The Interpretations Process Membership Services Training.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student-Athlete Reinstatement Process Initial Recruitment- evaluation, questionnaire, scholarship offer Initial Recruitment- evaluation, questionnaire,
Advertisements

LSDBi/RSRO NCAA Division III
1. NCAA Division III Financial Aid Reporting Program and Self-Assessment 2012.
Introduction to the NCAA Amateurism Clearinghouse.
Lincoln University Athletics – NCAA Rules Education Contacts and Evaluations.
New Principals’ Workshop October 5, GOVERNANCE The Principal’s Role New Principals’ Workshop.
Basketball Hot Topics Charnele Kemper Jen Roe. Agenda O Scholastic and Nonscholastic Events. O Qualifying Regular-Season Multiple Team Events.
Andy Cardamone Charnele Kemper
 Overview and Virginia Tech Procedures for Reporting October 19, 2010 Virginia Tech Athletics Compliance ***** RULES-EDUCATION *****
BOSTON COLLEGE ATHLETICS DEPT. COMPLIANCE OFFICE Coaches Meeting December 4, 2007.
NCAA Division I Academic Hot Topics
Natasha Oakes and Leslie Schuemann. 1. Session Outcomes. 2. Learning Objectives. 3. Compliance Concepts. 4. Resources.
State Residency Classification for Tuition Purposes Training July 2010 North Carolina State Residence Classification Manual A Manual to Assist the Public.
DIVISION I GOVERNANCE UPDATE Brandy Hataway Kris Richardson 1.
NCAA Division I Interpretations Philosophy
NCAA Bylaw 11 (Conduct and Employment of Athletics Personnel) Concepts.
Fundamental Introduction NCAA Division III Bylaw 14
COACHES MEETING Boston College Compliance Office September 9, 2008.
ACCIDENT REVIEW PROCESS. OBJECTIVES After completing this lesson the participants will be able to: Understand the role of an Accident Review Board/Board.
Current Status of the SWA within the NCAA Judith Sweet NCAA Senior Vice President for Championships and Education Services/ Senior Woman Administrator.
Financial Aid: Advanced/Classroom Dialogue Kris Richardson Alex Smith.
Division I Legislative Process
DIVISION II AND III INSTITUTIONS WITH DIVISION I SPORTS – FOUNDATIONAL Kristen Matha & Alex Smith 2015 Regional Rules.
NCAA Division I Interpretations Philosophy Brandy Hataway & Charnele Kemper.
Equality Impact Assessment Training. History Stephen Lawrence case The Macpherson Report Police Force ‘institutionally racist’ - policies, procedures,
Coaches Compliance Meeting April Agenda Transportation Handout Education for Secondary Schools on New Eligibility Rules Reminder of High School.
Compliance and its Cast of Characters ~ Introductory Compliance Concepts for those with Auxiliary Roles Kimberli E. Bowman NCAA Membership Services.
PROPOSAL TO RECRUIT, RETAIN, and SUPPORT FACULTY OF AFRICAN DESCENT Submitted by UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I FACULTY OF AFRICAN DESCENT (FAD) Prepared by Darnell.
NCAA Division III Bylaw 15 – Financial Aid Brandy Hataway Jeff Myers.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Educational Session: NCAA Division I Hot Topics Thursday, January 16, :30 to 11:00 A.M.
Conference USA Head Coaches Responsibility. What’s On Our Agenda Today? Rationale for rule change NCAA Bylaw Triggers of the Rule Promoting an.
Regional Rules Seminars  Provide background of academic misconduct legislative proposal.  Identify proposed changes to academic misconduct legislation.
Request from University Graduate Council for Revision to UFS Bylaws.
Roles and Responsibilities in Municipal Land Use.
DIVISION II LEGISLATIVE AND INTERPRETIVE PROCESSES Amanda Conklin Jennifer Fraser.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits. Athletics Certification Process. Operating Principles. Measurable Standards.
NCAA Division I Student- Athlete Reinstatement (Part I) Kelly Groddy Jennifer Henderson.
Preseason Coaches Meeting. When faced with a question or concern regarding NCAA rules and regulations, the following process should be followed: Step.
Division I Student-Athlete Reinstatement: Institutional, NCAA and Media Navigation Advanced Application.
Susan Britsch Jennifer Smith 2014 NACADA Annual Conference October 2014.
NCAA Working Group on the Collegiate Model – Rules Overview March 2012.
University of Louisiana at Lafayette Rules Education Meeting April 28, 2010 Division I – Playing and Practice Seasons –
2011 Regional Rules Seminars NCAA Division II Committee on Student-Athlete Reinstatement and Secondary Infractions.
NCAA DIVISION I ISSUES American Volleyball Coaches Association December 2004 Lynn Holzman NCAA Director of Membership Services.
Moving To the Year 2000:Implementing 4010 Implementation Resolution Process Rich Emrich EDI Manager J.M. Schneider.
Standing Committee on Improvement Implementation Anne Aikman-Scalese, SCI Chair | ICANN-52 | February 2015.
The Role of Governing Bodies Chapter 12. Who Governs Sport Amateur sport is regulated and controlled by a broad spectrum of organizations that include.
Lynn Holzman Director of Academic and Membership Affairs, NCAA.
1.  Presentation to the Standing Committee on Finance – Parliament  23 October
Self-Reporting Secondary Violations. This session will review: 1. The definition of a secondary violation; 2. Level I and Level II secondary violations.
Processing Level I and II Violations 2013 Regional Rules Seminars Laura McNab and Mike Zonder NCAA Enforcement Staff.
NCAA Division III Bylaw 17 – Out-of-Season Athletically Related Activities Team Presenters Jeff Myers Jean Orr.
Division I Student-Athlete Reinstatement Stephanie Grace | Matt Maher | Brad Rochman.
NCAA Division III Bylaw 17 – Out-of-Season Athletically Related Activities Team Presenters Jeff Myers Jean Orr.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Purpose and Benefits.
Division I Academic Misconduct Emily Capehart Andy Cardamone Azure Davey.
NCAA Division III Institutional Performance Program Eric Hartung Nicole Hollomon Erin Irick.
DIVISION III REQUESTS/SELF-REPORTS ONLINE: INTERPRETATIONS, WAIVERS AND VIOLATIONS Kristin DiBiase Faith English Kelly Groddy.
Division I Recruiting Hot Topics
Division I Student-Athlete Reinstatement Stephanie Grace | Matt Maher | Brad Rochman
Janet Calandro A. Faith English Kelly Groddy
Setting Actuarial Standards
Prepared for NACADA Carrie Leger White
Division I Legislative Relief Waivers Brandy Hataway abbie markey
Main NCAA Title.
Interpretations process Kelly Brummett Kris richardson
Division I Bylaws 11/13/17 Modernization
Division II Financial Aid
Presentation transcript:

The Interpretations Process Membership Services Training

Overview Participants Types of Responses Process  Student-Athlete Friendly Philosophy  Screening Process Impact on Enforcement

The Interpretations Process? The rule is not clear Coach poses a question. NCAA staff provides an answer. Everyone’s doing it!!!

The Participants The Interpretations Process Enforcement Services Member Institutions Member ConferencesCCACA Membership Services Interps Committees Management Council ARS

Member Institutions Apply and enforce NCAA legislation. Administer its athletics program in accordance with the constitution, bylaws and other legislation of the Association.

Member Conferences Assist member institutions in applying NCAA legislation. Promote competitive equity by ensuring consistent application of the rules. Assist membership services staff by reducing volume of interpretations requests.

Membership Services Assists institutions and conferences in applying legislation. Issues three categories of responses:  Institutional Discretion.  Confirmations.  Determinations. Membership Services does not have the authority to adopt or approve legislation. Membership Services does have the authority to issue a binding staff interpretation.

Divisional Interpretive Subcommittees/Committees (e.g., LRIC) Issue official interpretations in response to requests from:  Institutions/Conferences.  Membership services staff.  Governance structure. Review all recorded membership services staff interpretations (screening process).

Management Councils Review all official interpretations issued by Sub/Committee. May issue official interpretations on their own. Institutions/conferences may appeal the Sub/Committee decisions to the Council. Council decisions are final.  Sub/Committee does not have the authority to revise an interpretation approved by the Council.  It can, however, recommend modification or reversal of previously approved interpretations.

Types of Responses

Is the Issue Interpretive? An issue is not interpretive if:  The plain meaning of the legislation is clear on its face;  The legislative history of the rule (including intent and rationale) clearly addresses the situation; or  A published official interpretation clearly addresses the situation.

Institutional Discretion Institutional Discretion: oIs not an "interpretation. " oIs provided when: 1.An issue or fact situation is not addressed clearly by the legislation or an official interpretation; and 2.The issue is not one of national significance.

Staff Confirmations A staff confirmation: o Is issued when the legislation or an official interpretation is responsive to the inquiry. o Is not an " interpretation. " o Is binding on all member institutions. Actions contrary to staff confirmations are considered rules violations. Recourse is to seek further review by divisional interpretive body or amend the legislation.

Staff Determinations A staff determination:  Is an " interpretation. "  Is provided when: 1. An issue or fact situation is not addressed clearly by the legislation or an official interpretation; and 2. The issue is one of national significance.  Is binding on the institution asking the question (and others who have knowledge). Prior actions contrary to a staff determination are not considered rules violations. Recourse is to seek further review by divisional interpretive body or amend the legislation.

Official Interpretations Official Interpretations: o Are rendered by the appropriate Divisional Subcommittee/Committee (e.g., Division I LRIC.) o Are binding on all institutions regardless of knowledge. o May be in the form of a confirmation or determination. 1. Determinations are binding from the issue date forward. 2. Confirmations are binding regardless of when the action occurred.

Screening Process

SCREENING PROCESS Divisional Interpretive Body Review of Staff Interpretations Staff issues confirmation or determination. Sub/Committee reviews staff interpretations Remains staff interpretation. May be appealed to Divisional Body. Committee reviews the issue and renders official interpretation. Interpretive Body Disagrees with Staff Interpretive Body Approves Staff Interpretation Official interpretations, review of staff interpretations or other responses may be appealed to Management Council. Committee agrees with staff and issues official interpretation.

The End.