Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Russell Schiermeier.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2014 Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Advertisements

Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Justin Johnson.
University of Buffalo, SUNY 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Heads Under Pressure Nick Harker Chris Tockey Peter Britanyak Design Project: Instrumented Head for the Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Diesel Engines TRF 210. History of Diesel Engines 1890 Dr Rudolf Diesel had a theory that any fuel could be ignited by the heat caused by high pressure.
Internal Combustion Engines – The Diesel
Seminar On Gasoline Direct Injection
University of Minnesota – Duluth Design Presentation 2006 Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Design and Testing of a Four-Stroke Snowmobile with Catalytic Exhaust Treatment Scott Miers and Ryan Hayes.
Diesel Automotive Engines
Heads Under Pressure Snowmobile Head Design Team Members: Peter Britanyak, Nick Harker, and Chris Tockey.
U NIVERSITY O F W ATERLOO T EAM E CO -S NOW. T EAM B ACKGROUND Team Eco-Snow is a student organization at the University of Waterloo The project is managed.
Internal Combustion Engines – The Diesel References Required Principles of Naval Engineering – (pP ) Optional Introduction to Naval Engineering.
Approved by DC-E USCG AuxA, Inc Boating Skills & Seamanship Lesson 10 Powering Your Boat.
1 Presenters: Ozzie Goodman Zak Parker. Design Objectives  Create Efficient Snowmobile Fueled by 16%-32% Isobutanol  Emissions Reductions  Noise 
Cylinder Head Bolts.
Introduction Diesel Engine.
North Dakota State University Ross Larson Justin Omdalen.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2014 Clean Snowmobile Team
Gasoline Direct Injection GDIGDIGDI.  Introduction  Advantages of Fuel Injection over Carburetor  Main Components of Electronic Fuel Injection  Electronic.
University Of Maine Clean Snowmobile The Rock!. Introduction Maine – New England Snowmobiling! The Economic Impact –3000 full time equivalent jobs* –Jobs.
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Different Types of IC Engine Rated by their maximum horsepower Three Types –Reciprocating –Rotary –Sustained Combustion.
2006 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Matt Prusak - Team Leader Wes Barrett – Vice President.
Presented By Dillon Savage & Crystal Green UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWO-STROKE WITH DIRECT INJECTION AND SOUND REDUCTION.
Minnesota State University, Mankato X treme  AET Program  1989  TAC-ABET Accredited  140 Majors  The Team  Seven Seniors  Ten Undergraduates 
SEMINAR DIGITAL TWIN SPARK IGNITION ENGINE (DTSi) Presented by:
University Of Maine Clean Snowmobile The Rock!. Introduction Maine – New England Snowmobiling! The Economic Impact –3000 full time equivalent jobs* –Jobs.
Kettering University Clean Snowmobile Challenge March 23 rd – April 1 st, 2001 Presented by: Kyle Schwulst and Andrew Stahr.
University of Wisconsin Madison Presented by: Eric Schroeder Adam Schumacher 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation.
2005 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Greg Davis David Meyer Advisor: Dr. Bernhard Bettig Incorporation of a High Performance, Four-Cylinder, Four-Stroke.
2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Rich Stueber Pryce Nutting.
© Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Permission granted to reproduce for educational use only Publisher The Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Tinley Park, Illinois.
ADVANCE IN AUTOMOBILES HYDROGEN FUELLED ENGINES BY C.SUBRAMANIAN, 10MECH50, III-MECH, VCET,MADURAI.
Kettering University Presenters: Chad Swartz John Stimpson.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Joe Lofgren Brandon Salaba Kyle Schroer Kyle Levanen Dylan Dahlheimer UMD University.
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Automotive Technology, Fifth Edition James Halderman GASOLINE DIRECT- INJECTION SYSTEMS 79.
California Off-road Mobile Source Technology Review JOHN DEERE LE ENGINE TECHNOLOGY John Deere Consumer Products February 2, 2000.
Gasoline Direct Injection Presented by P.MEGHANA 09001A0317 M.MOUNIKA 09001A0331 Presented by P.MEGHANA 09001A0317 M.MOUNIKA 09001A0331 GDI GDI GDI GDI.
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Minnesota State University Mankato Dylan Brandt, Nick Perkins, Abdulsalam Hamud, Wayne Minnichsoffer, Andrew Pickle.
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2005 Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Automotive Engine Performance, 3/e By James D. Halderman Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2003 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ All rights.
Lecture 2. Top Dead Center (TDC): Position of the piston when it stops at the extreme point away from the crankshaft. – Top because this position is at.
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy 2016 SAE Clean Snowmobile Competition Presented by: Pryce McDaniel, Josh McCoy, Mike Waloch 3/7/16.
University of Minnesota Clean Snowmobile Team. Overview Our Team Goals Design Objectives Development Process Current Snowmobile.
SCUDERI SPLIT CYCLE I.C. ENGINE
Analysis of GDI Internal Combustion Engines as Automobile Prime Movers
Introduction to the Clean Snowmobile Competition
Introduction Spark Ignition ( SI ) Engine Control : Control of a SI engine for the best fuel efficiency, low emission and good drivability is a demanding.
Introduction Spark Ignition ( SI ) Engine Control : Control of a SI engine for the best fuel efficiency, low emission and good drivability is a demanding.
University of Wisconsin Platteville 2017 CSC Diesel Team
Team Members Jacob Schofield - President Nels Eide – Driveline / Testing Mark Boeckmann - Engine Keith Propson – Sound / Exhaust.
What is CRDI ? CRDI stands for Common Rail Direct Injection.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2017 Clean Snowmobile Team
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy
Presented By Ian Sullivan
Engine Design and Classification
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
Diesel Automotive Engines
2018 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
Who We Are Samuel Wick – President Blake Thurnbeck – Engine Packaging
GREEN ENGINE.
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University of Wisconsin-Platteville CSC CI Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
University of Wisconsin – Platteville 2019 SI Snowmobile Team
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Presentation transcript:

Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Russell Schiermeier

Compared to a typical trail snowmobile:  Reduce HC, CO, and NO x Emissions  Minimize Sound Production  Improve Fuel Efficiency  Maintain Performance and Reliability

UI first participated in the CSC in 2001: the second year of the competition That year’s team mated a sno- cross chassis to a 750 cc four-stroke BMW motorcycle engine Multiple wins: 2002 and 2003 Four-strokes are already a commercially available solution Does not meet the needs of many consumers

Direct InjectionChassis Modifications  Adapt E-Tec Injectors to Polaris 600 engine  Design head for optimum piston chamber geometry  Implement power and control systems  Use sound absorbing and vibration damping materials to reduce noise output  Install direct drive to increase efficiency and decrease weight Clean, quiet two-stroke

 Preserving the right to ride in sensitive areas with new technology by improving the two-stroke engine  Less pollution  Increased gas mileage  Reduced cost for the outfitter  Increased range or lighter weight with smaller gas tank  Maintains stock power and handling characteristics  Minimal cost over production snowmobile

 E-Tec© low-pressure fuel injectors  More efficient than high- pressure air or fuel  Cylinder head  Combustion chamber with steep walls  MoTec M4 ECU and custom injector control system  55V power source Injector Spark Plug Combustion Chamber

 Taken in December, 2004  74% less HC + NO x and 41% less CO (5 mode weighted average) without a catalyst.  Displayed areas tuning was needed most.

 Injector  Head  Spark Plug  Fuel Cone  Piston  Cylinder Port Geometry  Cooling passages

Squish Area Dome Angle Improved near nozzle geometry Spark plug location Stock cooling passage geometry Dome Radius

‘05 Squish Reduction Near nozzle geometry Improvement Shorter chamber ‘04

Cost of Implementation Less than $200 difference between stock and cost of implementing direct injection technology due to injectors, fuel pump and ECU Technology is used in the outboard industry whose standards are stricter than EPA standards for snowmobiles

Packaging Improve the look of a stock production snowmobile Packaging power source inside stock housing eliminates need for external alternator or battery Lightest weight at this years competition

 Continued production of two-stroke engine  Meeting the customer demand of the two- stroke power-to-weight ratio  Meeting emission standards  Minimize implementation cost by using currently available technology

Summary Direct-Injection solves many of current problems – Improves fuel efficiency – Reduces pollution emissions – Maintains stock power-to-weight ratio and handling – Feasible solution that is realistic

Thank You! Questions?