted by the expert from Germany The French/German ASEP proposal Informal.
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values ~Rationality of Thresholds for N2 and M3~ JASIC 1 Informal document GRB (57 th GRB, 5-7 February 2013, agenda.
Report GRB ad hoc Working Group ASEP by the Chairman of the ASEP WG GRB 49; February 2009 Informal document No. GRB (49th GRB, February 2009,
RWTÜV Fahrzeug GmbH, Institute for Vehicle Technology 1 Mobilität Motorcycles have the highest technical potential of noise emission (figure 1), Motorcycles.
UN/ECE GRB R41WG DEG conclusions 8 August General - 1 In February 2007, GRB agreed: In February 2007, GRB agreed: That ISO362-2 is practical and.
1 Mr H A Nakhawa, ARAI, Pune, India 13 th DHC Informal Group Meeting 64 th GRPE Session, June 2012 Geneva Validation 1 results of Indian Vehicles on LPVC.
1 Comments on the Ste 3 gearshift calculation tool from validation 2 participants Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values JASIC 1 Informal document GRB Rev.1 (55th GRB, 7-9 February 2012, agenda item 3(b))
1 Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data delivered by vehicle manufacturers By Heinz Steven
Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP
1 Proposals of WLTC versions for low powered vehicles Heinz Steven WLTP.
Japanese proposal on R51 limit values
Brussels, 22 September 2009 – 101st MVEG 1 WLTP – DHC Results of Validation Phase 1.b
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Motorcycle Noise Emission Proposal for a measurement method representing rural driving behaviour.
Anchor points in ASEP the shifting in the various proposals as the chairman has understood it ASEP meeting June 2008 v4.
ASEP Test Results CVT & Hybrid Vehicles GRB informal meeting # September 2007 JASIC.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Motorcycle Noise Emissions - The German Position – - ISO response - 4. GRB Informal Group Meeting 25./26. August 2005 Milwaukee.
GRB – ASEP – 08 Criteria to compare proposals Den Hagg – September 2007.
Starting note on gearshift issues
Status report about the work of the task force on gearshift issues
Additional ASEP data GRB IG ASEP sept 2007 By the Netherlands.
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
Motorcycle Noise Emission
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview R51 ASEP IWG July 2017.
Status report about the work of the task force on gearshift issues
ASEP, items for clarification
UN-R41.04 ASEP Overview.
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
ASEP -- Revision of D/F and OICA methods --
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Noise problems and driving conditions in China based on ECE R51.03
Off-cycles principles
Driving conditions and conclusions of China on ASEP test method
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
Random Cycle Generator
9th Noise Experts Group meeting 30 November 2017
Development of the Japan’s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
WLTP-21-04e Revision 1 Amendment proposals for annex 2 of GTR #15 from the cycle gearshift issues task force Heinz Steven
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Continuously Research on ASEP
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
ASEP for L5 vehicles with CVT/AT
Amendment proposals for Regulation Nos 9, 63 and 92
ASEP IMMA inputs to R51 ASEP IWG
Suggestions on development of UN Regulation No. 51
Tianjin Motorcycle Technical Center
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
IMMA proposal for a test procedure towards real driving conditions
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.
Presentation transcript:

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Revision of ECE R41 ASEP Concept for Motorcycles By Heinz Steven

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 2 Mobilität Check the noise emission behaviour of a motorcycle for driving conditions that occur in real world traffic but are not covered by the ISO test(s) (not to exceed concept). This should especially include driving conditions on rural roads. The checks should make sure that the noise emission behaviour of the motorcycle under these conditions does not deviate significantly from what one would expect from the ISO results. Aim

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 3 Mobilität Vehicle speeds between 20 km/h (v_AA’) and 80 km/h (v_BB’) Engine speeds at BB’ up to 0.85*(s – n_idle) + n_idle for pmr <= 66, up to 3,4105*pmr-0,3315* (s – n_idle) + n_idle, for pmr > 66 with s – rated engine speed in min-1, n_idle – idling speed in min-1 pmr = P n in kW/(m 0 in kg +75)*1000 pmr is the power to mass ratio index. This is the rated power of the vehicle (P n ) in kW di-vided by the kerb mass of the vehicle (m 0 ) in kg + 75 (to account for the mass of the driver) and multiplied by ASEP test area limitations

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 4 Mobilität ASEP test area limitations

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 5 Mobilität ASEP test area limitations

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 6 Mobilität The reference point is L_wot_i, the wot test result from ISO in gear i and n_PP_i, the corresponding engine speed at PP’. For engine speeds within the test area but other than n_PP_i a slope has to be defined in order to take into account that the the noise emission increases with engine speed. The slope might be different for engine speeds below and above n_PP_i. In addition to that it may be necessary to consider an additional tolerance value of x dB. Reference Point

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 7 Mobilität Example for an ASEP limit curve Reference point, 3000 min -1, 74 dB(A), (tolerance to be added) n_max ASEP

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 8 Mobilität The data of the ECE R41 test campaign in 2006 do not allow the definition of a complete ASEP test. Additional data has to be collected in order to  define the appropriate ASEP limit curve (slope; tolerance),  identify the appropriate PMR threshold value below which it may be not necessary to apply ASEP tests. A test protocol was developed by the R41 task force that defines 3 different driving conditions (vehicle and engine speeds and gear selection) to be used for test campaigns. Tests to be done

IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 9 Mobilität Thank You Revision of ECE R41