Cyberinfrastructure (CI) "It is easier to invent the future than to predict it" - Alan Kay Clifford A. Jacobs National Science Foundation Division of Atmospheric.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CCIRN Meeting Douglas Gatchell US NSF/CISE/SCI July 3, 2004.
Advertisements

Conference xxx - August 2003 Fabrizio Gagliardi EDG Project Leader and EGEE designated Project Director Position paper Delivery of industrial-strength.
DELOS Highlights COSTANTINO THANOS ITALIAN NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL.
Supporting Research on Campus - Using Cyberinfrastructure (CI) Public research use of ICT has rapidly increased in the past decade, requiring high performance.
1 US activities and strategy :NSF Ron Perrott. 2 TeraGrid An instrument that delivers high-end IT resources/services –a computational facility – over.
Joint CASC/CCI Workshop Report Strategic and Tactical Recommendations EDUCAUSE Campus Cyberinfrastructure Working Group Coalition for Academic Scientific.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Dr. Daniel A. Hitchcock October 21, 2003
Presentation at WebEx Meeting June 15,  Context  Challenge  Anticipated Outcomes  Framework  Timeline & Guidance  Comment and Questions.
CyberInfrastructure ( CI ): Whence? Thomas J. Greene, Ph.D. Sr. Program Dir. for CISE-ANIR, National Science Foundation.
SACNAS, Sept 29-Oct 1, 2005, Denver, CO What is Cyberinfrastructure? The Computer Science Perspective Dr. Chaitan Baru Project Director, The Geosciences.
GENI: Global Environment for Networking Innovations Larry Landweber Senior Advisor NSF:CISE Joint Techs Madison, WI July 17, 2006.
EInfrastructures (Internet and Grids) US Resource Centers Perspective: implementation and execution challenges Alan Blatecky Executive Director SDSC.
1 Cyberinfrastructure Framework for 21st Century Science & Engineering (CF21) IRNC Kick-Off Workshop July 13,
SDSC Computing the 21st Century Talk Given to the NSF Sugar Panel May 27, 1998.
1 Software & Grid Middleware for Tier 2 Centers Rob Gardner Indiana University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National.
Cyberinfrastructure - Revolutionizing Discovery, Learning & Innovation Deborah L. Crawford Deputy Assistant Director of NSF for Computer & Information.
1 Intellectual Architecture Leverage existing domain research strengths and organize around multidisciplinary challenges Institute for Computational Research.
NSF and Environmental Cyberinfrastructure Margaret Leinen Environmental Cyberinfrastructure Workshop, NCAR 2002.
Is 'Designing' Cyberinfrastructure - or, Even, Defining It - Possible? Peter A. Freeman National Science Foundation January 29, 2007 The views expressed.
The Interplay of Funding Policy for infrastructure at NSF Richard S. Hirsh.
1 Ideas About the Future of HPC in Europe “The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of.
1 Building National Cyberinfrastructure Alan Blatecky Office of Cyberinfrastructure EPSCoR Meeting May 21,
Assessment of Core Services provided to USLHC by OSG.
Computing in Atmospheric Sciences Workshop: 2003 Challenges of Cyberinfrastructure Alan Blatecky Executive Director San Diego Supercomputer Center.
US NITRD LSN-MAGIC Coordinating Team – Organization and Goals Richard Carlson NGNS Program Manager, Research Division, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing.
Research Cyberinfrastructure Alliance Working in partnership to enable computationally intensive, innovative, interdisciplinary research for the 21 st.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Sept 29-30, 2005 Cambridge, MA 1 Grand Challenges Workshop for Computer Systems Software Brett D. Fleisch Program Director National Science Foundation.
NCAR Annual Budget Review October 8, 2007 Tim Killeen NCAR Director.
NCAR Supercomputing Center (NSC) Project Status Update to the CHAP 4 October 2007 Krista Laursen NSC Project Director.
National Science Foundation DMR ITR Computational Review and Workshop: ITR and beyond Daryl Hess, NSF Bruce Taggart, NSF June 17-19, 2004 Urbana, IL.
Results of the HPC in Europe Taskforce (HET) e-IRG Workshop Kimmo Koski CSC – The Finnish IT Center for Science April 19 th, 2007.
Cyberinfrastructure Planning at NSF Deborah L. Crawford Acting Director, Office of Cyberinfrastructure HPC Acquisition Models September 9, 2005.
Cyberinfrastructure: Enabling New Research Frontiers Sangtae “Sang” Kim Division Director – Division of Shared Cyberinfrastructure Directorate for Computer.
National Science Foundation Blue Ribbon Panel on Cyberinfrastructure Introduction, Context & Charge Dan Atkins, Chair University of Michigan.
Cyberinfrastructure A Status Report Deborah Crawford, Ph.D. Interim Director, Office of Cyberinfrastructure National Science Foundation.
DOE 2000, March 8, 1999 The IT 2 Initiative and NSF Stephen Elbert program director NSF/CISE/ACIR/PACI.
Perspectives on Cyberinfrastructure Daniel E. Atkins Professor, University of Michigan School of Information & Dept. of EECS October 2002.
“ … a new age has dawned in scientific and engineering research, pushed by continuing progress in computing, information and communication technology,
JOHN W. D. CONNOLLY, DIRECTOR, UK CENTER FOR COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCES AND THE KENTUCKY EPSCOR FOR NSF The Future of Cyber Infrastructure in Kentucky
Geosciences - Observations (Bob Wilhelmson) The geosciences in NSF’s world consists of atmospheric science, ocean science, and earth science Many of the.
The Minority-Serving Institutions (MSI) Cyberinfrastructure (CI) Empowerment Coalition [MSI- CIEC] Providing the “human middleware” to build and enhance.
National Center for Supercomputing Applications Barbara S. Minsker, Ph.D. Associate Professor National Center for Supercomputing Applications and Department.
National Science Foundation Revolutionizing science and engineering research though cyberinfrastructure by David G. Messerschmitt Member, NSF Blue Ribbon.
08/05/06 Slide # -1 CCI Workshop Snowmass, CO CCI Roadmap Discussion Jim Bottum and Patrick Dreher Building the Campus Cyberinfrastructure Roadmap Campus.
NSF CyberInfrastructure Linkages with “IT Issues” in the FDA Critical Path Initiative Sangtae “Sang” Kim, PhD National Science Foundation* presented at.
Cyberinfrastructure What is it? Russ Hobby Internet2 Joint Techs, 18 July 2007.
Middleware Camp NMI (NSF Middleware Initiative) Program Director Alan Blatecky Advanced Networking Infrastructure and Research.
The Minority-Serving Institutions (MSI) Cyberinfrastructure (CI) Institute [MSI C(I) 2 ] Providing a scalable mechanism for developing a CI-enabled science.
“A Library outranks any other one thing a community can do to benefit its people.” --Andrew Carnegie.
1 Cyberinfrastructure: The Future and Its Challenges Oklahoma Supercomputing Symposium 2003 September 25, 2003 Peter A. Freeman Assistant Director of NSF.
National Strategic Computing Initiative
1 NSF/TeraGrid Science Advisory Board Meeting July 19-20, San Diego, CA Brief TeraGrid Overview and Expectations of Science Advisory Board John Towns TeraGrid.
Funding: Staffing for Research Computing What staffing models does your institution use for research computing? How does your institution pay for the staffing.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY OPP Advisory Committee 10/26/06.
Cyberinfrastructure: Many Things to Many People Russ Hobby Program Manager Internet2.
December 10, 2003Slide 1 International Networking and Cyberinfrastructure Douglas Gatchell Program Director International Networking National Science Foundation,
1 Cyber-Enabled Discovery and Innovation Michael Foster May 11, 2007.
Digital Data Collections ARL, CNI, CLIR, and DLF Forum October 28, 2005 Washington DC Chris Greer Program Director National Science Foundation.
U.S. Grid Projects and Involvement in EGEE Ian Foster Argonne National Laboratory University of Chicago EGEE-LHC Town Meeting,
NSF Middleware Initiative Purpose To design, develop, deploy and support a set of reusable, expandable set of middleware functions and services that benefit.
Internet2 Strategic Directions October Fundamental Questions  What does higher education (and the rest of the world) require from the Internet.
National Science Foundation Blue Ribbon Panel on Cyberinfrastructure Summary for the OSCER Symposium 13 September 2002.
NITRD Networking and ITRD IT R&D CIC computing, info and comm HPCC and communication HPC high-performance computing George O. Strawn NITRD co-chair and.
APAN Meeting Douglas Gatchell US NSF/CISE/SCI July 4, 2004.
Data Infrastructure Building Blocks (DIBBS) NSF Solicitation Webinar -- March 3, 2016 Amy Walton, Program Director Advanced Cyberinfrastructure.
1 Open Science Grid: Project Statement & Vision Transform compute and data intensive science through a cross- domain self-managed national distributed.
The Minority-Serving Institutions (MSI) Cyberinfrastructure (CI) Institute [MSI C(I) 2 ] Providing a scalable mechanism for developing a CI-enabled science.
The future belongs to those who prepare for it today.
Unidata Policy Committee
Presentation transcript:

Cyberinfrastructure (CI) "It is easier to invent the future than to predict it" - Alan Kay Clifford A. Jacobs National Science Foundation Division of Atmospheric Sciences Head, UCAR and Lower Atmospheric Facilities Oversight Section 4201 Wilson Blvd, Suite 775 Arlington, VA

Outline  Background  Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through cyberinfrastructure  Planning for Cyberinfrastructure  Conclusions

Background An incomplete of historical events that set the stage for CI

Panel on Large Scale Computing in Science and Engineering (Lax report, 1982)  Increase access to regularly upgraded supercomputing facilities via high bandwidth networks.  Increase research in computational mathematics, software, and algorithms.  Train people in scientific computing.  Invest in research on new supercomputer systems.

NSF Blue Ribbon Panel on High Performance Computing (1993) A. CENTRAL GOAL FOR NSF HPC POLICY –VISION OF THE HPC PYRAMID B. RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPLEMENT THESE GOALS C. THE NSF HPC CENTERS –ALLOCATION OF CENTER HPC RESOURCES TO INVESTIGATORS –EDUCATION AND TRAINING D. NSF AND THE NATIONAL HPC EFFORT; RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE STATES

NSF Blue Ribbon Panel on High Performance Computing (1993) Challenges I. How can NSF remove existing barriers to the rapid evolution of HPC, making it truly usable by all the nation’s scientists and engineers? II. How can NSF provide scalable access to a pyramid of computing resources?  Balance computing environments and access III. How can NSF encourage the continued broadening of the base of participation in HPC? IV. How can NSF best create the intellectual and management leadership for the future of HPC in the U.S.? RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Balanced pyramids of computing environment 2. Essential research investments to remove the obstacles to realizing the technology of the pyramid and its effective use. 3. Institutional structure for delivery of HPC capabilities 4. NSF’s role at the national level and its relationship with the States in HPC

Hayes Report Vision (1995)  Provide access to high-end computing infrastructure for the academic scientific and engineering community;  Partner with universities, states, and industry to facilitate and enhance that access;  Support the effective use of such infrastructure through training, consulting, and related support services;  Be a vigorous early user of experimental and emerging high performance technologies that offer high potential for advancing computational science and engineering;  Facilitate the development of the intellectual capital required to maintain world leadership.

Evolution of the Computational Infrastructure Supercomputer Centers PACI | | | | | | NPACI and Alliance SDSC, NCSA, PSC, CTC Prior Computing Investments NSF Networking From NSF/CISE Directorate Lax1982 Branscomb1993Hayes1995

Enabling and Motivating a CI Initiative ASC PACI’s Pittsburgh TSC Distributed Terascale Facility Some ITR Projects Digital Library Initiatives Networking Initiatives Middleware Initiatives Other CISE Research Cyber- Infrastructure Initiative Initiatives in non-CISE Directorates NSB Research Infrastructure Review Initiatives in DOE, NIH, DOD, NASA, … International Initiatives: UK e-science, Earth Simulator, EU Grid & 6th Framework Scientific Data Collection/Curation Collaboratories

NSB asked in 2001: What is NSF’s Strategy to provide CI to the S&E Community? Evolution of the Computational Infrastructure Supercomputer Centers PACI | | | | | | NPACI and Alliance SDSC, NCSA, PSC, CTC Terascale TCS, DTF, ETF High-End Cyberinfrastructure Prior Computing Investments NSF Networking From NSF/CISE Directorate HPCC Grand Challenge PITAC ITR NSB Infrastructure ReportAktins2003

Blue Ribbon Panel convened by the Assistant Director for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CISE) of the National Science Foundation (NSF) – –Daniel E. Atkins, Chair   University of Michigan – –Kelvin K. Droegemeier   University of Oklahoma – –Stuart I. Feldman   IBM – –Hector Garcia-Molina   Stanford University – –Michael L. Klein   University of Pennsylvania – –David G. Messerschmitt   University of California at Berkeley – –Paul Messina   California Institute of Technology – –Jeremiah P. Ostriker   Princeton University – –Margaret H. Wright   New York University  1) evaluate current major investments in cyberinfrastructure, most especially the Partnerships for Advanced Computational Infrastructure (PACI)  2) recommend new areas of emphasis relevant to cyberinfrastructure; and  3) propose an implementation plan for pursuing these new areas of emphasis. PanelCharge

Input to Panel  62 presentations at invitational public testimony sessions  700 responses to a community-wide survey  review of dozens of prior relevant reports; scores of unsolicited s and phone calls  250 pages of written critique from 60 reviewers of an early draft of this report  hundreds of hours of deliberation and discussion between Panel members  The members of the Panel have backgrounds in areas widely relevant to creating, managing, and using advanced cyberinfrastructure. courtesy of D. Atkins

LIGO ATLAS and CMS NVO and ALMA The number of nation-scale projects is growing rapidly! Climate Change Cyberinfrastructure Enabled Science courtesy of D. Atkins

Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through Cyberinfrastructure  NSF has an opportunity to provide leadership for the Nation in an initiative to revolutionize science and engineering research capitalizing on cyberinfrastructure opportunities. –A nascent revolution has begun. Demand is here and growing. The time is now (opportunities & opportunity costs.) –Many prior investments (projects, initiatives, centers) are a key resource to build upon. –Now need sanction, leadership and empowerment through significant new funding and effective coordination. –Need very broad (synergistic) participation by many communities with complementary needs and expertise. –Need appropriate leadership and management structure. –Need incremental funding of $1B/year.

Cyberinfrastructure Vision  provide an integrated system of hardware and software resources and services that...  enable scientists and engineers to explore important research and education opportunities… that otherwise would not be possible

Cyberinfrastructure (CI) Overarching recommendation “NSF should establish and lead a large- scale, interagency, and internationally coordinated Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Program (ACP) to create, deploy, and apply cyberinfrastructure in ways that radically empower all scientific and engineering research and allied education” § Cyberinfrastructure is "essential, not optional, to the aspirations of research communities." Cyberinfrastructure is "essential, not optional, to the aspirations of research communities."

Opportunity  Enable more ubiquitous, comprehensive knowledge environments that become functionally complete for specific research communities in terms of –People –Data –Information tools –Instruments  “Such environments enables teams to share and collaborate over time and over geographic, organizational and disciplinary distances.”  Can serve individuals, teams, organizations to revolutionize –What they can do –How they do it –Who participates

Shared Opportunity and Responsibility  All NSF communities  Multi-agency  Industry  International

Cyberinfrastructure consists of …  Computational engines  Mass storage  Networking  Digital libraries/data bases  Sensors/effectors  Software  Services  All integrated to permit the effective and efficient building of applications

Integrated CI Services to Enable New Knowledge Environments for Research and Education High performance computation services Data, information, knowledge management services Observation, measurement, fabrication services Interfaces, visualization services Collaboration services Networking, Operating Systems, Middleware Base Technology: computation, storage, communication Customization for discipline- and project specific applications Community-Specific Environments for Research and Education (collaboratory, co-laboratory, grid community, e-science, virtual community) Cyberinfrastructure

Dimensions of CI Research courtesy of D. Atkins

Interactivity: Converging Streams of Activity GRIDS (broadly defined) E-science CI-enabled Science & Engineering Research & Education Science-driven pilots (not using above labels) ITFRU Scholarly communication in the digital age Home Land Security courtesy of D. Atkins

Computational Diversity Capability not just capacity: technology, policy, tools. Still need some center-based leading- edge super computers. On-demand supercomputing,not just batch. courtesy of D. Atkins

Pervasiveness of CI-enabled Knowledge-Based Activities Opportunities and challenges for multi-use. Opportunities for leverage and coalition building to obtain the resources to really do it. courtesy of D. Atkins

Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Program (ACP): Need highly coordinated, persistent, major investment in…  Research and development (CI as object of R&D) –Base technology –CI components & systems –Science-driven pilots  Operational services –Distributed but connected (Grid) –Exploit commonality, interoperability –Advanced, leading-edge but… –Robust, predictable, responsive, persistent  Domain science communities (CI in service of R&D) –Specific application of CI to revolutionizing research (pilot -> operational) –Required not optional. New things, new ways. –New things, new ways. Empowerment, training, retraining. X-informatics.  Education and broader engagement –Multi-use: education, public science literacy –Equity of access –Pilots of broader application: ITFRU, industry, workforce & economic development courtesy of D. Atkins

Incremental budget estimates based on  current and previous NSF activities  testimonies  other agencies’ programs in related areas  activities in other countries  explicit input from community on first draft courtesy of D. Atkins

Major components of ACP Total Annual Budget $1020 (Annual expenditure in millions of dollars) Provision of operational operational CI * CI * Application of CI to advance S&E research research Information and data support Fundamental research to advance CI Computationalcenters Data repositories Digital Libraries Networking & connections Application service centers $375 $185 $30 $60 $10 $660 $200 $200 $60 * Includes $75M/Year for computational centers

NOT Business as Usual for NSF nor It’s Usual Research Community  Scale  Duration, Persistence  Complexity (technical, managerial)  Richness and Diversity of Partnerships  Gaps, Chasms  Approach: Pasteur Quadrant model of knowledge creation and use.  (Also more persistence and scale in provisioning of CI for the research community.) courtesy of D. Atkins

National Petascale Systems National Petascale Systems Ubiquitous Sensor/actuator Networks Ubiquitous Sensor/actuator Networks Laboratory Terascale Systems Laboratory Terascale Systems Ubiquitous Infosphere Collaboratories Responsive Environments Responsive Environments Terabit Networks Contextual Awareness Contextual Awareness Smart Objects Smart Objects Building Out Building Up Science, Policy and Education Petabyte Archives Petabyte Archives Futures: The Computing Continuum courtesy of D. Atkins

Planning for Cyberinfrastructure

Cyberinfrastructure Planning: Steps/Timeline  Broad, informal consultations with community - continuous  Internal NSF planning underway since January  Workshops to seek community inputs on management structures  NSF FY05 and beyond budget planning for CI - underway  ETF Management and Operation Approach to be developed by end of this summer  Broad NSF CI Roadmap, v1 - early 2004 From presentation to NSB Aug. 2003

Recent Planning Activities  Management & Models Meetings (4 total)  Budget planning (across NSF)  Cyberinfrastructure Working Group (CIWG) active across directorates at program level  Strategic planning underway (CISE leading)  Programmatic plans expected by mid- October  Proposed CISE reorganization From presentation to NSB Aug. 2003

Cyberinfrastructure Planning: Strategies  Exploit the opportunities open to us to revolutionize S&E  Maintain technological leadership in computation, information, communications resources  Balance upgrades and new resources  Develop structures to permit significant growth in funding  Aggressively seek expanded CI funding From presentation to NSB Aug. 2003

Other Updates  House Committee on Science testimony –Committed to key recommendations of Atkins Report –NSF will continue commitment to supercomputing –Supercomputing is essential part of cyberinfrastructure vision –Grid investments underscore importance of integration  Terascale Extensions competition From presentation to NSB Aug. 2003

Other Updates (continued)  High-End Computing Revitalization Task Force (HEC-RTF) and cooperation with other agencies  Industry involvement (Council on Competitiveness study) From presentation to NSB Aug. 2003

Conclusions  CI is not new! –Atmospheric Sciences has been engaged building CI for more than five decades  What is new? –A holistic view of CI –The enormity of opportunities and challenges that CI offers –The need to lead and administer CI with coordinated leadership  CI will enrich Atmospheric Sciences

Atkins Report: Clifford A. Jacobs National Science Foundation Division of Atmospheric Sciences Head, UCAR and Lower Atmospheric Facilities Oversight Section 4201 Wilson Blvd, Suite 775 Arlington, VA

Pasteur’s Quadrant Research Model (from Donald Stokes) Focus on New Knowledge Creation? Focus on Application? No Yes Edison Bohr Pasteur courtesy of D. Atkins

ACP Report:

Layered Architecture of the ACP Applications of information technology to science and engineering research Conduct of science and engineering research Cyberinfrastructure supporting applications Core technologies incorporated into cyberinfrastructure Cyberinfrastructure Cyberinfrastructure